Hotel bathrooms are one of the most important places in terms of customer satisfaction, and where the most complaints are reported. To share their experiences, guests rate hotels, comment, and share images of their positive or negative ratings. An important part of the room images shared by guests is related to bathrooms. Guests tend to prove their satisfaction or dissatisfaction with the bathrooms with images in their comments. These Positive or negative comments and visuals potentially affect the prospective guests. In this study, two different versions of a deep learning algorithm were designed to classify hotel bathrooms as satisfactory (good) or unsatisfactory (bad, when any defects such as dirtiness, deficiencies, malfunctions were present) by analyzing images. The best-performer between the two models was determined as a result of a series of extensive experimental studies. The models were trained for each of 144 combinations of 5 hyper-parameter sets with a data set containing more than 11 thousand bathroom images, specially created for this study. The "HotelBath" data set was shared also with the community with this study. Four different image sizes were taken into consideration: 128, 256, 512 and 1024 pixels in both directions. The classification performances of the models were measured with several metrics. Both algorithms showed very attractive performances even with many combinations of hyper-parameters. They can classify bathroom images with very high accuracy. Suh that the top algorithm achieved an accuracy of 92.4% and an AUC (area under the curve) score of 0.967. In addition, other metrics also proved the success...

The increasing reliance on large language models (LLMs) in academic writing has led to a rise in plagiarism. Existing AI-generated text classifiers have limited accuracy and often produce false positives. We propose a novel approach using natural language processing (NLP) techniques, offering quantifiable metrics at both sentence and document levels for easier interpretation by human evaluators. Our method employs a multi-faceted approach, generating multiple paraphrased versions of a given question and inputting them into the LLM to generate answers. By using a contrastive loss function based on cosine similarity, we match generated sentences with those from the student's response. Our approach achieves up to 94% accuracy in classifying human and AI text, providing a robust and adaptable solution for plagiarism detection in academic settings. This method improves with LLM advancements, reducing the need for new model training or reconfiguration, and offers a more transparent way of evaluating and detecting AI-generated text.

As the size of the pre-trained language model (PLM) continues to increase, numerous parameter-efficient transfer learning methods have been proposed recently to compensate for the tremendous cost of fine-tuning. Despite the impressive results achieved by large pre-trained language models (PLMs) and various parameter-efficient transfer learning (PETL) methods on sundry benchmarks, it remains unclear if they can handle inputs that have been distributionally shifted effectively. In this study, we systematically explore how the ability to detect out-of-distribution (OOD) changes as the size of the PLM grows or the transfer methods are altered. Specifically, we evaluated various PETL techniques, including fine-tuning, Adapter, LoRA, and prefix-tuning, on three different intention classification tasks, each utilizing various language models with different scales.

Large language models (LLMs) are remarkable data annotators. They can be used to generate high-fidelity supervised training data, as well as survey and experimental data. With the widespread adoption of LLMs, human gold--standard annotations are key to understanding the capabilities of LLMs and the validity of their results. However, crowdsourcing, an important, inexpensive way to obtain human annotations, may itself be impacted by LLMs, as crowd workers have financial incentives to use LLMs to increase their productivity and income. To investigate this concern, we conducted a case study on the prevalence of LLM usage by crowd workers. We reran an abstract summarization task from the literature on Amazon Mechanical Turk and, through a combination of keystroke detection and synthetic text classification, estimate that 33-46% of crowd workers used LLMs when completing the task. Although generalization to other, less LLM-friendly tasks is unclear, our results call for platforms, researchers, and crowd workers to find new ways to ensure that human data remain human, perhaps using the methodology proposed here as a stepping stone. Code/data: https://github.com/epfl-dlab/GPTurk

In this paper, we develop a series of differential privacy (DP) algorithms from a family of random projections (RP) for general applications in machine learning, data mining, and information retrieval. Among the presented algorithms, iDP-SignRP is remarkably effective under the setting of ``individual differential privacy'' (iDP), based on sign random projections (SignRP). Also, DP-SignOPORP considerably improves existing algorithms in the literature under the standard DP setting, using ``one permutation + one random projection'' (OPORP), where OPORP is a variant of the celebrated count-sketch method with fixed-length binning and normalization. Without taking signs, among the DP-RP family, DP-OPORP achieves the best performance. Our key idea for improving DP-RP is to take only the signs, i.e., $sign(x_j) = sign\left(\sum_{i=1}^p u_i w_{ij}\right)$, of the projected data. The intuition is that the signs often remain unchanged when the original data ($u$) exhibit small changes (according to the ``neighbor'' definition in DP). In other words, the aggregation and quantization operations themselves provide good privacy protections. We develop a technique called ``smooth flipping probability'' that incorporates this intuitive privacy benefit of SignRPs and improves the standard DP bit flipping strategy. Based on this technique, we propose DP-SignOPORP which satisfies strict DP and outperforms other DP variants based on SignRP (and RP), especially when $\epsilon$ is not very large (e.g., $\epsilon = 5\sim10$). Moreover, if an application scenario accepts individual DP, then we immediately obtain an algorithm named iDP-SignRP which achieves excellent utilities even at small~$\epsilon$ (e.g., $\epsilon<0.5$).

