South Korean artificial intelligence (AI) developer Vuno has received class II approval for its Vuno Med Chest X-ray algorithm for identifying abnormal findings on chest x-rays. The algorithm was trained to find nodules, pneumothorax, effusions, and interstitial opacities that are commonly seen on chest x-ray images. The algorithm classifies lesions as normal or abnormal and highlights suspected abnormal regions. Results from clinical trials of the algorithm indicate it reduced the average reading time of medical staff by 50% while improving lesion detection performance by 5.8%. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were all improved with Vuno Med Chest X-ray, and the probability of false positives in normal areas was reduced by 50%.

Machine learning algorithms can take important decisions, sometimes legally binding, about our everyday life. In most cases, however, these systems and decisions are neither regulated nor certified. Given the potential harm that these algorithms can cause, qualities such as fairness, accountability and transparency of predictive systems are of paramount importance. Recent literature suggested voluntary self-reporting on these aspects of predictive systems -- e.g., data sheets for data sets -- but their scope is often limited to a single component of a machine learning pipeline, and producing them requires manual labour. To resolve this impasse and ensure high-quality, fair, transparent and reliable machine learning systems, we developed an open source toolbox that can inspect selected fairness, accountability and transparency aspects of these systems to automatically and objectively report them back to their engineers and users. We describe design, scope and usage examples of this Python toolbox in this paper. The toolbox provides functionality for inspecting fairness, accountability and transparency of all aspects of the machine learning process: data (and their features), models and predictions. It is available to the public under the BSD 3-Clause open source licence.

What is the most effective way to select the best causal model among potential candidates? In this paper, we propose a method to effectively select the best individual-level treatment effect (ITE) predictors from a set of candidates using only an observational validation set. In model selection or hyperparameter tuning, we are interested in choosing the best model or the value of hyperparameter from potential candidates. Thus, we focus on accurately preserving the rank order of the ITE prediction performance of candidate causal models. The proposed evaluation metric is theoretically proved to preserve the true ranking of the model performance in expectation and to minimize the upper bound of the finite sample uncertainty in model selection. Consistent with the theoretical result, empirical experiments demonstrate that our proposed method is more likely to select the best model and set of hyperparameter in both model selection and hyperparameter tuning.

--A key obstacle in automated analytics and meta-learning is the inability to recognize when different datasets contain measurements of the same variable. Because provided attribute labels are often uninformative in practice, this task may be more robustly addressed by leveraging the data values themselves rather than just relying on their arbitrarily selected variable names. Here, we present a computationally efficient method to identify high-confidence variable matches between a given set of data values and a large repository of previously encountered datasets. Our approach enjoys numerous advantages over distributional similarity based techniques because we leverage learned vector embeddings of datasets which adaptively account for naturalforms of data variation encountered in practice. Based on the neural architecture of deep sets, our embeddings can be computed for both numeric and string data. In dataset search and schema matching tasks, our methods outperform standard statistical techniques and we find that the learned embeddings generalize well to new data sources. I NTRODUCTION Emerging ideas in automated analytics [1] and meta-learning across many datasets [2] offer great promise for improving both performance and tedium in the data science pipeline. However, a major obstacle remains: such methods generally have no knowledge about what type of real-world entity (i.e. In contrast, human analysts presented with new data often utilize this knowledge to recall previously-encountered datasets that contain the same sort of variables. Reviewing past experience with how different algorithms fared on these same variables enables a person to quickly leverage methods that work well for this type of data (e.g.

This paper presents an exploratory study to understand the relationship between a humans' cognitive load, trust, and anthropomorphism during human-robot interaction. To understand the relationship, we created a \say{Matching the Pair} game that participants could play collaboratively with one of two robot types, Husky or Pepper. The goal was to understand if humans would trust the robot as a teammate while being in the game-playing situation that demanded a high level of cognitive load. Using a humanoid vs. a technical robot, we also investigated the impact of physical anthropomorphism and we furthermore tested the impact of robot error rate on subsequent judgments and behavior. Our results showed that there was an inversely proportional relationship between trust and cognitive load, suggesting that as the amount of cognitive load increased in the participants, their ratings of trust decreased. We also found a triple interaction impact between robot-type, error-rate and participant's ratings of trust. We found that participants perceived Pepper to be more trustworthy in comparison with the Husky robot after playing the game with both robots under high error-rate condition. On the contrary, Husky was perceived as more trustworthy than Pepper when it was depicted as featuring a low error-rate. Our results are interesting and call further investigation of the impact of physical anthropomorphism in combination with variable error-rates of the robot.

