Interaction between humans and AI systems raises the question of how people understand AI systems. This has been addressed with explainable AI, the interpretability arising from users' domain expertise, or collaborating with AI in a stable environment. In the absence of these elements, we discuss designing Actionable AI, which allows non-experts to configure black-box agents. In this paper, we experiment with an AI-powered cartpole game and observe 22 pairs of participants to configure it via direct manipulation. Our findings suggest that, in uncertain conditions, non-experts were able to achieve good levels of performance. By influencing the behaviour of the agent, they exhibited an operational understanding of it, which proved sufficient to reach their goals. Based on this, we derive implications for designing Actionable AI systems. In conclusion, we propose Actionable AI as a way to open access to AI-based agents, giving end users the agency to influence such agents towards their own goals.

Traditional agentic workflows rely on external prompts to manage interactions with tools and the environment, which limits the autonomy of reasoning models. We position Large Agent Models (LAMs) that internalize the generation of Chain-of-Action (CoA), enabling the model to autonomously decide when and how to use external tools. Our proposed AutoCoA framework combines supervised fine-tuning (SFT) and reinforcement learning (RL), allowing the model to seamlessly switch between reasoning and action while efficiently managing environment interactions. Main components include step-level action triggering, trajectory-level CoA optimization, and an internal world model to reduce realenvironment interaction costs. Evaluations on open-domain QA tasks demonstrate that AutoCoA-trained agent models significantly outperform ReAct-based workflows in task completion, especially in tasks that require long-term reasoning and multi-step actions. Code and dataset are available at https://github.com/ OpenAI has outlined five progressive stages on the path to Artificial General Intelligence (AGI). The first stage, characterized as Chatbot, is exemplified by Large Language Models (LLMs) like GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 OpenAI (2023). The second stage, termed Reasoner, introduces Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) such as o1 OpenAI (2024) and o3. Recently, OpenAI released Operator OpenAI (2025a) and Deep Research OpenAI (2025b), signaling the arrival of the third stage: Agent. These systems reportedly combine reasoning with autonomous tool usage, enabling independent execution of multi-round workflows by interacting with the real-world environment. It is believed that the technology behind Operator and Deep Research is not merely integrating existing LLMs or LRMs with agentic workflows (e.g., ReAct Yao et al. (2022), Reflexion Shinn et al. (2023)). Instead, it represents a further upgrade in model capabilities: the new models are capable of long-term planning, tool manipulation, and environmental interaction.

Generative AI is frequently portrayed as revolutionary or even apocalyptic, prompting calls for novel regulatory approaches. This essay argues that such views are misguided. Instead, generative AI should be understood as an evolutionary step in the broader algorithmic media landscape, alongside search engines and social media. Like these platforms, generative AI centralizes information control, relies on complex algorithms to shape content, and extensively uses user data, thus perpetuating common problems: unchecked corporate power, echo chambers, and weakened traditional gatekeepers. Regulation should therefore share a consistent objective: ensuring media institutions remain trustworthy. Without trust, public discourse risks fragmenting into isolated communities dominated by comforting, tribal beliefs -- a threat intensified by generative AI's capacity to bypass gatekeepers and personalize truth. Current governance frameworks, such as the EU's AI Act and the US Executive Order 14110, emphasize reactive risk mitigation, addressing measurable threats like national security, public health, and algorithmic bias. While effective for novel technological risks, this reactive approach fails to adequately address broader issues of trust and legitimacy inherent to digital media. Proactive regulation fostering transparency, accountability, and public confidence is essential. Viewing generative AI exclusively as revolutionary risks repeating past regulatory failures that left social media and search engines insufficiently regulated. Instead, regulation must proactively shape an algorithmic media environment serving the public good, supporting quality information and robust civic discourse.

Recent advances in generative artificial intelligence (AI), including large language models (LLMs), have opened new possibilities in education and in particular on scaling up personalization. One form of personalization that generative AI powers is interactive learning via tutoring dialogues between AI-powered tutors and students. These interactions have the potential to tailor instruction to each student's needs and progress, while offering personalized feedback, all in real time, in a scalable way. Given the widespread success of human tutors for improving student outcomes [29], many recent works have developed LLM-based tutors, showing promise across various educational domains [15, 25, 30, 32, 33, 39, 42, 50]. Many LLM-based tutors are even deployed in practice, such as Khan Academy's Khanmigo [21] and Carnegie Learning's LiveHint [4]. Several preliminary studies have shown that interacting with LLMs can increase student learning [52], although some have shown that students can develop an over-reliance on LLMs which negatively impacts their learning [23]. Many prior works have focused on improving LLMs' ability to follow effective tutoring principles, adapting them for the tutoring task that they are not pre-trained for. One approach, explored in [46], analyzes the decision-making process underlying human tutor utterances, showing that integrating expert decisions enhances LLM-based tutoring. Another study, [28], examines tutor moves in interactions with an LLM-powered simulated student agent, demonstrating that move annotation data contributes to better tutoring performance.

