The R package DynForest implements random forests for predicting a categorical or a (multiple causes) time-to-event outcome based on time-fixed and time-dependent predictors. Through the random forests, the time-dependent predictors can be measured with error at subject-specific times, and they can be endogeneous (i.e., impacted by the outcome process). They are modeled internally using flexible linear mixed models (thanks to lcmm package) with time-associations pre-specified by the user. DynForest computes dynamic predictions that take into account all the information from time-fixed and time-dependent predictors. DynForest also provides information about the most predictive variables using variable importance and minimal depth. Variable importance can also be computed on groups of variables. To display the results, several functions are available such as summary and plot functions. This paper aims to guide the user with a step-by-step example of the different functions for fitting random forests within DynForest.

The effectiveness of machine learning models is significantly affected by the size of the dataset and the quality of features as redundant and irrelevant features can radically degrade the performance. This paper proposes IGRF-RFE: a hybrid feature selection method tasked for multi-class network anomalies using a Multilayer perceptron (MLP) network. IGRF-RFE can be considered as a feature reduction technique based on both the filter feature selection method and the wrapper feature selection method. In our proposed method, we use the filter feature selection method, which is the combination of Information Gain and Random Forest Importance, to reduce the feature subset search space. Then, we apply recursive feature elimination(RFE) as a wrapper feature selection method to further eliminate redundant features recursively on the reduced feature subsets. Our experimental results obtained based on the UNSW-NB15 dataset confirm that our proposed method can improve the accuracy of anomaly detection while reducing the feature dimension. The results show that the feature dimension is reduced from 42 to 23 while the multi-classification accuracy of MLP is improved from 82.25% to 84.24%.

Artificial Intelligence (AI) has come a long way in recent years and is rapidly changing the way we live and work. While AI has the potential to greatly benefit society, it's important to understand that not all AI is created equal. Alin Turing's 1950 paper "Computing Machinery and Intelligence" and its subsequent Turing Test established the fundamental goal and vision of AI. Real artificial Intelligence can be divided into several subsets, including machine learning, deep learning, natural language processing, expert system, robotics, machine vision and speech recognition. These subsets of AI are continuously evolving and expanding as technology advances, creating new and exciting possibilities in the field of AI.

Traditional classifiers infer labels under the premise that the training and test samples are generated from the same distribution. This assumption can be problematic for safety-critical applications such as medical diagnosis and network attack detection. In this paper, we consider the multi-class classification problem when the training data and the test data may have different distributions. We propose conformalized semi-supervised random forest (CSForest), which constructs set-valued predictions $C(x)$ to include the correct class label with desired probability while detecting outliers efficiently. We compare the proposed method to other state-of-art methods in both a synthetic example and a real data application to demonstrate the strength of our proposal.

Missing data is common in applied data science, particularly for tabular data sets found in healthcare, social sciences, and natural sciences. Most supervised learning methods only work on complete data, thus requiring preprocessing such as missing value imputation to work on incomplete data sets. However, imputation alone does not encode useful information about the missing values themselves. For data sets with informative missing patterns, the Missing Indicator Method (MIM), which adds indicator variables to indicate the missing pattern, can be used in conjunction with imputation to improve model performance. While commonly used in data science, MIM is surprisingly understudied from an empirical and especially theoretical perspective. In this paper, we show empirically and theoretically that MIM improves performance for informative missing values, and we prove that MIM does not hurt linear models asymptotically for uninformative missing values. Additionally, we find that for high-dimensional data sets with many uninformative indicators, MIM can induce model overfitting and thus test performance. To address this issue, we introduce Selective MIM (SMIM), a novel MIM extension that adds missing indicators only for features that have informative missing patterns. We show empirically that SMIM performs at least as well as MIM in general, and improves MIM for high-dimensional data. Lastly, to demonstrate the utility of MIM on real-world data science tasks, we demonstrate the effectiveness of MIM and SMIM on clinical tasks generated from the MIMIC-III database of electronic health records.

