Goto

Collaborating Authors

 Decision Tree Learning



Inference in Bayesian Additive Vector Autoregressive Tree Models

arXiv.org Machine Learning

Vector autoregressive (VAR) models assume linearity between the endogenous variables and their lags. This linearity assumption might be overly restrictive and could have a deleterious impact on forecasting accuracy. As a solution, we propose combining VAR with Bayesian additive regression tree (BART) models. The resulting Bayesian additive vector autoregressive tree (BAVART) model is capable of capturing arbitrary non-linear relations between the endogenous variables and the covariates without much input from the researcher. Since controlling for heteroscedasticity is key for producing precise density forecasts, our model allows for stochastic volatility in the errors. Using synthetic and real data, we demonstrate the advantages of our methods. For Eurozone data, we show that our nonparametric approach improves upon commonly used forecasting models and that it produces impulse responses to an uncertainty shock that are consistent with established findings in the literature.


Handling Missing Data in Decision Trees: A Probabilistic Approach

arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence

However, most of these are heuristics in nature (Twala et al., 2008), tailored towards some specific tree induction algorithm Decision trees are a popular family of models (Chen & Guestrin, 2016; Prokhorenkova et al., 2018), due to their attractive properties such as interpretability or make strong distributional assumptions about the data, and ability to handle heterogeneous such as the feature distribution factorizing completely (e.g., data. Concurrently, missing data is a prevalent mean, median imputation (Rubin, 1976)) or according to the occurrence that hinders performance of machine tree structure (Quinlan, 1993). As many works have compared learning models. As such, handling missing data the most prominent ones in empirical studies (Batista in decision trees is a well studied problem. In & Monard, 2003; Saar-Tsechansky & Provost, 2007), there this paper, we tackle this problem by taking a is no clear winner and ultimately, the adoption of a particular probabilistic approach. At deployment time, we strategy in practice boils down to its availability in the use tractable density estimators to compute the ML libraries employed. "expected prediction" of our models. At learning time, we fine-tune parameters of already learned In this work, we tackle handling missing data in trees at trees by minimizing their "expected prediction both learning and deployment time from a principled probabilistic loss" w.r.t.


Reducing Risk of Model Inversion Using Privacy-Guided Training

arXiv.org Machine Learning

Machine learning models often pose a threat to the privacy of individuals whose data is part of the training set. Several recent attacks have been able to infer sensitive information from trained models, including model inversion or attribute inference attacks. These attacks are able to reveal the values of certain sensitive features of individuals who participated in training the model. It has also been shown that several factors can contribute to an increased risk of model inversion, including feature influence. We observe that not all features necessarily share the same level of privacy or sensitivity. In many cases, certain features used to train a model are considered especially sensitive and therefore propitious candidates for inversion. We present a solution for countering model inversion attacks in tree-based models, by reducing the influence of sensitive features in these models. This is an avenue that has not yet been thoroughly investigated, with only very nascent previous attempts at using this as a countermeasure against attribute inference. Our work shows that, in many cases, it is possible to train a model in different ways, resulting in different influence levels of the various features, without necessarily harming the model's accuracy. We are able to utilize this fact to train models in a manner that reduces the model's reliance on the most sensitive features, while increasing the importance of less sensitive features. Our evaluation confirms that training models in this manner reduces the risk of inference for those features, as demonstrated through several black-box and white-box attacks.


Do Decision Trees need Feature Scaling?

#artificialintelligence

Machine Learning algorithms have always been on the path towards evolution since its inception. Today the domain has come a long way from mathematical modelling to ensemble modelling and more. This evolution has seen more robust and SOTA models which is almost bridging the gap between potentials capabilities of human and AI. Ensemble modelling has given us one of those SOTA model XGBoost. Recently I happened to participate in a Machine Learning Hiring Challenge where the problem statement was a classification problem.


EAPS: Edge-Assisted Predictive Sleep Scheduling for 802.11 IoT Stations

arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence

The broad deployment of 802.11 (a.k.a., WiFi) access points and significant enhancement of the energy efficiency of these wireless transceivers has resulted in increasing interest in building 802.11-based IoT systems. Unfortunately, the main energy efficiency mechanisms of 802.11, namely PSM and APSD, fall short when used in IoT applications. PSM increases latency and intensifies channel access contention after each beacon instance, and APSD does not inform stations about when they need to wake up to receive their downlink packets. In this paper, we present a new mechanism---edge-assisted predictive sleep scheduling (EAPS)---to adjust the sleep duration of stations while they expect downlink packets. We first implement a Linux-based access point that enables us to collect parameters affecting communication latency. Using this access point, we build a testbed that, in addition to offering traffic pattern customization, replicates the characteristics of real-world environments. We then use multiple machine learning algorithms to predict downlink packet delivery. Our empirical evaluations confirm that when using EAPS the energy consumption of IoT stations is as low as PSM, whereas the delay of packet delivery is close to the case where the station is always awake.


