Grammatical Error Correction (GEC) is the task of automatically detecting and correcting errors in text. The task not only includes the correction of grammatical errors, such as missing prepositions and mismatched subject-verb agreement, but also orthographic and semantic errors, such as misspellings and word choice errors respectively. The field has seen significant progress in the last decade, motivated in part by a series of five shared tasks, which drove the development of rule-based methods, statistical classifiers, statistical machine translation, and finally neural machine translation systems which represent the current dominant state of the art. In this survey paper, we condense the field into a single article and first outline some of the linguistic challenges of the task, introduce the most popular datasets that are available to researchers (for both English and other languages), and summarise the various methods and techniques that have been developed with a particular focus on artificial error generation. We next describe the many different approaches to evaluation as well as concerns surrounding metric reliability, especially in relation to subjective human judgements, before concluding with an overview of recent progress and suggestions for future work and remaining challenges. We hope that this survey will serve as comprehensive resource for researchers who are new to the field or who want to be kept apprised of recent developments.

For patients suffering from central nervous system tumors, prognosis estimation, treatment decisions, and postoperative assessments are made from the analysis of a set of magnetic resonance (MR) scans. Currently, the lack of open tools for standardized and automatic tumor segmentation and generation of clinical reports, incorporating relevant tumor characteristics, leads to potential risks from inherent decisions' subjectivity. To tackle this problem, the proposed Raidionics open-source software has been developed, offering both a user-friendly graphical user interface and stable processing backend. The software includes preoperative segmentation models for each of the most common tumor types (i.e., glioblastomas, lower grade gliomas, meningiomas, and metastases), together with one early postoperative glioblastoma segmentation model. Preoperative segmentation performances were quite homogeneous across the four different brain tumor types, with an average Dice around 85% and patient-wise recall and precision around 95%. Postoperatively, performances were lower with an average Dice of 41%. Overall, the generation of a standardized clinical report, including the tumor segmentation and features computation, requires about ten minutes on a regular laptop. The proposed Raidionics software is the first open solution enabling an easy use of state-of-the-art segmentation models for all major tumor types, including preoperative and postsurgical standardized reports.

Losing pets can be highly distressing for pet owners, and finding a lost pet is often challenging and time-consuming. An artificial intelligence-based application can significantly improve the speed and accuracy of finding lost pets. In order to facilitate such an application, this study introduces a contrastive neural network model capable of accurately distinguishing between images of pets. The model was trained on a large dataset of dog images and evaluated through 3-fold cross-validation. Following 350 epochs of training, the model achieved a test accuracy of 90%. Furthermore, overfitting was avoided, as the test accuracy closely matched the training accuracy. Our findings suggest that contrastive neural network models hold promise as a tool for locating lost pets. This paper provides the foundation for a potential web application that allows users to upload images of their missing pets, receiving notifications when matching images are found in the application's image database. This would enable pet owners to quickly and accurately locate lost pets and reunite them with their families.

We present an alternative to reweighting techniques for modifying distributions to account for a desired change in an underlying conditional distribution, as is often needed to correct for mis-modelling in a simulated sample. We employ conditional normalizing flows to learn the full conditional probability distribution from which we sample new events for conditional values drawn from the target distribution to produce the desired, altered distribution. In contrast to common reweighting techniques, this procedure is independent of binning choice and does not rely on an estimate of the density ratio between two distributions. In several toy examples we show that normalizing flows outperform reweighting approaches to match the distribution of the target. We demonstrate that the corrected distribution closes well with the ground truth, and a statistical uncertainty on the training dataset can be ascertained with bootstrapping. In our examples, this leads to a statistical precision up to three times greater than using reweighting techniques with identical sample sizes for the source and target distributions. We also explore an application in the context of high energy particle physics.

In the realm of machine learning, the study of anomaly detection and localization within image data has gained substantial traction, particularly for practical applications such as industrial defect detection. While the majority of existing methods predominantly use Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) as their primary network architecture, we introduce a novel approach based on the Transformer backbone network. Our method employs a two-stage incremental learning strategy. During the first stage, we train a Masked Autoencoder (MAE) model solely on normal images. In the subsequent stage, we apply pixel-level data augmentation techniques to generate corrupted normal images and their corresponding pixel labels. This process allows the model to learn how to repair corrupted regions and classify the status of each pixel. Ultimately, the model generates a pixel reconstruction error matrix and a pixel anomaly probability matrix. These matrices are then combined to produce an anomaly scoring matrix that effectively detects abnormal regions. When benchmarked against several state-of-the-art CNN-based methods, our approach exhibits superior performance on the MVTec AD dataset, achieving an impressive 97.6% AUC.

