The signal content of the codes encoded by a presynaptic neuron will be decoded by some other neurons postsynpatically. Neurons are often thought to be encoding a single type of 282 Signal Processing by Multiplexing and Demultiplexing in Neurons 283 codes. But there is evidence suggesting that neurons may encode more than one type of signals. One of the mechanisms for embedding multiple types of signals processed by a neuron is multiplexing. When the signals are multiplexed, they also need to be demultiplexed to extract the useful information transmitted by the neurons. Theoretical and experimental evidence of such multiplexing and demultiplexing scheme for signal processing by neurons will be given below.

This srudy has demonstrated how artificial neural networks (ANNs) can be used to characterize seismic sources using high-frequency regional seismic data. We have taken the novel approach of using ANNs as a research tool for obtaining seismic source information, specifically depth of focus for earthquakes and ripple-fire characteristics for economic blasts, rather than as just a feature classifier between earthquake and explosion populations. Overall, we have found that ANNs have potential applications to seismic event characterization and identification, beyond just as a feature classifier. In future studies, these techniques should be applied to actual data of regional seismic events recorded at the new regional seismic arrays. The results of this study indicates that an ANN should be evaluated as part of an operational seismic event identification system. 1 INTRODUCTION ANNs have usually been used as pattern matching algorithms, and recent studies have applied ANNs to standard classification between classes of earthquakes and explosions using wavefonn features (Dowla, et al, 1989), (Dysart and Pulli, 1990).

Mobile Robot Competition and Exhibition

Announcement of the new Mobile Robot Competition and Exhibition, to be held annually at the AAAI National Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Announcement of the new Mobile Robot Competition and Exhibition, to be held annually at the AAAI National Conference on Artificial Intelligence.

Decision analysis and expert systems are technologies intended to support human reasoning and decision making by formalizing expert knowledge so that it is amenable to mechanized reasoning methods. Despite some common goals, these two paradigms have evolved divergently, with fundamental differences in principle and practice. We present the key ideas of decision analysis and review recent research and applications that aim toward a marriage of these two paradigms. This work combines decision-analytic methods for structuring and encoding uncertain knowledge and preferences with computational techniques from AI for knowledge representation, inference, and explanation.

I survey four viewpoints about what AI is. I describe a program exhibiting AI as one that can change as a result of interactions with the user. Such a program would have to process hundreds or thousands of examples as opposed to a handful. Because AI is a machine's attempt to explain the behavior of the (human) system it is trying to model, the ability of a program design to scale up is critical. Researchers need to face the complexities of scaling up to programs that actually serve a purpose. The move from toy domains into concrete ones has three big consequences for the development of AI. First, it will force software designers to face the idiosyncrasies of its users. Second, it will act as an important reality check between the language of the machine, the software, and the user. Third, the scaled-up programs will become templates for future work. For a variety of reasons, some of which I discuss one of the following four things: (1) AI means in this article, the newly formed Institute magic bullets, (2) AI means inference engines, for the Learning Sciences has been concentrating (3) AI means getting a machine to do something its efforts on building high-quality you didn't think a machine could do educational software for use in business and (the "gee whiz" view), and (4) AI means elementary and secondary schools. In the two having a machine learn.

Automated diagnosis is an important AI problem not only for its potential practical applications but also because it exposes issues common to all automated reasoning efforts and presents real challenges to existing paradigms. Current research in this area addresses many problems, including managing and structuring probabilistic information, modeling physical systems, reasoning with defeasible assumptions, and interleaving deliberation and action. Furthermore, diagnosis programs must face these problems in contexts where scaling up to deal with cases of realistic size results in daunting combinatorics. This article presents these and other issues as discussed at the First International Workshop on Principles of Diagnosis.

Each of the The second volume promises to inherent to the task of specifying objections is then analyzed from a draw on a characterization of AI's the deterministic or nondeterministic formal standpoint because the relevant essential methodology as continuous machine, and complexity of electric elements of formal theory are attempts to overcome the formal or logical circuits), physical limits of introduced in subsequent chapters. I hope to see my (that is, finite, discrete concepts can Lovelace's objection. Despite the criticisms dissipate after reading the never form a perfect model of a continuous introductory character of the chapter, second volume. Let's get a feeling of what this first and possible-world semantics. With volume is really about.

Decision analysis and expert systems are technologies intended to support human reasoning and decision making by formalizing expert knowledge so that it is amenable to mechanized reasoning methods. Despite some common goals, these two paradigms have evolved divergently, with fundamental differences in principle and practice. Recent recognition of the deficiencies of traditional AI techniques for treating uncertainty, coupled with the development of belief nets and influence diagrams, is stimulating renewed enthusiasm among AI researchers in probabilistic reasoning and decision analysis. We present the key ideas of decision analysis and review recent research and applications that aim toward a marriage of these two paradigms. This work combines decision-analytic methods for structuring and encoding uncertain knowledge and preferences with computational techniques from AI for knowledge representation, inference, and explanation. We end by outlining remaining research issues to fully develop the potential of this enterprise.

I give an introduction to Bayesian networks for AI researchers with a limited grounding in probability theory. Over the last few years, this method of reasoning using probabilities has become popular within the AI probability and uncertainty community. Indeed, it is probably fair to say that Bayesian networks are to a large segment of the AI-uncertainty community what resolution theorem proving is to the AIlogic community. Nevertheless, despite what seems to be their obvious importance, the ideas and techniques have not spread much beyond the research community responsible for them. This is probably because the ideas and techniques are not that easy to understand. I hope to rectify this situation by making Bayesian networks more accessible to the probabilistically unsophisticated.