Goto

Collaborating Authors

 Generative AI


MechStyle: Augmenting Generative AI with Mechanical Simulation to Create Stylized and Structurally Viable 3D Models

arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence

Recent developments in Generative AI enable creators to stylize 3D models based on text prompts. These methods change the 3D model geometry, which can compromise the model's structural integrity once fabricated. We present MechStyle, a system that enables creators to stylize 3D printable models while preserving their structural integrity. MechStyle accomplishes this by augmenting the Generative AI-based stylization process with feedback from a Finite Element Analysis (FEA) simulation. As the stylization process modifies the geometry to approximate the desired style, feedback from the FEA simulation reduces modifications to regions with increased stress. We evaluate the effectiveness of FEA simulation feedback in the augmented stylization process by comparing three stylization control strategies. We also investigate the time efficiency of our approach by comparing three adaptive scheduling strategies. Finally, we demonstrate MechStyle's user interface that allows users to generate stylized and structurally viable 3D models and provide five example applications.


GraspFactory: A Large Object-Centric Grasping Dataset

arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence

Large datasets have been a major contributor to the success of AI models. The fields of Computer Vision and Natural Language Processing have seen tremendous progress due to the presence of internet-scale datasets like ImageNet [1] and Laion-5b [2]. Models such as Chat-GPT [3] and Dall-E[4] demonstrate strong generalization capabilities for tasks that were not explicitly represented in their training data, thanks to the use of diverse training datasets and large-scale transformer-based architectures. Similar efforts have been undertaken in robotics to collect large datasets, such as Open X-Embodiment [5] and DROID [6]. These datasets focus on end-to-end training of robots but there is still a need for task-specific datasets. Robot grasping is one such task, and a generalized grasping model remains elusive, in part due to the lack of geometrically diverse objects in existing datasets. In this work, we present an object-centric grasping dataset that offers greater geometric diversity compared to existing datasets. Currently, object-centric grasping datasets [7, 8, 9] and scene-based grasping datasets [10, 11, 12] are mostly geared toward domestic robotics applications. These datasets have been used to train robot grasping models such as [13, 14, 15, 16].


Can You Trust Your Copilot? A Privacy Scorecard for AI Coding Assistants

arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence

The rapid integration of AI-powered coding assistants into developer workflows has raised significant privacy and trust concerns. As developers entrust proprietary code to services like OpenAI's GPT, Google's Gemini, and GitHub Copilot, the unclear data handling practices of these tools create security and compliance risks. This paper addresses this challenge by introducing and applying a novel, expert-validated privacy scorecard. The methodology involves a detailed analysis of four document types; from legal policies to external audits; to score five leading assistants against 14 weighted criteria. A legal expert and a data protection officer refined these criteria and their weighting. The results reveal a distinct hierarchy of privacy protections, with a 20-point gap between the highest- and lowest-ranked tools. The analysis uncovers common industry weaknesses, including the pervasive use of opt-out consent for model training and a near-universal failure to filter secrets from user prompts proactively. The resulting scorecard provides actionable guidance for developers and organizations, enabling evidence-based tool selection. This work establishes a new benchmark for transparency and advocates for a shift towards more user-centric privacy standards in the AI industry.


Assessing Classical Machine Learning and Transformer-based Approaches for Detecting AI-Generated Research Text

arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence

The rapid adoption of large language models (LLMs) such as ChatGPT has blurred the line between human and AI-generated texts, raising urgent questions about academic integrity, intellectual property, and the spread of misinformation. Thus, reliable AI-text detection is needed for fair assessment to safeguard human authenticity and cultivate trust in digital communication. In this study, we investigate how well current machine learning (ML) approaches can distinguish ChatGPT-3.5-generated texts from human-written texts employing a labeled data set of 250 pairs of abstracts from a wide range of research topics. We test and compare both classical (Logistic Regression armed with classical Bag-of-Words, POS, and TF-IDF features) and transformer-based (BERT augmented with N-grams, DistilBERT, BERT with a lightweight custom classifier, and LSTM-based N-gram models) ML detection techniques. As we aim to assess each model's performance in detecting AI-generated research texts, we also aim to test whether an ensemble of these models can outperform any single detector. Results show DistilBERT achieves the overall best performance, while Logistic Regression and BERT-Custom offer solid, balanced alternatives; LSTM- and BERT-N-gram approaches lag. The max voting ensemble of the three best models fails to surpass DistilBERT itself, highlighting the primacy of a single transformer-based representation over mere model diversity. By comprehensively assessing the strengths and weaknesses of these AI-text detection approaches, this work lays a foundation for more robust transformer frameworks with larger, richer datasets to keep pace with ever-improving generative AI models.


