Is overparameterization a privacy liability? In this work, we study the effect that the number of parameters has on a classifier's vulnerability to membership inference attacks. We first demonstrate how the number of parameters of a model can induce a privacy--utility trade-off: increasing the number of parameters generally improves generalization performance at the expense of lower privacy. However, remarkably, we then show that if coupled with proper regularization, increasing the number of parameters of a model can actually simultaneously increase both its privacy and performance, thereby eliminating the privacy--utility trade-off. Theoretically, we demonstrate this curious phenomenon for logistic regression with ridge regularization in a bi-level feature ensemble setting. Pursuant to our theoretical exploration, we develop a novel leave-one-out analysis tool to precisely characterize the vulnerability of a linear classifier to the optimal membership inference attack. We empirically exhibit this "blessing of dimensionality" for neural networks on a variety of tasks using early stopping as the regularizer.

We analyze the data-dependent capacity of neural networks and assess anomalies in inputs from the perspective of networks during inference. The notion of data-dependent capacity allows for analyzing the knowledge base of a model populated by learned features from training data. We define purview as the additional capacity necessary to characterize inference samples that differ from the training data. To probe the purview of a network, we utilize gradients to measure the amount of change required for the model to characterize the given inputs more accurately. To eliminate the dependency on ground-truth labels in generating gradients, we introduce confounding labels that are formulated by combining multiple categorical labels. We demonstrate that our gradient-based approach can effectively differentiate inputs that cannot be accurately represented with learned features. We utilize our approach in applications of detecting anomalous inputs, including out-of-distribution, adversarial, and corrupted samples. Our approach requires no hyperparameter tuning or additional data processing and outperforms state-of-the-art methods by up to 2.7%, 19.8%, and 35.6% of AUROC scores, respectively.

Fairness in AI has garnered quite some attention in research, and increasingly also in society. The so-called "Impossibility Theorem" has been one of the more striking research results with both theoretical and practical consequences, as it states that satisfying a certain combination of fairness measures is impossible. To date, this negative result has not yet been complemented with a positive one: a characterization of which combinations of fairness notions are possible. This work aims to fill this gap by identifying maximal sets of commonly used fairness measures that can be simultaneously satisfied. The fairness measures used are demographic parity, equal opportunity, false positive parity, predictive parity, predictive equality, overall accuracy equality and treatment equality. We conclude that in total 12 maximal sets of these fairness measures are possible, among which seven combinations of two measures, and five combinations of three measures. Our work raises interest questions regarding the practical relevance of each of these 12 maximal fairness notions in various scenarios.

3D object detection has become indispensable in the field of autonomous driving. To date, gratifying breakthroughs have been recorded in 3D object detection research, attributed to deep learning. However, deep learning algorithms are data-driven and require large amounts of annotated point cloud data for training and evaluation. Unlike 2D image labels, annotating point cloud data is difficult due to the limitations of sparsity, irregularity, and low resolution, which requires more manual work, and the annotation efficiency is much lower than 2D image.Therefore, we propose an annotation algorithm for point cloud data, which is pre-annotation and camera-LiDAR late fusion algorithm to easily and accurately annotate. The contributions of this study are as follows. We propose (1) a pre-annotation algorithm that employs 3D object detection and auto fitting for the easy annotation of point clouds, (2) a camera-LiDAR late fusion algorithm using 2D and 3D results for easily error checking, which helps annotators easily identify missing objects, and (3) a point cloud annotation evaluation pipeline to evaluate our experiments. The experimental results show that the proposed algorithm improves the annotating speed by 6.5 times and the annotation quality in terms of the 3D Intersection over Union and precision by 8.2 points and 5.6 points, respectively; additionally, the miss rate is reduced by 31.9 points.

This study presents a machine learning (ML) pipeline for clinical data classification in the context of a 30-day readmission problem, along with a fairness audit on subgroups based on sensitive attributes. A range of ML models are used for classification and the fairness audit is conducted on the model predictions. The fairness audit uncovers disparities in equal opportunity, predictive parity, false positive rate parity, and false negative rate parity criteria on the MIMIC III dataset based on attributes such as gender, ethnicity, language, and insurance group. The results identify disparities in the model's performance across different groups and highlights the need for better fairness and bias mitigation strategies. The study suggests the need for collaborative efforts among researchers, policymakers, and practitioners to address bias and fairness in artificial intelligence (AI) systems.

Coronaviruses are membrane-enveloped, non-segmented positive-strand RNA viruses belonging to the Coronaviridae family. Various animal species, mainly mammalian and avian, are severely infected by various coronaviruses, causing serious concerns like the recent pandemic (COVID-19). Therefore, building a deeper understanding of these viruses is essential to devise prevention and mitigation mechanisms. In the Coronavirus genome, an essential structural region is the spike region, and it's responsible for attaching the virus to the host cell membrane. Therefore, the usage of only the spike protein, instead of the full genome, provides most of the essential information for performing analyses such as host classification. In this paper, we propose a novel method for predicting the host specificity of coronaviruses by analyzing spike protein sequences from different viral subgenera and species. Our method involves using the Poisson correction distance to generate a distance matrix, followed by using a radial basis function (RBF) kernel and kernel principal component analysis (PCA) to generate a low-dimensional embedding. Finally, we apply classification algorithms to the low-dimensional embedding to generate the resulting predictions of the host specificity of coronaviruses. We provide theoretical proofs for the non-negativity, symmetry, and triangle inequality properties of the Poisson correction distance metric, which are important properties in a machine-learning setting. By encoding the spike protein structure and sequences using this comprehensive approach, we aim to uncover hidden patterns in the biological sequences to make accurate predictions about host specificity. Finally, our classification results illustrate that our method can achieve higher predictive accuracy and improve performance over existing baselines.

