Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly used to simulate human users in interactive settings such as therapy, education, and social role-play. While these simulations enable scalable training and evaluation of AI agents, off-the-shelf LLMs often drift from their assigned personas, contradict earlier statements, or abandon role-appropriate behavior. We introduce a unified framework for evaluating and improving persona consistency in LLM-generated dialogue. We define three automatic metrics--prompt-to-line consistency, line-to-line consistency, and Q&A consistency--that capture different types of persona drift and validate each against human annotations. Using these metrics as reward signals, we apply multiturn reinforcement learning to fine-tune LLMs for three user roles: a patient, a student, and a social chat partner. Our method reduces inconsistency by over 55%, resulting in more coherent, faithful, and trustworthy simulated users.

Options markets represent one of the most sophisticated segments of the financial ecosystem, with prices that directly reflect market uncertainty. In this paper, we introduce the first reinforcement learning (RL) framework specifically designed for volatility trading through options, focusing on profit from the difference between implied volatility and realized volatility. Our multi-agent architecture consists of an Option Position Agent (OP-Agent) responsible for volatility timing by controlling long/short volatility positions, and a Hedger Routing Agent (HR-Agent) that manages risk and maximizes path-dependent profits by selecting optimal hedging strategies with different risk preferences. Evaluating our approach using cryptocurrency options data from 2021-2024, we demonstrate superior performance on BTC and ETH, significantly outperforming traditional strategies and machine learning baselines across all profit and risk-adjusted metrics while exhibiting sophisticated trading behavior.

The goal is to find representations (e.g., embeddings in Rd or a tree metric) where anchors are placed closer to positive than to negative examples. While finding global optima of contrastive objectives is NP-hard, the complexity of finding local optima--representations that do not improve by local search algorithms such as gradient-based methods--remains open. Our work settles the complexity of finding local optima in various contrastive learning problems by proving PLS-hardness in discrete settings (e.g., maximize satisfied triplets) and CLS-hardness in continuous settings (e.g., minimize Triplet Loss), where PLS(Polynomial Local Search) and CLS(Continuous Local Search) are well-studied complexity classes capturing local search dynamics in discrete and continuous optimization, respectively. Our results imply that no polynomial time algorithm (local search or otherwise) can find a local optimum for various contrastive learning problems, unless PLS P(or CLS P for continuous problems). Even in the unlikely scenario that PLS P(or CLS P), our reductions imply that there exist instances where local search algorithms need exponential time to reach a local optimum, even for d = 1(embeddings on a line).

Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated strong generative capabilities but remain prone to inconsistencies and hallucinations. We introduce Peer Elicitation Games (PEG), a training-free, game-theoretic framework for aligning LLMs through a peer elicitation mechanism involving a generator and multiple discriminators instantiated from distinct base models. Discriminators interact in a peer evaluation setting, where utilities are computed using a determinant-based mutual information score that provably incentivizes truthful reporting without requiring ground-truth labels. We establish theoretical guarantees showing that each agent, via online learning, achieves sublinear regret in the sense their cumulative performance approaches that of the best fixed truthful strategy in hindsight. Moreover, we prove last-iterate convergence to a truthful Nash equilibrium, ensuring that the actual policies used by agents converge to stable and truthful behavior over time. Empirical evaluations across multiple benchmarks demonstrate significant improvements in factual accuracy.

Transformers have been widely adopted in natural language processing, computer vision, and other domains due to their exceptional performance across a variety of tasks. However, the computational cost of Transformers is prohibitively high, particularly when handling long input sequences, significantly increasing both training and inference time. Although various token pruning methods have been proposed to reduce the computational burden of Transformers, most approaches overlook critical differences in sequences in terms of length and complexity, leading to suboptimal compression efficiency. In this paper, we propose AD-TP, an Attribution-Driven Adaptive Token Pruning method designed to retain only the most informative tokens. We analyze the performance of using accumulated attention values to measure token importance and find that attention values do not accurately reflect the actual contribution of each token to text understanding.

We address the learning problem in the context of infinite-horizon average-reward POMDPs. Traditionally, this problem has been approached using Spectral Decomposition (SD) methods applied to samples collected under non-adaptive policies, such as uniform or round-robin policies. Recently, SD techniques have been extended to accommodate a restricted class of adaptive policies such as memoryless policies. However, the use of adaptive policies has introduced challenges related to data inefficiency, as SD methods typically require all samples to be drawn from a single policy. In this work, we propose Mixed Spectral Estimation, which generalizes spectral estimation techniques to support a broader class of belief-based policies.

Recent advancements in large language models (LLMs) have significantly enhanced text generation capabilities, yet evaluating their performance in generative writing remains a challenge. Existing benchmarks primarily focus on generic text generation or limited in writing tasks, failing to capture the diverse requirements of high-quality written contents across various domains. To bridge this gap, we present WritingBench, a comprehensive benchmark designed to evaluate LLMs across 6 core writing domains and 100 subdomains.We further propose a querydependent evaluation framework that empowers LLMs to dynamically generate instance-specific assessment criteria. This framework is complemented by a finetuned critic model for criteria-aware scoring, enabling evaluations in style, format and length. The framework's validity is further demonstrated by its data curation capability, which enables a 7B-parameter model to outperform the performance of GPT-4o in writing. We open-source the benchmark, along with evaluation tools and modular framework components, to advance the development of LLMs in writing.

To learn approximately optimal acting policies for decision problems, modern Actor Critic algorithms rely on deep Neural Networks (DNNs) to parameterize the acting policy and greedification operators to iteratively improve it. The reliance on DNNs suggests an improvement that is gradient based, which is per step much less greedy than the improvement possible by greedier operators such as the greedy update used by Q-learning algorithms. On the other hand, slow changes to the policy can also be beneficial for the stability of the learning process, resulting in a tradeoff between greedification and stability. To better address this tradeoff, we propose to decouple the acting policy from the policy evaluated by the critic. This allows the agent to separately improve the critic's policy (e.g.

Developers think feeding first-person footage, called “egocentric data,” into specialized AI models will help robots copy humans.

Large Language Models exhibit logical inconsistency across multi-turn inference processes, undermining correctness in complex inferential tasks. Challenges arise from ensuring that outputs align with both factual correctness and human intent.