AuthPrint: Fingerprinting Generative Models Against Malicious Model Providers

arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence

Abstract--Generative models are increasingly adopted in high-stakes domains, yet current deployments offer no mechanisms to verify whether a given output truly originates from the certified model. We address this gap by extending model fingerprinting techniques beyond the traditional collaborative setting to one where the model provider itself may act adversarially, replacing the certified model with a cheaper or lower-quality substitute. T o our knowledge, this is the first work to study fingerprinting for provenance attribution under such a threat model. Our approach introduces a trusted verifier that, during a certification phase, extracts hidden fingerprints from the authentic model's output space and trains a detector to recognize them. During verification, this detector can determine whether new outputs are consistent with the certified model, without requiring specialized hardware or model modifications. In extensive experiments, our methods achieve near-zero FPR@95%TPR on both GANs and diffusion models, and remain effective even against subtle architectural or training changes. Furthermore, the approach is robust to adaptive adversaries that actively manipulate outputs in an attempt to evade detection. Recent advances in generative AI have led to the widespread deployment of generative models across various domains, with providers of generative AI services increasingly monetizing their models by offering subscription-based access. However, this rapid adoption has raised serious concerns about the risks posed by these models, particularly in safety-critical domains, such as healthcare and defense, where erroneous model outputs can have disastrous consequences [1]. In response, policymakers are introducing legal frameworks to regulate the use of AI and, in particular, the deployment of generative models. For instance, the European Union's AI Act mandates independent, periodic audits for "high-risk" AI systems deployed in domains such as healthcare, education, employment, and critical infrastructure [2]. This requirement to pass or be certified by an audit raises a critical question: How can users verify that a given output indeed originated from the audited model?


Why Settle for One? Text-to-ImageSet Generation and Evaluation

arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence

Despite remarkable progress in Text-to-Image models, many real-world applications require generating coherent image sets with diverse consistency requirements. Existing consistent methods often focus on a specific domain with specific aspects of consistency, which significantly constrains their generalizability to broader applications. In this paper, we propose a more challenging problem, Text-to-ImageSet (T2IS) generation, which aims to generate sets of images that meet various consistency requirements based on user instructions. To systematically study this problem, we first introduce $\textbf{T2IS-Bench}$ with 596 diverse instructions across 26 subcategories, providing comprehensive coverage for T2IS generation. Building on this, we propose $\textbf{T2IS-Eval}$, an evaluation framework that transforms user instructions into multifaceted assessment criteria and employs effective evaluators to adaptively assess consistency fulfillment between criteria and generated sets. Subsequently, we propose $\textbf{AutoT2IS}$, a training-free framework that maximally leverages pretrained Diffusion Transformers' in-context capabilities to harmonize visual elements to satisfy both image-level prompt alignment and set-level visual consistency. Extensive experiments on T2IS-Bench reveal that diverse consistency challenges all existing methods, while our AutoT2IS significantly outperforms current generalized and even specialized approaches. Our method also demonstrates the ability to enable numerous underexplored real-world applications, confirming its substantial practical value. Visit our project in https://chengyou-jia.github.io/T2IS-Home.


The Unwinnable Arms Race of AI Image Detection

arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence

The rapid progress of image generative AI has blurred the boundary between synthetic and real images, fueling an arms race between generators and discriminators. This paper investigates the conditions under which discriminators are most disadvantaged in this competition. We analyze two key factors: data dimensionality and data complexity. While increased dimensionality often strengthens the discriminators ability to detect subtle inconsistencies, complexity introduces a more nuanced effect. Using Kolmogorov complexity as a measure of intrinsic dataset structure, we show that both very simple and highly complex datasets reduce the detectability of synthetic images; generators can learn simple datasets almost perfectly, whereas extreme diversity masks imperfections. In contrast, intermediate-complexity datasets create the most favorable conditions for detection, as generators fail to fully capture the distribution and their errors remain visible.


Generative AI for FFRDCs

arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence

Federally funded research and development centers (FFRDCs) face text-heavy workloads, from policy documents to scientific and engineering papers, that are slow to analyze manually. We show how large language models can accelerate summarization, classification, extraction, and sense-making with only a few input-output examples. To enable use in sensitive government contexts, we apply OnPrem$.$LLM, an open-source framework for secure and flexible application of generative AI. Case studies on defense policy documents and scientific corpora, including the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) and National Science Foundation (NSF) Awards, demonstrate how this approach enhances oversight and strategic analysis while maintaining auditability and data sovereignty.


Elon Musk's xAI accuses OpenAI of stealing trade secrets in new lawsuit

The Guardian

Suit alleges OpenAI has a'troubling pattern' of hiring former xAI workers to access secrets about the Grok chatbot Elon Musk's artificial intelligence startup xAI has accused rival OpenAI of stealing its trade secrets in a new lawsuit, the latest in Musk's legal assault on his former business partner, Sam Altman. The lawsuit, filed on Wednesday in California federal court, alleged that OpenAI was engaged in a "deeply troubling pattern" of hiring away former xAI employees to gain access to trade secrets related to its AI chatbot Grok . The company says OpenAI is pursuing unfair advantages in the race to develop AI technology. "OpenAI is targeting those individuals with knowledge of xAI's key technologies and business plans, including xAI's source code and its operational advantages in launching data centers, then inducing those employees to breach their confidentiality and other obligations to xAI through unlawful means," the lawsuit states. Musk and xAI have launched numerous lawsuits against OpenAI in recent years as part of a longstanding feud between Altman and Musk.


Meta Poaches OpenAI Scientist to Help Lead AI Lab

WIRED

Yang Song, who previously led the strategic explorations team at OpenAI, is the new'research principal' of Meta Superintelligence Labs. Mark Zuckerberg has poached a high-ranking OpenAI researcher to be the research principal of Meta Superintelligence Labs (MSL). Yang Song, who previously led the strategic explorations team at OpenAI, is now reporting to Shengjia Zhao, another OpenAI alum who has overseen the buzzy AI effort since July, according to multiple sources. He started earlier this month. The move comes after Zuckerberg went on a hiring blitz earlier this summer, bringing in at least 11 top researchers from OpenAI, Google, and Anthropic.