Neural networks, although a powerful engine in supervised methods, often require expensive tuning efforts for optimized performance. Habitability classes are hard to discriminate, especially when attributes used as hard markers of separation are removed from the data set. The solution is approached from the point of investigating analytical properties of the proposed activation functions. The theory of ordinary differential equations and fixed point are exploited to justify the "lack of tuning efforts" to achieve optimal performance compared to traditional activation functions. Additionally, the relationship between the proposed activation functions and the more popular ones is established through extensive analytical and empirical evidence. Finally, the activation functions have been implemented in plain vanilla feed-forward neural network to classify exoplanets.

We present a weakly-supervised data augmentation approach to improve Named Entity Recognition (NER) in a challenging domain: extracting biomedical entities (e.g., proteins) from the scientific literature. First, we train a neural NER (NNER) model over a small seed of fully-labeled examples. Second, we use a reference set of entity names (e.g., proteins in UniProt) to identify entity mentions with high precision, but low recall, on an unlabeled corpus. Third, we use the NNER model to assign weak labels to the corpus. Finally, we retrain our NNER model iteratively over the augmented training set, including the seed, the reference-set examples, and the weakly-labeled examples, which improves model performance. We show empirically that this augmented bootstrapping process significantly improves NER performance, and discuss the factors impacting the efficacy of the approach.

The increasing impact of algorithmic decisions on people's lives compels us to scrutinize their fairness and, in particular, the disparate impacts that ostensibly-color-blind algorithms can have on different groups. Examples include credit decisioning, hiring, advertising, criminal justice, personalized medicine, and targeted policymaking, where in some cases legislative or regulatory frameworks for fairness exist and define specific protected classes. In this paper we study a fundamental challenge to assessing disparate impacts in practice: protected class membership is often not observed in the data. This is particularly a problem in lending and healthcare. We consider the use of an auxiliary dataset, such as the US census, that includes class labels but not decisions or outcomes. We show that a variety of common disparity measures are generally unidentifiable aside for some unrealistic cases, providing a new perspective on the documented biases of popular proxy-based methods. We provide exact characterizations of the sharpest-possible partial identification set of disparities either under no assumptions or when we incorporate mild smoothness constraints. We further provide optimization-based algorithms for computing and visualizing these sets, which enables reliable and robust assessments -- an important tool when disparity assessment can have far-reaching policy implications. We demonstrate this in two case studies with real data: mortgage lending and personalized medicine dosing.

Leave-one-out cross validation (LOOCV) can be particularly accurate among CV variants for estimating out-of-sample error. Unfortunately, LOOCV requires re-fitting a model $N$ times for a dataset of size $N$. To avoid this prohibitive computational expense, a number of authors have proposed approximations to LOOCV. These approximations work well when the unknown parameter is of small, fixed dimension but suffer in high dimensions; they incur a running time roughly cubic in the dimension, and, in fact, we show their accuracy significantly deteriorates in high dimensions. We demonstrate that these difficulties can be surmounted in $\ell_1$-regularized generalized linear models when we assume that the unknown parameter, while high dimensional, has a small support. In particular, we show that, under interpretable conditions, the support of the recovered parameter does not change as each datapoint is left out. This result implies that the previously proposed heuristic of only approximating CV along the support of the recovered parameter has running time and error that scale with the (small) support size even when the full dimension is large. Experiments on synthetic and real data support the accuracy of our approximations.

Recent years have seen a surge of interest in the problem of fair classification, which is concerned with disparities in classification output or performance when conditioned on a protected attribute such as race or gender, or ethnicity. Many measures of fairness have been introduced [1-14] and fairness-enhancing interventions have been proposed to mitigate these disparities [15]. Roughly categorized, these interventions either (i) change data used to train a classifier (pre-processing) [16-20], (ii) change a classifier's output (post-processing) [4, 21-24], or (iii) directly change a classification model to ensure fairness (in-processing) [5, 25-32]. This paper places more emphasis on probabilistic classification in which the outputs of interest are predicted probabilities of belonging to one of the classes, often referred to as scores, as opposed to binary predictions. Scores are desirable because they indicate confidences in predictions. We propose an optimization formulation for transforming scores to satisfy fairness constraints while minimizing the loss in utility. The formulation accommodates any fairness criteria that can be expressed as linear inequalities involving conditional means of scores, including variants of statistical parity (SP) [1] and equalized odds (EO) [4, 5]. We derive a closed-form expression for the optimal transformed scores and a convex dual optimization problem for the Lagrange multipliers that parametrize the transformation.

In this article, we investigate a family of classification algorithms defined by the principle of empirical risk minimization, in the high dimensional regime where the feature dimension $p$ and data number $n$ are both large and comparable. Based on recent advances in high dimensional statistics and random matrix theory, we provide under mixture data model a unified stochastic characterization of classifiers learned with different loss functions. Our results are instrumental to an in-depth understanding as well as practical improvements on this fundamental classification approach. As the main outcome, we demonstrate the existence of a universally optimal loss function which yields the best high dimensional performance at any given $n/p$ ratio.

Ensemble approaches for uncertainty estimation have recently been applied to the tasks of misclassification detection, out-of-distribution input detection and adversarial attack detection. Prior Networks have been proposed as an approach to efficiently emulating an ensemble of models by parameterising a Dirichlet prior distribution over output distributions. These models have been shown to outperform ensemble approaches, such as Monte-Carlo Dropout, on the task of out-of-distribution input detection. However, scaling Prior Networks to complex datasets with many classes is difficult using the training criteria originally proposed. This paper makes two contributions. Firstly, we show that the appropriate training criterion for Prior Networks is the reverse KL-divergence between Dirichlet distributions. Using this loss we successfully train Prior Networks on image classification datasets with up to 200 classes and improve out-of-distribution detection performance. Secondly, taking advantage of the new training criterion, this paper investigates using Prior Networks to detect adversarial attacks. It is shown that the construction of successful adaptive whitebox attacks, which affect the prediction and evade detection, against Prior Networks trained on CIFAR-10 and CIFAR-100 takes a greater amount of computational effort than against standard neural networks, adversarially trained neural networks and dropout-defended networks.

In the world of Natural Language Processing (NLP), the most basic models are based on Bag of Words. But such models fail to capture the syntactic relations between words. For example, suppose we build a sentiment analyser based on only Bag of Words. Such a model will not be able to capture the difference between "I like you", where "like" is a verb with a positive sentiment, and "I am like you", where "like" is a preposition with a neutral sentiment. So this leaves us with a question -- how do we improve on this Bag of Words technique?

We present a novel approach to train pixel resolution segmentation models on whole slide images in a weakly supervised setup. The model is trained to classify patches extracted from slides. This leads the training to be made under noisy labeled data. We solve the problem with two complementary strategies. First, the patches are sampled online using the model's knowledge by focusing on regions where the model's confidence is higher. Second, we propose an extension of the KL divergence that is robust to noisy labels. Our preliminary experiment on CAMELYON 16 data set show promising results.

Lifelong machine learning is a novel machine learning paradigm which can continually accumulate knowledge during learning. The knowledge extracting and reusing abilities enable the lifelong machine learning to solve the related problems. The traditional approaches like Na\"ive Bayes and some neural network based approaches only aim to achieve the best performance upon a single task. Unlike them, the lifelong machine learning in this paper focuses on how to accumulate knowledge during learning and leverage them for further tasks. Meanwhile, the demand for labelled data for training also is significantly decreased with the knowledge reusing. This paper suggests that the aim of the lifelong learning is to use less labelled data and computational cost to achieve the performance as well as or even better than the supervised learning.