Goto

Collaborating Authors

 Industry


Perception

Classics

W. H. Freeman. See also: An Introduction to Perception. Macmillan, 1975 (http://psych.unl.edu/psycrs/350lab/lab12_exp/rock.pdf). The effect of inattention on form perception. Rock, Irvin; Gutman, Daniel. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, Vol 7(2), Apr 1981, 275-285 (http://psycnet.apa.org/journals/xhp/7/2/275/). Irvin Rock, Joseph DiVita, A case of viewer-centered object perception, Cognitive Psychology, Volume 19, Issue 2, April 1987, Pages 280-293 (http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0010028587900132). Rock, Irvin. The perception of disoriented figures. Scientific American, Vol 230(1), Jan 1974, 78-85 (https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/24949985.pdf?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents). Irvin Rock, Christopher M Linnett, Paul Grant, Arien Mack, Perception without attention: Results of a new method, Cognitive Psychology, Volume 24, Issue 4, October 1992, Pages 502-534 (http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/001002859290017V). Irvin Rock (ed.). Indirect Perception. MIT Press, 1997 (https://books.google.com/books?isbn=0262181770). Arien Mack and Irvin Rock. Inattentional Blindness, MIT Press, 1998. (https://books.google.com/books?isbn=0262133393).


Rule-Based Expert Systems: The MYCIN Experiments of the Stanford Heuristic Programming Project

Classics

Artificial intelligence, or AI, is largely an experimental scienceโ€”at least as much progress has been made by building and analyzing programs as by examining theoretical questions. MYCIN is one of several well-known programs that embody some intelligence and provide data on the extent to which intelligent behavior can be programmed. As with other AI programs, its development was slow and not always in a forward direction. But we feel we learned some useful lessons in the course of nearly a decade of work on MYCIN and related programs. In this book we share the results of many experiments performed in that time, and we try to paint a coherent picture of the work. The book is intended to be a critical analysis of several pieces of related research, performed by a large number of scientists. We believe that the whole field of AI will benefit from such attempts to take a detailed retrospective look at experiments, for in this way the scientific foundations of the field will gradually be defined. It is for all these reasons that we have prepared this analysis of the MYCIN experiments.

The complete book in a single file.


Rule-Based Expert Systems: The MYCIN Experiments of the Stanford Heuristic Programming Project

Classics

Artificial intelligence, or AI, is largely an experimental scienceโ€”at least as much progress has been made by building and analyzing programs as by examining theoretical questions. MYCIN is one of several well-known programs that embody some intelligence and provide data on the extent to which intelligent behavior can be programmed. As with other AI programs, its development was slow and not always in a forward direction. But we feel we learned some useful lessons in the course of nearly a decade of work on MYCIN and related programs. In this book we share the results of many experiments performed in that time, and we try to paint a coherent picture of the work. The book is intended to be a critical analysis of several pieces of related research, performed by a large number of scientists. We believe that the whole field of AI will benefit from such attempts to take a detailed retrospective look at experiments, for in this way the scientific foundations of the field will gradually be defined. It is for all these reasons that we have prepared this analysis of the MYCIN experiments.ContentsContributorsForewordAllen NewellPrefacePart One: BackgroundChapter 1โ€”The Context of the MYCIN ExperimentsChapter 2โ€”The Origin of Rule-Based Systems in AIRandall Davis and Jonathan J. KingPart Two: Using RulesChapter 3โ€”The Evolution of MYCINโ€™s Rule FormChapter 4โ€”The Structure of the MYCIN SystemWilliam van MelleChapter 5โ€”Details of the Consultation SystemEdward H. ShortliffeChapter 6โ€”Details of the Revised Therapy AlgorithmWilliam J. ClanceyPart Three: Building a Knowledge BaseChapter 7โ€”Knowledge EngineeringChapter 8โ€”Completeness and Consistency in a Rule-Based SystemMotoi Suwa, A. Carlisle Scott, and Edward H. ShortliffeChapter 9โ€”Interactive Transfer of ExpertiseRandall Davis[#p4]] Part Four: Reasoning Under UncertaintyChapter 10โ€”Uncertainty and Evidential SupportChapter 11โ€”A Model of Inexact Reasoning in MedicineEdward H. Shortliffe and Bruce G. BuchananChapter 12โ€”Probabilistic Reasoning and Certainty FactorsJ. Barclay AdamsChapter 13โ€”The Dempster-Shafer Theory of EvidenceJean Gordon and Edward H. ShortliffePart Five: Generalizing MYCINChapter 14โ€”Use of the MYCIN Inference EngineChapter 15โ€”EMYCIN: A Knowledge Engineerโ€™s Tool for Constructing Rule-Based Expert SystemsWilliam van Melle, Edward H. Shortliffe, and Bruce G. BuchananChapter 16โ€”Experience Using EMYCINJames S. Bennett and Robert S. EngelmorePart Six: Explaining the ReasoningChapter 17โ€”Explanation as a Topic of AI ResearchChapter 18โ€”Methods for Generating ExplanationsA. Carlisle Scott, William J. Clancey, Randall Davis, and Edward H. ShortliffeChapter 19โ€”Specialized Explanations for Dosage SelectionSharon Wraith Bennett and A. Carlisle ScottChapter 20โ€”Customized Explanations Using Causal KnowledgeJerold W. Wallis and Edward H. ShortliffePart Seven: Using Other RepresentationsChapter 21โ€”Other Representation FrameworksChapter 22โ€”Extensions to the Rule-Based Formalism for a Monitoring TaskLawrence M. Fagan, John C. Kunz, Edward A. Feigenbaum, and John J. OsbornChapter 23โ€”A Representation Scheme Using Both Frames and RulesJanice S. AikinsChapter 24โ€”Another Look at FramesDavid E. Smith and Jan E. ClaytonPart Eight: TutoringChapter 25โ€”Intelligent Computer-Aided InstructionChapter 26โ€”Use of MYCINโ€™s Rules for TutoringWilliam J. ClanceyPart Nine: Augmenting the RulesChapter 27โ€”Additional Knowledge StructuresChapter 28โ€”Meta-Level KnowledgeRandall Davis and Bruce G. BuchananChapter 29โ€”Extensions to Rules for Explanation and TutoringWilliam J. ClanceyPart Ten: Evaluating PerformanceChapter 30โ€”The Problem of EvaluationChapter 31โ€”An Evaluation of MYCINโ€™s AdviceVictor L. Yu, Lawrence M. Fagan, Sharon Wraith Bennett, William J . Clancey, A. Carlisle Scott, John F. Hannigan, Robert L. Blum, Bruce G. Buchanan, and Stanley N. CohenPart Eleven: Designing for Human UseChapter 32โ€”Human Engineering of Medical Expert SystemsChapter 33โ€”Strategies for Understanding Structured EnglishAlain BonnetChapter 34โ€”An Analysis of Physiciansโ€™ AttitudesRandy L. Teach and Edward H. ShortliffeChapter 35โ€”An Expert System for Oncology Protocol ManagementEdward H. Shortliffe, A. Carlisle Scott, Miriam B. Bischoff, A. Bruce Campbell, William van MeUe, and Charlotte D. JacobsPart Twelve: ConclusionsChapter 36โ€”Major Lessons from This WorkEpilogAppendixReferencesName IndexSubject IndexReading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., Inc.


