Soil and groundwater contamination is a pervasive problem at thousands of locations across the world. Contaminated sites often require decades to remediate or to monitor natural attenuation. Climate change exacerbates the long-term site management problem because extreme precipitation and/or shifts in precipitation/evapotranspiration regimes could re-mobilize contaminants and proliferate affected groundwater. To quickly assess the spatiotemporal variations of groundwater contamination under uncertain climate disturbances, we developed a physics-informed machine learning surrogate model using U-Net enhanced Fourier Neural Operator (U-FNO) to solve Partial Differential Equations (PDEs) of groundwater flow and transport simulations at the site scale.We develop a combined loss function that includes both data-driven factors and physical boundary constraints at multiple spatiotemporal scales. Our U-FNOs can reliably predict the spatiotemporal variations of groundwater flow and contaminant transport properties from 1954 to 2100 with realistic climate projections. In parallel, we develop a convolutional autoencoder combined with online clustering to reduce the dimensionality of the vast historical and projected climate data by quantifying climatic region similarities across the United States. The ML-based unique climate clusters provide climate projections for the surrogate modeling and help return reliable future recharge rate projections immediately without querying large climate datasets. In all, this Multi-scale Digital Twin work can advance the field of environmental remediation under climate change.

On Tuesday, Meta AI unveiled a demo of Galactica, a large language model designed to "store, combine and reason about scientific knowledge." While intended to accelerate writing scientific literature, adversarial users running tests found it could also generate realistic nonsense. After several days of ethical criticism, Meta took the demo offline, reports MIT Technology Review. Large language models (LLMs), such as OpenAI's GPT-3, learn to write text by studying millions of examples and understanding the statistical relationships between words. As a result, they can author convincing-sounding documents, but those works can also be riddled with falsehoods and potentially harmful stereotypes.

More Zillow-like debacles are expected. There is a new vulnerability in the data science ranks. Based on the recent discussions with dozens of Fortune 500 data science teams, we can expect to see a continued spotlight on AI model quality in 2023. Stay updated on last news about Artificial Intelligence. Check your inbox or spam folder to confirm your subscription.

We show that deep networks trained to satisfy demographic parity often do so through a form of race or gender awareness, and that the more we force a network to be fair, the more accurately we can recover race or gender from the internal state of the network. Based on this observation, we investigate an alternative fairness approach: we add a second classification head to the network to explicitly predict the protected attribute (such as race or gender) alongside the original task. After training the two-headed network, we enforce demographic parity by merging the two heads, creating a network with the same architecture as the original network. We establish a close relationship between existing approaches and our approach by showing (1) that the decisions of a fair classifier are well-approximated by our approach, and (2) that an unfair and optimally accurate classifier can be recovered from a fair classifier and our second head predicting the protected attribute. We use our explicit formulation to argue that the existing fairness approaches, just as ours, demonstrate disparate treatment and that they are likely to be unlawful in a wide range of scenarios under US law.

A supervised text classification model relies on labelled datasets to train the model (Sebastiani, 2002). From an experimental perspective, the design and evaluation of classification models typically rely on data pertaining to fixed periods of time. Recent research demonstrates that such models, while showing competitive performance in their experimental environment, underperform when they need to classify new data that is distant in time from that observed during training (Alkhalifa and Zubiaga, 2022). This deterioration of performance has been demonstrated for different classification tasks, including topic classification (Rocha, Mourão, Pereira, Gonçalves, and Meira, 2008), sentiment classification (Lukes and Søgaard, 2018), hate speech detection (Florio, Basile, Polignano, Basile, and Patti, 2020), stance detection (Alkhalifa, Kochkina, and Zubiaga, 2021) and political ideology detection (Röttger and Pierrehumbert, 2021). This performance drop can happen for multiple reasons, including among others the evolution in language use (Smith, 2004) or the evolution of public opinion (Bonilla and Mo, 2019) and its extent may vary (Alkhalifa et al., 2021). This poses an important challenge and limitation on such models when one plans to continue using the model over a long period of time to classify new, incoming data, as can be the case with a stream of user-generated contents (Cheng, Chen, Lee, and Li, 2021).

