Task-specific architectures are a growing area of expert system research. Evaluation is one task that is required in many problem-solving domains. This article describes a task-specific, domain-independent architecture for candidate evaluation. I discuss the task-specific architecture approach to knowledge-based system development. Next, I present a review of candidate evaluation methods that have been used in AI and psychological modeling, focusing on the distinction between discrete truth table approaches and continuous linear models. Finally, I describe a task-specific expert system shell, which includes a development environment (Ceved) and a run-time consultation environment (Ceval). This shell enables nonprogramming domain experts to easily encode and represent evaluation-type knowledge and incorporates the encoded knowledge in performance systems.

Intelligence (AAAI) hopes that these This year's conference featured a new A talk united by a set of related research This year's program represented an by Jim Green0 addressed modeling issues. Constraint this approach is not seen There was time to interact Reasoning and Component Technologies as often today. Where is it session following each set of presentations. Highlights from the program focused on a presentation on among the accepted papers. A panel entitled "How Long which ran for two consecutive days Until the Household Robot: The For the first time, Innovative Applications during the conference. The emergence State of the Art in Robotics" featured in Artificial Intelligence (IAAI) of the forum Planning, Perception, speakers from industry and Carnegie presentations and AI Online interactive and Robotics reflected a recent trend Mellon's Robotic Institute, who panels were presented concurrently in Planning, with videotapes and a live robot providing an impressive demonstration Perception, and Robotics included demonstration.

The Board of Directors the address given here.

Case-based reasoning provides both a methodology for building systems and a cognitive model of people. It is consistent with much that psychologists have observed in the natural problem solving people do. Psychologists have also observed, however, that people have several problems in doing analogical or case-based reasoning. Although they are good at using analogs to solve new problems, they are not always good at remembering the right ones. However, computers are good at remembering. I present case-based decision aiding as a methodology for building systems in which people and machines work together to solve problems. The case-based decision-aiding system augments the person's memory by providing cases (analogs) for a person to use in solving a problem. The person does the actual decision making using these cases as guidelines. I present an overview of case-based decision aiding, some technical details about how to implement such systems, and several examples of case-based systems.

AI research is conducted at a number of academic and research units at the Georgia Institute of Technology. Some of this research is basic in nature, and some has an applied character to it. This article briefly describes basic AI research in the College of Computing at Georgia Tech.

A memorial tribute to AI researcher Jonathan King who died of cancer in 1991.

The Second International Workshop on User Modeling was held March 30- April 1, 1990 in Honolulu, Hawaii. The general chairperson was Dr. Wolfgang Wahlster of the University of Saarbrucken; the program and local arrangements chairperson was Dr. David Chin of the University of Hawaii at Manoa. The workshop was sponsored by AAAI and the University of Hawaii, with AAAI providing eight travel stipends for students.

A workshop on defeasible reasoning with specificity was held under the arch in St. Louis during April 1989, with support from AAAI and McDonnell Douglas, and the assistance of Rockwell Science Center Palo Alto and the Department of Computer Science of Washington University.

As you can see from direct inspection of the magazine, it's a little different I hope you enjoy this special issue.

Clancey troubleshooting tutor for only 20 The cognitive modeling group provided would like to see alternative cognitive hours gained a proficiency equivalent strong advocacy for the use of models available within a system to that of trainees with 40 months cognitive modeling in building these rather than a single "correct" model (almost 4 years) on-the-job training systems. They argued for increased used to justify instruction.