Rule-Based Expert Systems: The MYCIN Experiments of the Stanford Heuristic Programming Project

Classics

Artificial intelligence, or AI, is largely an experimental scienceโ€”at least as much progress has been made by building and analyzing programs as by examining theoretical questions. MYCIN is one of several well-known programs that embody some intelligence and provide data on the extent to which intelligent behavior can be programmed. As with other AI programs, its development was slow and not always in a forward direction. But we feel we learned some useful lessons in the course of nearly a decade of work on MYCIN and related programs. In this book we share the results of many experiments performed in that time, and we try to paint a coherent picture of the work. The book is intended to be a critical analysis of several pieces of related research, performed by a large number of scientists. We believe that the whole field of AI will benefit from such attempts to take a detailed retrospective look at experiments, for in this way the scientific foundations of the field will gradually be defined. It is for all these reasons that we have prepared this analysis of the MYCIN experiments.ContentsContributorsForewordAllen NewellPrefacePart One: BackgroundChapter 1โ€”The Context of the MYCIN ExperimentsChapter 2โ€”The Origin of Rule-Based Systems in AIRandall Davis and Jonathan J. KingPart Two: Using RulesChapter 3โ€”The Evolution of MYCINโ€™s Rule FormChapter 4โ€”The Structure of the MYCIN SystemWilliam van MelleChapter 5โ€”Details of the Consultation SystemEdward H. ShortliffeChapter 6โ€”Details of the Revised Therapy AlgorithmWilliam J. ClanceyPart Three: Building a Knowledge BaseChapter 7โ€”Knowledge EngineeringChapter 8โ€”Completeness and Consistency in a Rule-Based SystemMotoi Suwa, A. Carlisle Scott, and Edward H. ShortliffeChapter 9โ€”Interactive Transfer of ExpertiseRandall Davis[#p4]] Part Four: Reasoning Under UncertaintyChapter 10โ€”Uncertainty and Evidential SupportChapter 11โ€”A Model of Inexact Reasoning in MedicineEdward H. Shortliffe and Bruce G. BuchananChapter 12โ€”Probabilistic Reasoning and Certainty FactorsJ. Barclay AdamsChapter 13โ€”The Dempster-Shafer Theory of EvidenceJean Gordon and Edward H. ShortliffePart Five: Generalizing MYCINChapter 14โ€”Use of the MYCIN Inference EngineChapter 15โ€”EMYCIN: A Knowledge Engineerโ€™s Tool for Constructing Rule-Based Expert SystemsWilliam van Melle, Edward H. Shortliffe, and Bruce G. BuchananChapter 16โ€”Experience Using EMYCINJames S. Bennett and Robert S. EngelmorePart Six: Explaining the ReasoningChapter 17โ€”Explanation as a Topic of AI ResearchChapter 18โ€”Methods for Generating ExplanationsA. Carlisle Scott, William J. Clancey, Randall Davis, and Edward H. ShortliffeChapter 19โ€”Specialized Explanations for Dosage SelectionSharon Wraith Bennett and A. Carlisle ScottChapter 20โ€”Customized Explanations Using Causal KnowledgeJerold W. Wallis and Edward H. ShortliffePart Seven: Using Other RepresentationsChapter 21โ€”Other Representation FrameworksChapter 22โ€”Extensions to the Rule-Based Formalism for a Monitoring TaskLawrence M. Fagan, John C. Kunz, Edward A. Feigenbaum, and John J. OsbornChapter 23โ€”A Representation Scheme Using Both Frames and RulesJanice S. AikinsChapter 24โ€”Another Look at FramesDavid E. Smith and Jan E. ClaytonPart Eight: TutoringChapter 25โ€”Intelligent Computer-Aided InstructionChapter 26โ€”Use of MYCINโ€™s Rules for TutoringWilliam J. ClanceyPart Nine: Augmenting the RulesChapter 27โ€”Additional Knowledge StructuresChapter 28โ€”Meta-Level KnowledgeRandall Davis and Bruce G. BuchananChapter 29โ€”Extensions to Rules for Explanation and TutoringWilliam J. ClanceyPart Ten: Evaluating PerformanceChapter 30โ€”The Problem of EvaluationChapter 31โ€”An Evaluation