In this paper, we develop a new classification method based on nearest centroid, and it is called the nearest disjoint centroid classifier. Our method differs from the nearest centroid classifier in the following two aspects: (1) the centroids are defined based on disjoint subsets of features instead of all the features, and (2) the distance is induced by the dimensionality-normalized norm instead of the Euclidean norm. We provide a few theoretical results regarding our method. In addition, we propose a simple algorithm based on adapted k-means clustering that can find the disjoint subsets of features used in our method, and extend the algorithm to perform feature selection. We evaluate and compare the performance of our method to other closely related classifiers on both simulated data and real-world gene expression datasets. The results demonstrate that our method is able to outperform other competing classifiers by having smaller misclassification rates and/or using fewer features in various settings and situations.

Directed networks appear in various areas, such as biology, sociology, physiology and computer science. However, at present, most network analysis ignores the direction. In this paper, we construct a spectral clustering method based on the singular decomposition of the adjacency matrix to detect community in directed stochastic block model (DiSBM). By considering a sparsity parameter, under some mild conditions, we show the proposed approach can consistently recover hidden row and column communities for different scaling of degrees. By considering the degree heterogeneity of both row and column nodes, we further establish a theoretical framework for directed degree corrected stochastic block model (DiDCSBM). We show that the spectral clustering method stably yields consistent community detection for row clusters and column clusters under mild constraints on the degree heterogeneity. Our theoretical results under DiSBM and DiDCSBM provide some innovations on some special directed networks, such as directed network with balanced clusters, directed network with nodes enjoying similar degrees, and the directed Erd\"os-R\'enyi graph. Furthermore, our theoretical results under DiDCSBM are consistent with those under DiSBM when DiDCSBM degenerates to DiSBM.

Clustering (cluster analysis) is grouping objects based on similarities. Clustering can be used in many areas, including machine learning, computer graphics, pattern recognition, image analysis, information retrieval, bioinformatics, and data compression. Clusters are a tricky concept, which is why there are so many different clustering algorithms. Different cluster models are employed, and for each of these cluster models, different algorithms can be given. Clusters found by one clustering algorithm will definitely be different from clusters found by a different algorithm. Grouping an unlabelled example is called clustering. As the samples are unlabelled, clustering relies on unsupervised machine learning. If the examples are labeled, then it becomes classification. Knowledge of cluster models is fundamental if you want to understand the differences between various cluster algorithms, and in this article, we're going to explore this topic in depth.

As a data scientist, you have several basic tools at your disposal, which you can also apply in combination to a data set. More and more complex dependencies are formed. This makes it all the more difficult to recognize these similar properties and to assign the data to so-called clusters in a way that can be evaluated. You have certainly heard of these algorithms and maybe used one or the other, but do you really know what clustering algorithms are? So let's first clarify what these algorithms are in the first place.

Up until the 1970's there were two main ways of clustering points in space. One of them, perhaps pioneered by Pearson [44], was to fit a (usually Gaussian) mixture to the data, and that being done, classify each data point -- as well as any other point available at a later date -- according to the most likely component in the mixture. The other one was based on a direct partitioning of the space, most notably by minimization of the average minimum squared distance to a center: the K-means problem, whose computational difficulty led to a number of famous algorithms [22, 31, 36, 37, 39] and likely played a role in motivating the development of hierarchical clustering [21, 25, 54, 63]. In the 1970's, two decidedly nonparametric approaches to clustering were proposed, both based on the topography given by the population density. Of course, in practice, the density is estimated, often by some form of kernel density estimation.

