In this essay I argue that it is logically and practically possible to secure the right to privacy under conditions of increasing social transparency. The argument is predicated on a particular analysis of the right to privacy as the right to the personal space required for the exercise of practical rationality. It also rests on the distinction between the unidirectional transparency required by repressive governments and the increasing omnidirectional transparency that liberal information societies are experiencing today. I claim that a properly administered omnidirectional transparency will not only enhance privacy and autonomy, but can also be a key development in the creation of a society that is more tolerant of harmless diversity and temperate in its punishment of anti-social behaviors.

Some of the top legal ontologies developed so far include the Functional Ontology for Law [FOLaw] The increasing need for legal information and content (Valente 1995), the Frame-Based Ontology (van Kralingen management caused by the growing amount of 1995), the LRI-Core ontology (Breuker 2004), unstructured (or poorly structured) legal data managed by DOLCE CLO [Core Legal Ontology] (Gangemi et al. legal publishing companies, law firms and public 2003), or the Ontology of Fundamental Concepts (Rubino administrations, or the increasing amount of legal et al. 2006, Sartor 2006) the basis for the LKIF-Core information directly available on the World Wide Web, Ontology (Breuker et al. 2007). Nevertheless, most legal have created an urgent need to construct conceptual ontologies are domain specific ontologies, which represent structures for knowledge representation to share and particular legal domains towards search, indexing and manage intelligently all this information, whilst making reasoning in a specific domain of national or European law human-machine communication and understanding (e.g. the IPRONTO ontology by Delgado et al. 2003, the possible.

Human trafficking is a multi-dimensional problem for which we have incomplete data, limited knowledge of the exploiters, and no understanding of the dynamics of the process. It is a problem that requires a larger, more complete database, understanding of key actors and their interactions in a dynamic environment. These methods exist in the areas of Data Mining, Machine Learning, Network Analysis, and Multi-agent systems. Using these methods, it is possible to create a model which is unique to detecting and preventing human trafficking. These methods can give applicable and successful solutions for different components of the problem of human trafficking. The goal is to build an intelligent system to enable collaboration and analysis, to identify and profile victims, traffickers, buyers, and exploiters, to predict human trafficking patterns, and to disrupt and destabilize human trafficking networks. In this paper, I will outline how some of these methods may be able to help analyze and model the dynamic phenomenon of human trafficking. The purpose is to see whether, using intelligent systems and appropriate collaboration and analysis tools, optimized intervention strategies can be created to profile victims and traffickers as well as impact, dissolve, and disrupt the human trafficking network in such a way that the network is unable to recover.

RefereeToolbox is a java package implementing combination operators for fusing evidences. It is downloadable from: http://refereefunction.fredericdambreville.com/releases RefereeToolbox is based on an interpretation of the fusion rules by means of Referee Functions (refer to 2). This approach implies a dissociation between the definition of the combination and its actual implementation, which is common to all referee-based combinations. As a result, RefereeToolbox is designed with the aim to be generic and evolutive. It is composed of three distinct classes of objects: - A class for the logical representation of the information; this class is generic and incremental; are yet implemented structures as: - Powerset, - Free Boolean algebra, - Superpowerset, - Open/closed hyperpowerset, - · · · make yours! The generic implementation of RefereeToolbox makes possible to combine these three classes and their instances without restriction. For an introduction to the theory of referee function, please refer to [3]. A referee function for s sources of information is also called a s-ary referee function. The case X is called the rejection case. The value z is called the rejection rate. See the 19 GNU General P u b l i c License f o r more d e t a i l s. 20 21 You should have r e c e i v e d a copy o f the GNU General P ublic Lic e nse 22 along with RefereeToolbox. BR 50 BR 51 RefereeToolbox i s d i s t r i b u t e d i n the hope that i t w i l l be u s e f u l, 52 but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the im plie d warranty o f 53 MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the 54 GNU General P u b l i c License f o r more d e t a i l s. BR 55 BR 56 You should have r e c e i v e d a copy o f the GNU General P ublic Lic e nse 57 along with RefereeToolbox. See the 19 GNU General P u b l i c License f o r more d e t a i l s. 20 21 You should have r e c e i v e d a copy o f the GNU General P ublic Lic e nse 22 along with RefereeToolbox. BR 48 BR 49 RefereeToolbox i s d i s t r i b u t e d i n the hope that i t w i l l be u s e f u l, 50 but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the im plie d warranty o f 51 MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the 52 GNU General P u b l i c License f o r more d e t a i l s. BR 53 BR 54 You should have r e c e i v e d a copy o f the GNU General P ublic Lic e nse 55 along with RefereeToolbox. See the 19 GNU General P u b l i c License f o r more d e t a i l s. 20 21 You should have r e c e i v e d a copy o f the GNU General P ublic Lic e nse 22 along with RefereeToolbox. BR 45 BR 46 RefereeToolbox i s d i s t r i b u t e d i n the hope that i t w i l l be u s e f u l, 47 but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the im plie d warranty o f 48 MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the 49 GNU General P u b l i c License f o r more d e t a i l s.

