The identification of influential observations is an important part of data analysis that can prevent erroneous conclusions drawn from biased estimators. However, in high dimensional data, this identification is challenging. Classical and recently-developed methods often perform poorly when there are multiple influential observations in the same dataset. In particular, current methods can fail when there is masking several influential observations with similar characteristics, or swamping when the influential observations are near the boundary of the space spanned by well-behaved observations. Therefore, we propose an algorithm-based, multi-step, multiple detection procedure to identify influential observations that addresses current limitations. Our three-step algorithm to identify and capture undesirable variability in the data, $\asymMIP,$ is based on two complementary statistics, inspired by asymmetric correlations, and built on expectiles. Simulations demonstrate higher detection power than competing methods. Use of the resulting asymptotic distribution leads to detection of influential observations without the need for computationally demanding procedures such as the bootstrap. The application of our method to the Autism Brain Imaging Data Exchange neuroimaging dataset resulted in a more balanced and accurate prediction of brain maturity based on cortical thickness. See our GitHub for a free R package that implements our algorithm: \texttt{asymMIP} (\url{github.com/AmBarry/hidetify}).

Compositional disorder induces myriad captivating phenomena in perovskites. Target-driven discovery of perovskite solid solutions has been a great challenge due to the analytical complexity introduced by disorder. Here, we demonstrate that an unsupervised deep learning strategy can find fingerprints of disordered materials that embed perovskite formability and underlying crystal structure information by learning only from the chemical composition, manifested in (A1-xA'x)BO3 and A(B1-xB'x)O3 formulae. This phenomenon can be capitalized to predict the crystal symmetry of experimental compositions, outperforming several supervised machine learning (ML) algorithms. The educated nature of material fingerprints has led to the conception of analogical materials discovery that facilitates inverse exploration of promising perovskites based on similarity investigation with known materials. The search space of unstudied perovskites is screened from ~600,000 feasible compounds using experimental data powered ML models and automated web mining tools at a 94% success rate. This concept further provides insights on possible phase transitions and computational modelling of complex compositions. The proposed quantitative analysis of materials analogies is expected to bridge the gap between the existing materials literature and the undiscovered terrain.

Manifold learning is used for dimensionality reduction, with the goal of finding a projection subspace to increase and decrease the inter- and intraclass variances, respectively. However, a bottleneck for subspace learning methods often arises from the high dimensionality of datasets. In this paper, a hierarchical approach is proposed to scale subspace learning methods, with the goal of improving classification in large datasets by a range of 3% to 10%. Different combinations of methods are studied. We assess the proposed method on five publicly available large datasets, for different eigen-value based subspace learning methods such as linear discriminant analysis, principal component analysis, generalized discriminant analysis, and reconstruction independent component analysis. To further examine the effect of the proposed method on various classification methods, we fed the generated result to linear discriminant analysis, quadratic linear analysis, k-nearest neighbor, and random forest classifiers. The resulting classification accuracies are compared to show the effectiveness of the hierarchical approach, reporting results of an average of 5% increase in classification accuracy.

With the growing popularity of Android devices, Android malware is seriously threatening the safety of users. Although such threats can be detected by deep learning as a service (DLaaS), deep neural networks as the weakest part of DLaaS are often deceived by the adversarial samples elaborated by attackers. In this paper, we propose a new semi-black-box attack framework called one-feature-each-iteration (OFEI) to craft Android adversarial samples. This framework modifies as few features as possible and requires less classifier information to fool the classifier. We conduct a controlled experiment to evaluate our OFEI framework by comparing it with the benchmark methods JSMF, GenAttack and pointwise attack. The experimental results show that our OFEI has a higher misclassification rate of 98.25%. Furthermore, OFEI can extend the traditional white-box attack methods in the image field, such as fast gradient sign method (FGSM) and DeepFool, to craft adversarial samples for Android. Finally, to enhance the security of DLaaS, we use two uncertainties of the Bayesian neural network to construct the combined uncertainty, which is used to detect adversarial samples and achieves a high detection rate of 99.28%.

