Clustering: Overviews

Understanding data mining clustering methods


When you go to the grocery store, you see that items of a similar nature are displayed nearby to each other. When you organize the clothes in your closet, you put similar items together (e.g. Every personal organizing tip on the web to save you from your clutter suggests some sort of grouping of similar items together. Even we don't notice it, we are involved in grouping similar objects together in every aspect of our life. This is called clustering in machine learning, so in this post I will provide an overview of data mining clustering methods.

A general framework for the IT-based clustering methods Machine Learning

Previously, we proposed a physically inspired rule to organize the data points in a sparse yet effective structure, called the in-tree (IT) graph, which is able to capture a wide class of underlying cluster structures in the datasets, especially for the density-based datasets. Although there are some redundant edges or lines between clusters requiring to be removed by computer, this IT graph has a big advantage compared with the k-nearest-neighborhood (k-NN) or the minimal spanning tree (MST) graph, in that the redundant edges in the IT graph are much more distinguishable and thus can be easily determined by several methods previously proposed by us. In this paper, we propose a general framework to re-construct the IT graph, based on an initial neighborhood graph, such as the k-NN or MST, etc, and the corresponding graph distances. For this general framework, our previous way of constructing the IT graph turns out to be a special case of it. This general framework 1) can make the IT graph capture a wider class of underlying cluster structures in the datasets, especially for the manifolds, and 2) should be more effective to cluster the sparse or graph-based datasets.

Ward's Hierarchical Clustering Method: Clustering Criterion and Agglomerative Algorithm Machine Learning

The Ward error sum of squares hierarchical clustering method has been very widely used since its first description by Ward in a 1963 publication. It has also been generalized in various ways. However there are different interpretations in the literature and there are different implementations of the Ward agglomerative algorithm in commonly used software systems, including differing expressions of the agglomerative criterion. Our survey work and case studies will be useful for all those involved in developing software for data analysis using Ward's hierarchical clustering method.