Fast production of large area patterns with nanometre resolution is crucial for the established semiconductor industry and for enabling industrial-scale production of next-generation quantum devices. Metastable atom lithography with binary holography masks has been suggested as a higher resolution/low-cost alternative to the current state of the art: extreme ultraviolet (EUV) lithography. However, it was recently shown that the interaction of the metastable atoms with the mask material (SiN) leads to a strong perturbation of the wavefront, not included in existing mask generation theory, which is based on classical scalar waves. This means that the inverse problem (creating a mask based on the desired pattern) cannot be solved analytically even in 1D. Here we present a machine learning approach to mask generation targeted for metastable atoms. Our algorithm uses a combination of genetic optimisation and deep learning to obtain the mask. A novel deep neural architecture is trained to produce an initial approximation of the mask. This approximation is then used to generate the initial population of the genetic optimisation algorithm that can converge to arbitrary precision. We demonstrate the generation of arbitrary 1D patterns for system dimensions within the Fraunhofer approximation limit.

Online trajectory planners enable quadrotors to safely and smoothly navigate in unknown cluttered environments. However, tuning parameters is challenging since modern planners have become too complex to mathematically model and predict their interaction with unstructured environments. This work takes humans out of the loop by proposing a planner parameter adaptation framework that formulates objectives into two complementary categories and optimizes them asynchronously. Objectives evaluated with and without trajectory execution are optimized using Bayesian Optimization (BayesOpt) and Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO), respectively. By combining two kinds of objectives, the total convergence rate of the black-box optimization is accelerated while the dimension of optimized parameters can be increased. Benchmark comparisons demonstrate its superior performance over other strategies. Tests with changing obstacle densities validate its real-time environment adaption, which is difficult for prior manual tuning. Real-world flights with different drone platforms, environments, and planners show the proposed framework's scalability and effectiveness.

Analog/mixed-signal circuit design is one of the most complex and time-consuming stages in the whole chip design process. Due to various process, voltage, and temperature (PVT) variations from chip manufacturing, analog circuits inevitably suffer from performance degradation. Although there has been plenty of work on automating analog circuit design under the typical condition, limited research has been done on exploring robust designs under real and unpredictable silicon variations. Automatic analog design against variations requires prohibitive computation and time costs. To address the challenge, we present RobustAnalog, a robust circuit design framework that involves the variation information in the optimization process. Specifically, circuit optimizations under different variations are considered as a set of tasks. Similarities among tasks are leveraged and competitions are alleviated to realize a sample-efficient multi-task training. Moreover, RobustAnalog prunes the task space according to the current performance in each iteration, leading to a further simulation cost reduction. In this way, RobustAnalog can rapidly produce a set of circuit parameters that satisfies diverse constraints (e.g. gain, bandwidth, noise...) across variations. We compare RobustAnalog with Bayesian optimization, Evolutionary algorithm, and Deep Deterministic Policy Gradient (DDPG) and demonstrate that RobustAnalog can significantly reduce required optimization time by 14-30 times. Therefore, our study provides a feasible method to handle various real silicon conditions.

Have you ever heard the term, "Coding your way out of a paper bag"? In this book, you'll do exactly that. In each chapter, you'll examine different machine learning techniques that you can use to programmatically get particles, ants, bees, and even turtles out of a paper bag. While the metaphor itself may be silly, it's a great way to demonstrate how algorithms find solutions over time. If you're a beginner-to-intermediate programmer keen to understand machine learning, this book is for you.

How does Elixir fit in? Before you start reading this book, you're likely wondering two things: Elixir is certainly not a popular choice for genetic algorithm design; however, that doesn't mean it's not a good choice. First, the significant increases in available computing power over the last decade have meant the need for incredibly efficient code has diminished. That's not to say you shouldn't pay attention to efficiency and writing efficient code; however, the need to optimize code for low-power hardware has significantly decreased. Second, as you'll see in Chapter 11, Optimizing Your Algorithms, parallelism in Elixir is a straightforward task. The BEAM is especially optimized for running numerous processes at once, so writing and running parallel code is easy.

NeuroEvolution automates the generation of Artificial Neural Networks through the application of techniques from Evolutionary Computation. The main goal of these approaches is to build models that maximize predictive performance, sometimes with an additional objective of minimizing computational complexity. Although the evolved models achieve competitive results performance-wise, their robustness to adversarial examples, which becomes a concern in security-critical scenarios, has received limited attention. In this paper, we evaluate the adversarial robustness of models found by two prominent NeuroEvolution approaches on the CIFAR-10 image classification task: DENSER and NSGA-Net. Since the models are publicly available, we consider white-box untargeted attacks, where the perturbations are bounded by either the L2 or the Linfinity-norm. Similarly to manually-designed networks, our results show that when the evolved models are attacked with iterative methods, their accuracy usually drops to, or close to, zero under both distance metrics. The DENSER model is an exception to this trend, showing some resistance under the L2 threat model, where its accuracy only drops from 93.70% to 18.10% even with iterative attacks. Additionally, we analyzed the impact of pre-processing applied to the data before the first layer of the network. Our observations suggest that some of these techniques can exacerbate the perturbations added to the original inputs, potentially harming robustness. Thus, this choice should not be neglected when automatically designing networks for applications where adversarial attacks are prone to occur.

This primer is an attempt to provide a detailed summary of the different facets of lifelong learning. We start with Chapter 2 which provides a high-level overview of lifelong learning systems. In this chapter, we discuss prominent scenarios in lifelong learning (Section 2.4), provide 8 Introduction a high-level organization of different lifelong learning approaches (Section 2.5), enumerate the desiderata for an ideal lifelong learning system (Section 2.6), discuss how lifelong learning is related to other learning paradigms (Section 2.7), describe common metrics used to evaluate lifelong learning systems (Section 2.8). This chapter is more useful for readers who are new to lifelong learning and want to get introduced to the field without focusing on specific approaches or benchmarks. The remaining chapters focus on specific aspects (either learning algorithms or benchmarks) and are more useful for readers who are looking for specific approaches or benchmarks. Chapter 3 focuses on regularization-based approaches that do not assume access to any data from previous tasks. Chapter 4 discusses memory-based approaches that typically use a replay buffer or an episodic memory to save subset of data across different tasks. Chapter 5 focuses on different architecture families (and their instantiations) that have been proposed for training lifelong learning systems. Following these different classes of learning algorithms, we discuss the commonly used evaluation benchmarks and metrics for lifelong learning (Chapter 6) and wrap up with a discussion of future challenges and important research directions in Chapter 7.

We present a comprehensive global sensitivity analysis of two single-objective and two multi-objective state-of-the-art global optimization evolutionary algorithms as an algorithm configuration problem. That is, we investigate the quality of influence hyperparameters have on the performance of algorithms in terms of their direct effect and interaction effect with other hyperparameters. Using three sensitivity analysis methods, Morris LHS, Morris, and Sobol, to systematically analyze tunable hyperparameters of covariance matrix adaptation evolutionary strategy, differential evolution, non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm III, and multi-objective evolutionary algorithm based on decomposition, the framework reveals the behaviors of hyperparameters to sampling methods and performance metrics. That is, it answers questions like what hyperparameters influence patterns, how they interact, how much they interact, and how much their direct influence is. Consequently, the ranking of hyperparameters suggests their order of tuning, and the pattern of influence reveals the stability of the algorithms.

Symbolic regression (SR) is the task of learning a model of data in the form of a mathematical expression. By their nature, SR models have the potential to be accurate and human-interpretable at the same time. Unfortunately, finding such models, i.e., performing SR, appears to be a computationally intensive task. Historically, SR has been tackled with heuristics such as greedy or genetic algorithms and, while some works have hinted at the possible hardness of SR, no proof has yet been given that SR is, in fact, NP-hard. This begs the question: Is there an exact polynomial-time algorithm to compute SR models? We provide evidence suggesting that the answer is probably negative by showing that SR is NP-hard.

PyGAD is an open-source Python library for building the genetic algorithm and optimizing machine learning algorithms. It works with Keras and PyTorch. PyGAD supports different types of crossover, mutation, and parent selection operators. PyGAD allows different types of problems to be optimized using the genetic algorithm by customizing the fitness function. Besides building the genetic algorithm, it builds and optimizes machine learning algorithms.