Long-separated research has been conducted on two highly correlated tracks: traffic and incidents. Traffic track witnesses complicating deep learning models, e.g., to push the prediction a few percent more accurate, and the incident track only studies the incidents alone, e.g., to infer the incident risk. We, for the first time, spatiotemporally aligned the two tracks in a large-scale region (16,972 traffic nodes) from year 2022 to 2024: our TraffiDent dataset includes traffic, i.e., time-series indexes on traffic flow, lane occupancy, and average vehicle speed, and incident, whose records are spatiotemporally aligned with traffic data, with seven different incident classes. Additionally, each node includes detailed physical and policylevel meta-attributes of lanes. Previous datasets typically contain only traffic or incident data in isolation, limiting research to general forecasting tasks.

As major progress in LLM-based long-form text generation enables paradigms such as retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) and inference-time scaling, safely incorporating private information into the generation remains a critical open question.

From a $13 Blink camera to $25 noise-cancelling earbuds, these are the name-brand picks worth grabbing before the sale ends June 26. More information Adding us as a Preferred Source in Google by using this link indicates that you would like to see more of our content in Google News results. You don't have to spend a ton to save money. We may earn revenue from the products available on this page and participate in affiliate programs. By signing up, you confirm you are 16+, will receive newsletters and promotional content and agree to our Terms of Use and acknowledge the data practices in our Privacy Policy .

Alignment faking in large language models presented a demonstration of Claude 3 Opus and Claude 3.5 Sonnet selectively complying with a helpfulonly training objective to prevent modification of their behavior outside of training. We expand this analysis to 25 models and find that only 5 (Claude 3 Opus, Claude 3.5 Sonnet, Llama 3 405B, Grok 3, Gemini 2.0 Flash) comply with harmful queries more when they infer they are in training than when they infer they are in deployment. First, we study the motivations of these 5 models. Results from perturbing details of the scenario suggest that only Claude 3 Opus's compliance gap is primarily and consistently motivated by trying to keep its goals. Second, we investigate why many chat models don't fake alignment. Our results suggest this is not entirely due to a lack of capabilities: many base models fake alignment some of the time, and post-training eliminates alignment-faking for some models and amplifies it for others.We investigate 5 hypotheses for how post-training may suppress alignment faking and find that variations in refusal behavior may account for a significant portion of differences in alignment faking.

Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) is essential for aligning large language models (LLMs) with human preferences and values. While recent research has primarily focused on algorithmic advancements--such as reducing computational overhead or strengthening reward models to mitigate reward hacking--the critical role of prompt-data construction and its scalability has received comparatively less attention. In this paper, we address this gap by systematically exploring data-driven bottlenecks that currently hinder RLHF performance scaling, focusing specifically on the challenges posed by reward hacking and decreasing response diversity. To mitigate reward hacking, we introduce a hybrid reward system combining reasoning task verifiers (RTV) and a generative reward model (GenRM). This approach enables accurate assessment of responses against clearly defined ground-truth solutions. Additionally, in order to ensure response diversity and enhance learning effectiveness, we propose a novel prompt-selection method named Pre-PPO, explicitly identifying training prompts that are inherently challenging and thus less prone to reward hacking.

Recent advances in artificial intelligence have significantly impacted image retrieval tasks, yet Patent-Product Image Retrieval (PPIR) has received limited attention. PPIR, which retrieves patent images based on product images to identify potential infringements, presents unique challenges: (1) both product and patent images often contain numerous categories of artificial objects, but models pre-trained on standard datasets exhibit limited discriminative power to recognize some of those unseen objects; and (2) the significant domain gap between binary patent line drawings and colorful RGB product images further complicates similarity comparisons for product-patent pairs. To address these challenges, we formulate it as an open-set image retrieval task and introduce a comprehensive Patent-Product Image Retrieval Dataset (PPIRD) including a test set with 439 product-patent pairs, a retrieval pool of 727,921 patents, and an unlabeled pre-training set of 3,799,695 images. We further propose a novel Intermediate Domain Alignment and Morphology Analogy (IDAMA) strategy. IDAMA maps both image types to an intermediate sketch domain using edge detection to minimize the domain discrepancy, and employs a Morphology Analogy Filter to select discriminative patent images based on visual features via analogical reasoning. Extensive experiments on PPIRD demonstrate that IDAMA significantly outperforms baseline methods (+7.58 mAR) and offers valuable insights into domain mapping and representation learning for PPIR.

Causal effect estimation is critical to a range of scientific disciplines. Existing methods for this task either require interventional data, knowledge about the ground-truth causal graph, or rely on assumptions such as unconfoundedness, restricting their applicability in real-world settings. In the domain of tabular machine learning, Prior-data fitted networks (PFNs) have achieved state-of-theart predictive performance, having been pre-trained on synthetic causal data to solve tabular prediction problems via in-context learning. To assess whether this can be transferred to the problem of causal effect estimation, we pre-train PFNs on synthetic data drawn from a wide variety of causal structures, including interventions, to predict interventional outcomes given observational data. Through extensive experiments in synthetic and semi-synthetic settings, we show that our approach allows for the accurate estimation of causal effects without knowledge of the underlying causal graph.

AI systems are increasingly able to autonomously conduct realistic software engineering tasks, and may soon be deployed to automate machine learning (ML) R&D itself. Frontier AI systems may be deployed in safety-critical settings, including to help ensure the safety of future systems. Unfortunately, frontier and future systems may not be sufficiently trustworthy, and there is evidence that these systems may even be misaligned with their developers or users. Therefore, we investigate the capabilities of AI agents to act against the interests of their users when conducting ML engineering, by sabotaging ML models, sandbagging their performance, and subverting oversight mechanisms. First, we extend MLE-Bench, a benchmark for realistic ML tasks, with code-sabotage tasks such as implanting backdoors and purposefully causing generalisation failures.

Large language models (LLMs) have shown impressive capabilities across tasks such as mathematics, coding, and reasoning, yet their learning ability, which is crucial for adapting to dynamic environments and acquiring new knowledge, remains underexplored. In this work, we address this gap by introducing a framework inspired by cognitive psychology and education. Specifically, we decompose general learning ability into three distinct, complementary dimensions: Learning from Instructor (acquiring knowledge via explicit guidance), Learning from Concept (internalizing abstract structures and generalizing to new contexts), and Learning from Experience (adapting through accumulated exploration and feedback). We conduct a comprehensive empirical study across the three learning dimensions and identify several insightful findings, such as (i) interaction improves learning; (ii) conceptual understanding is scale-emergent and benefits larger models; and (iii) LLMs are effective few-shot learners but not many-shot learners. Based on our framework and empirical findings, we introduce a benchmark that provides a unified and realistic evaluation of LLMs' general learning abilities across three learning cognition dimensions. It enables diagnostic insights and supports evaluation and development of more adaptive and human-like models. The code is available here 2.

We study the ability of language models to reason about appropriate information disclosure--a central aspect of the evolving field of agentic privacy. Whereas previous works have focused on evaluating a model's ability to align with human decisions, we examine the role of ambiguity and missing context on model performance when making information-sharing decisions. We identify context ambiguity as a crucial barrier for high performance in privacy assessments. By designing Camber, a framework for context disambiguation, we show that model-generated decision rationales can reveal ambiguities and that systematically disambiguating context based on these rationales leads to significant accuracy improvements (up to 13.3% in precision and up to 22.3% in recall) as well as reductions in prompt sensitivity. Overall, our results indicate that approaches for context disambiguation are a promising way forward to enhance agentic privacy reasoning.