Due to the availability of only a few labeled instances for the novel target prediction task and the significant domain shift between the well annotated source domain and the target domain, cross-domain few-shot learning (CDFSL) induces a very challenging adaptation problem. In this paper, we propose a simple Adaptive Weighted Co-Learning (AWCoL) method to address the CDFSL challenge by adapting two independently trained source prototypical classification models to the target task in a weighted co-learning manner. The proposed method deploys a weighted moving average prediction strategy to generate probabilistic predictions from each model, and then conducts adaptive co-learning by jointly fine-tuning the two models in an alternating manner based on the pseudo-labels and instance weights produced from the predictions. Moreover, a negative pseudo-labeling regularizer is further deployed to improve the fine-tuning process by penalizing false predictions. Comprehensive experiments are conducted on multiple benchmark datasets and the empirical results demonstrate that the proposed method produces state-of-the-art CDFSL performance.

Extractive question answering (QA) systems can enable physicians and researchers to query medical records, a foundational capability for designing clinical studies and understanding patient medical history. However, building these systems typically requires expert-annotated QA pairs. Large language models (LLMs), which can perform extractive QA, depend on high quality data in their prompts, specialized for the application domain. We introduce a novel approach, XAIQA, for generating synthetic QA pairs at scale from data naturally available in electronic health records. Our method uses the idea of a classification model explainer to generate questions and answers about medical concepts corresponding to medical codes. In an expert evaluation with two physicians, our method identifies $2.2\times$ more semantic matches and $3.8\times$ more clinical abbreviations than two popular approaches that use sentence transformers to create QA pairs. In an ML evaluation, adding our QA pairs improves performance of GPT-4 as an extractive QA model, including on difficult questions. In both the expert and ML evaluations, we examine trade-offs between our method and sentence transformers for QA pair generation depending on question difficulty.

In testing industry, precise item categorization is pivotal to align exam questions with the designated content domains outlined in the assessment blueprint. Traditional methods either entail manual classification, which is laborious and error-prone, or utilize machine learning requiring extensive training data, often leading to model underfit or overfit issues. This study unveils a novel approach employing the zero-shot and few-shot Generative Pretrained Transformer (GPT) classifier for hierarchical item categorization, minimizing the necessity for training data, and instead, leveraging human-like language descriptions to define categories. Through a structured python dictionary, the hierarchical nature of examination blueprints is navigated seamlessly, allowing for a tiered classification of items across multiple levels. An initial simulation with artificial data demonstrates the efficacy of this method, achieving an average accuracy of 92.91% measured by the F1 score. This method was further applied to real exam items from the 2022 In-Training Examination (ITE) conducted by the American Board of Family Medicine (ABFM), reclassifying 200 items according to a newly formulated blueprint swiftly in 15 minutes, a task that traditionally could span several days among editors and physicians. This innovative approach not only drastically cuts down classification time but also ensures a consistent, principle-driven categorization, minimizing human biases and discrepancies. The ability to refine classifications by adjusting definitions adds to its robustness and sustainability.

This paper presents a novel benchmarking framework Dyport for evaluating biomedical hypothesis generation systems. Utilizing curated datasets, our approach tests these systems under realistic conditions, enhancing the relevance of our evaluations. We integrate knowledge from the curated databases into a dynamic graph, accompanied by a method to quantify discovery importance. This not only assesses hypothesis accuracy but also their potential impact in biomedical research which significantly extends traditional link prediction benchmarks. Applicability of our benchmarking process is demonstrated on several link prediction systems applied on biomedical semantic knowledge graphs. Being flexible, our benchmarking system is designed for broad application in hypothesis generation quality verification, aiming to expand the scope of scientific discovery within the biomedical research community. Availability and implementation: Dyport framework is fully open-source. All code and datasets are available at: https://github.com/IlyaTyagin/Dyport

Alzheimer's disease has an increasing prevalence in the population world-wide, yet current diagnostic methods based on recommended biomarkers are only available in specialized clinics. Due to these circumstances, Alzheimer's disease is usually diagnosed late, which contrasts with the currently available treatment options that are only effective for patients at an early stage. Blood-based biomarkers could fill in the gap of easily accessible and low-cost methods for early diagnosis of the disease. In particular, immune-based blood-biomarkers might be a promising option, given the recently discovered cross-talk of immune cells of the central nervous system with those in the peripheral immune system. With the help of machine learning algorithms and mechanistic modeling approaches, such as agent-based modeling, an in-depth analysis of the simulation of cell dynamics is possible as well as of high-dimensional omics resources indicative of pathway signaling changes. Here, we give a background on advances in research on brain-immune system cross-talk in Alzheimer's disease and review recent machine learning and mechanistic modeling approaches which leverage modern omics technologies for blood-based immune system-related biomarker discovery.

