Air pollution is the origination of particulate matter, chemicals, or biological substances that brings pain to either humans or other living creatures or instigates discomfort to the natural habitat and the airspace. Hence, air pollution remains one of the paramount environmental issues as far as metropolitan cities are concerned. Several air pollution benchmarks are even said to have a negative influence on human health. Also, improper detection of air pollution benchmarks results in severe complications for humans and living creatures. To address this aspect, a novel technique called, Discretized Regression and Least Square Support Vector (DR-LSSV) based air pollution forecasting is proposed. The results indicate that the proposed DR-LSSV Technique can efficiently enhance air pollution forecasting performance and outperforms the conventional machine learning methods in terms of air pollution forecasting accuracy, air pollution forecasting time, and false positive rate.

High-dimensional data is common in multiple areas, such as health care and genomics, where the number of features can be tens of thousands. In such scenarios, the large number of features often leads to inefficient learning. Constraint generation methods have recently enabled efficient learning of L1-regularized support vector machines (SVMs). In this paper, we leverage such methods to obtain an efficient learning algorithm for the recently proposed minimax risk classifiers (MRCs). The proposed iterative algorithm also provides a sequence of worst-case error probabilities and performs feature selection. Experiments on multiple high-dimensional datasets show that the proposed algorithm is efficient in high-dimensional scenarios. In addition, the worst-case error probability provides useful information about the classifier performance, and the features selected by the algorithm are competitive with the state-of-the-art.

The vulnerability to adversarial examples remains one major obstacle for Machine Learning (ML)-based Android malware detection. Realistic attacks in the Android malware domain create Realizable Adversarial Examples (RealAEs), i.e., AEs that satisfy the domain constraints of Android malware. Recent studies have shown that using such RealAEs in Adversarial Training (AT) is more effective in defending against realistic attacks than using unrealizable AEs (unRealAEs). This is because RealAEs allow defenders to explore certain pockets in the feature space that are vulnerable to realistic attacks. However, existing defenses commonly generate RealAEs in the problem space, which is known to be time-consuming and impractical for AT. In this paper, we propose to generate RealAEs in the feature space, leading to a simpler and more efficient solution. Our approach is driven by a novel interpretation of Android domain constraints in the feature space. More concretely, our defense first learns feature-space domain constraints by extracting meaningful feature dependencies from data and then applies them to generating feature-space RealAEs during AT. Extensive experiments on DREBIN, a well-known Android malware detector, demonstrate that our new defense outperforms not only unRealAE-based AT but also the state-of-the-art defense that relies on non-uniform perturbations. We further validate the ability of our learned feature-space domain constraints in representing Android malware properties by showing that our feature-space domain constraints can help distinguish RealAEs from unRealAEs.

In this paper we present a Twin Parametric-Margin Support Vector Machine (TPMSVM) model to tackle the problem of multiclass classification. In the spirit of one-versus-all paradigm, for each class we construct a classifier by solving a TPMSVM-type model. Once all classifiers have been determined, they are combined into an aggregate decision function. We consider the cases of both linear and nonlinear kernel-induced classifiers. In addition, we robustify the proposed approach through robust optimization techniques. Indeed, in real-world applications observations are subject to measurement errors and noise, affecting the quality of the solutions. Consequently, data uncertainties need to be included within the model in order to prevent low accuracies in the classification process. Preliminary computational experiments on real-world datasets show the good performance of the proposed approach.

We present a novel feature selection technique, Sparse Linear Centroid-Encoder (SLCE). The algorithm uses a linear transformation to reconstruct a point as its class centroid and, at the same time, uses the $\ell_1$-norm penalty to filter out unnecessary features from the input data. The original formulation of the optimization problem is nonconvex, but we propose a two-step approach, where each step is convex. In the first step, we solve the linear Centroid-Encoder, a convex optimization problem over a matrix $A$. In the second step, we only search for a sparse solution over a diagonal matrix $B$ while keeping $A$ fixed. Unlike other linear methods, e.g., Sparse Support Vector Machines and Lasso, Sparse Linear Centroid-Encoder uses a single model for multi-class data. We present an in-depth empirical analysis of the proposed model and show that it promotes sparsity on various data sets, including high-dimensional biological data. Our experimental results show that SLCE has a performance advantage over some state-of-the-art neural network-based feature selection techniques.

This study explored the use of machine learning algorithms for predicting and imputing missing values in categorical datasets. We focused on ensemble models that use the error correction output codes (ECOC) framework, including SVM-based and KNN-based ensemble models, as well as an ensemble classifier that combines SVM, KNN, and MLP models. We applied these algorithms to three datasets: the CPU dataset, the hypothyroid dataset, and the Breast Cancer dataset. Our experiments showed that the machine learning algorithms were able to achieve good performance in predicting and imputing the missing values, with some variations depending on the specific dataset and missing value pattern. The ensemble models using the error correction output codes (ECOC) framework were particularly effective in improving the accuracy and robustness of the predictions, compared to individual models. However, there are also challenges and limitations to using deep learning for missing value imputation, including the need for large amounts of labeled data and the potential for overfitting. Further research is needed to evaluate the effectiveness and efficiency of deep learning algorithms for missing value imputation and to develop strategies for addressing the challenges and limitations that may arise.

