Manual segmentation of medical images (e.g., segmenting tumors in CT scans) is a high-effort task that can be accelerated with machine learning techniques. However, selecting the right segmentation approach depends on the evaluation function, particularly in medical image segmentation where we must deal with dependency between voxels. For instance, in contrast to classical systems where the predictions are either correct or incorrect, predictions in medical image segmentation may be partially correct and incorrect simultaneously. In this paper, we explore this expressiveness to extract the useful properties of these systems and formally define a novel multi-modal evaluation (MME) approach to measure the effectiveness of different segmentation methods. This approach improves the segmentation evaluation by introducing new relevant and interpretable characteristics, including detection property, boundary alignment, uniformity, total volume, and relative volume. Our proposed approach is open-source and publicly available for use. We have conducted several reproducible experiments, including the segmentation of pancreas, liver tumors, and multi-organs datasets, to show the applicability of the proposed approach.

Nearly all practical neural models for classification are trained using cross-entropy loss. Yet this ubiquitous choice is supported by little theoretical or empirical evidence. Recent work (Hui & Belkin, 2020) suggests that training using the (rescaled) square loss is often superior in terms of the classification accuracy. In this paper we propose the "squentropy" loss, which is the sum of two terms: the cross-entropy loss and the average square loss over the incorrect classes. We provide an extensive set of experiments on multi-class classification problems showing that the squentropy loss outperforms both the pure cross entropy and rescaled square losses in terms of the classification accuracy. We also demonstrate that it provides significantly better model calibration than either of these alternative losses and, furthermore, has less variance with respect to the random initialization. Additionally, in contrast to the square loss, squentropy loss can typically be trained using exactly the same optimization parameters, including the learning rate, as the standard cross-entropy loss, making it a true "plug-and-play" replacement. Finally, unlike the rescaled square loss, multiclass squentropy contains no parameters that need to be adjusted.

Generalized Zero-Shot Learning (GZSL) and Open-Set Recognition (OSR) are two mainstream settings that greatly extend conventional visual object recognition. However, the limitations of their problem settings are not negligible. The novel categories in GZSL require pre-defined semantic labels, making the problem setting less realistic; the oversimplified unknown class in OSR fails to explore the innate fine-grained and mixed structures of novel categories. In light of this, we are motivated to consider a new problem setting named Zero-Knowledge Zero-Shot Learning (ZK-ZSL) that assumes no prior knowledge of novel classes and aims to classify seen and unseen samples and recover semantic attributes of the fine-grained novel categories for further interpretation. To achieve this, we propose a novel framework that recovers the clustering structures of both seen and unseen categories where the seen class structures are guided by source labels. In addition, a structural alignment loss is designed to aid the semantic learning of unseen categories with their recovered structures. Experimental results demonstrate our method's superior performance in classification and semantic recovery on four benchmark datasets.

Even though auto-encoders (AEs) have the desirable property of learning compact representations without labels and have been widely applied to out-of-distribution (OoD) detection, they are generally still poorly understood and are used incorrectly in detecting outliers where the normal and abnormal distributions are strongly overlapping. In general, the learned manifold is assumed to contain key information that is only important for describing samples within the training distribution, and that the reconstruction of outliers leads to high residual errors. However, recent work suggests that AEs are likely to be even better at reconstructing some types of OoD samples. In this work, we challenge this assumption and investigate what auto-encoders actually learn when they are posed to solve two different tasks. First, we propose two metrics based on the Fr\'echet inception distance (FID) and confidence scores of a trained classifier to assess whether AEs can learn the training distribution and reliably recognize samples from other domains. Second, we investigate whether AEs are able to synthesize normal images from samples with abnormal regions, on a more challenging lung pathology detection task. We have found that state-of-the-art (SOTA) AEs are either unable to constrain the latent manifold and allow reconstruction of abnormal patterns, or they are failing to accurately restore the inputs from their latent distribution, resulting in blurred or misaligned reconstructions. We propose novel deformable auto-encoders (MorphAEus) to learn perceptually aware global image priors and locally adapt their morphometry based on estimated dense deformation fields. We demonstrate superior performance over unsupervised methods in detecting OoD and pathology.

The Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence is widely used in state-of-the-art Bayesian Neural Networks (BNNs) to approximate the posterior distribution of weights. However, the KL divergence is unbounded and asymmetric, which may lead to instabilities during optimization or may yield poor generalizations. To overcome these limitations, we examine the Jensen-Shannon (JS) divergence that is bounded, symmetric, and more general. Towards this, we propose two novel loss functions for BNNs. The first loss function uses the geometric JS divergence (JS-G) that is symmetric, unbounded, and offers an analytical expression for Gaussian priors. The second loss function uses the generalized JS divergence (JS-A) that is symmetric and bounded. We show that the conventional KL divergence-based loss function is a special case of the two loss functions presented in this work. To evaluate the divergence part of the loss we use analytical expressions for JS-G and use Monte Carlo methods for JS-A. We provide algorithms to optimize the loss function using both these methods. The proposed loss functions offer additional parameters that can be tuned to control the degree of regularisation. The regularization performance of the JS divergences is analyzed to demonstrate their superiority over the state-of-the-art. Further, we derive the conditions for better regularization by the proposed JS-G divergence-based loss function than the KL divergence-based loss function. Bayesian convolutional neural networks (BCNN) based on the proposed JS divergences perform better than the state-of-the-art BCNN, which is shown for the classification of the CIFAR data set having various degrees of noise and a histopathology data set having a high bias.

