First, explosive increase of graph data poses a great challenge to GNN training on large-scale datasets. Previously, Graph neural networks (GNNs) have been a hot many graph-based tasks were often conducted on toy datasets spot of recent research and are widely utilized in diverse that are relatively small compared to graphs in realistic applications, applications. However, with the use of huger which is harmful to model scalability and practical data and deeper models, an urgent demand is unsurprisingly usages. Currently, large-scale graph datasets are thereby proposed made to accelerate GNNs for more efficient in literature [Hu et al., 2020a] for advanced research, execution. In this paper, we provide a comprehensive and at the same time, making GNNs execution (i.e., training survey on acceleration methods for GNNs and inference) a time-consuming process.

Machine reading comprehension (MRC) of text data is one important task in Natural Language Understanding. It is a complex NLP problem with a lot of ongoing research fueled by the release of the Stanford Question Answering Dataset (SQuAD) and Conversational Question Answering (CoQA). It is considered to be an effort to teach computers how to "understand" a text, and then to be able to answer questions about it using deep learning. However, until now large-scale training on private text data and knowledge sharing has been missing for this NLP task. Hence, we present FedQAS, a privacy-preserving machine reading system capable of leveraging large-scale private data without the need to pool those datasets in a central location. The proposed approach combines transformer models and federated learning technologies. The system is developed using the FEDn framework and deployed as a proof-of-concept alliance initiative. FedQAS is flexible, language-agnostic, and allows intuitive participation and execution of local model training. In addition, we present the architecture and implementation of the system, as well as provide a reference evaluation based on the SQUAD dataset, to showcase how it overcomes data privacy issues and enables knowledge sharing between alliance members in a Federated learning setting.

Being able to learn from small amounts of data is a key characteristic of human intelligence, but exactly {\em how} small? In this paper, we introduce a novel experimental paradigm that allows us to examine classification in an extremely data-scarce setting, asking whether humans can learn more categories than they have exemplars (i.e., can humans do "less-than-one shot" learning?). An experiment conducted using this paradigm reveals that people are capable of learning in such settings, and provides several insights into underlying mechanisms. First, people can accurately infer and represent high-dimensional feature spaces from very little data. Second, having inferred the relevant spaces, people use a form of prototype-based categorization (as opposed to exemplar-based) to make categorical inferences. Finally, systematic, machine-learnable patterns in responses indicate that people may have efficient inductive biases for dealing with this class of data-scarce problems.

Predicative machine learning models are frequently being used by companies, institutes and organizations to make choices about humans. Strategic classification studies learning in settings where self-interested users can strategically modify their features to obtain favorable predictive outcomes. A key working assumption, however, is that 'favorable' always means 'positive'; this may be appropriate in some applications (e.g., loan approval, university admissions and hiring), but reduces to a fairly narrow view what user interests can be. In this work we argue for a broader perspective on what accounts for strategic user behavior, and propose and study a flexible model of generalized strategic classification. Our generalized model subsumes most current models, but includes other novel settings; among these, we identify and target one intriguing sub-class of problems in which the interests of users and the system are aligned. For this cooperative setting, we provide an in-depth analysis, and propose a practical learning approach that is effective and efficient. We compare our approach to existing learning methods and show its statistical and optimization benefits. Returning to our fully generalized model, we show how our results and approach can extend to the most general case. We conclude with a set of experiments that empirically demonstrate the utility of our approach.

Motivated by robust dynamic resource allocation in operations research, we study the Online Learning to Transport (OLT) problem where the decision variable is a probability measure, an infinite-dimensional object. We draw connections between online learning, optimal transport, and partial differential equations through an insight called the minimal selection principle, originally studied in the Wasserstein gradient flow setting by Ambrosio et al. (2005). This allows us to extend the standard online learning framework to the infinite-dimensional setting seamlessly. Based on our framework, we derive a novel method called the minimal selection or exploration (MSoE) algorithm to solve OLT problems using mean-field approximation and discretization techniques. In the displacement convex setting, the main theoretical message underpinning our approach is that minimizing transport cost over time (via the minimal selection principle) ensures optimal cumulative regret upper bounds. On the algorithmic side, our MSoE algorithm applies beyond the displacement convex setting, making the mathematical theory of optimal transport practically relevant to non-convex settings common in dynamic resource allocation.

Much of modern learning theory has been split between two regimes: the classical \emph{offline} setting, where data arrive independently, and the \emph{online} setting, where data arrive adversarially. While the former model is often both computationally and statistically tractable, the latter requires no distributional assumptions. In an attempt to achieve the best of both worlds, previous work proposed the smooth online setting where each sample is drawn from an adversarially chosen distribution, which is smooth, i.e., it has a bounded density with respect to a fixed dominating measure. We provide tight bounds on the minimax regret of learning a nonparametric function class, with nearly optimal dependence on both the horizon and smoothness parameters. Furthermore, we provide the first oracle-efficient, no-regret algorithms in this setting. In particular, we propose an oracle-efficient improper algorithm whose regret achieves optimal dependence on the horizon and a proper algorithm requiring only a single oracle call per round whose regret has the optimal horizon dependence in the classification setting and is sublinear in general. Both algorithms have exponentially worse dependence on the smoothness parameter of the adversary than the minimax rate. We then prove a lower bound on the oracle complexity of any proper learning algorithm, which matches the oracle-efficient upper bounds up to a polynomial factor, thus demonstrating the existence of a statistical-computational gap in smooth online learning. Finally, we apply our results to the contextual bandit setting to show that if a function class is learnable in the classical setting, then there is an oracle-efficient, no-regret algorithm for contextual bandits in the case that contexts arrive in a smooth manner.

Machine learned models are increasingly entering wider ranges of domains in our lives, driving a constantly increasing number of important systems. Large scale systems can be trained in highly parallel and distributed training environments, with a large amount of randomness in training the models. While some systems may tolerate such randomness leading to models that differ from one another every time a model retrains, for many applications, reproducible models are required, where slight changes in training do not lead to drastic differences in the model learned. Beyond practical deployments of machine learned models, the reproducibility crisis in the machine learning academic world has also been well-documented: see [Pineau et al., 2021] and the references therein for an excellent discussion of the reasons for irreproducibility (insufficient exploration of hyperparameters and experimental setups, lack of sufficient documentation, inaccessible code, and different computational hardware) and for mitigation recommendations. However, recent papers [Chen et al., 2020, D'Amour et al., 2020, Dusenberry et al., 2020, Snapp and Shamir, 2021, