The training of generative adversarial networks (GANs) is usually vulnerable to mode collapse and vanishing gradients. The evolutionary generative adversarial network (E-GAN) attempts to alleviate these issues by optimizing the learning strategy with multiple loss functions. It uses a learning-based evolutionary framework, which develops new mutation operators specifically for general deep neural networks. However, the evaluation mechanism in the fitness function of E-GAN cannot truly reflect the adaptability of individuals to their environment, leading to an inaccurate assessment of the diversity of individuals. Moreover, the evolution step of E-GAN only contains mutation operators without considering the crossover operator jointly, isolating the superior characteristics among individuals. To address these issues, we propose an improved E-GAN framework called IE-GAN, which introduces a new fitness function and a generic crossover operator. In particular, the proposed fitness function, from an objective perspective, can model the evolutionary process of individuals more accurately. The crossover operator, which has been commonly adopted in evolutionary algorithms, can enable offspring to imitate the superior gene expression of their parents through knowledge distillation. Experiments on various datasets demonstrate the effectiveness of our proposed IE-GAN in terms of the quality of the generated samples and time efficiency.

Influence maximization is a crucial issue for mining the deep information of social networks, which aims to select a seed set from the network to maximize the number of influenced nodes. To evaluate the influence spread of a seed set efficiently, existing studies have proposed transformations with lower computational costs to replace the expensive Monte Carlo simulation process. These alternate transformations, based on network prior knowledge, induce different search behaviors with similar characteristics to various perspectives. Specifically, it is difficult for users to determine a suitable transformation a priori. This article proposes a multi-transformation evolutionary framework for influence maximization (MTEFIM) with convergence guarantees to exploit the potential similarities and unique advantages of alternate transformations and to avoid users manually determining the most suitable one. In MTEFIM, multiple transformations are optimized simultaneously as multiple tasks. Each transformation is assigned an evolutionary solver. Three major components of MTEFIM are conducted via: 1) estimating the potential relationship across transformations based on the degree of overlap across individuals of different populations, 2) transferring individuals across populations adaptively according to the inter-transformation relationship, and 3) selecting the final output seed set containing all the transformation's knowledge. The effectiveness of MTEFIM is validated on both benchmarks and real-world social networks. The experimental results show that MTEFIM can efficiently utilize the potentially transferable knowledge across multiple transformations to achieve highly competitive performance compared to several popular IM-specific methods. The implementation of MTEFIM can be accessed at https://github.com/xiaofangxd/MTEFIM.

Automated Machine Learning has grown very successful in automating the time-consuming, iterative tasks of machine learning model development. However, current methods struggle when the data is imbalanced. Since many real-world datasets are naturally imbalanced, and improper handling of this issue can lead to quite useless models, this issue should be handled carefully. This paper first introduces a new benchmark to study how different AutoML methods are affected by label imbalance. Second, we propose strategies to better deal with imbalance and integrate them into an existing AutoML framework. Finally, we present a systematic study which evaluates the impact of these strategies and find that their inclusion in AutoML systems significantly increases their robustness against label imbalance.

Interactive Imitation Learning (IIL) is a branch of Imitation Learning (IL) where human feedback is provided intermittently during robot execution allowing an online improvement of the robot's behavior. In recent years, IIL has increasingly started to carve out its own space as a promising data-driven alternative for solving complex robotic tasks. The advantages of IIL are its data-efficient, as the human feedback guides the robot directly towards an improved behavior, and its robustness, as the distribution mismatch between the teacher and learner trajectories is minimized by providing feedback directly over the learner's trajectories. Nevertheless, despite the opportunities that IIL presents, its terminology, structure, and applicability are not clear nor unified in the literature, slowing down its development and, therefore, the research of innovative formulations and discoveries. In this article, we attempt to facilitate research in IIL and lower entry barriers for new practitioners by providing a survey of the field that unifies and structures it. In addition, we aim to raise awareness of its potential, what has been accomplished and what are still open research questions. We organize the most relevant works in IIL in terms of human-robot interaction (i.e., types of feedback), interfaces (i.e., means of providing feedback), learning (i.e., models learned from feedback and function approximators), user experience (i.e., human perception about the learning process), applications, and benchmarks. Furthermore, we analyze similarities and differences between IIL and RL, providing a discussion on how the concepts offline, online, off-policy and on-policy learning should be transferred to IIL from the RL literature. We particularly focus on robotic applications in the real world and discuss their implications, limitations, and promising future areas of research.

Real-world optimisation problems typically have objective functions which cannot be expressed analytically. These optimisation problems are evaluated through expensive physical experiments or simulations. Cheap approximations of the objective function can reduce the computational requirements for solving these expensive optimisation problems. These cheap approximations may be machine learning or statistical models and are known as surrogate models. This paper introduces a simulation of a well-known batch processing problem in the literature. Evolutionary algorithms such as Genetic Algorithm (GA), Differential Evolution (DE) are used to find the optimal schedule for the simulation. We then compare the quality of solutions obtained by the surrogate-assisted versions of the algorithms against the baseline algorithms. Surrogate-assistance is achieved through Probablistic Surrogate-Assisted Framework (PSAF). The results highlight the potential for improving baseline evolutionary algorithms through surrogates. For different time horizons, the solutions are evaluated with respect to several quality indicators. It is shown that the PSAF assisted GA (PSAF-GA) and PSAF-assisted DE (PSAF-DE) provided improvement in some time horizons. In others, they either maintained the solutions or showed some deterioration. The results also highlight the need to tune the hyper-parameters used by the surrogate-assisted framework, as the surrogate, in some instances, shows some deterioration over the baseline algorithm.

