This lack of rich textual edge annotations significantly limits the exploration of contextual relationships between entities, hindering deeper insights into graph-structured data.

This paradigm has been challenged by practical deployments, which are more dynamic in nature.

Recent advancements have shown promise in applying traditional Semi-Supervised Learning strategies to the task of Generalized Category Discovery (GCD).

Our work designs privacy attacks, which have the potential to cause harm. The main limitation of our work is the strong threat model under which our attacks work. All of our results on CIFAR-10 make use of fewer than 30000 trained models. We plot the effectiveness of Transfer LiRA in Figure 7. ROC curves for our student attacks are found Further qualitative examples can be found in Figure 9. Ablation of score information CIFAR-10 with duplicates are found in Figure 11. Distillation threat models, which we will consider simultaneously.

Model distillation is frequently proposed as a technique to reduce the privacy leakage of machine learning. These empirical privacy defenses rely on the intuition that distilled "student" models protect the privacy of training data, as they only interact with this data indirectly through a "teacher" model. In this work, we design membership inference attacks to systematically study the privacy provided by knowledge distillation to both the teacher and student training sets. Our new attacks show that distillation alone provides only limited privacy across a number of domains. We explain the success of our attacks on distillation by showing that membership inference attacks on a private dataset can succeed even if the target model is never queried on any actual training points, but only on inputs whose predictions are highly influenced by training data. Finally, we show that our attacks are strongest when student and teacher sets are similar, or when the attacker can poison the teacher set.

A unifying theme in the design of intelligent agents is to efficiently optimize a policy based on what prior knowledge of the problem is available and what actions can be taken to learn more about it.

Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) has recently surged in popularity, particularly for aligning large language models and other AI systems with human intentions. At its core, RLHF can be viewed as a specialized instance of Preference-based Reinforcement Learning (PbRL), where the preferences specifically originate from human judgments rather than arbitrary evaluators. Despite this connection, most existing approaches in both RLHF and PbRL primarily focus on optimizing a mean reward objective, neglecting scenarios that necessitate risk-awareness, such as AI safety, healthcare, and autonomous driving. These scenarios often operate under a one-episode-reward setting, which makes conventional risk-sensitive objectives inapplicable.

In Algorithm 1 we present the memorizing and recalling procedures of the single-layer tPC.Algorithm 1 Memorizing and recalling with single-layer tPC Here we present the proof for Property 1 in the main text, that the single-layer tPC can be viewed as a "whitened" version of the AHN. When applied to the data sequence, it whitens the data such that (i.e., Eq.16 in the main text): These observations are consistent with our numerical results shown in Figure 1. MCAHN has a much larger MSE than that of the tPC because of the entirely wrong recalls. In Figure 1 we also present the online recall results of the models in MovingMNIST, CIFAR10 and UCF101. In Fig 4 we show a natural example of aliased sequences where a movie of a human doing push-ups is memorized and recalled by the model.