Outcome labeling ambiguity and subjectivity are ubiquitous in real-world datasets. While practitioners commonly combine ambiguous outcome labels in an ad hoc way to improve the accuracy of multi-class classification, there lacks a principled approach to guide label combination by any optimality criterion. To address this problem, we propose the information-theoretic classification accuracy (ITCA), a criterion of outcome "information" conditional on outcome prediction, to guide practitioners on how to combine ambiguous outcome labels. ITCA indicates a balance in the trade-off between prediction accuracy (how well do predicted labels agree with actual labels) and prediction resolution (how many labels are predictable). To find the optimal label combination indicated by ITCA, we develop two search strategies: greedy search and breadth-first search. Notably, ITCA and the two search strategies are adaptive to all machine-learning classification algorithms. Coupled with a classification algorithm and a search strategy, ITCA has two uses: to improve prediction accuracy and to identify ambiguous labels. We first verify that ITCA achieves high accuracy with both search strategies in finding the correct label combinations on synthetic and real data. Then we demonstrate the effectiveness of ITCA in diverse applications including medical prognosis, cancer survival prediction, user demographics prediction, and cell type classification.

The widespread availability of cell phones has enabled non-profits to deliver critical health information to their beneficiaries in a timely manner. This paper describes our work to assist non-profits that employ automated messaging programs to deliver timely preventive care information to beneficiaries (new and expecting mothers) during pregnancy and after delivery. Unfortunately, a key challenge in such information delivery programs is that a significant fraction of beneficiaries drop out of the program. Yet, non-profits often have limited health-worker resources (time) to place crucial service calls for live interaction with beneficiaries to prevent such engagement drops. To assist non-profits in optimizing this limited resource, we developed a Restless Multi-Armed Bandits (RMABs) system. One key technical contribution in this system is a novel clustering method of offline historical data to infer unknown RMAB parameters. Our second major contribution is evaluation of our RMAB system in collaboration with an NGO, via a real-world service quality improvement study. The study compared strategies for optimizing service calls to 23003 participants over a period of 7 weeks to reduce engagement drops. We show that the RMAB group provides statistically significant improvement over other comparison groups, reducing ~ 30% engagement drops. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study demonstrating the utility of RMABs in real world public health settings. We are transitioning our RMAB system to the NGO for real-world use.

The k means clustering Python is one of the unsurprised machine learning methods applied to identify data object clusters within a dataset. There are various kinds of clustering methods, but it has been seen that k means is the oldest and most preferred clustering method. Because of this, k-means clustering in Python is the straightforward method that various data scientists and programmers adopt. If you want to know how to implement k-means clustering Python, then keep scrolling the blog. In this blog, we have covered all the necessary details about the K-means clustering, and an example is also detailed to help you the clustering's functioning.

Everyone knows how Covid-19 pandemic devastated the nightlife industry with social distancing, lockdowns, mask-wearing and early curfews. These nightlife spaces were shuttered because they had been deemed non-essential services and places of easy transmission for the coronavirus. Now that central and state governments in India have eased the restrictions people can finally enjoy a breather, commemorating a special occasion or just spending time with friends over food and drinks. In a city like Pune, which boasts a happening nightlife scene, there's always a party happening somewhere or the other. Widely known as the "IT hub of India", "Automobile and Manufacturing hub of India" and "Oxford of the East", Pune is known for its lifestyle, pleasant weather and just… everything good.

The clustering-based unsupervised relation discovery method has gradually become one of the important methods of open relation extraction (OpenRE). However, high-dimensional vectors can encode complex linguistic information which leads to the problem that the derived clusters cannot explicitly align with the relational semantic classes. In this work, we propose a relation-oriented clustering model and use it to identify the novel relations in the unlabeled data. Specifically, to enable the model to learn to cluster relational data, our method leverages the readily available labeled data of pre-defined relations to learn a relation-oriented representation. We minimize distance between the instance with same relation by gathering the instances towards their corresponding relation centroids to form a cluster structure, so that the learned representation is cluster-friendly. To reduce the clustering bias on predefined classes, we optimize the model by minimizing a joint objective on both labeled and unlabeled data. Experimental results show that our method reduces the error rate by 29.2% and 15.7%, on two datasets respectively, compared with current SOTA methods.