In explanations, explainers have mental representations of explainees' developing knowledge and shifting interests regarding the explanandum. These mental representations are dynamic in nature and develop over time, thereby enabling explainers to react to explainees' needs by adapting and customizing the explanation. XAI should be able to react to explainees' needs in a similar manner. Therefore, a component that incorporates aspects of explainers' mental representations of explainees is required. In this study, we took first steps by investigating explainers' mental representations in everyday explanations of technological artifacts. According to the dual nature theory, technological artifacts require explanations with two distinct perspectives, namely observable and measurable features addressing "Architecture" or interpretable aspects addressing "Relevance". We conducted extended semi structured pre-, post- and video recall-interviews with explainers (N=9) in the context of an explanation. The transcribed interviews were analyzed utilizing qualitative content analysis. The explainers' answers regarding the explainees' knowledge and interests with regard to the technological artifact emphasized the vagueness of early assumptions of explainers toward strong beliefs in the course of explanations. The assumed knowledge of explainees in the beginning is centered around Architecture and develops toward knowledge with regard to both Architecture and Relevance. In contrast, explainers assumed higher interests in Relevance in the beginning to interests regarding both Architecture and Relevance in the further course of explanations. Further, explainers often finished the explanation despite their perception that explainees still had gaps in knowledge. These findings are transferred into practical implications relevant for user models for adaptive explainable systems.

Given the black-box nature and complexity of large transformer language models (LM), concerns about generalizability and robustness present ethical implications for domains such as hate speech (HS) detection. Using the content rich Social Bias Frames dataset, containing human-annotated stereotypes, intent, and targeted groups, we develop a three stage analysis to evaluate if LMs faithfully assess hate speech. First, we observe the need for modeling contextually grounded stereotype intents to capture implicit semantic meaning. Next, we design a new task, Stereotype Intent Entailment (SIE), which encourages a model to contextually understand stereotype presence. Finally, through ablation tests and user studies, we find a SIE objective improves content understanding, but challenges remain in modeling implicit intent.

Although robots are becoming more advanced with human-like anthropomorphic features and decision-making abilities to improve collaboration, the active integration of humans into this process remains under-explored. This article presents the first experimental study exploring decision-making interactions between humans and robots with visual cues from robotic eyes, which can dynamically influence human opinion formation. The cues generated by robotic eyes gradually guide human decisions towards alignment with the robot's choices. Both human and robot decision-making processes are modeled as non-linear opinion dynamics with evolving biases. To examine these opinion dynamics under varying biases, we conduct numerical parametric and equilibrium continuation analyses using tuned parameters designed explicitly for the presented human-robot interaction experiment. Furthermore, to facilitate the transition from disagreement to agreement, we introduced a human opinion observation algorithm integrated with the formation of the robot's opinion, where the robot's behavior is controlled based on its formed opinion. The algorithms developed aim to enhance human involvement in consensus building, fostering effective collaboration between humans and robots. Experiments with 51 participants (N = 51) show that human-robot teamwork can be improved by guiding human decisions using robotic cues. Finally, we provide detailed insights on the effects of trust, cognitive load, and participant demographics on decision-making based on user feedback and post-experiment interviews.

As machine learning systems become more widely deployed, including in settings such as resume screening, hiring, lending, and recommendation systems, people have begun to respond to them strategically. Often, this takes the form of "gaming the system" or using an algorithmic system's rules and procedures to manipulate it and achieve desired outcomes. Examples include Uber drivers coordinating the times they log on and off the app to impact its surge pricing algorithm (Möhlmann and Zalmanson, 2017), and Twitter (Burrell et al., 2019) and Facebook (Eslami et al., 2016) users' decisions regarding how to interact with content given the platforms' curation algorithms. Game theoretical modeling and analysis have been used in recent years to formally analyze such strategic responses of humans to algorithms (e.g., Hardt et al. (2016); Milli et al. (2019); Liu et al. (2020); see also Related Work). However, these existing works assume standard models of decision making, where agents are fully rational when responding to algorithms; yet, humans exhibit different forms of cognitive biases in decision making (Kahnemann and Tversky, 1979). Motivated by this, we explore the impacts behavioral biases on agents' strategic responses to algorithms. We begin by proposing an extension of existing models of strategic classification to account for behavioral biases.