Generative AI (GenAI) has demonstrated remarkable capabilities in code generation, and its integration into complex product modeling and simulation code generation can significantly enhance the efficiency of the system design phase in Model-Based Systems Engineering (MBSE). In this study, we introduce a generative system design methodology framework for MBSE, offering a practical approach for the intelligent generation of simulation models for system physical properties. First, we employ inference techniques, generative models, and integrated modeling and simulation languages to construct simulation models for system physical properties based on product design documents. Subsequently, we fine-tune the language model used for simulation model generation on an existing library of simulation models and additional datasets generated through generative modeling. Finally, we introduce evaluation metrics for the generated simulation models for system physical properties. Our proposed approach to simulation model generation presents the innovative concept of scalable templates for simulation models. Using these templates, GenAI generates simulation models for system physical properties through code completion. The experimental results demonstrate that, for mainstream open-source Transformer-based models, the quality of the simulation model is significantly improved using the simulation model generation method proposed in this paper.

Existing benchmarks do not test Large Multimodal Models (LMMs) on their interactive intelligence with human users, which is vital for developing generalpurpose AI assistants. We design InterFeedback, an interactive framework, which can be applied to any LMM and dataset to assess this ability autonomously. On top of this, we introduce InterFeedback-Bench that evaluates interactive intelligence using two representative datasets, MMMU-Pro and MathVerse, to test 10 different open-source LMMs. Additionally, we present InterFeedback-Human, a newly collected dataset of 120 cases designed for manually testing interactive performance in leading models such as OpenAI-o1 and Claude-3.5-Sonnet. Our evaluation results indicate that even the state-of-the-art LMM, OpenAI-o1, struggles to refine its responses based on human feedback, achieving an average score of less than 50%. Our findings point to the need for methods that can enhance LMMs' capabilities to interpret and benefit from feedback. In this paper, we are curious about the question "Can Large Multimodal Models evolve through Interactive Human Feedback?" It is central to developing general-purpose AI assistants with Large Multimodal Models (LMMs). While these models show exceptional performance on tackling multimodal tasks directly, their ability to interact with humans remains largely unknown. We argue that an LMM functioning as the general assistant should possess two capabilities: 1) exceptional problem-solving ability and 2) the ability to improve itself through feedback (e.g., human feedback, execution results).

Despite a plethora of anomaly detection models developed over the years, their ability to generalize to unseen anomalies remains an issue, particularly in critical systems. This paper aims to address this challenge by introducing Swift Hydra, a new framework for training an anomaly detection method based on generative AI and reinforcement learning (RL). Through featuring an RL policy that operates on the latent variables of a generative model, the framework synthesizes novel and diverse anomaly samples that are capable of bypassing a detection model. These generated synthetic samples are, in turn, used to augment the detection model, further improving its ability to handle challenging anomalies. Swift Hydra also incorporates Mamba models structured as a Mixture of Experts (MoE) to enable scalable adaptation of the number of Mamba experts based on data complexity, effectively capturing diverse feature distributions without increasing the model's inference time. Empirical evaluations on ADBench benchmark demonstrate that Swift Hydra outperforms other state-of-the-art anomaly detection models while maintaining a relatively short inference time. From these results, our research highlights a new and auspicious paradigm of integrating RL and generative AI for advancing anomaly detection.

This study explores the use of OpenAI's API for inductive thematic analysis, employing a stepwise strategy to enhance transparency and traceability in GenAI-generated coding. A five-phase analysis and evaluation process were followed. Using the stepwise prompt, GenAI effectively generated codes with supporting statements and references, categorized themes, and developed broader interpretations by linking them to real-world contexts. While GenAI performed at a comparable level to human coders in coding and theming, it exhibited a more generalized and conceptual approach to interpretation, whereas human coders provided more specific, theme-based interpretations. Mapping these processes onto Naeem et al.'s (2023) six-step thematic analysis framework, GenAI covered four out of the six steps, while human coders followed three steps. Although GenAI's coding, theming, and interpretation align with keywording, coding, theming, and interpretation in Naeem et al.'s framework, human coders' interpretations were more closely tied to themes rather than broader conceptualization. This study positions GenAI as a viable tool for conducting inductive thematic analysis with minimal human intervention, offering an efficient and structured approach to qualitative data analysis. Future research should explore the development of specialized prompts that align GenAI's inductive thematic analysis with established qualitative research frameworks.

This study introduces a new methodology for an Inference Index (InI), called INFerence INdex In Testing model Effectiveness methodology (INFINITE), aiming to evaluate the performance of Large Language Models (LLMs) in code generation tasks. The InI index provides a comprehensive assessment focusing on three key components: efficiency, consistency, and accuracy. This approach encapsulates time-based efficiency, response quality, and the stability of model outputs, offering a thorough understanding of LLM performance beyond traditional accuracy metrics. We applied this methodology to compare OpenAI's GPT-4o (GPT), OpenAI-o1 pro (OAI1), and OpenAI-o3 mini-high (OAI3) in generating Python code for the Long-Short-Term-Memory (LSTM) model to forecast meteorological variables such as temperature, relative humidity and wind velocity. Our findings demonstrate that GPT outperforms OAI1 and performs comparably to OAI3 regarding accuracy and workflow efficiency. The study reveals that LLM-assisted code generation can produce results similar to expert-designed models with effective prompting and refinement. GPT's performance advantage highlights the benefits of widespread use and user feedback.

In this paper, we introduce an automated approach to domain-specific metamodel construction relying on Large Language Model (LLM). The main focus is adoption in automotive domain. As outcome, a prototype was implemented as web service using Python programming language, while OpenAI's GPT-4o was used as the underlying LLM. Based on the initial experiments, this approach successfully constructs Ecore metamodel based on set of automotive requirements and visualizes it making use of PlantUML notation, so human experts can provide feedback in order to refine the result. Finally, locally deployable solution is also considered, including the limitations and additional steps required.