Challenges can be seen as a type of game that motivates participants to solve serious tasks. As a result, competition organizers must develop effective game rules. However, these rules have multiple objectives beyond making the game enjoyable for participants. These objectives may include solving real-world problems, advancing scientific or technical areas, making scientific discoveries, and educating the public. In many ways, creating a challenge is similar to launching a product. It requires the same level of excitement and rigorous testing, and the goal is to attract ''customers'' in the form of participants. The process begins with a solid plan, such as a competition proposal that will eventually be submitted to an international conference and subjected to peer review. Although peer review does not guarantee quality, it does force organizers to consider the impact of their challenge, identify potential oversights, and generally improve its quality. This chapter provides guidelines for creating a strong plan for a challenge. The material draws on the preparation guidelines from organizations such as Kaggle 1 , ChaLearn 2 and Tailor 3 , as well as the NeurIPS proposal template, which some of the authors contributed to.

This study aimed to analyze brain activity during various STEM activities, exploring the feasibility of classifying between different tasks. EEG brain data from twenty subjects engaged in five cognitive tasks were collected and segmented into 4-second clips. Power spectral densities of brain frequency waves were then analyzed. Testing different k-intervals with XGBoost, Random Forest, and Bagging Classifier revealed that Random Forest performed best, achieving a testing accuracy of 91.07% at an interval size of two. When utilizing all four EEG channels, cognitive flexibility was most recognizable. Task-specific classification accuracy showed the right frontal lobe excelled in mathematical processing and planning, the left frontal lobe in cognitive flexibility and mental flexibility, and the left temporoparietal lobe in connections. Notably, numerous connections between frontal and temporoparietal lobes were observed during STEM activities. This study contributes to a deeper understanding of implementing machine learning in analyzing brain activity and sheds light on the brain's mechanisms.

With the growing application of AI-based systems in our lives and society, there is a rising need to ensure that AI-based systems are developed and used in a responsible way. Fairness is one of the socio-technical concerns that must be addressed in AI-based systems for this purpose. Unfair AI-based systems, particularly, unfair AI-based mobile apps, can pose difficulties for a significant proportion of the global populace. This paper aims to deeply analyze fairness concerns in AI-based app reviews. We first manually constructed a ground-truth dataset including a statistical sample of fairness and non-fairness reviews. Leveraging the ground-truth dataset, we then developed and evaluated a set of machine learning and deep learning classifiers that distinguish fairness reviews from non-fairness reviews. Our experiments show that our best-performing classifier can detect fairness reviews with a precision of 94%. We then applied the best-performing classifier on approximately 9.5M reviews collected from 108 AI-based apps and identified around 92K fairness reviews. While the fairness reviews appear in 23 app categories, we found that the 'communication' and 'social' app categories have the highest percentage of fairness reviews. Next, applying the K-means clustering technique to the 92K fairness reviews, followed by manual analysis, led to the identification of six distinct types of fairness concerns (e.g., 'receiving different quality of features and services in different platforms and devices' and 'lack of transparency and fairness in dealing with user-generated content'). Finally, the manual analysis of 2,248 app owners' responses to the fairness reviews identified six root causes (e.g., 'copyright issues', 'external factors', 'development cost') that app owners report to justify fairness concerns.

In medical image diagnosis, fairness has become increasingly crucial. Without bias mitigation, deploying unfair AI would harm the interests of the underprivileged population and potentially tear society apart. Recent research addresses prediction biases in deep learning models concerning demographic groups (e.g., gender, age, and race) by utilizing demographic (sensitive attribute) information during training. However, many sensitive attributes naturally exist in dermatological disease images. If the trained model only targets fairness for a specific attribute, it remains unfair for other attributes. Moreover, training a model that can accommodate multiple sensitive attributes is impractical due to privacy concerns. To overcome this, we propose a method enabling fair predictions for sensitive attributes during the testing phase without using such information during training. Inspired by prior work highlighting the impact of feature entanglement on fairness, we enhance the model features by capturing the features related to the sensitive and target attributes and regularizing the feature entanglement between corresponding classes. This ensures that the model can only classify based on the features related to the target attribute without relying on features associated with sensitive attributes, thereby improving fairness and accuracy. Additionally, we use disease masks from the Segment Anything Model (SAM) to enhance the quality of the learned feature. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed method can improve fairness in classification compared to state-of-the-art methods in two dermatological disease datasets.

This study investigated the use of forearm EMG data for distinguishing eight hand gestures, employing the Neural Network and Random Forest algorithms on data from ten participants. The Neural Network achieved 97 percent accuracy with 1000-millisecond windows, while the Random Forest achieved 85 percent accuracy with 200-millisecond windows. Larger window sizes improved gesture classification due to increased temporal resolution. The Random Forest exhibited faster processing at 92 milliseconds, compared to the Neural Network's 124 milliseconds. In conclusion, the study identified a Neural Network with a 1000-millisecond stream as the most accurate (97 percent), and a Random Forest with a 200-millisecond stream as the most efficient (85 percent). Future research should focus on increasing sample size, incorporating more hand gestures, and exploring different feature extraction methods and modeling algorithms to enhance system accuracy and efficiency.

