Gradient Descent
Analog VLSI Implementation of Multi-dimensional Gradient Descent
Kirk, David B., Kerns, Douglas, Fleischer, Kurt, Barr, Alan H.
The implementation uses noise injection and multiplicative correlation to estimate derivatives, as in [Anderson, Kerns 92]. One intended application of this technique is setting circuit parameters on-chip automatically, rather than manually [Kirk 91]. Gradient descent optimization may be used to adjust synapse weights for a backpropagation or other on-chip learning implementation. The approach combines the features of continuous multidimensional gradient descent and the potential for an annealing style of optimization. We present data measured from our analog VLSI implementation. 1 Introduction This work is similar to [Anderson, Kerns 92], but represents two advances. First, we describe the extension of the technique to multiple dimensions. Second, we demonstrate an implementation of the multidimensional technique in analog VLSI, and provide results measured from the chip. Unlike previous work using noise sources in adaptive systems, we use the noise as a means of estimating the gradient of a function f(y), rather than performing an annealing process [Alspector 88]. We also estimate gr-;:dients continuously in position and time, in contrast to [Umminger 89] and [J abri 91], which utilize discrete position gradient estimates.
A Parallel Gradient Descent Method for Learning in Analog VLSI Neural Networks
Alspector, J., Meir, R., Yuhas, B., Jayakumar, A., Lippe, D.
Typical methods for gradient descent in neural network learning involve calculation of derivatives based on a detailed knowledge of the network model. This requires extensive, time consuming calculations for each pattern presentation and high precision that makes it difficult to implement in VLSI. We present here a perturbation technique that measures, not calculates, the gradient. Since the technique uses the actual network as a measuring device, errors in modeling neuron activation and synaptic weights do not cause errors in gradient descent. The method is parallel in nature and easy to implement in VLSI. We describe the theory of such an algorithm, an analysis of its domain of applicability, some simulations using it and an outline of a hardware implementation.
Analog VLSI Implementation of Multi-dimensional Gradient Descent
Kirk, David B., Kerns, Douglas, Fleischer, Kurt, Barr, Alan H.
The implementation uses noise injection and multiplicative correlation to estimate derivatives, as in [Anderson, Kerns 92]. One intended application of this technique is setting circuit parameters on-chip automatically, rather than manually [Kirk 91]. Gradient descent optimization may be used to adjust synapse weights for a backpropagation or other on-chip learning implementation. The approach combines the features of continuous multidimensional gradient descent and the potential for an annealing style of optimization. We present data measured from our analog VLSI implementation. 1 Introduction This work is similar to [Anderson, Kerns 92], but represents two advances. First, we describe the extension of the technique to multiple dimensions. Second, we demonstrate animplementation of the multidimensional technique in analog VLSI, and provide results measured from the chip. Unlike previous work using noise sources in adaptive systems, we use the noise as a means of estimating the gradient of a function f(y), rather than performing an annealing process [Alspector 88]. We also estimate gr-;:dients continuously in position and time, in contrast to [Umminger 89] and [J abri 91], which utilize discrete position gradient estimates.
A Parallel Gradient Descent Method for Learning in Analog VLSI Neural Networks
Alspector, J., Meir, R., Yuhas, B., Jayakumar, A., Lippe, D.
Typical methods for gradient descent in neural network learning involve calculation of derivatives based on a detailed knowledge of the network model. This requires extensive, time consuming calculations for each pattern presentationand high precision that makes it difficult to implement in VLSI. We present here a perturbation technique that measures, not calculates, the gradient. Since the technique uses the actual network as a measuring device, errors in modeling neuron activation and synaptic weights do not cause errors in gradient descent. The method is parallel in nature and easy to implement in VLSI.
Gradient Descent: Second Order Momentum and Saturating Error
We then regard gradient descent with momentum as a dynamic system and explore a non quadratic error surface, showing that saturation of the error accounts for a variety of effects observed in simulations and justifies some popular heuristics. 1 INTRODUCTION Gradient descent is the bread-and-butter optimization technique in neural networks. Some people build special purpose hardware to accelerate gradient descent optimization of backpropagation networks. Understanding the dynamics of gradient descent on such surfaces is therefore of great practical value. Here we briefly review the known results in the convergence of batch gradient descent; show that second-order momentum does not give any speedup; simulate a real network and observe some effect not predicted by theory; and account for these effects by analyzing gradient descent with momentum on a saturating error surface.
Gradient Descent: Second Order Momentum and Saturating Error
We then regard gradient descent with momentum as a dynamic system and explore a non quadratic error surface, showing that saturation of the error accounts for a variety of effects observed in simulations and justifies some popular heuristics. 1 INTRODUCTION Gradient descent is the bread-and-butter optimization technique in neural networks. Some people build special purpose hardware to accelerate gradient descent optimization of backpropagation networks. Understanding the dynamics of gradient descent on such surfaces is therefore of great practical value. Here we briefly review the known results in the convergence of batch gradient descent; show that second-order momentum does not give any speedup; simulate a real network and observe some effect not predicted by theory; and account for these effects by analyzing gradient descent with momentum on a saturating error surface.
Gradient Descent: Second Order Momentum and Saturating Error
We then regard gradient descent with momentum as a dynamic system and explore a non quadratic error surface, showing that saturation of the error accounts for a variety of effects observed in simulations and justifies some popular heuristics. 1 INTRODUCTION Gradient descent is the bread-and-butter optimization technique in neural networks. Some people build special purpose hardware to accelerate gradient descent optimization ofbackpropagation networks. Understanding the dynamics of gradient descent on such surfaces is therefore of great practical value. Here we briefly review the known results in the convergence of batch gradient descent; showthat second-order momentum does not give any speedup; simulate a real network and observe some effect not predicted by theory; and account for these effects by analyzing gradient descent with momentum on a saturating error surface.