Federated learning (FL) is the most popular distributed machine learning technique. FL allows machine-learning models to be trained without acquiring raw data to a single point for processing. Instead, local models are trained with local data; the models are then shared and combined. This approach preserves data privacy as locally trained models are shared instead of the raw data themselves. Broadly, FL can be divided into horizontal federated learning (HFL) and vertical federated learning (VFL). For the former, different parties hold different samples over the same set of features; for the latter, different parties hold different feature data belonging to the same set of samples. In a number of practical scenarios, VFL is more relevant than HFL as different companies (e.g., bank and retailer) hold different features (e.g., credit history and shopping history) for the same set of customers. Although VFL is an emerging area of research, it is not well-established compared to HFL. Besides, VFL-related studies are dispersed, and their connections are not intuitive. Thus, this survey aims to bring these VFL-related studies to one place. Firstly, we classify existing VFL structures and algorithms. Secondly, we present the threats from security and privacy perspectives to VFL. Thirdly, for the benefit of future researchers, we discussed the challenges and prospects of VFL in detail.

Decision Trees are used in statistics, data mining and machine learning and they are a supervised learning method which can be applied in both classification and regression. But the Decision Trees can be improved using boosting as it was first described by Schapire in his paper "The Strength of Weak Learnability "[1]. Basically, a boosting algorithm is a learning algorithm that will take advantage of the weak learners in order to generate high-accuracy hypotheses. However, over the years the algorithm has been improved and adapted by various contributors. The fact that the algorithm suffered a series of mutation that lead to algorithms like XGBoost, AdaBoost, Gradient Boost, LightGBM, is proof that the main idea has passed "the test of time".

The widespread deployment of deep nets in practical applications has lead to a growing desire to understand how and why such black-box methods perform prediction. Much work has focused on understanding what part of the input pattern (an image, say) is responsible for a particular class being predicted, and how the input may be manipulated to predict a different class. We focus instead on understanding which of the internal features computed by the neural net are responsible for a particular class. We achieve this by mimicking part of the neural net with an oblique decision tree having sparse weight vectors at the decision nodes. Using the recently proposed Tree Alternating Optimization (TAO) algorithm, we are able to learn trees that are both highly accurate and interpretable. Such trees can faithfully mimic the part of the neural net they replaced, and hence they can provide insights into the deep net black box. Further, we show we can easily manipulate the neural net features in order to make the net predict, or not predict, a given class, thus showing that it is possible to carry out adversarial attacks at the level of the features. These insights and manipulations apply globally to the entire training and test set, not just at a local (single-instance) level. We demonstrate this robustly in the MNIST and ImageNet datasets with LeNet5 and VGG networks.

Interpretability of reinforcement learning policies is essential for many real-world tasks but learning such interpretable policies is a hard problem. Particularly rule-based policies such as decision trees and rules lists are difficult to optimize due to their non-differentiability. While existing techniques can learn verifiable decision tree policies there is no guarantee that the learners generate a decision that performs optimally. In this work, we study the optimization of size-limited decision trees for Markov Decision Processes (MPDs) and propose OMDTs: Optimal MDP Decision Trees. Given a user-defined size limit and MDP formulation OMDT directly maximizes the expected discounted return for the decision tree using Mixed-Integer Linear Programming. By training optimal decision tree policies for different MDPs we empirically study the optimality gap for existing imitation learning techniques and find that they perform sub-optimally. We show that this is due to an inherent shortcoming of imitation learning, namely that complex policies cannot be represented using size-limited trees. In such cases, it is better to directly optimize the tree for expected return. While there is generally a trade-off between the performance and interpretability of machine learning models, we find that OMDTs limited to a depth of 3 often perform close to the optimal limit.

Evaluating fairness can be challenging in practice because the sensitive attributes of data are often inaccessible due to privacy constraints. The go-to approach that the industry frequently adopts is using off-the-shelf proxy models to predict the missing sensitive attributes, e.g. Meta [Alao et al., 2021] and Twitter [Belli et al., 2022]. Despite its popularity, there are three important questions unanswered: (1) Is directly using proxies efficacious in measuring fairness? (2) If not, is it possible to accurately evaluate fairness using proxies only? (3) Given the ethical controversy over inferring user private information, is it possible to only use weak (i.e. inaccurate) proxies in order to protect privacy? Our theoretical analyses show that directly using proxy models can give a false sense of (un)fairness. Second, we develop an algorithm that is able to measure fairness (provably) accurately with only three properly identified proxies. Third, we show that our algorithm allows the use of only weak proxies (e.g. with only 68.85%accuracy on COMPAS), adding an extra layer of protection on user privacy. Experiments validate our theoretical analyses and show our algorithm can effectively measure and mitigate bias. Our results imply a set of practical guidelines for practitioners on how to use proxies properly. Code is available at github.com/UCSC-REAL/fair-eval.