The goal of Next-Generation Networks is to improve upon the current networking paradigm, especially in providing higher data rates, near-real-time latencies, and near-perfect quality of service. However, existing radio access network (RAN) architectures lack sufficient flexibility and intelligence to meet those demands. Open RAN (O-RAN) is a promising paradigm for building a virtualized and intelligent RAN architecture. This paper presents a Machine Learning (ML)-based Traffic Steering (TS) scheme to predict network congestion and then proactively steer O-RAN traffic to avoid it and reduce the expected queuing delay. To achieve this, we propose an optimized setup focusing on safeguarding both latency and reliability to serve URLLC applications. The proposed solution consists of a two-tiered ML strategy based on Naive Bayes Classifier and deep Q-learning. Our solution is evaluated against traditional reactive TS approaches that are offered as xApps in O-RAN and shows an average of 15.81 percent decrease in queuing delay across all deployed SFCs.

Tabular data is prevalent in many high-stakes domains, such as financial services or public policy. Gradient Boosted Decision Trees (GBDT) are popular in these settings due to their scalability, performance, and low training cost. While fairness in these domains is a foremost concern, existing in-processing Fair ML methods are either incompatible with GBDT, or incur in significant performance losses while taking considerably longer to train. We present FairGBM, a dual ascent learning framework for training GBDT under fairness constraints, with little to no impact on predictive performance when compared to unconstrained GBDT. Since observational fairness metrics are non-differentiable, we propose smooth convex error rate proxies for common fairness criteria, enabling gradient-based optimization using a ``proxy-Lagrangian'' formulation. Our implementation shows an order of magnitude speedup in training time relative to related work, a pivotal aspect to foster the widespread adoption of FairGBM by real-world practitioners.

In this work, Transition Probability Matrix (TPM) is proposed as a new method for extracting the features of nodes in the graph. The proposed method uses random walks to capture the connectivity structure of a node's close neighborhood. The information obtained from random walks is converted to anonymous walks to extract the topological features of nodes. In the embedding process of nodes, anonymous walks are used since they capture the topological similarities of connectivities better than random walks. Therefore the obtained embedding vectors have richer information about the underlying connectivity structure. The method is applied to node classification and link prediction tasks. The performance of the proposed algorithm is superior to the state-of-the-art algorithms in the recent literature. Moreover, the extracted information about the connectivity structure of similar networks is used to link prediction and node classification tasks for a completely new graph.

SHAP explanations aim at identifying which features contribute the most to the difference in model prediction at a specific input versus a background distribution. Recent studies have shown that they can be manipulated by malicious adversaries to produce arbitrary desired explanations. However, existing attacks focus solely on altering the black-box model itself. In this paper, we propose a complementary family of attacks that leave the model intact and manipulate SHAP explanations using stealthily biased sampling of the data points used to approximate expectations w.r.t the background distribution. In the context of fairness audit, we show that our attack can reduce the importance of a sensitive feature when explaining the difference in outcomes between groups while remaining undetected. More precisely, experiments performed on real-world datasets showed that our attack could yield up to a 90\% relative decrease in amplitude of the sensitive feature attribution. These results highlight the manipulability of SHAP explanations and encourage auditors to treat them with skepticism.

Using deep learning models to diagnose cancer from histology data presents several challenges. Cancer grading and localization of regions of interest (ROIs) in these images normally relies on both image- and pixel-level labels, the latter requiring a costly annotation process. Deep weakly-supervised object localization (WSOL) methods provide different strategies for low-cost training of deep learning models. Using only image-class annotations, these methods can be trained to classify an image, and yield class activation maps (CAMs) for ROI localization. This paper provides a review of state-of-art DL methods for WSOL. We propose a taxonomy where these methods are divided into bottom-up and top-down methods according to the information flow in models. Although the latter have seen limited progress, recent bottom-up methods are currently driving much progress with deep WSOL methods. Early works focused on designing different spatial pooling functions. However, these methods reached limited localization accuracy, and unveiled a major limitation -- the under-activation of CAMs which leads to high false negative localization. Subsequent works aimed to alleviate this issue and recover complete object. Representative methods from our taxonomy are evaluated and compared in terms of classification and localization accuracy on two challenging histology datasets. Overall, the results indicate poor localization performance, particularly for generic methods that were initially designed to process natural images. Methods designed to address the challenges of histology data yielded good results. However, all methods suffer from high false positive/negative localization. Four key challenges are identified for the application of deep WSOL methods in histology -- under/over activation of CAMs, sensitivity to thresholding, and model selection.

