How neuronal circuits achieve credit assignment remains a central unsolved question in systems neuroscience. Various studies have suggested plausible solutions for back-propagating error signals through multi-layer networks. These purely functionally motivated models assume distinct neuronal compartments to represent local error signals that determine the sign of synaptic plasticity. However, this explicit error modulation is inconsistent with phenomenological plasticity models in which the sign depends primarily on postsynaptic activity. Here we show how a plausible microcircuit model and Hebbian learning rule derived within an adaptive control theory framework can resolve this discrepancy. Assuming errors are encoded in top-down dis-inhibitory synaptic afferents, we show that error-modulated learning emerges naturally at the circuit level when recurrent inhibition explicitly influences Hebbian plasticity. The same learning rule accounts for experimentally observed plasticity in the absence of inhibition and performs comparably to back-propagation of error (BP) on several non-linearly separable benchmarks. Our findings bridge the gap between functional and experimentally observed plasticity rules and make concrete predictions on inhibitory modulation of excitatory plasticity.

Autonomous robots used in infrastructure inspection, space exploration and other critical missions operate in highly dynamic environments. As such, they must continually verify their ability to complete the tasks associated with these missions safely and effectively. Here we present a Bayesian learning framework that enables this runtime verification of autonomous robots. The framework uses prior knowledge and observations of the verified robot to learn expected ranges for the occurrence rates of regular and singular (e.g., catastrophic failure) events. Interval continuous-time Markov models defined using these ranges are then analysed to obtain expected intervals of variation for system properties such as mission duration and success probability. We apply the framework to an autonomous robotic mission for underwater infrastructure inspection and repair. The formal proofs and experiments presented in the paper show that our framework produces results that reflect the uncertainty intrinsic to many real-world systems, enabling the robust verification of their quantitative properties under parametric uncertainty.

Robotic exploration of unknown environments is fundamentally a problem of decision making under uncertainty where the robot must account for uncertainty in sensor measurements, localization, action execution, as well as many other factors. For large-scale exploration applications, autonomous systems must overcome the challenges of sequentially deciding which areas of the environment are valuable to explore while safely evaluating the risks associated with obstacles and hazardous terrain. In this work, we propose a risk-aware meta-level decision making framework to balance the tradeoffs associated with local and global exploration. Meta-level decision making builds upon classical hierarchical coverage planners by switching between local and global policies with the overall objective of selecting the policy that is most likely to maximize reward in a stochastic environment. We use information about the environment history, traversability risk, and kinodynamic constraints to reason about the probability of successful policy execution to switch between local and global policies. We have validated our solution in both simulation and on a variety of large-scale real world hardware tests. Our results show that by balancing local and global exploration we are able to significantly explore large-scale environments more efficiently.

Neural operators have proven to be a promising approach for modeling spatiotemporal systems in the physical sciences. However, training these models for large systems can be quite challenging as they incur significant computational and memory expense -- these systems are often forced to rely on autoregressive time-stepping of the neural network to predict future temporal states. While this is effective in managing costs, it can lead to uncontrolled error growth over time and eventual instability. We analyze the sources of this autoregressive error growth using prototypical neural operator models for physical systems and explore ways to mitigate it. We introduce architectural and application-specific improvements that allow for careful control of instability-inducing operations within these models without inflating the compute/memory expense. We present results on several scientific systems that include Navier-Stokes fluid flow, rotating shallow water, and a high-resolution global weather forecasting system. We demonstrate that applying our design principles to neural operators leads to significantly lower errors for long-term forecasts as well as longer time horizons without qualitative signs of divergence compared to the original models for these systems. We open-source our \href{https://github.com/mikemccabe210/stabilizing_neural_operators}{code} for reproducibility.

Advancements in semiconductor fabrication over the past decade have catalyzed extensive research into all-optical devices driven by exciton-polariton condensates. Preliminary validations of such devices, including transistors, have shown encouraging results even under ambient conditions. A significant challenge still remains for large scale application however: the lack of a robust solver that can be used to simulate complex nonlinear systems which require an extended period of time to stabilize. Addressing this need, we propose the application of a machine-learning-based Fourier Neural Operator approach to find the solution to the Gross-Pitaevskii equations coupled with extra exciton rate equations. This work marks the first direct application of Neural Operators to an exciton-polariton condensate system. Our findings show that the proposed method can predict final-state solutions to a high degree of accuracy almost 1000 times faster than CUDA-based GPU solvers. Moreover, this paves the way for potential all-optical chip design workflows by integrating experimental data.

