Accurate segmentation of coronary arteries is a pivotal process in assessing cardiovascular diseases. However, the intricate structure of the cardiovascular system presents significant challenges for automatic segmentation, especially when utilizing methodologies like the SYNTAX Score, which relies extensively on detailed structural information for precise risk stratification. To address these difficulties and cater to this need, we present MPSeg, an innovative multi-phase strategy designed for coronary artery segmentation. Our approach specifically accommodates these structural complexities and adheres to the principles of the SYNTAX Score. Initially, our method segregates vessels into two categories based on their unique morphological characteristics: Left Coronary Artery (LCA) and Right Coronary Artery (RCA). Specialized ensemble models are then deployed for each category to execute the challenging segmentation task. Due to LCA's higher complexity over RCA, a refinement model is utilized to scrutinize and correct initial class predictions on segmented areas. Notably, our approach demonstrated exceptional effectiveness when evaluated in the Automatic Region-based Coronary Artery Disease diagnostics using x-ray angiography imagEs (ARCADE) Segmentation Detection Algorithm challenge at MICCAI 2023.

The performance of state-of-the-art machine learning models often deteriorates when testing on demographics that are under-represented in the training dataset. This problem has predominately been studied in a supervised learning setting where the data distribution is static. However, real-world applications often involve distribution shifts caused by the deployed models. For instance, the performance disparity against monitory users can lead to a high customer churn rate, thus the available data provided by active users are skewed due to the lack of minority users. This feedback effect further exacerbates the disparity among different demographic groups in future steps. To address this issue, we propose asymptotically fair participation as a condition to maintain long-term model performance over all demographic groups. In this work, we aim to address the problem of achieving asymptotically fair participation via optimal control formulation. Moreover, we design a surrogate retention system based on existing literature on evolutionary population dynamics to approximate the dynamics of distribution shifts on active user counts, from which the objective of achieving asymptotically fair participation is formulated as an optimal control problem, and the control variables are considered as the model parameters. We apply an efficient implementation of Pontryagin's maximum principle to estimate the optimal control solution. To evaluate the effectiveness of the proposed method, we design a generic simulation environment that simulates the population dynamics of the feedback effect between user retention and model performance. When we deploy the resulting models to the simulation environment, the optimal control solution accounts for long-term planning and leads to superior performance compared with existing baseline methods.

In the realm of scientific exploration and technological advancement, the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) has catalyzed breakthroughs across various scientific and technological domains. One such domain that has witnessed significant transformation is materials science, where AI-driven approaches is believed to have the potential to revolutionize the search for novel materials with desired properties: towards this aim, data quality remains key in determining reliability of AI-models. Clearly, the quality of data is a multifaceted issue, as it is linked to disparate aspects in data generation including the accuracy by which materials properties are either measured or computed by simulations, the state of knowledge and/or ability to control operating parameters during experiments, the different adopted protocols and metrological approaches etc. In this work, we focus on a few special aspects of data quality that - to the best of our knowledge - have been poorly discussed in the literature, despite their possible detrimental impact on the ability of AI-based models to serve as platforms for material discovery. One of these aspects pertains to data bias, and while it has been previously mentioned in other works [1, 2], we believe that we still lack quantitative detection and assessment tools. We therefore present here a potential quantitative approach to assess it. Other overlooked aspects, namely possible hidden variables and disparate data age, are also discussed.

Amidst growing concerns of large language models (LLMs) being misused for generating misinformation or completing homework assignments, watermarking has emerged as an effective solution for distinguishing human-written and LLM-generated text. A prominent watermarking strategy is to embed a signal into generated text by upsampling a (pseudorandomly-chosen) subset of tokens at every generation step. Although this signal is imperceptible to a human reader, it is detectable through statistical testing. However, implanting such signals alters the model's output distribution and can have unintended effects when watermarked LLMs are used for downstream applications. In this work, we evaluate the performance of watermarked LLMs on a diverse suite of tasks, including text classification, textual entailment, reasoning, question answering, translation, summarization, and language modeling. We find that watermarking has negligible impact on the performance of tasks posed as k-class classification problems in the average case. However, the accuracy can plummet to that of a random classifier for some scenarios (that occur with non-negligible probability). Tasks that are cast as multiple-choice questions and short-form generation are surprisingly unaffected by watermarking. For long-form generation tasks, including summarization and translation, we see a drop of 15-20% in the performance due to watermarking. Our findings highlight the trade-offs that users should be cognizant of when using watermarked models, and point to cases where future research could improve existing trade-offs.

Ensuring a neural network is not relying on protected attributes (e.g., race, sex, age) for prediction is crucial in advancing fair and trustworthy AI. While several promising methods for removing attribute bias in neural networks have been proposed, their limitations remain under-explored. To that end, in this work, we mathematically and empirically reveal the limitation of existing attribute bias removal methods in presence of strong bias and propose a new method that can mitigate this limitation. Specifically, we first derive a general non-vacuous information-theoretical upper bound on the performance of any attribute bias removal method in terms of the bias strength, revealing that they are effective only when the inherent bias in the dataset is relatively weak. Next, we derive a necessary condition for the existence of any method that can remove attribute bias regardless of the bias strength. Inspired by this condition, we then propose a new method using an adversarial objective that directly filters out protected attributes in the input space while maximally preserving all other attributes, without requiring any specific target label. The proposed method achieves state-of-the-art performance in both strong and moderate bias settings. We provide extensive experiments on synthetic, image, and census datasets, to verify the derived theoretical bound and its consequences in practice, and evaluate the effectiveness of the proposed method in removing strong attribute bias.