Evaluation of generative models has been an underrepresented field despite the surge of generative architectures. Most recent models are evaluated upon rather obsolete metrics which suffer from robustness issues, while being unable to assess more aspects of visual quality, such as compositionality and logic of synthesis. At the same time, the explainability of generative models remains a limited, though important, research direction with several current attempts requiring access to the inner functionalities of generative models. Contrary to prior literature, we view generative models as a black box, and we propose a framework for the evaluation and explanation of synthesized results based on concepts instead of pixels. Our framework exploits knowledge-based counterfactual edits that underline which objects or attributes should be inserted, removed, or replaced from generated images to approach their ground truth conditioning. Moreover, global explanations produced by accumulating local edits can also reveal what concepts a model cannot generate in total. The application of our framework on various models designed for the challenging tasks of Story Visualization and Scene Synthesis verifies the power of our approach in the model-agnostic setting.

Learning high-quality, self-supervised, visual representations is essential to advance the role of computer vision in biomedical microscopy and clinical medicine. Previous work has focused on self-supervised representation learning (SSL) methods developed for instance discrimination and applied them directly to image patches, or fields-of-view, sampled from gigapixel whole-slide images (WSIs) used for cancer diagnosis. However, this strategy is limited because it (1) assumes patches from the same patient are independent, (2) neglects the patient-slide-patch hierarchy of clinical biomedical microscopy, and (3) requires strong data augmentations that can degrade downstream performance. Importantly, sampled patches from WSIs of a patient's tumor are a diverse set of image examples that capture the same underlying cancer diagnosis. This motivated HiDisc, a data-driven method that leverages the inherent patient-slide-patch hierarchy of clinical biomedical microscopy to define a hierarchical discriminative learning task that implicitly learns features of the underlying diagnosis. HiDisc uses a self-supervised contrastive learning framework in which positive patch pairs are defined based on a common ancestry in the data hierarchy, and a unified patch, slide, and patient discriminative learning objective is used for visual SSL. We benchmark HiDisc visual representations on two vision tasks using two biomedical microscopy datasets, and demonstrate that (1) HiDisc pretraining outperforms current state-of-the-art self-supervised pretraining methods for cancer diagnosis and genetic mutation prediction, and (2) HiDisc learns high-quality visual representations using natural patch diversity without strong data augmentations.

The field of time series anomaly detection is constantly advancing, with several methods available, making it a challenge to determine the most appropriate method for a specific domain. The evaluation of these methods is facilitated by the use of metrics, which vary widely in their properties. Despite the existence of new evaluation metrics, there is limited agreement on which metrics are best suited for specific scenarios and domain, and the most commonly used metrics have faced criticism in the literature. This paper provides a comprehensive overview of the metrics used for the evaluation of time series anomaly detection methods, and also defines a taxonomy of these based on how they are calculated. By defining a set of properties for evaluation metrics and a set of specific case studies and experiments, twenty metrics are analyzed and discussed in detail, highlighting the unique suitability of each for specific tasks. Through extensive experimentation and analysis, this paper argues that the choice of evaluation metric must be made with care, taking into account the specific requirements of the task at hand.

Although home IoT (Internet of Things) devices are typically plain and task oriented, the context of their daily use may affect their traffic patterns. For this reason, anomaly-based intrusion detection systems tend to suffer from a high false positive rate (FPR). To overcome this, we propose a two-step collaborative anomaly detection method which first uses an autoencoder to differentiate frequent (`benign') and infrequent (possibly `malicious') traffic flows. Clustering is then used to analyze only the infrequent flows and classify them as either known ('rare yet benign') or unknown (`malicious'). Our method is collaborative, in that (1) normal behaviors are characterized more robustly, as they take into account a variety of user interactions and network topologies, and (2) several features are computed based on a pool of identical devices rather than just the inspected device. We evaluated our method empirically, using 21 days of real-world traffic data that emanated from eight identical IoT devices deployed on various networks, one of which was located in our controlled lab where we implemented two popular IoT-related cyber-attacks. Our collaborative anomaly detection method achieved a macro-average area under the precision-recall curve of 0.841, an F1 score of 0.929, and an FPR of only 0.014. These promising results were obtained by using labeled traffic data from our lab as the test set, while training the models on the traffic of devices deployed outside the lab, and thus demonstrate a high level of generalizability. In addition to its high generalizability and promising performance, our proposed method also offers benefits such as privacy preservation, resource savings, and model poisoning mitigation. On top of that, as a contribution to the scientific community, our novel dataset is available online.

Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine-Learning (ML) models have been increasingly used in medical products, such as medical device software. General considerations on the statistical aspects for the evaluation of AI/ML-enabled medical diagnostic devices are discussed in this paper. We also provide relevant academic references and note good practices in addressing various statistical challenges in the clinical validation of AI/ML-enabled medical devices in the context of their intended use.