As historically acknowledged in the Reasoning about Actions and Change community, intuitiveness of a logical domain description cannot be fully automated. Moreover, like any other logical theory, action theories may also evolve, and thus knowledge engineers need revision methods to help in accommodating new incoming information about the behavior of actions in an adequate manner. The present work is about changing action domain descriptions in multimodal logic. Its contribution is threefold: first we revisit the semantics of action theory contraction proposed in previous work, giving more robust operators that express minimal change based on a notion of distance between Kripke-models. Second we give algorithms for syntactical action theory contraction and establish their correctness with respect to our semantics for those action theories that satisfy a principle of modularity investigated in previous work. Since modularity can be ensured for every action theory and, as we show here, needs to be computed at most once during the evolution of a domain description, it does not represent a limitation at all to the method here studied. Finally we state AGM-like postulates for action theory contraction and assess the behavior of our operators with respect to them. Moreover, we also address the revision counterpart of action theory change, showing that it benefits from our semantics for contraction.

Inspired by a growing interest in analyzing network data, we study the problem of node classification on graphs, focusing on approaches based on kernel machines. Conventionally, kernel machines are linear classifiers in the implicit feature space. We argue that linear classification in the feature space of kernels commonly used for graphs is often not enough to produce good results. When this is the case, one naturally considers nonlinear classifiers in the feature space. We show that repeating this process produces something we call "deep kernel machines." We provide some examples where deep kernel machines can make a big difference in classification performance, and point out some connections to various recent literature on deep architectures in artificial intelligence and machine learning.

When individuals independently recollect events or retrieve facts from memory, how can we aggregate these retrieved memories to reconstruct the actual set of events or facts? In this research, we report the performance of individuals in a series of general knowledge tasks, where the goal is to reconstruct from memory the order of historic events, or the order of items along some physical dimension. We introduce two Bayesian models for aggregating order information based on a Thurstonian approach and Mallows model. Both models assume that each individuals reconstruction is based on either a random permutation of the unobserved ground truth, or by a pure guessing strategy. We apply MCMC to make inferences about the underlying truth and the strategies employed by individuals. The models demonstrate a wisdom of crowds" effect, where the aggregated orderings are closer to the true ordering than the orderings of the best individual."

Networks are ubiquitous in science and have become a focal point for discussion in everyday life. Formal statistical models for the analysis of network data have emerged as a major topic of interest in diverse areas of study, and most of these involve a form of graphical representation. Probability models on graphs date back to 1959. Along with empirical studies in social psychology and sociology from the 1960s, these early works generated an active network community and a substantial literature in the 1970s. This effort moved into the statistical literature in the late 1970s and 1980s, and the past decade has seen a burgeoning network literature in statistical physics and computer science. The growth of the World Wide Web and the emergence of online networking communities such as Facebook, MySpace, and LinkedIn, and a host of more specialized professional network communities has intensified interest in the study of networks and network data. Our goal in this review is to provide the reader with an entry point to this burgeoning literature. We begin with an overview of the historical development of statistical network modeling and then we introduce a number of examples that have been studied in the network literature. Our subsequent discussion focuses on a number of prominent static and dynamic network models and their interconnections. We emphasize formal model descriptions, and pay special attention to the interpretation of parameters and their estimation. We end with a description of some open problems and challenges for machine learning and statistics.

In this paper, we present AutoMed, an automated mediator for multi-issue bilateral negotiation under time constraints. AutoMed uses a qualitative model to represent the negotiators' preferences. It analyzes the negotiators' preferences, monitors the negotiations and proposes possible solutions for resolving the conflict. We conducted experiments in a simulated environment. The results show that negotiations mediated by AutoMed are concluded significantly faster than non-mediated ones and without any of the negotiators opting out. Furthermore, the subjects in the mediated negotiations are more satisfied from the resolutions than the subjects in the non-mediated negotiations.

Although it has contributed to remarkable improvements in some specific areas, attempts to develop a universal design theory are generally characterized by failure. This paper sketches arguments for a new approach to engineering design based on Semiotics - the science about signs. The approach is to combine different design theories over all the product life cycle stages into one coherent and traceable framework. Besides, it is to bring together the designer's and user's understandings of the notion of 'good product'. Building on the insight from natural sciences that complex systems always exhibit a self-organizing meaning-influential hierarchical dynamics, objective laws controlling product development are found through an examination of design as a semiosis process. These laws are then applied to support evolutionary design of products. An experiment validating some of the theoretical findings is outlined, and concluding remarks are given.