The names of actual companies and products mentioned herein may be the trademarks of their respective owners.

Normally when I do RF projects I use some sort of feature selection method to choose which features to use. Then I fit the RF model onto those features. Then to test accuracy / related metrics I use cross validation, confusion matrices, etc. However in this case I only have two given features. I don't want to just literally run a RF model on those two features as my whole entire project. I'm thinking gradient boosting is what I should learn?

The characterization of amorphous materials is especially challenging because their lack of long-range order makes it difficult to define structural metrics. In this work, we apply deep learning algorithms to accurately classify amorphous materials and characterize their structural features. Specifically, we show that convolutional neural networks and message passing neural networks can classify two-dimensional liquids and liquid-cooled glasses from molecular dynamics simulations with greater than 0.98 AUC, with no a priori assumptions about local particle relationships, even when the liquids and glasses are prepared at the same inherent structure energy. Furthermore, we demonstrate that message passing neural networks surpass convolutional neural networks in this context in both accuracy and interpretability. We extract a clear interpretation of how message passing neural networks evaluate liquid and glass structures by using a self-attention mechanism. Using this interpretation, we derive three novel structural metrics that accurately characterize glass formation. The methods presented here provide us with a procedure to identify important structural features in materials that could be missed by standard techniques and give us a unique insight into how these neural networks process data. I. INTRODUCTION Classifying material structures and predicting their properties are important tasks in materials science. The behavior of materials often depends strongly on their underlying structure, and understanding these structure-property relationships relies on accurately describing the structural features of a material. However, quantifying structure-property relationships and identifying structural features in complex materials are difficult tasks. A variety of standard techniques have been developed to analyze material structures. Some of the most common techniques include the Steinhardt bond order parameters, 1 Bond Angle Analysis (BAA), 2 and Common Neighbor Analysis (CNA), 3 which are useful for detecting order-disorder transitions and differentiating between crystal structures in ordered samples. As discussed in Reinhardt et al., 4 the Steinhardt bond order parameters can be stymied by thermal fluctuations or am-a) Electronic mail: swansonk1@uchicago.edu BAA relies on a small set of crystalline reference structures that may not be present in amorphous samples. CNA is more flexible than BAA, but it cannot provide accurate information about particles that do not exhibit known symmetries, making analysis of irregular structures challenging.

Artificial neural networks have been successfully used for many different classification tasks including malware detection and distinguishing between malicious and non-malicious programs. Although artificial neural networks perform very well on these tasks, they are also vulnerable to adversarial examples. An adversarial example is a sample that has minor modifications made to it so that the neural network misclassifies it. Many techniques have been proposed, both for crafting adversarial examples and for hardening neural networks against them. Most previous work has been done in the image domain. Some of the attacks have been adopted to work in the malware domain which typically deals with binary feature vectors. In order to better understand the space of adversarial examples in malware classification, we study different approaches of crafting adversarial examples and defense techniques in the malware domain and compare their effectiveness on multiple datasets.

Antifreeze proteins (AFPs) are the sub-set of ice binding proteins indispensable for the species living in extreme cold weather. These proteins bind to the ice crystals, hindering their growth into large ice lattice that could cause physical damage. There are variety of AFPs found in numerous organisms and due to the heterogeneous sequence characteristics, AFPs are found to demonstrate a high degree of diversity, which makes their prediction a challenging task. Herein, we propose a machine learning framework to deal with this vigorous and diverse prediction problem using the manifolding learning through composition of k-spaced amino acid pairs. We propose to use the deep neural network with skipped connection and ReLU non-linearity to learn the non-linear mapping of protein sequence descriptor and class label. The proposed antifreeze protein prediction method called AFP-CKSAAP has shown to outperform the contemporary methods, achieving excellent prediction scores on standard dataset. The main evaluater for the performance of the proposed method in this study is Youden's index whose high value is dependent on both sensitivity and specificity. In particular, AFP-CKSAAP yields a Youden's index value of 0.82 on the independent dataset, which is better than previous methods.