With a long history of traditional Graph Anomaly Detection (GAD) algorithms and recently popular Graph Neural Networks (GNNs), it is still not clear (1) how they perform under a standard comprehensive setting, (2) whether GNNs can outperform traditional algorithms such as tree ensembles, and (3) how about their efficiency on large-scale graphs. In response, we introduce GADBench -- a benchmark tool dedicated to supervised anomalous node detection in static graphs. GADBench facilitates a detailed comparison across 29 distinct models on ten real-world GAD datasets, encompassing thousands to millions ($\sim$6M) nodes. Our main finding is that tree ensembles with simple neighborhood aggregation can outperform the latest GNNs tailored for the GAD task. We shed light on the current progress of GAD, setting a robust groundwork for subsequent investigations in this domain. GADBench is open-sourced at https://github.com/squareRoot3/GADBench.

With the remarkable generation performance of large language models, ethical and legal concerns about using them have been raised, such as plagiarism and copyright issues. For such concerns, several approaches to watermark and detect LLM-generated text have been proposed very recently. However, we discover that the previous methods fail to function appropriately with code generation tasks because of the syntactic and semantic characteristics of code. Based on \citet{Kirchenbauer2023watermark}, we propose a new watermarking method, Selective WatErmarking via Entropy Thresholding (SWEET), that promotes "green" tokens only at the position with high entropy of the token distribution during generation, thereby preserving the correctness of the generated code. The watermarked code is detected by the statistical test and Z-score based on the entropy information. Our experiments on HumanEval and MBPP show that SWEET significantly improves the Pareto Frontier between the code correctness and watermark detection performance. We also show that notable post-hoc detection methods (e.g. DetectGPT) fail to work well in this task. Finally, we show that setting a reasonable entropy threshold is not much of a challenge. Code is available at https://github.com/hongcheki/sweet-watermark.

Sepsis is a syndrome that develops in the body in response to the presence of an infection. Characterized by severe organ dysfunction, sepsis is one of the leading causes of mortality in Intensive Care Units (ICUs) worldwide. These complications can be reduced through early application of antibiotics. Hence, the ability to anticipate the onset of sepsis early is crucial to the survival and well-being of patients. Current machine learning algorithms deployed inside medical infrastructures have demonstrated poor performance and are insufficient for anticipating sepsis onset early. Recently, deep learning methodologies have been proposed to predict sepsis, but some fail to capture the time of onset (e.g., classifying patients' entire visits as developing sepsis or not) and others are unrealistic for deployment in clinical settings (e.g., creating training instances using a fixed time to onset, where the time of onset needs to be known apriori). In this paper, we first propose a novel but realistic prediction framework that predicts each morning whether sepsis onset will occur within the next 24 hours using the most recent data collected the previous night, when patient-provider ratios are higher due to cross-coverage resulting in limited observation to each patient. However, as we increase the prediction rate into daily, the number of negative instances will increase, while that of positive instances remain the same. This causes a severe class imbalance problem making it hard to capture these rare sepsis cases. To address this, we propose a nightly profile representation learning (NPRL) approach. We prove that NPRL can theoretically alleviate the rare event problem and our empirical study using data from a level-1 trauma center demonstrates the effectiveness of our proposal.

This paper introduces a novel approach for identifying the possible large language models (LLMs) involved in text generation. Instead of adding an additional classification layer to a base LM, we reframe the classification task as a next-token prediction task and directly fine-tune the base LM to perform it. We utilize the Text-to-Text Transfer Transformer (T5) model as the backbone for our experiments. We compared our approach to the more direct approach of utilizing hidden states for classification. Evaluation shows the exceptional performance of our method in the text classification task, highlighting its simplicity and efficiency. Furthermore, interpretability studies on the features extracted by our model reveal its ability to differentiate distinctive writing styles among various LLMs even in the absence of an explicit classifier. We also collected a dataset named OpenLLMText, containing approximately 340k text samples from human and LLMs, including GPT3.5, PaLM, LLaMA, and GPT2.

Uncertainty Quantification (UQ) has gained traction in an attempt to fix the black-box nature of Deep Learning. Specifically (medical) biosignals such as electroencephalography (EEG), electrocardiography (ECG), electroocculography (EOG) and electromyography (EMG) could benefit from good UQ, since these suffer from a poor signal to noise ratio, and good human interpretability is pivotal for medical applications and Brain Computer Interfaces. In this paper, we review the state of the art at the intersection of Uncertainty Quantification and Biosignal with Machine Learning. We present various methods, shortcomings, uncertainty measures and theoretical frameworks that currently exist in this application domain. Overall it can be concluded that promising UQ methods are available, but that research is needed on how people and systems may interact with an uncertainty model in a (clinical) environment.