of MYCINโ€™s AdviceVictor L. Yu, Lawrence M. Fagan, Sharon Wraith Bennett, William J . Clancey, A. Carlisle Scott, John F. Hannigan, Robert L. Blum, Bruce G. Buchanan, and Stanley N. CohenPart Eleven: Designing for Human UseChapter 32โ€”Human Engineering of Medical Expert SystemsChapter 33โ€”Strategies for Understanding Structured EnglishAlain BonnetChapter 34โ€”An Analysis of Physiciansโ€™ AttitudesRandy L. Teach and Edward H. ShortliffeChapter 35โ€”An Expert System for Oncology Protocol ManagementEdward H. Shortliffe, A. Carlisle Scott, Miriam B. Bischoff, A. Bruce Campbell, William van MeUe, and Charlotte D. JacobsPart Twelve: ConclusionsChapter 36โ€”Major Lessons from This WorkEpilogAppendixReferencesName IndexSubject IndexReading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., Inc.


Readings in Medical Artificial Intelligence: The First Decade - Table of Contents

Classics

A survey of early work exploring how AI can be used in medicine, with somewhat more technical expositions than in the complementary volume "Artificial Intelligence in Medicine." Each chapter is preceded by a brief introduction that outlines our view of its contribution to the field, the reason it was selected for inclusion in this volume, an overview of its content, and a discussion of how the work evolved after the article appeared and how it relates to other chapters in the book.


What Should Artificial Intelligence Want from the Supercomputers?

AI Magazine

While some proposals for supercomputers increase the powers of existing machines like CDC and Cray supercomputers, others suggest radical changes of architecture to speed up non-traditional operations such as logical inference in PROLOG, recognition/ action in production systems, or message passing. We examine the case of parallel PROLOG to identify several related computations which subsume those of parallel PROLOG, but which have much wider interest, and which may have roughly the same difficulty of mechanization. Similar considerations apply to some other proposed architectures as well, raising the possibility that current efforts may be limiting their aims unnecessarily.


Research at Jet Propulsion Laboratory

AI Magazine

AI research at JPL started in 1972 when design and construction of experimental "Mars Rover" began. Early in that effort, it was recognized that rover planning capabilities were inadequate. Research in planning was begun in 1975, and work on a succession of AI expert systems of steadily increasing power has continued to the present. Within the group, we have concentrated our efforts on expert systems, although work on vision and robotics has continued in a separate organizations, with which we have maintained informal contacts.



Review of States of Mind

AI Magazine

The subject the idea has changed psychology, anthropology, sociology, is attempting to make sense of the world, and often coping and psychiatry should make its pervasiveness and importance with incomplete information, failure to understand, or lacking more evident.


What Should Artificial Intelligence Want from the Supercomputers?

AI Magazine

While some proposals for supercomputers increase the powers of existing machines like CDC and Cray supercomputers, others suggest radical changes of architecture to speed up non-traditional operations such as logical inference in PROLOG, recognition/ action in production systems, or message passing. We examine the case of parallel PROLOG to identify several related computations which subsume those of parallel PROLOG, but which have much wider interest, and which may have roughly the same difficulty of mechanization. Similar considerations apply to some other proposed architectures as well, raising the possibility that current efforts may be limiting their aims unnecessarily.