Background: Huntington's disease (HD) is a rare, genetically determined brain disorder that limits the life of the patient, although early prognosis of HD can substantially improve the patient's quality of life. Current HD prognosis methods include using a variety of complex biomarkers such as clinical and imaging factors, however these methods have many shortfalls, such as their resource demand and failure to distinguish symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. Quantitative biomedical signaling has been used for diagnosis of other neurological disorders such as schizophrenia and has potential for exposing abnormalities in HD patients. Methodology: In this project, we used a premade, certified dataset collected at a clinic with 27 HD positive patients, 36 controls, and 6 unknowns with electroencephalography, electrocardiography, and functional near-infrared spectroscopy data. We first preprocessed the data and extracted a variety of features from both the transformed and raw signals, after which we applied a plethora of shallow machine learning techniques. Results: We found the highest accuracy was achieved by a scaled-out Extremely Randomized Trees algorithm, with area under the curve of the receiver operator characteristic of 0.963 and accuracy of 91.353%. The subsequent feature analysis showed that 60.865% of the features had p<0.05, with the features from the raw signal being most significant. Conclusion: The results indicate the promise of neural and cardiac signals for marking abnormalities in HD, as well as evaluating the progression of the disease in patients.

Text-to-image models, which can generate high-quality images based on textual input, have recently enabled various content-creation tools. Despite significantly affecting a wide range of downstream applications, the distributions of these generated images are still not fully understood, especially when it comes to the potential stereotypical attributes of different genders. In this work, we propose a paradigm (Gender Presentation Differences) that utilizes fine-grained self-presentation attributes to study how gender is presented differently in text-to-image models. By probing gender indicators in the input text (e.g., "a woman" or "a man"), we quantify the frequency differences of presentation-centric attributes (e.g., "a shirt" and "a dress") through human annotation and introduce a novel metric: GEP. Furthermore, we propose an automatic method to estimate such differences. The automatic GEP metric based on our approach yields a higher correlation with human annotations than that based on existing CLIP scores, consistently across three state-of-the-art text-to-image models. Finally, we demonstrate the generalization ability of our metrics in the context of gender stereotypes related to occupations.

Machine learning techniques can provide an efficient and accurate means of predicting possible drug-drug interactions and combat the growing problem of adverse drug interactions. Most existing models for predicting interactions rely on the chemical properties of drugs. While such models can be accurate, the required properties are not always available. Results: In this article we address the drug-drug interaction issue as a link prediction problem and extend a method proposed by Shtar et al [1], which uses artificial neural networks and propagation over graph nodes in order to consider specific interactions when detecting drug-drug interactions. After extracting and analyzing the possible interactions, a table which presents the interactions as a one-hot vector between each pair of drugs is created. Then, a deep neural network (DNN) is used as a predictor.

We present a new learning-based framework S-3D-RCNN that can recover accurate object orientation in SO(3) and simultaneously predict implicit shapes for outdoor rigid objects from stereo RGB images. In contrast to previous studies that map local appearance to observation angles, we explore a progressive approach by extracting meaningful Intermediate Geometrical Representations (IGRs) to estimate egocentric object orientation. This approach features a deep model that transforms perceived intensities to object part coordinates, which are mapped to a 3D representation encoding object orientation in the camera coordinate system. To enable implicit shape estimation, the IGRs are further extended to model visible object surface with a point-based representation and explicitly addresses the unseen surface hallucination problem. Extensive experiments validate the effectiveness of the proposed IGRs and S-3D-RCNN achieves superior 3D scene understanding performance using existing and proposed new metrics on the KITTI benchmark. Code and pre-trained models will be available at this https URL.

The right to be forgotten (RTBF) is motivated by the desire of people not to be perpetually disadvantaged by their past deeds. For this, data deletion needs to be deep and permanent, and should be removed from machine learning models. Researchers have proposed machine unlearning algorithms which aim to erase specific data from trained models more efficiently. However, these methods modify how data is fed into the model and how training is done, which may subsequently compromise AI ethics from the fairness perspective. To help software engineers make responsible decisions when adopting these unlearning methods, we present the first study on machine unlearning methods to reveal their fairness implications. We designed and conducted experiments on two typical machine unlearning methods (SISA and AmnesiacML) along with a retraining method (ORTR) as baseline using three fairness datasets under three different deletion strategies. Experimental results show that under non-uniform data deletion, SISA leads to better fairness compared with ORTR and AmnesiacML, while initial training and uniform data deletion do not necessarily affect the fairness of all three methods. These findings have exposed an important research problem in software engineering, and can help practitioners better understand the potential trade-offs on fairness when considering solutions for RTBF.