Goto

Collaborating Authors

 Industry


On the Generalization Ability of On-Line Learning Algorithms

Neural Information Processing Systems

In this paper we show that online algorithms for classification and regression canbe naturally used to obtain hypotheses with good datadependent tailbounds on their risk. Our results are proven without requiring complicated concentration-of-measure arguments and they hold for arbitrary online learning algorithms. Furthermore, when applied to concrete online algorithms, our results yield tail bounds that in many cases are comparable or better than the best known bounds.


Associative memory in realistic neuronal networks

Neural Information Processing Systems

Almost two decades ago, Hopfield [1] showed that networks of highly reduced model neurons can exhibit multiple attracting fixed points, thus providing a substrate for associative memory. It is still not clear, however, whether realistic neuronal networks can support multiple attractors. The main difficulty is that neuronal networks in vivo exhibit a stable background state at low firing rate, typically afew Hz. Embedding attractor is easy; doing so without destabilizing the background is not. Previous work [2, 3] focused on the sparse coding limit, in which a vanishingly small number of neurons are involved in any memory. Here we investigate the case in which the number of neurons involved in a memory scales with the number of neurons in the network.


Motivated Reinforcement Learning

Neural Information Processing Systems

Competition between actions is based on the motivating characteristics of their consequent states in this sense. Substantial, careful, experiments reviewed in Dickinson & Balleine,12,13 into the neurobiology and psychology ofmotivation shows that this view is incomplete. In many cases, animals are faced with the choice not between many different actionsat a given state, but rather whether a single response isworth executing at all. Evidence suggests that the motivational process underlying this choice has different psychological andneural properties from that underlying action choice. We describe and model these motivational systems, and consider the way they interact.


Generalization Performance of Some Learning Problems in Hilbert Functional Spaces

Neural Information Processing Systems

We investigate the generalization performance of some learning problems inHilbert functional Spaces. We introduce a notion of convergence of the estimated functional predictor to the best underlying predictor, and obtain an estimate on the rate of the convergence. This estimate allows us to derive generalization bounds on some learning formulations.



Bayesian Predictive Profiles With Applications to Retail Transaction Data

Neural Information Processing Systems

Massive transaction data sets are recorded in a routine manner in telecommunications, retail commerce, and Web site management. In this paper we address the problem of inferring predictive individual profilesfrom such historical transaction data. We describe a generative mixture model for count data and use an an approximate Bayesian estimation framework that effectively combines anindividual's specific history with more general population patterns. We use a large real-world retail transaction data set to illustrate how these profiles consistently outperform non-mixture and non-Bayesian techniques in predicting customer behavior in out-of-sample data.


Agglomerative Multivariate Information Bottleneck

Neural Information Processing Systems

The information bottleneck method is an unsupervised model independent data organization technique. Given a joint distribution peA, B), this method constructs anew variable T that extracts partitions, or clusters, over the values of A that are informative about B. In a recent paper, we introduced a general principled frameworkfor multivariate extensions of the information bottleneck method that allows us to consider multiple systems of data partitions that are interrelated. In this paper, we present a new family of simple agglomerative algorithms to construct such systems of interrelated clusters. We analyze the behavior of these algorithms and apply them to several real-life datasets.


A Natural Policy Gradient

Neural Information Processing Systems

Sham Kakade Gatsby Computational Neuroscience Unit 17 Queen Square, London, UK WC1N 3AR http://www.gatsby.ucl.ac.uk sham@gatsby.ucl.ac.uk Abstract We provide a natural gradient method that represents the steepest descent direction based on the underlying structure of the parameter space.Although gradient methods cannot make large changes in the values of the parameters, we show that the natural gradient ismoving toward choosing a greedy optimal action rather than just a better action. These greedy optimal actions are those that would be chosen under one improvement step of policy iteration with approximate, compatible value functions, as defined by Sutton etal. We then show drastic performance improvements in simple MDPs and in the more challenging MDP of Tetris. 1 Introduction There has been a growing interest in direct policy-gradient methods for approximate planning in large Markov decision problems (MDPs). Unfortunately, the standard gradient descent rule is noncovariant. In this paper, we present a covariant gradient by defining a metric based on the underlying structure of the policy.



Active Portfolio-Management based on Error Correction Neural Networks

Neural Information Processing Systems

This paper deals with a neural network architecture which establishes a portfolio management system similar to the Black / Litterman approach. This allocation scheme distributes funds across various securities or financial marketswhile simultaneously complying with specific allocation constraints which meet the requirements of an investor. The portfolio optimization algorithm is modeled by a feedforward neural network. The underlying expected return forecasts are based on error correction neural networks (ECNN), which utilize the last model error as an auxiliary input to evaluate their own misspecification. The portfolio optimization is implemented such that (i.) the allocations comply with investor's constraints and that (ii.) the risk of the portfolio canbe controlled.