Network intrusion detection systems (NIDS) to detect malicious attacks continue to meet challenges. NIDS are often developed offline while they face auto-generated port scan infiltration attempts, resulting in a significant time lag from adversarial adaption to NIDS response. To address these challenges, we use hypergraphs focused on internet protocol addresses and destination ports to capture evolving patterns of port scan attacks. The derived set of hypergraph-based metrics are then used to train an ensemble machine learning (ML) based NIDS that allows for real-time adaption in monitoring and detecting port scanning activities, other types of attacks, and adversarial intrusions at high accuracy, precision and recall performances. This ML adapting NIDS was developed through the combination of (1) intrusion examples, (2) NIDS update rules, (3) attack threshold choices to trigger NIDS retraining requests, and (4) a production environment with no prior knowledge of the nature of network traffic. 40 scenarios were auto-generated to evaluate the ML ensemble NIDS comprising three tree-based models. The resulting ML Ensemble NIDS was extended and evaluated with the CIC-IDS2017 dataset. Results show that under the model settings of an Update-ALL-NIDS rule (specifically retrain and update all the three models upon the same NIDS retraining request) the proposed ML ensemble NIDS evolved intelligently and produced the best results with nearly 100% detection performance throughout the simulation.

When making strategic decisions, we are often confronted with overwhelming information to process. The situation can be further complicated when some pieces of evidence are contradicted each other or paradoxical. The challenge then becomes how to determine which information is useful and which ones should be eliminated. This process is known as meta-decision. Likewise, when it comes to using Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems for strategic decision-making, placing trust in the AI itself becomes a meta-decision, given that many AI systems are viewed as opaque "black boxes" that process large amounts of data. Trusting an opaque system involves deciding on the level of Trustworthy AI (TAI). We propose a new approach to address this issue by introducing a novel taxonomy or framework of TAI, which encompasses three crucial domains: articulate, authentic, and basic for different levels of trust. To underpin these domains, we create ten dimensions to measure trust: explainability/transparency, fairness/diversity, generalizability, privacy, data governance, safety/robustness, accountability, reproducibility, reliability, and sustainability. We aim to use this taxonomy to conduct a comprehensive survey and explore different TAI approaches from a strategic decision-making perspective.

Firewalls are critical components in securing communication networks by screening all incoming (and occasionally exiting) data packets. Filtering is carried out by comparing incoming data packets to a set of rules designed to prevent malicious code from entering the network. To regulate the flow of data packets entering and leaving a network, an Internet firewall keeps a track of all activity. While the primary function of log files is to aid in troubleshooting and diagnostics, the information they contain is also very relevant to system audits and forensics. Firewalls primary function is to prevent malicious data packets from being sent. In order to better defend against cyberattacks and understand when and how malicious actions are influencing the internet, it is necessary to examine log files. As a result, the firewall decides whether to 'allow,' 'deny,' 'drop,' or 'reset-both' the incoming and outgoing packets. In this research, we apply various categorization algorithms to make sense of data logged by a firewall device. Harmonic mean F1 score, recall, and sensitivity measurement data with a 99% accuracy score in the random forest technique are used to compare the classifier's performance. To be sure, the proposed characteristics did significantly contribute to enhancing the firewall classification rate, as seen by the high accuracy rates generated by the other methods.

This paper studies speculative reasoning task on real-world knowledge graphs (KG) that contain both \textit{false negative issue} (i.e., potential true facts being excluded) and \textit{false positive issue} (i.e., unreliable or outdated facts being included). State-of-the-art methods fall short in the speculative reasoning ability, as they assume the correctness of a fact is solely determined by its presence in KG, making them vulnerable to false negative/positive issues. The new reasoning task is formulated as a noisy Positive-Unlabeled learning problem. We propose a variational framework, namely nPUGraph, that jointly estimates the correctness of both collected and uncollected facts (which we call \textit{label posterior}) and updates model parameters during training. The label posterior estimation facilitates speculative reasoning from two perspectives. First, it improves the robustness of a label posterior-aware graph encoder against false positive links. Second, it identifies missing facts to provide high-quality grounds of reasoning. They are unified in a simple yet effective self-training procedure. Empirically, extensive experiments on three benchmark KG and one Twitter dataset with various degrees of false negative/positive cases demonstrate the effectiveness of nPUGraph.

Label error is a ubiquitous problem in annotated data. Large amounts of label error substantially degrades the quality of deep learning models. Existing methods to tackle the label error problem largely focus on the classification task, and either rely on task specific architecture or require non-trivial additional computations, which is undesirable or even unattainable for industry usage. In this paper, we propose LEDO: a model-agnostic and computationally efficient framework for Label Error Detection and Overwrite. LEDO is based on Monte Carlo Dropout combined with uncertainty metrics, and can be easily generalized to multiple tasks and data sets. Applying LEDO to an industry opinion-based question answering system demonstrates it is effective at improving accuracy in all the core models. Specifically, LEDO brings 1.1% MRR gain for the retrieval model, 1.5% PR AUC improvement for the machine reading comprehension model, and 0.9% rise in the Average Precision for the ranker, on top of the strong baselines with a large-scale social media dataset. Importantly, LEDO is computationally efficient compared to methods that require loss function change, and cost-effective as the resulting data can be used in the same continuous training pipeline for production. Further analysis shows that these gains come from an improved decision boundary after cleaning the label errors existed in the training data.