The ever-growing size of the datasets renders well-studied learning techniques, such as Kernel Ridge Regression, inapplicable, posing a serious computational challenge. Divide-and-conquer is a common remedy, suggesting to split the dataset into disjoint partitions, obtain the local estimates and average them, it allows to scale-up an otherwise ineffective base approach. In the current study we suggest a fully data-driven approach to quantify uncertainty of the averaged estimator. Namely, we construct simultaneous element-wise confidence bands for the predictions yielded by the averaged estimator on a given deterministic prediction set. The novel approach features rigorous theoretical guaranties for a wide class of base learners with Kernel Ridge regression being a special case. As a by-product of our analysis we also obtain a sup-norm consistency result for the divide-and-conquer Kernel Ridge Regression. The simulation study supports the theoretical findings.

The presented report evaluates Contextualizing Hate Speech Classifiers with Post-hoc Explanation Kennedy et al. (2020) paper within the scope of ML Reproducibility Challenge 2020. Our work focuses on both aspects constituting the paper: the method itself and the validity of the stated results. In the following sections, we have described the paper, related works, algorithmic frameworks, our experiments and evaluations. Scope of Reproducibility For the GHC (a dataset), the most important difference between BERT WR and BERT SOC is the increase in recall. While, for Stormfront (a dataset), there are similar improvements for in-domain data and the NYT dataset. But, for verifying the claims we also have tried to run the same experiment on a new data-set.

Abusive language is a massive problem in online social platforms. Existing abusive language detection techniques are particularly ill-suited to comments containing heterogeneous abusive language patterns, i.e., both abusive and non-abusive parts. This is due in part to the lack of datasets that explicitly annotate heterogeneity in abusive language. We tackle this challenge by providing an annotated dataset of abusive language in over 11,000 comments from YouTube. We account for heterogeneity in this dataset by separately annotating both the comment as a whole and the individual sentences that comprise each comment. We then propose an algorithm that uses a supervised attention mechanism to detect and categorize abusive content using multi-task learning. We empirically demonstrate the challenges of using traditional techniques on heterogeneous content and the comparative gains in performance of the proposed approach over state-of-the-art methods.

Sometimes it seems paradoxical to call the famous bell curve "normal". Among all the assumptions made by traditional statistical theory, the normality assumption is notorious for the frequency it doesn't hold. My aim in this article is to show a way to test hypotheses when the normality assumption of traditional hypothesis tests is violated. In this scenario, we can't rely on theoretical results, so we need to depart from theory's ivory tower and double the bet on our data. To get there, first I briefly review what hypothesis testing is, focusing on an intuitive grasp of the reasoning behind it (no equations allowed!). Then I proceed to a case study motivated by a business problem where the normality assumption doesn't hold. This makes matters concrete and will direct our discussion. After the problem is explained, I will show that bootstrapping is a good way to fill the gaps left by theory without changing anything in the reasoning at the heart of hypothesis testing. In particular, I will show that bootstrapping leads to the right conclusion about the test. I conclude this article with a critical evaluation of bootstrapping and similar methods, pointing out their pros and cons. Many data scientists have trouble understanding hypothesis testing.

Existing RGB-based 2D hand pose estimation methods learn the joint locations from a single resolution, which is not suitable for different hand sizes. To tackle this problem, we propose a new deep learning-based framework that consists of two main modules. The former presents a segmentation-based approach to detect the hand skeleton and localize the hand bounding box. The second module regresses the 2D joint locations through a multi-scale heatmap regression approach that exploits the predicted hand skeleton as a constraint to guide the model. Furthermore, we construct a new dataset that is suitable for both hand detection and pose estimation. We qualitatively and quantitatively validate our method on two datasets. Results demonstrate that the proposed method outperforms state-of-the-art and can recover the pose even in cluttered images and complex poses.

Before researchers rush to reason across all available data, they should first check if the information is densest within some small region. We say this since, in 240 GitHub projects, we find that the information in that data ``clumps'' towards the earliest parts of the project. In fact, a defect prediction model learned from just the first 150 commits works as well, or better than state-of-the-art alternatives. Using just this early life cycle data, we can build models very quickly (using weeks, not months, of CPU time). Also, we can find simple models (with just two features) that generalize to hundreds of software projects. Based on this experience, we warn that prior work on generalizing software engineering defect prediction models may have needlessly complicated an inherently simple process. Further, prior work that focused on later-life cycle data now needs to be revisited since their conclusions were drawn from relatively uninformative regions. Replication note: all our data and scripts are online at https://github.com/snaraya7/early-defect-prediction-tse.