In the literature of mitigating unfairness in machine learning, many fairness measures are designed to evaluate predictions of learning models and also utilised to guide the training of fair models. It has been theoretically and empirically shown that there exist conflicts and inconsistencies among accuracy and multiple fairness measures. Optimising one or several fairness measures may sacrifice or deteriorate other measures. Two key questions should be considered, how to simultaneously optimise accuracy and multiple fairness measures, and how to optimise all the considered fairness measures more effectively. In this paper, we view the mitigating unfairness problem as a multi-objective learning problem considering the conflicts among fairness measures. A multi-objective evolutionary learning framework is used to simultaneously optimise several metrics (including accuracy and multiple fairness measures) of machine learning models. Then, ensembles are constructed based on the learning models in order to automatically balance different metrics. Empirical results on eight well-known datasets demonstrate that compared with the state-of-the-art approaches for mitigating unfairness, our proposed algorithm can provide decision-makers with better tradeoffs among accuracy and multiple fairness metrics. Furthermore, the high-quality models generated by the framework can be used to construct an ensemble to automatically achieve a better tradeoff among all the considered fairness metrics than other ensemble methods. Our code is publicly available at https://github.com/qingquan63/FairEMOL

While generative models have recently become ubiquitous in many scientific areas, less attention has been paid to their evaluation. For molecular generative models, the state-of-the-art examines their output in isolation or in relation to its input. However, their biological and functional properties, such as ligand-target interaction is not being addressed. In this study, a novel biologically-inspired benchmark for the evaluation of molecular generative models is proposed. Specifically, three diverse reference datasets are designed and a set of metrics are introduced which are directly relevant to the drug discovery process. In particular we propose a recreation metric, apply drug-target affinity prediction and molecular docking as complementary techniques for the evaluation of generative outputs. While all three metrics show consistent results across the tested generative models, a more detailed comparison of drug-target affinity binding and molecular docking scores revealed that unimodal predictiors can lead to erroneous conclusions about target binding on a molecular level and a multi-modal approach is thus preferrable. The key advantage of this framework is that it incorporates prior physico-chemical domain knowledge into the benchmarking process by focusing explicitly on ligand-target interactions and thus creating a highly efficient tool not only for evaluating molecular generative outputs in particular, but also for enriching the drug discovery process in general.

Python is a dynamic language, so usually, you'll only see errors in your code when you attempt to run it. This library is a static checker, so it finds bugs in your programs without even running them. It will also add type checkers that will help to ensure that you're using variables and functions in your code correctly. It includes lots of features such as type inference, generics, callable types, tuple types, union types, structural subtyping, and more. It has more than 14k stars on GitHub. If you are using Jupyter Notebooks then this is a good resource for you.

Educational robots allow experimenting with a variety of principles from mechanics, electronics, and informatics. Here we propose ClipBot, a low-cost, do-it-yourself, robot whose skeleton is made of two paper clips. An Arduino nano microcontroller actuates two servo motors that move the paper clips. However, such mechanical configuration confers physical impairments to movement. This creates the need for and allows experimenting with artificial intelligence methods to overcome hardware limitations. We report our experience in the usage of this robot during the study week 'fascinating informatics', organized by the Swiss Foundation Schweizer Jugend Forscht (www.sjf.ch). Students at the high school level were asked to implement a genetic algorithm to optimize the movements of the robot until it learned to walk. Such a methodology allowed the robot to learn the motor actuation scheme yielding straight movement in the forward direction using less than 20 iterations.

Artificial intelligence and semantic technologies are evolving and have been applied in various research areas, including the education domain. Higher Education institutions strive to improve students' academic performance. Early intervention to at-risk students and a reasonable curriculum is vital for students' success. Prior research opted for deploying traditional machine learning models to predict students' performance. In terms of curriculum semantic analysis, after conducting a comprehensive systematic review regarding the use of semantic technologies in the Computer Science curriculum, a major finding of the study is that technologies used to measure similarity have limitations in terms of accuracy and ambiguity in the representation of concepts, courses, etc. To fill these gaps, in this study, three implementations were developed, that is, to predict students' performance using marks from the previous semester, to model a course representation in a semantic way and compute the similarity, and to identify the prerequisite between two similar courses. Regarding performance prediction, we used the combination of Genetic Algorithm and Long-Short Term Memory (LSTM) on a dataset from a Brazilian university containing 248730 records. As for similarity measurement, we deployed BERT to encode the sentences and used cosine similarity to obtain the distance between courses. With respect to prerequisite identification, TextRazor was applied to extract concepts from course description, followed by employing SemRefD to measure the degree of prerequisite between two concepts. The outcomes of this study can be summarized as: (i) a breakthrough result improves Manrique's work by 2.5% in terms of accuracy in dropout prediction; (ii) uncover the similarity between courses based on course description; (iii) identify the prerequisite over three compulsory courses of School of Computing at ANU.