Labor shortages in the United States are impacting a number of industries including the meat processing sector. Collaborative technologies that work alongside humans while increasing production abilities may support the industry by enhancing automation and improving job quality. However, existing automation technologies used in the meat industry have limited collaboration potential, low flexibility, and high cost. The objective of this work was to explore the use of a robot arm to collaboratively work alongside a human and complete tasks performed in a meat processing facility. Toward this objective, we demonstrated proof-of-concept approaches to ensure human safety while exploring the capacity of the robot arm to perform example meat processing tasks. In support of human safety, we developed a knife instrumentation system to detect when the cutting implement comes into contact with meat within the collaborative space. To demonstrate the capability of the system to flexibly conduct a variety of basic meat processing tasks, we developed vision and control protocols to execute slicing, trimming, and cubing of pork loins. We also collected a subjective evaluation of the actions from experts within the U.S. meat processing industry. On average the experts rated the robot's performance as adequate. Moreover, the experts generally preferred the cuts performed in collaboration with a human worker to cuts completed autonomously, highlighting the benefits of robotic technologies that assist human workers rather than replace them. Video demonstrations of our proposed framework can be found here: https://youtu.be/56mdHjjYMVc

High-quality text generation capability of latest Large Language Models (LLMs) causes concerns about their misuse (e.g., in massive generation/spread of disinformation). Machine-generated text (MGT) detection is important to cope with such threats. However, it is susceptible to authorship obfuscation (AO) methods, such as paraphrasing, which can cause MGTs to evade detection. So far, this was evaluated only in monolingual settings. Thus, the susceptibility of recently proposed multilingual detectors is still unknown. We fill this gap by comprehensively benchmarking the performance of 10 well-known AO methods, attacking 37 MGT detection methods against MGTs in 11 languages (i.e., 10 $\times$ 37 $\times$ 11 = 4,070 combinations). We also evaluate the effect of data augmentation on adversarial robustness using obfuscated texts. The results indicate that all tested AO methods can cause detection evasion in all tested languages, where homoglyph attacks are especially successful.

This paper addresses a major challenge to historical research on the 19th century. Large quantities of sources have become digitally available for the first time, while extraction techniques are lagging behind. Therefore, we researched machine learning (ML) models to recognise and extract complex data structures in a high-value historical primary source, the Schematismus. It records every single person in the Habsburg civil service above a certain hierarchical level between 1702 and 1918 and documents the genesis of the central administration over two centuries. Its complex and intricate structure as well as its enormous size have so far made any more comprehensive analysis of the administrative and social structure of the later Habsburg Empire on the basis of this source impossible. We pursued two central objectives: Primarily, the improvement of the OCR quality, for which we considered an improved structure recognition to be essential; in the further course, it turned out that this also made the extraction of the data structure possible. We chose Faster R-CNN as base for the ML architecture for structure recognition. In order to obtain the required amount of training data quickly and economically, we synthesised Hof- und Staatsschematismus-style data, which we used to train our model. The model was then fine-tuned with a smaller set of manually annotated historical source data. We then used Tesseract-OCR, which was further optimised for the style of our documents, to complete the combined structure extraction and OCR process. Results show a significant decrease in the two standard parameters of OCR-performance, WER and CER (where lower values are better). Combined structure detection and fine-tuned OCR improved CER and WER values by remarkable 71.98 percent (CER) respectively 52.49 percent (WER).

Feature Selection is a crucial procedure in Data Science tasks such as Classification, since it identifies the relevant variables, making thus the classification procedures more interpretable, cheaper in terms of measurement and more effective by reducing noise and data overfit. The relevance of features in a classification procedure is linked to the fact that misclassifications costs are frequently asymmetric, since false positive and false negative cases may have very different consequences. However, off-the-shelf Feature Selection procedures seldom take into account such cost-sensitivity of errors. In this paper we propose a mathematical-optimization-based Feature Selection procedure embedded in one of the most popular classification procedures, namely, Support Vector Machines, accommodating asymmetric misclassification costs. The key idea is to replace the traditional margin maximization by minimizing the number of features selected, but imposing upper bounds on the false positive and negative rates. The problem is written as an integer linear problem plus a quadratic convex problem for Support Vector Machines with both linear and radial kernels. The reported numerical experience demonstrates the usefulness of the proposed Feature Selection procedure. Indeed, our results on benchmark data sets show that a substantial decrease of the number of features is obtained, whilst the desired trade-off between false positive and false negative rates is achieved.

This article studies how to intervene against statistical discrimination, when it is based on beliefs generated by machine learning, rather than by humans. Unlike beliefs formed by a human mind, machine learning-generated beliefs are verifiable. This allows interventions to move beyond simple, belief-free designs like affirmative action, to more sophisticated ones, that constrain decision makers in ways that depend on what they are thinking. Such mind reading interventions can perform well where affirmative action does not, even when the beliefs being conditioned on are possibly incorrect and biased.