This paper is about non-approximate acceleration of high dimensional nonparametric operations such as k nearest neighbor classifiers and the prediction phase of Support Vector Machine classifiers. We attempt to exploit the fact that even if we want exact answers to nonparametric queries, we usually do not need to explicitly find the datapoints close to the query, but merely need to ask questions about the properties about that set of datapoints. This offers a small amount of computational leeway, and we investigate how much that leeway can be exploited. For clarity, this paper concentrates on pure k-NN classification and the prediction phase of SVMs. We introduce new ball tree algorithms that on real-world datasets give accelerations of 2-fold up to 100-fold compared against highly optimized traditional ball-tree-based k-NN.

This paper is about non-approximate acceleration of high dimensional nonparametric operations such as k nearest neighbor classifiers and the prediction phase of Support Vector Machine classifiers. We attempt to exploit the fact that even if we want exact answers to nonparametric queries, we usually do not need to explicitly find the datapoints close to the query, but merely need to ask questions about the properties about that set of datapoints. This offers a small amount of computational leeway, and we investigate how much that leeway can be exploited. For clarity, this paper concentrates on pure k-NN classification and the prediction phase of SVMs. We introduce new ball tree algorithms that on real-world datasets give accelerations of 2-fold up to 100-fold compared against highly optimized traditional ball-tree-based k-NN.

This paper is about non-approximate acceleration of high dimensional nonparametric operations such as k nearest neighbor classifiers and the prediction phase of Support Vector Machine classifiers. We attempt to exploit the fact that even if we want exact answers to nonparametric queries, we usually do not need to explicitly find the datapoints close to the query, but merely need to ask questions about the properties about that set of datapoints. This offers a small amount of computational leeway, andwe investigate how much that leeway can be exploited. For clarity, this paper concentrates on pure k-NN classification and the prediction phaseof SVMs. We introduce new ball tree algorithms that on real-world datasets give accelerations of 2-fold up to 100-fold compared against highly optimized traditional ball-tree-based k-NN.

Guided by an initial idea of building a complex (non linear) decision surface with maximal local margin in input space, we give a possible geometrical intuition as to why K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN) algorithms often perform more poorly than SVMs on classification tasks. We then propose modified K-Nearest Neighbor algorithms to overcome the perceived problem. The approach is similar in spirit to Tangent Distance, but with invariances inferred from the local neighborhood rather than prior knowledge. Experimental results on real world classification tasks suggest that the modified KNN algorithms often give a dramatic improvement over standard KNN and perform as well or better than SVMs.

Guided by an initial idea of building a complex (non linear) decision surface with maximal local margin in input space, we give a possible geometrical intuition as to why K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN) algorithms often perform more poorly than SVMs on classification tasks. We then propose modified K-Nearest Neighbor algorithms to overcome the perceived problem. The approach is similar in spirit to Tangent Distance, but with invariances inferred from the local neighborhood rather than prior knowledge. Experimental results on real world classification tasks suggest that the modified KNN algorithms often give a dramatic improvement over standard KNN and perform as well or better than SVMs.

Guided by an initial idea of building a complex (non linear) decision surface with maximal local margin in input space, we give a possible geometrical intuition as to why K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN) algorithms often perform more poorly than SVMs on classification tasks. We then propose modified K-Nearest Neighbor algorithms to overcome the perceived problem.The approach is similar in spirit to Tangent Distance, but with invariances inferred from the local neighborhood rather than prior knowledge. Experimental results on real world classification tasks suggest thatthe modified KNN algorithms often give a dramatic improvement overstandard KNN and perform as well or better than SVMs.

Even if the underlying phenomena are inherently deterministic, the complexity of these phenomena often makes a probabilistic formulation the only feasible approach from the computational point of view. Although quantities such as the mean, the variance, and possibly higher order moments of a random variable have often been sufficient to characterize a particular problem, the quest for higher modeling accuracy, and for more realistic assumptions drives us towards modeling the available random variables using their probability density. This of course leads us to the problem of density estimation (see [6]). The most common approach for density estimation is the nonparametric approach, where the density is determined according to a formula involving the data points available. The most common non parametric methods are the kernel density estimator, also known as the Parzen window estimator [4] and the k-nearest neighbor technique [1].

Even if the underlying phenomena are inherently deterministic, the complexity of these phenomena often makes a probabilistic formulation the only feasible approach from the computational point of view. Although quantities such as the mean, the variance, and possibly higher order moments of a random variable have often been sufficient to characterize a particular problem, the quest for higher modeling accuracy, and for more realistic assumptions drives us towards modeling the available random variables using their probability density. This of course leads us to the problem of density estimation (see [6]). The most common approach for density estimation is the nonparametric approach, where the density is determined according to a formula involving the data points available. The most common non parametric methods are the kernel density estimator, also known as the Parzen window estimator [4] and the k-nearest neighbor technique [1].

Although quantities such as the mean, the variance, and possibly higher order moments of a random variable have often been sufficient to characterize a particular problem, the quest for higher modeling accuracy, and for more realistic assumptions drives us towards modeling the available random variables using their probability density. This of course leads us to the problem of density estimation (see [6]). The most common approach for density estimation is the nonparametric approach, where the density is determined according to a formula involving the data points available. The most common non parametric methods are the kernel density estimator, alsoknown as the Parzen window estimator [4] and the k-nearest neighbor technique [1]. Non parametric density estimation belongs to the class of ill-posed problems in the sense that small changes in the data can lead to large changes in "To whom correspondence should be addressed.

We consider the general problem of learning multi-category classification from labeled examples. We present experimental results for a nearest neighbor algorithm which actively selects samples from different pattern classes according to a querying rule instead of the a priori class probabilities. The amount of improvement of this query-based approach over the passive batch approach depends on the complexity of the Bayes rule. The principle on which this algorithm is based is general enough to be used in any learning algorithm which permits a model-selection criterion and for which the error rate of the classifier is calculable in terms of the complexity of the model. 1 INTRODUCTION We consider the general problem of learning multi-category classification from labeled examples. In many practical learning settings the time or sample size available for training are limited. This may have adverse effects on the accuracy of the resulting classifier. For instance, in learning to recognize handwritten characters typical time limitation confines the training sample size to be of the order of a few hundred examples. It is important to make learning more efficient by obtaining only training data which contains significant information about the separability of the pattern classes thereby letting the learning algorithm participate actively in the sampling process. Querying for the class labels of specificly selected examples in the input space may lead to significant improvements in the generalization error (cf.