Machine learning (ML) is emerging as a transformative tool for the design of architected materials, offering properties that far surpass those achievable through lab-based trial-and-error methods. However, a major challenge in current inverse design strategies is their reliance on extensive computational and/or experimental datasets, which becomes particularly problematic for designing micro-scale stochastic architected materials that exhibit nonlinear mechanical behaviors. Here, we introduce a new end-to-end scientific ML framework, leveraging deep neural operators (DeepONet), to directly learn the relationship between the complete microstructure and mechanical response of architected metamaterials from sparse but high-quality in situ experimental data. The approach facilitates the inverse design of structures tailored to specific nonlinear mechanical behaviors. Results obtained from spinodal microstructures, printed using two-photon lithography, reveal that the prediction error for mechanical responses is within a range of 5 - 10%. Our work underscores that by employing neural operators with advanced micro-mechanics experimental techniques, the design of complex micro-architected materials with desired properties becomes feasible, even in scenarios constrained by data scarcity. Our work marks a significant advancement in the field of materials-by-design, potentially heralding a new era in the discovery and development of next-generation metamaterials with unparalleled mechanical characteristics derived directly from experimental insights.

Optimization problems are ubiquitous in science and engineering applications [1]. Those also include the support to engineering tasks that are in increasing demand to meet sustainability goals such as the identification of the best design configurations to maximize the performance and minimize the environmental impact of novel engineering solutions, and the detection and identification of damages or faults to monitor the health condition of complex systems to maximize their useful life and minimize waste of resources. Over the last decades, the increase of computing power and the advances in computational modelling capabilities made available computer-based models for the accurate analysis and simulation of complex physical systems. This is the case of computational schemes for the numerical solution of governing partial differential equations as computational fluid dynamic solvers to represent viscous fluids, and finite element methods for the analysis of mechanical structures, heath transfer and electromagnetic phenomena. In principle, this computer-based representations can provide a remarkable contribution to enhance the search and identification task in simulation-based optimization. Unfortunately, the extensive adoption of these high-fidelity models during the optimization procedure is hampered by the significant computational cost and time required for their evaluation, potentially in the order of months for a single evaluation on high performance computing platforms. This issue becomes more challenging for many-query optimization problems where the demand for model evaluations grows exponentially with the number of parameters to optimize. The use of low-fidelity models constitutes a popular approach to reduce the computational resources associated with the solution of optimization problems. Low-fidelity representations introduce assumptions about the physics and/or approximate the solution of the governing equations, and relief the computational expenditure for the evaluation of the response of the system.

While real-world problems are often challenging to analyze analytically, deep learning excels in modeling complex processes from data. Existing optimization frameworks like CasADi facilitate seamless usage of solvers but face challenges when integrating learned process models into numerical optimizations. To address this gap, we present the Learning for CasADi (L4CasADi) framework, enabling the seamless integration of PyTorch-learned models with CasADi for efficient and potentially hardware-accelerated numerical optimization. The applicability of L4CasADi is demonstrated with two tutorial examples: First, we optimize a fish's trajectory in a turbulent river for energy efficiency where the turbulent flow is represented by a PyTorch model. Second, we demonstrate how an implicit Neural Radiance Field environment representation can be easily leveraged for optimal control with L4CasADi.

We introduce a probabilistic technique for full-waveform inversion, employing variational inference and conditional normalizing flows to quantify uncertainty in migration-velocity models and its impact on imaging. Our approach integrates generative artificial intelligence with physics-informed common-image gathers, reducing reliance on accurate initial velocity models. Considered case studies demonstrate its efficacy producing realizations of migration-velocity models conditioned by the data. These models are used to quantify amplitude and positioning effects during subsequent imaging.

The standard theory of optimal stopping is based on the idealised assumption that the underlying process is essentially known. In this paper, we drop this restriction and study data-driven optimal stopping for a general diffusion process, focusing on investigating the statistical performance of the proposed estimator of the optimal stopping barrier. More specifically, we derive non-asymptotic upper bounds on the simple regret, along with uniform and non-asymptotic PAC bounds. Minimax optimality is verified by completing the upper bound results with matching lower bounds on the simple regret. All results are shown both under general conditions on the payoff functions and under more refined assumptions that mimic the margin condition used in binary classification, leading to an improved rate of convergence. Additionally, we investigate how our results on the simple regret transfer to the cumulative regret for a specific exploration-exploitation strategy, both with respect to lower bounds and upper bounds.