With the wide-spread application of machine learning models, it has become critical to study the potential data leakage of models trained on sensitive data. Recently, various membership inference (MI) attacks are proposed to determine if a sample was part of the training set or not. The question is whether these attacks can be reliably used in practice. We show that MI models frequently misclassify neighboring nonmember samples of a member sample as members. In other words, they have a high false positive rate on the subpopulations of the exact member samples that they can identify. We then showcase a practical application of MI attacks where this issue has a real-world repercussion. Here, MI attacks are used by an external auditor (investigator) to show to a judge/jury that an auditee unlawfully used sensitive data. Due to the high false positive rate of MI attacks on member's subpopulations, auditee challenges the credibility of the auditor by revealing the performance of the MI attacks on these subpopulations. We argue that current membership inference attacks can identify memorized subpopulations, but they cannot reliably identify which exact sample in the subpopulation was used during the training.

The community of different types of microbes present in a biological niche plays a very important role in functioning of the system. The crosstalk or interactions among the different microbes contributes to the building blocks of such microbial community structures. Evidence reported in biomedical text serves as a reliable source for predicting such interactions. However, going through the vast and ever-increasing volume of biomedical literature is an intimidating and time consuming process. This necessitates development of automated methods capable of accurately extracting bacterial relations reported in biomedical literature. In this paper, we introduce a method for automated extraction of microbial interactions (specifically between bacteria) from biomedical literature along with ways of using transfer learning to improve its accuracy. We also describe a pipeline using which relations among specific bacteria groups can be mined. Additionally, we introduce the first publicly available dataset which can be used to develop bacterial interaction extraction methods.

Fairness-aware machine learning has garnered significant attention in recent years because of extensive use of machine learning in sensitive applications like judiciary systems. Various heuristics, and optimization frameworks have been proposed to enforce fairness in classification \cite{del2020review} where the later approaches either provides empirical results or provides fairness guarantee for the exact minimizer of the objective function \cite{celis2019classification}. In modern machine learning, Stochastic Gradient Descent (SGD) type algorithms are almost always used as training algorithms implying that the learned model, and consequently, its fairness properties are random. Hence, especially for crucial applications, it is imperative to construct Confidence Interval (CI) for the fairness of the learned model. In this work we provide CI for test unfairness when a group-fairness-aware, specifically, Disparate Impact (DI), and Disparate Mistreatment (DM) aware linear binary classifier is trained using online SGD-type algorithms. We show that asymptotically a Central Limit Theorem holds for the estimated model parameter of both DI and DM-aware models. We provide online multiplier bootstrap method to estimate the asymptotic covariance to construct online CI. To do so, we extend the known theoretical guarantees shown on the consistency of the online bootstrap method for unconstrained SGD to constrained optimization which could be of independent interest. We illustrate our results on synthetic and real datasets.

Detection and mitigation of critical web vulnerabilities and attacks like cross-site scripting (XSS), and cross-site request forgery (CSRF) have been a great concern in the field of web security. Such web attacks are evolving and becoming more challenging to detect. Several ideas from different perspectives have been put forth that can be used to improve the performance of detecting these web vulnerabilities and preventing the attacks from happening. Machine learning techniques have lately been used by researchers to defend against XSS and CSRF, and given the positive findings, it can be concluded that it is a promising research direction. The objective of this paper is to briefly report on the research works that have been published in this direction of applying classical and advanced machine learning to identify and prevent XSS and CSRF. The purpose of providing this survey is to address different machine learning approaches that have been implemented, understand the key takeaway of every research, discuss their positive impact and the downsides that persists, so that it can help the researchers to determine the best direction to develop new approaches for their own research and to encourage researchers to focus towards the intersection between web security and machine learning.

Zero-resource cross-lingual transfer approaches aim to apply supervised models from a source language to unlabelled target languages. In this paper we perform an in-depth study of the two main techniques employed so far for cross-lingual zero-resource sequence labelling, based either on data or model transfer. Although previous research has proposed translation and annotation projection (data-based cross-lingual transfer) as an effective technique for cross-lingual sequence labelling, in this paper we experimentally demonstrate that high capacity multilingual language models applied in a zero-shot (model-based cross-lingual transfer) setting consistently outperform data-based cross-lingual transfer approaches. A detailed analysis of our results suggests that this might be due to important differences in language use. More specifically, machine translation often generates a textual signal which is different to what the models are exposed to when using gold standard data, which affects both the fine-tuning and evaluation processes. Our results also indicate that data-based cross-lingual transfer approaches remain a competitive option when high-capacity multilingual language models are not available.