DriveML: Self-Drive Machine Learning Projects

#artificialintelligence

Implementing some of the pillars of an automated machine learning pipeline such as (i) Automated data preparation, (ii) Feature engineering, (iii) Model building in classification context that includes techniques such as (a) Regularised regression [1], (b) Logistic regression [2], (c) Random Forest [3], (d) Decision tree [4] and (e) Extreme Gradient Boosting (xgboost) [5], and finally, (iv) Model explanation (using lift chart and partial dependency plots). Also provides some additional features such as generating missing at random (MAR) variables and automated exploratory data analysis. Moreover, function exports the model results with the required plots in an HTML vignette report format that follows the best practices of the industry and the academia.


Learning Optimal Tree Models Under Beam Search

arXiv.org Machine Learning

Retrieving relevant targets from an extremely large target set under computational limits is a common challenge for information retrieval and recommendation systems. Tree models, which formulate targets as leaves of a tree with trainable node-wise scorers, have attracted a lot of interests in tackling this challenge due to their logarithmic computational complexity in both training and testing. Tree-based deep models (TDMs) and probabilistic label trees (PLTs) are two representative kinds of them. Though achieving many practical successes, existing tree models suffer from the training-testing discrepancy, where the retrieval performance deterioration caused by beam search in testing is not considered in training. This leads to an intrinsic gap between the most relevant targets and those retrieved by beam search with even the optimally trained node-wise scorers. We take a first step towards understanding and analyzing this problem theoretically, and develop the concept of Bayes optimality under beam search and calibration under beam search as general analyzing tools for this purpose. Moreover, to eliminate the discrepancy, we propose a novel algorithm for learning optimal tree models under beam search. Experiments on both synthetic and real data verify the rationality of our theoretical analysis and demonstrate the superiority of our algorithm compared to state-of-the-art methods.


Spatio-temporal Sequence Prediction with Point Processes and Self-organizing Decision Trees

arXiv.org Machine Learning

We investigate spatio-temporal prediction and introduce a novel prediction algorithm. Our approach is based on the point processes, which we use to model the event arrivals in both space and time. Although we specifically use the Hawkes process, other processes can be readily used as provided remarks in the paper. Moreover, we partition the given spatial region into subregions by an adaptive decision tree and model each subregion with individual and interacting point processes. With individual point processes for each subregion, we estimate the time and location of the events using the past event times and locations. Furthermore, thanks to the nonstationary and self-exciting point generation mechanism in the Hawkes process and the adaptive partitioning of the space, we model the data as nonstationary in both time and space. Finally, we provide a gradient based joint optimization algorithm for the adaptive tree parameter and the point process parameters. With the joint optimization, our algorithm can infer the source statistics and adaptive partitioning of the region. We also provide a training algorithm for the online setup, where we update the model parameters with newly arrived points. We provide experimental results on both simulated data and real-life data where we compare our approach with the standard approaches and demonstrate significant performance improvements thanks to the adaptive spatial partitioning mechanism and the joint optimization procedure.


The Max-Cut Decision Tree: Improving on the Accuracy and Running Time of Decision Trees

arXiv.org Machine Learning

Decision trees are a widely used method for classification, both by themselves and as the building blocks of multiple different ensemble learning methods. The Max-Cut decision tree involves novel modifications to a standard, baseline model of classification decision tree construction, precisely CART Gini. One modification involves an alternative splitting metric, maximum cut, based on maximizing the distance between all pairs of observations belonging to separate classes and separate sides of the threshold value. The other modification is to select the decision feature from a linear combination of the input features constructed using Principal Component Analysis (PCA) locally at each node. Our experiments show that this node-based localized PCA with the novel splitting modification can dramatically improve classification, while also significantly decreasing computational time compared to the baseline decision tree. Moreover, our results are most significant when evaluated on data sets with higher dimensions, or more classes; which, for the example data set CIFAR-100, enable a 49% improvement in accuracy while reducing CPU time by 94%. These introduced modifications dramatically advance the capabilities of decision trees for difficult classification tasks.