The acquisition of accurate channel state information (CSI) is of utmost importance since it provides performance improvement of wireless communication systems. However, acquiring accurate CSI, which can be done through channel estimation or channel prediction, is an intricate task due to the complexity of the time-varying and frequency selectivity of the wireless environment. To this end, we propose an efficient machine learning (ML)-based technique for channel prediction in orthogonal frequency-division multiplexing (OFDM) sub-bands. The novelty of the proposed approach lies in the training of channel fading samples used to estimate future channel behaviour in selective fading.

The burgeoning fields of machine learning (ML) and quantum machine learning (QML) have shown remarkable potential in tackling complex problems across various domains. However, their susceptibility to adversarial attacks raises concerns when deploying these systems in security sensitive applications. In this study, we present a comparative analysis of the vulnerability of ML and QML models, specifically conventional neural networks (NN) and quantum neural networks (QNN), to adversarial attacks using a malware dataset. We utilize a software supply chain attack dataset known as ClaMP and develop two distinct models for QNN and NN, employing Pennylane for quantum implementations and TensorFlow and Keras for traditional implementations. Our methodology involves crafting adversarial samples by introducing random noise to a small portion of the dataset and evaluating the impact on the models performance using accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 score metrics. Based on our observations, both ML and QML models exhibit vulnerability to adversarial attacks. While the QNNs accuracy decreases more significantly compared to the NN after the attack, it demonstrates better performance in terms of precision and recall, indicating higher resilience in detecting true positives under adversarial conditions. We also find that adversarial samples crafted for one model type can impair the performance of the other, highlighting the need for robust defense mechanisms. Our study serves as a foundation for future research focused on enhancing the security and resilience of ML and QML models, particularly QNN, given its recent advancements. A more extensive range of experiments will be conducted to better understand the performance and robustness of both models in the face of adversarial attacks.

Building a multilingual Automated Speech Recognition (ASR) system in a linguistically diverse country like India can be a challenging task due to the differences in scripts and the limited availability of speech data. This problem can be solved by exploiting the fact that many of these languages are phonetically similar. These languages can be converted into a Common Label Set (CLS) by mapping similar sounds to common labels. In this paper, new approaches are explored and compared to improve the performance of CLS based multilingual ASR model. Specific language information is infused in the ASR model by giving Language ID or using CLS to Native script converter on top of the CLS Multilingual model. These methods give a significant improvement in Word Error Rate (WER) compared to the CLS baseline. These methods are further tried on out-of-distribution data to check their robustness.

This paper focuses on supervised and unsupervised online label shift, where the class marginals $Q(y)$ varies but the class-conditionals $Q(x|y)$ remain invariant. In the unsupervised setting, our goal is to adapt a learner, trained on some offline labeled data, to changing label distributions given unlabeled online data. In the supervised setting, we must both learn a classifier and adapt to the dynamically evolving class marginals given only labeled online data. We develop novel algorithms that reduce the adaptation problem to online regression and guarantee optimal dynamic regret without any prior knowledge of the extent of drift in the label distribution. Our solution is based on bootstrapping the estimates of \emph{online regression oracles} that track the drifting proportions. Experiments across numerous simulated and real-world online label shift scenarios demonstrate the superior performance of our proposed approaches, often achieving 1-3\% improvement in accuracy while being sample and computationally efficient. Code is publicly available at https://github.com/acmi-lab/OnlineLabelShift.

Machine-readable representations of privacy policies are door openers for a broad variety of novel privacy-enhancing and, in particular, transparency-enhancing technologies (TETs). In order to generate such representations, transparency information needs to be extracted from written privacy policies. However, respective manual annotation and extraction processes are laborious and require expert knowledge. Approaches for fully automated annotation, in turn, have so far not succeeded due to overly high error rates in the specific domain of privacy policies. In the end, a lack of properly annotated privacy policies and respective machine-readable representations persists and enduringly hinders the development and establishment of novel technical approaches fostering policy perception and data subject informedness. In this work, we present a prototype system for a `Human-in-the-Loop' approach to privacy policy annotation that integrates ML-generated suggestions and ultimately human annotation decisions. We propose an ML-based suggestion system specifically tailored to the constraint of data scarcity prevalent in the domain of privacy policy annotation. On this basis, we provide meaningful predictions to users thereby streamlining the annotation process. Additionally, we also evaluate our approach through a prototypical implementation to show that our ML-based extraction approach provides superior performance over other recently used extraction models for legal documents.