Heart disorder has just overtaken cancer as the world's biggest cause of mortality. Several cardiac failures, heart disease mortality, and diagnostic costs can all be reduced with early identification and treatment. Medical data is collected in large quantities by the healthcare industry, but it is not well mined. The discovery of previously unknown patterns and connections in this information can help with an improved decision when it comes to forecasting heart disorder risk. In the proposed study, we constructed an ML-based diagnostic system for heart illness forecasting, using a heart disorder dataset. We used data preprocessing techniques like outlier detection and removal, checking and removing missing entries, feature normalization, cross-validation, nine classification algorithms like RF, MLP, KNN, ETC, XGB, SVC, ADB, DT, and GBM, and eight classifier measuring performance metrics like ramification accuracy, precision, F1 score, specificity, ROC, sensitivity, log-loss, and Matthews' correlation coefficient, as well as eight classification performance evaluations. Our method can easily differentiate between people who have cardiac disease and those are normal. Receiver optimistic curves and also the region under the curves were determined by every classifier. Most of the classifiers, pretreatment strategies, validation methods, and performance assessment metrics for classification models have been discussed in this study. The performance of the proposed scheme has been confirmed, utilizing all of its capabilities. In this work, the impact of clinical decision support systems was evaluated using a stacked ensemble approach that included these nine algorithms

We consider modeling a binary response variable together with a set of covariates for two groups under observational data. The grouping variable can be the confounding variable (the common cause of treatment and outcome), gender, case/control, ethnicity, etc. Given the covariates and a binary latent variable, the goal is to construct two directed acyclic graphs (DAGs), while sharing some common parameters. The set of nodes, which represent the variables, are the same for both groups but the directed edges between nodes, which represent the causal relationships between the variables, can be potentially different. For each group, we also estimate the effect size for each node. We assume that each group follows a Gaussian distribution under its DAG. Given the parent nodes, the joint distribution of DAG is conditionally independent due to the Markov property of DAGs. We introduce the concept of Gaussian DAG-probit model under two groups and hence doubly Gaussian DAG-probit model. To estimate the skeleton of the DAGs and the model parameters, we took samples from the posterior distribution of doubly Gaussian DAG-probit model via MCMC method. We validated the proposed method using a comprehensive simulation experiment and applied it on two real datasets. Furthermore, we validated the results of the real data analysis using well-known experimental studies to show the value of the proposed grouping variable in the causality domain.

The most popular methods for measuring importance of the variables in a black box prediction algorithm make use of synthetic inputs that combine predictor variables from multiple subjects. These inputs can be unlikely, physically impossible, or even logically impossible. As a result, the predictions for such cases can be based on data very unlike any the black box was trained on. We think that users cannot trust an explanation of the decision of a prediction algorithm when the explanation uses such values. Instead we advocate a method called Cohort Shapley that is grounded in economic game theory and unlike most other game theoretic methods, it uses only actually observed data to quantify variable importance. Cohort Shapley works by narrowing the cohort of subjects judged to be similar to a target subject on one or more features. We illustrate it on an algorithmic fairness problem where it is essential to attribute importance to protected variables that the model was not trained on.

Abstract--Graph mining algorithms have been playing a significant role in myriad fields over the years. However, despite their promising performance on various graph analytical tasks, most of these algorithms lack fairness considerations. As a consequence, they could lead to discrimination towards certain populations when exploited in human-centered applications. Recently, algorithmic fairness has been extensively studied in graph-based applications. In contrast to algorithmic fairness on independent and identically distributed (i.i.d.) data, fairness in graph mining has exclusive backgrounds, taxonomies, and fulfilling techniques. In this survey, we provide a comprehensive and up-to-date introduction of existing literature under the context of fair graph mining. Specifically, we propose a novel taxonomy of fairness notions on graphs, which sheds light on their connections and differences. We further present an organized summary of existing techniques that promote fairness in graph mining. Finally, we discuss current research challenges and open questions, aiming at encouraging cross-breeding ideas and further advances. Graph-structured data is pervasive in diverse real-world Compared with achieving fairness in the context of independent applications, e.g., E-commerce [102], [121], health care [37], and identically distributed (i.i.d.) data, fulfilling [53], traffic forecasting [72], [100], and drug discovery [15], fairness in graph mining can be non-trivial due to two [172]. The first challenge is to formulate proper have been proposed to gain a deeper understanding of such fairness notions as the criteria to determine the existence of data. These algorithms have shown promising performance unfairness (i.e., bias). Although a vast amount of traditional on graph analytical tasks such as node classification [59], algorithmic fairness notions have been proposed centered [86], [161] and link prediction [4], [103], [109], contributing on i.i.d. For example, the same population can be most of them lack fairness considerations. Consequently, connected with different topologies as in Figure 1a and 1b, they could yield discriminatory results towards certain populations where each node represents an individual, and the color when such algorithms are exploited in humancentered of nodes denotes their demographic subgroup membership, applications [80]. Compared with the graph topology job recommender system may unfavorably recommend in Figure 1a, the topology in Figure 1b has more intra-group fewer job opportunities to individuals of a certain edges than inter-group edges. The dominance of intra-group gender [97] or individuals in an underrepresented ethnic edges in the graph topology is a common type of bias group [150].