Large language models (LLMs) transfer well to new tasks out-of-the-box simply given a natural language prompt that demonstrates how to perform the task and no additional training. Prompting is a brittle process wherein small modifications to the prompt can cause large variations in the model predictions, and therefore significant effort is dedicated towards designing a painstakingly "perfect prompt" for a task. To mitigate the high degree of effort involved in prompt-design, we instead ask whether producing multiple effective, yet imperfect, prompts and aggregating them can lead to a high quality prompting strategy. Our observations motivate our proposed prompting method, ASK ME ANYTHING (AMA). We first develop an understanding of the effective prompt formats, finding that question-answering (QA) prompts, which encourage open-ended generation ("Who went to the park?") tend to outperform those that restrict the model outputs ("John went to the park. Output True or False."). Our approach recursively uses the LLM itself to transform task inputs to the effective QA format. We apply the collected prompts to obtain several noisy votes for the input's true label. We find that the prompts can have very different accuracies and complex dependencies and thus propose to use weak supervision, a procedure for combining the noisy predictions, to produce the final predictions for the inputs. We evaluate AMA across open-source model families (e.g., EleutherAI, BLOOM, OPT, and T0) and model sizes (125M-175B parameters), demonstrating an average performance lift of 10.2% over the few-shot baseline. This simple strategy enables the open-source GPT-J-6B model to match and exceed the performance of few-shot GPT3-175B on 15 of 20 popular benchmarks. Averaged across these tasks, the GPT-J-6B model outperforms few-shot GPT3-175B. We release our code here: https://github.com/HazyResearch/ama_prompting

Generative AI based art has proliferated in the past year, with increasingly impressive use cases from generating fake human faces to the creation of systems that can generate thousands of artistic images from text prompts - some of these images have even been "good" enough to win accolades from qualified judges. In this paper, we explore how Generative Models have impacted artistry, not only from a qualitative point of view, but also from an angle of exploitation of artists -- both via plagiarism, where models are trained on their artwork without permission, and via profit shifting, where profits in the art market have shifted from art creators to model owners. However, we posit that if deployed responsibly, AI generative models have the possibility of being a positive, new modality in art that does not displace or harm existing artists.

STR is seeking a Software Engineer to join our growing Autonomy team, with a focus on building User Interfaces (UIs) for controlling teams of autonomous robotic systems. As part of STR's Autonomy team, you will design, develop, and test software that ranges from early prototypes to fielded systems and will revolutionize the way that humans interact with robotic systems. You will be able to develop and test your software in simulation, live demonstration, and field experiments. This hybrid position is based in STR's state-of-the-art Autonomy lab, which is located steps from STR's Woburn, MA corporate headquarters. We are seeking candidates at all levels – from established technical leads with proven experience to talented recent graduates seeking impactful research and development opportunities.

MIT Sloan Management Review and BCG have assembled an international panel of AI experts that includes academics and practitioners to help us gain insights into how responsible artificial intelligence (RAI) is being implemented in organizations worldwide. This month, we asked our expert panelists for reactions to the following provocation: Executives usually think of RAI as a technology issue. The results were wide-ranging, with 40% (8 out of 20) of our panelists either agreeing or strongly agreeing with the statement; 15% (3 out of 20) disagreeing or strongly disagreeing with it; and 45% (9 out of 20) expressing ambivalence, neither agreeing nor disagreeing. While our panelists differ on whether this sentiment is widely held among executives, a sizable fraction argue that it depends on which executives you ask. Our experts also contend that views are changing, with some offering ideas on how to accelerate this change.

In 2022, the growth of Legal Tech Artificial Intelligence Market is projected to reach Multi-million USD by 2026, In comparison to 2021, Over the next Seven years the Legal Tech Artificial Intelligence Market will register a magnificent spike in CAGR in terms of revenue, In this study, 2021 has been considered as the base year and 2022 to 2026 as the forecast period to estimate the market size for Legal Tech Artificial Intelligence. Legal Tech Artificial Intelligence Market Insights 2022 With "Legal Tech Artificial Intelligence market revenue was Million USD in 2016, grew to Million USD in 2020, and will reach Million USD in 2026, with a CAGR of % during 2020-2026." Legal Tech Artificial Intelligence Market research report is an analysis report that gives you an insight into the future and the future of business. The factual information and data contained in this report will allow you to identify the key features of the Legal Tech Artificial Intelligence Market that drive, revenue and growth potential. During the COVID-19 period, the global economy may be affected in three different ways: directly as it relates to production and demand, indirectly as it relates to supply chains and markets, and as a result of its financial consequences on firms and financial markets.