After that, to answer RQ1 and to understand the Recent research has shown that natural language impact of upstream bias and its removal on the processing (NLP) models are biased and systematically fairness of the task of text classification ( 5), we discriminate between people based on factors measure upstream bias, remove it and measure its like ethnicity, gender, and others (Nangia et al., impact before and after removal on the fairness of 2020; Elsafoury et al., 2022). The literature suggests the task of text classification. After that, we investigate four main sources of bias that have an impact downstream bias and its impact on the on the fairness of NLP models: Label bias, models' fairness ( 6) to answer RQ2. We then use Representation bias, sample bias, and Overamplification different methods to remove the downstream bias bias (Shah et al., 2020; Hovy and Prabhumoye, ( 7) and investigate the impact of these debiasing 2021). In the NLP literature, these sources methods ( 7.3) on the models' fairness to answer of bias are typically categorized as Upstream bias, RQ3. Then, we analyse our results 7.4 to find out which includes representation bias, and Downstream the most effective bias removal technique to answer bias, which includes Label, Sample and RQ4 and to ensure the fairness of the task of text Overampflication bias.

Given the volume of data needed to train modern machine learning models, external suppliers are increasingly used. However, incorporating external data poses data poisoning risks, wherein attackers manipulate their data to degrade model utility or integrity. Most poisoning defenses presume access to a set of clean data (or base set). While this assumption has been taken for granted, given the fast-growing research on stealthy poisoning attacks, a question arises: can defenders really identify a clean subset within a contaminated dataset to support defenses? This paper starts by examining the impact of poisoned samples on defenses when they are mistakenly mixed into the base set. We analyze five defenses and find that their performance deteriorates dramatically with less than 1% poisoned points in the base set. These findings suggest that sifting out a base set with high precision is key to these defenses' performance. Motivated by these observations, we study how precise existing automated tools and human inspection are at identifying clean data in the presence of data poisoning. Unfortunately, neither effort achieves the precision needed. Worse yet, many of the outcomes are worse than random selection. In addition to uncovering the challenge, we propose a practical countermeasure, Meta-Sift. Our method is based on the insight that existing attacks' poisoned samples shifts from clean data distributions. Hence, training on the clean portion of a dataset and testing on the corrupted portion will result in high prediction loss. Leveraging the insight, we formulate a bilevel optimization to identify clean data and further introduce a suite of techniques to improve efficiency and precision. Our evaluation shows that Meta-Sift can sift a clean base set with 100% precision under a wide range of poisoning attacks. The selected base set is large enough to give rise to successful defenses.

This paper presents an effective and general data augmentation framework for medical image segmentation. We adopt a computationally efficient and data-efficient gradient-based meta-learning scheme to explicitly align the distribution of training and validation data which is used as a proxy for unseen test data. We improve the current data augmentation strategies with two core designs. First, we learn class-specific training-time data augmentation (TRA) effectively increasing the heterogeneity within the training subsets and tackling the class imbalance common in segmentation. Second, we jointly optimize TRA and test-time data augmentation (TEA), which are closely connected as both aim to align the training and test data distribution but were so far considered separately in previous works. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our method on four medical image segmentation tasks across different scenarios with two state-of-the-art segmentation models, DeepMedic and nnU-Net. Extensive experimentation shows that the proposed data augmentation framework can significantly and consistently improve the segmentation performance when compared to existing solutions. Code is publicly available.

Language development experts need tools that can automatically identify languages from fluent, conversational speech, and provide reliable estimates of usage rates at the level of an individual recording. However, language identification systems are typically evaluated on metrics such as equal error rate and balanced accuracy, applied at the level of an entire speech corpus. These overview metrics do not provide information about model performance at the level of individual speakers, recordings, or units of speech with different linguistic characteristics. Overview statistics may therefore mask systematic errors in model performance for some subsets of the data, and consequently, have worse performance on data derived from some subsets of human speakers, creating a kind of algorithmic bias. In the current paper, we investigate how well a number of language identification systems perform on individual recordings and speech units with different linguistic properties in the MERLIon CCS Challenge. The Challenge dataset features accented English-Mandarin code-switched child-directed speech.

We propose the Taylorformer for time series and other random processes. Its two key components are: 1) the LocalTaylor wrapper to learn how and when to use Taylor series-based approximations for predictions, and 2) the MHA-X attention block which makes predictions in a way inspired by how Gaussian Processes' mean predictions are linear smoothings of contextual data. Taylorformer outperforms the state-of-the-art on several forecasting datasets, including electricity, oil temperatures and exchange rates with at least 14% improvement in MSE on all tasks, and better likelihood on 5/6 classic Neural Process tasks such as meta-learning 1D functions. Taylorformer combines desirable features from the Neural Process (uncertainty-aware predictions and consistency) and forecasting (predictive accuracy) literature, two previously distinct bodies.