Within an explainability framework, the neuropsychology of artificial intelligence focuses on studying synthetic neural cognitive mechanisms, considering them as new subjects of cognitive psychology research. The goal is to make artificial neural networks used in language models understandable by adapting concepts from human cognitive psychology to the interpretation of artificial neural cognition. In this context, the notion of categorization is particularly relevant because it plays a key role as a process of segmentation and reconstruction of informational data by the neural vectors of synthetic cognition. Thus, in this study, the aim is to use the concept of categorization, as understood in human cognitive psychology (particularly in its relation to the notion of similarity), to apply it to the analysis of neural behavior and to infer certain synthetic cognitive processes underlying the observed behaviors.

Large language models generate complex, open-ended outputs: instead of outputting a class label they write summaries, generate dialogue, or produce working code. In order to asses the reliability of these open-ended generation systems, we aim to identify qualitative categories of erroneous behavior, beyond identifying individual errors. To hypothesize and test for such qualitative errors, we draw inspiration from human cognitive biases---systematic patterns of deviation from rational judgement. Specifically, we use cognitive biases as motivation to (i) generate hypotheses for problems that models may have, and (ii) develop experiments that elicit these problems. Using code generation as a case study, we find that OpenAI's Codex errs predictably based on how the input prompt is framed, adjusts outputs towards anchors, and is biased towards outputs that mimic frequent training examples.

This paper investigates the computational mechanisms underlying a type of metacognitive monitoring known as detached mindfulness, a particularly effective therapeutic technique within cognitive psychology. While research strongly supports the capacity of detached mindfulness to reduce depression and anxiety, its cognitive and computational underpinnings remain largely unexplained. We employ a computational model of metacognitive skill to articulate the mechanisms through which a detached perception of affect reduces emotional reactivity.

A game developer called Amazing Seasun Games is demonstrating NVIDIA's Avatar Cloud Engine (ACE) technology through its upcoming multiplayer mecha game Mecha BREAK at Gamescom this year. NVIDIA unveiled ACE at Computer 2023, presenting it as a "custom AI model foundry service" that developers can use to make their games more interactive. Specifically, it will allow players to interact with NPCs without the constraints of pre-programmed conversations and will be able to give them appropriate responses. When NVIDIA launched the technology, it showed a player talking to an NPC called Jin at a ramen shop. The player asked how the character was, and Jin was able to respond naturally to tell them about his worries about his city's rising crime rates.

Extracting time-varying latent variables from computational cognitive models is a key step in model-based neural analysis, which aims to understand the neural correlates of cognitive processes. However, existing methods only allow researchers to infer latent variables that explain subjects' behavior in a relatively small class of cognitive models. For example, a broad class of relevant cognitive models with analytically intractable likelihood is currently out of reach from standard techniques, based on Maximum a Posteriori parameter estimation. Here, we present an approach that extends neural Bayes estimation to learn a direct mapping between experimental data and the targeted latent variable space using recurrent neural networks and simulated datasets. We show that our approach achieves competitive performance in inferring latent variable sequences in both tractable and intractable models. Furthermore, the approach is generalizable across different computational models and is adaptable for both continuous and discrete latent spaces. We then demonstrate its applicability in real world datasets. Our work underscores that combining recurrent neural networks and simulation-based inference to identify latent variable sequences can enable researchers to access a wider class of cognitive models for model-based neural analyses, and thus test a broader set of theories.

Humans naturally attribute utterances of direct speech to their speaker in literary works. When attributing quotes, we process contextual information but also access mental representations of characters that we build and revise throughout the narrative. Recent methods to automatically attribute such utterances have explored simulating human logic with deterministic rules or learning new implicit rules with neural networks when processing contextual information. However, these systems inherently lack \textit{character} representations, which often leads to errors on more challenging examples of attribution: anaphoric and implicit quotes. In this work, we propose to augment a popular quotation attribution system, BookNLP, with character embeddings that encode global information of characters. To build these embeddings, we create DramaCV, a corpus of English drama plays from the 15th to 20th century focused on Character Verification (CV), a task similar to Authorship Verification (AV), that aims at analyzing fictional characters. We train a model similar to the recently proposed AV model, Universal Authorship Representation (UAR), on this dataset, showing that it outperforms concurrent methods of characters embeddings on the CV task and generalizes better to literary novels. Then, through an extensive evaluation on 22 novels, we show that combining BookNLP's contextual information with our proposed global character embeddings improves the identification of speakers for anaphoric and implicit quotes, reaching state-of-the-art performance. Code and data will be made publicly available.