Recent advances in the development of vision-language models (VLMs) are yielding remarkable success in recognizing visual semantic content, including impressive instances of compositional image understanding. Here, we introduce the novel task of Visual Data-Type Identification, a basic perceptual skill with implications for data curation (e.g., noisy data-removal from large datasets, domain-specific retrieval) and autonomous vision (e.g., distinguishing changing weather conditions from camera lens staining). We develop two datasets consisting of animal images altered across a diverse set of 27 visual data-types, spanning four broad categories. An extensive zero-shot evaluation of 39 VLMs, ranging from 100M to 80B parameters, shows a nuanced performance landscape. While VLMs are reasonably good at identifying certain stylistic \textit{data-types}, such as cartoons and sketches, they struggle with simpler data-types arising from basic manipulations like image rotations or additive noise. Our findings reveal that (i) model scaling alone yields marginal gains for contrastively-trained models like CLIP, and (ii) there is a pronounced drop in performance for the largest auto-regressively trained VLMs like OpenFlamingo. This finding points to a blind spot in current frontier VLMs: they excel in recognizing semantic content but fail to acquire an understanding of visual data-types through scaling. By analyzing the pre-training distributions of these models and incorporating data-type information into the captions during fine-tuning, we achieve a significant enhancement in performance. By exploring this previously uncharted task, we aim to set the stage for further advancing VLMs to equip them with visual data-type understanding. Code and datasets are released at https://github.com/bethgelab/DataTypeIdentification.

Social media networks have become a significant aspect of people's lives, serving as a platform for their ideas, opinions and emotions. Consequently, automated sentiment analysis (SA) is critical for recognising people's feelings in ways that other information sources cannot. The analysis of these feelings revealed various applications, including brand evaluations, YouTube film reviews and healthcare applications. As social media continues to develop, people post a massive amount of information in different forms, including text, photos, audio and video. Thus, traditional SA algorithms have become limited, as they do not consider the expressiveness of other modalities. By including such characteristics from various material sources, these multimodal data streams provide new opportunities for optimising the expected results beyond text-based SA. Our study focuses on the forefront field of multimodal SA, which examines visual and textual data posted on social media networks. Many people are more likely to utilise this information to express themselves on these platforms. To serve as a resource for academics in this rapidly growing field, we introduce a comprehensive overview of textual and visual SA, including data pre-processing, feature extraction techniques, sentiment benchmark datasets, and the efficacy of multiple classification methodologies suited to each field. We also provide a brief introduction of the most frequently utilised data fusion strategies and a summary of existing research on visual-textual SA. Finally, we highlight the most significant challenges and investigate several important sentiment applications.

Machine learning (ML) models used in prediction and classification tasks may display performance disparities across population groups determined by sensitive attributes (e.g., race, sex, age). We consider the problem of evaluating the performance of a fixed ML model across population groups defined by multiple sensitive attributes (e.g., race and sex and age). To address this issue, we propose an approach to test for performance disparities based on Conditional Value-at-Risk (CVaR). By allowing a small probabilistic slack on the groups over which a model has approximately equal performance, we show that the sample complexity required for discovering performance violations is reduced exponentially to be at most upper bounded by the square root of the number of groups. As a byproduct of our analysis, when the groups are weighted by a specific prior distribution, we show that Rényi entropy of order 2/3 of the prior distribution captures the sample complexity of the proposed CVaR test algorithm. Finally, we also show that there exists a non-i.i.d. Machine learning (ML) algorithms are increasingly used in domains of consequence such as hiring [1], lending [2], [3], policing [4], and healthcare [5], [6].

With the growing prevalence of machine learning and artificial intelligence-based medical decision support systems, it is equally important to ensure that these systems provide patient outcomes in a fair and equitable fashion. This paper presents an innovative framework for detecting areas of algorithmic bias in medical-AI decision support systems. Our approach efficiently identifies potential biases in medical-AI models, specifically in the context of sepsis prediction, by employing the Classification and Regression Trees (CART) algorithm. We verify our methodology by conducting a series of synthetic data experiments, showcasing its ability to estimate areas of bias in controlled settings precisely. The effectiveness of the concept is further validated by experiments using electronic medical records from Grady Memorial Hospital in Atlanta, Georgia. These tests demonstrate the practical implementation of our strategy in a clinical environment, where it can function as a vital instrument for guaranteeing fairness and equity in AI-based medical decisions.

We propose a novel model-centric evaluation framework, OmniInput, to evaluate the quality of an AI/ML model's predictions on all possible inputs (including human-unrecognizable ones), which is crucial for AI safety and reliability. Unlike traditional data-centric evaluation based on pre-defined test sets, the test set in OmniInput is self-constructed by the model itself and the model quality is evaluated by investigating its output distribution. We employ an efficient sampler to obtain representative inputs and the output distribution of the trained model, which, after selective annotation, can be used to estimate the model's precision and recall at different output values and a comprehensive precision-recall curve. Our experiments demonstrate that OmniInput enables a more fine-grained comparison between models, especially when their performance is almost the same on pre-defined datasets, leading to new findings and insights for how to train more robust, generalizable models.