Accurately measuring discrimination is crucial to faithfully assessing fairness of trained machine learning (ML) models. Any bias in measuring discrimination leads to either amplification or underestimation of the existing disparity. Several sources of bias exist and it is assumed that bias resulting from machine learning is born equally by different groups (e.g. females vs males, whites vs blacks, etc.). If, however, bias is born differently by different groups, it may exacerbate discrimination against specific sub-populations. Sampling bias, is inconsistently used in the literature to describe bias due to the sampling procedure. In this paper, we attempt to disambiguate this term by introducing clearly defined variants of sampling bias, namely, sample size bias (SSB) and underrepresentation bias (URB). We show also how discrimination can be decomposed into variance, bias, and noise. Finally, we challenge the commonly accepted mitigation approach that discrimination can be addressed by collecting more samples of the underrepresented group.

The existing supervised relation extraction methods have achieved impressive performance in a closed-set setting, where the relations during both training and testing remain the same. In a more realistic open-set setting, unknown relations may appear in the test set. Due to the lack of supervision signals from unknown relations, a well-performing closed-set relation extractor can still confidently misclassify them into known relations. In this paper, we propose an unknown-aware training method, regularizing the model by dynamically synthesizing negative instances. To facilitate a compact decision boundary, ``difficult'' negative instances are necessary. Inspired by text adversarial attacks, we adaptively apply small but critical perturbations to original training instances and thus synthesizing negative instances that are more likely to be mistaken by the model as known relations. Experimental results show that this method achieves SOTA unknown relation detection without compromising the classification of known relations.

We introduce a novel nonlinear model, Sparse Adaptive Bottleneck Centroid-Encoder (SABCE), for determining the features that discriminate between two or more classes. The algorithm aims to extract discriminatory features in groups while reconstructing the class centroids in the ambient space and simultaneously use additional penalty terms in the bottleneck layer to decrease within-class scatter and increase the separation of different class centroids. The model has a sparsity-promoting layer (SPL) with a one-to-one connection to the input layer. Along with the primary objective, we minimize the $l_{2,1}$-norm of the sparse layer, which filters out unnecessary features from input data. During training, we update class centroids by taking the Hadamard product of the centroids and weights of the sparse layer, thus ignoring the irrelevant features from the target. Therefore the proposed method learns to reconstruct the critical components of class centroids rather than the whole centroids. The algorithm is applied to various real-world data sets, including high-dimensional biological, image, speech, and accelerometer sensor data. We compared our method to different state-of-the-art feature selection techniques, including supervised Concrete Autoencoders (SCAE), Feature Selection Networks (FsNet), Stochastic Gates (STG), and LassoNet. We empirically showed that SABCE features often produced better classification accuracy than other methods on the sequester test sets, setting new state-of-the-art results.

We propose a detector of adversarial samples that is based on the view of neural networks as discrete dynamic systems. The detector tells clean inputs from abnormal ones by comparing the discrete vector fields they follow through the layers. We also show that regularizing this vector field during training makes the network more regular on the data distribution's support, thus making the activations of clean inputs more distinguishable from those of abnormal ones. Experimentally, we compare our detector favorably to other detectors on seen and unseen attacks, and show that the regularization of the network's dynamics improves the performance of adversarial detectors that use the internal embeddings as inputs, while also improving test accuracy.

Before deploying a black-box model in high-stakes problems, it is important to evaluate the model's performance on sensitive subpopulations. For example, in a recidivism prediction task, we may wish to identify demographic groups for which our prediction model has unacceptably high false positive rates or certify that no such groups exist. In this paper, we frame this task, often referred to as "fairness auditing," in terms of multiple hypothesis testing. We show how the bootstrap can be used to simultaneously bound performance disparities over a collection of groups with statistical guarantees. Our methods can be used to flag subpopulations affected by model underperformance, and certify subpopulations for which the model performs adequately. Crucially, our audit is model-agnostic and applicable to nearly any performance metric or group fairness criterion. Our methods also accommodate extremely rich -- even infinite -- collections of subpopulations. Further, we generalize beyond subpopulations by showing how to assess performance over certain distribution shifts. We test the proposed methods on benchmark datasets in predictive inference and algorithmic fairness and find that our audits can provide interpretable and trustworthy guarantees.

We consider the problem of estimating (diagonally dominant) M-matrices as precision matrices in Gaussian graphical models. These models exhibit intriguing properties, such as the existence of the maximum likelihood estimator with merely two observations for M-matrices \citep{lauritzen2019maximum,slawski2015estimation} and even one observation for diagonally dominant M-matrices \citep{truell2021maximum}. We propose an adaptive multiple-stage estimation method that refines the estimate by solving a weighted $\ell_1$-regularized problem at each stage. Furthermore, we develop a unified framework based on the gradient projection method to solve the regularized problem, incorporating distinct projections to handle the constraints of M-matrices and diagonally dominant M-matrices. A theoretical analysis of the estimation error is provided. Our method outperforms state-of-the-art methods in precision matrix estimation and graph edge identification, as evidenced by synthetic and financial time-series data sets.