We investigate the generalization error of statistical learning models in a Federated Learning (FL) setting. Specifically, we study the evolution of the generalization error with the number of communication rounds between the clients and the parameter server, i.e., the effect on the generalization error of how often the local models as computed by the clients are aggregated at the parameter server. We establish PAC-Bayes and rate-distortion theoretic bounds on the generalization error that account explicitly for the effect of the number of rounds, say $ R \in \mathbb{N}$, in addition to the number of participating devices $K$ and individual datasets size $n$. The bounds, which apply in their generality for a large class of loss functions and learning algorithms, appear to be the first of their kind for the FL setting. Furthermore, we apply our bounds to FL-type Support Vector Machines (FSVM); and we derive (more) explicit bounds on the generalization error in this case. In particular, we show that the generalization error of FSVM increases with $R$, suggesting that more frequent communication with the parameter server diminishes the generalization power of such learning algorithms. Combined with that the empirical risk generally decreases for larger values of $R$, this indicates that $R$ might be a parameter to optimize in order to minimize the population risk of FL algorithms. Moreover, specialized to the case $R=1$ (sometimes referred to as "one-shot" FL or distributed learning) our bounds suggest that the generalization error of the FL setting decreases faster than that of centralized learning by a factor of $\mathcal{O}(\sqrt{\log(K)/K})$, thereby generalizing recent findings in this direction to arbitrary loss functions and algorithms. The results of this paper are also validated on some experiments.

It is challenging to implement Kernel methods, if the data sources are distributed and cannot be joined at a trusted third party for privacy reasons. It is even more challenging, if the use case rules out privacy-preserving approaches that introduce noise. An example for such a use case is machine learning on clinical data. To realize exact privacy preserving computation of kernel methods, we propose FLAKE, a Federated Learning Approach for KErnel methods on horizontally distributed data. With FLAKE, the data sources mask their data so that a centralized instance can compute a Gram matrix without compromising privacy. The Gram matrix allows to calculate many kernel matrices, which can be used to train kernel-based machine learning algorithms such as Support Vector Machines. We prove that FLAKE prevents an adversary from learning the input data or the number of input features under a semi-honest threat model. Experiments on clinical and synthetic data confirm that FLAKE is outperforming the accuracy and efficiency of comparable methods. The time needed to mask the data and to compute the Gram matrix is several orders of magnitude less than the time a Support Vector Machine needs to be trained. Thus, FLAKE can be applied to many use cases.

Adversarial examples bring a considerable security threat to support vector machines (SVMs), especially those used in safety-critical applications. Thus, robustness verification is an essential issue for SVMs, which can provide provable robustness against various kinds of adversary attacks. The evaluation results obtained through the robustness verification can provide a safe guarantee for the use of SVMs. The existing verification method does not often perform well in verifying SVMs with nonlinear kernels. To this end, we propose a method to improve the verification performance for SVMs with nonlinear kernels. We first formalize the adversarial robustness evaluation of SVMs as an optimization problem. Then a lower bound of the original problem is obtained by solving the Lagrangian dual problem of the original problem. Finally, the adversarial robustness of SVMs is evaluated concerning the lower bound. We evaluate the adversarial robustness of SVMs with linear and nonlinear kernels on the MNIST and Fashion-MNIST datasets. The experimental results show that the percentage of provable robustness obtained by our method on the test set is better than that of the state-of-the-art.

This research paper investigates the effectiveness of simple linear models versus complex machine learning techniques in breast cancer diagnosis, emphasizing the importance of interpretability and computational efficiency in the medical domain. We focus on Logistic Regression (LR), Decision Trees (DT), and Support Vector Machines (SVM) and optimize their performance using the UCI Machine Learning Repository dataset. Our findings demonstrate that the simpler linear model, LR, outperforms the more complex DT and SVM techniques, with a test score mean of 97.28%, a standard deviation of 1.62%, and a computation time of 35.56 ms. In comparison, DT achieved a test score mean of 93.73%, and SVM had a test score mean of 96.44%. The superior performance of LR can be attributed to its simplicity and interpretability, which provide a clear understanding of the relationship between input features and the outcome. This is particularly valuable in the medical domain, where interpretability is crucial for decision-making. Moreover, the computational efficiency of LR offers advantages in terms of scalability and real-world applicability. The results of this study highlight the power of simplicity in the context of breast cancer diagnosis and suggest that simpler linear models like LR can be more effective, interpretable, and computationally efficient than their complex counterparts, making them a more suitable choice for medical applications.