In healthcare, detecting stress and enabling individuals to monitor their mental health and wellbeing is challenging. Advancements in wearable technology now enable continuous physiological data collection. This data can provide insights into mental health and behavioural states through psychophysiological analysis. However, automated analysis is required to provide timely results due to the quantity of data collected. Machine learning has shown efficacy in providing an automated classification of physiological data for health applications in controlled laboratory environments. Ambulatory uncontrolled environments, however, provide additional challenges requiring further modelling to overcome. This work empirically assesses several approaches utilising machine learning classifiers to detect stress using physiological data recorded in an ambulatory setting with self-reported stress annotations. A subset of the training portion SMILE dataset enables the evaluation of approaches before submission. The optimal stress detection approach achieves 90.77% classification accuracy, 91.24 F1-Score, 90.42 Sensitivity and 91.08 Specificity, utilising an ExtraTrees classifier and feature imputation methods. Meanwhile, accuracy on the challenge data is much lower at 59.23% (submission #54 from BEaTS-MTU, username ZacDair). The cause of the performance disparity is explored in this work.

Isolation forest (iForest) has been emerging as arguably the most popular anomaly detector in recent years due to its general effectiveness across different benchmarks and strong scalability. Nevertheless, its linear axis-parallel isolation method often leads to (i) failure in detecting hard anomalies that are difficult to isolate in high-dimensional/non-linear-separable data space, and (ii) notorious algorithmic bias that assigns unexpectedly lower anomaly scores to artefact regions. These issues contribute to high false negative errors. Several iForest extensions are introduced, but they essentially still employ shallow, linear data partition, restricting their power in isolating true anomalies. Therefore, this paper proposes deep isolation forest. We introduce a new representation scheme that utilises casually initialised neural networks to map original data into random representation ensembles, where random axis-parallel cuts are subsequently applied to perform the data partition. This representation scheme facilitates high freedom of the partition in the original data space (equivalent to non-linear partition on subspaces of varying sizes), encouraging a unique synergy between random representations and random partition-based isolation. Extensive experiments show that our model achieves significant improvement over state-of-the-art isolation-based methods and deep detectors on tabular, graph and time series datasets; our model also inherits desired scalability from iForest.

As the use of Large Language Models (LLMs) in text generation tasks proliferates, concerns arise over their potential to compromise academic integrity. The education sector currently tussles with distinguishing student-authored homework assignments from AI-generated ones. This paper addresses the challenge by introducing HowkGPT, designed to identify homework assignments generated by AI. HowkGPT is built upon a dataset of academic assignments and accompanying metadata [17] and employs a pretrained LLM to compute perplexity scores for student-authored and ChatGPT-generated responses. These scores then assist in establishing a threshold for discerning the origin of a submitted assignment. Given the specificity and contextual nature of academic work, HowkGPT further refines its analysis by defining category-specific thresholds derived from the metadata, enhancing the precision of the detection. This study emphasizes the critical need for effective strategies to uphold academic integrity amidst the growing influence of LLMs and provides an approach to ensuring fair and accurate grading in educational institutions.

With ChatGPT under the spotlight, utilizing large language models (LLMs) for academic writing has drawn a significant amount of discussions and concerns in the community. While substantial research efforts have been stimulated for detecting LLM-Generated Content (LLM-content), most of the attempts are still in the early stage of exploration. In this paper, we present a holistic investigation of detecting LLM-generate academic writing, by providing a dataset, evidence, and algorithms, in order to inspire more community effort to address the concern of LLM academic misuse. We first present GPABenchmark, a benchmarking dataset of 600,000 samples of human-written, GPT-written, GPT-completed, and GPT-polished abstracts of research papers in CS, physics, and humanities and social sciences (HSS). We show that existing open-source and commercial GPT detectors provide unsatisfactory performance on GPABenchmark, especially for GPT-polished text. Moreover, through a user study of 150+ participants, we show that it is highly challenging for human users, including experienced faculty members and researchers, to identify GPT-generated abstracts. We then present CheckGPT, a novel LLM-content detector consisting of a general representation module and an attentive-BiLSTM classification module, which is accurate, transferable, and interpretable. Experimental results show that CheckGPT achieves an average classification accuracy of 98% to 99% for the task-specific discipline-specific detectors and the unified detectors. CheckGPT is also highly transferable that, without tuning, it achieves ~90% accuracy in new domains, such as news articles, while a model tuned with approximately 2,000 samples in the target domain achieves ~98% accuracy. Finally, we demonstrate the explainability insights obtained from CheckGPT to reveal the key behaviors of how LLM generates texts.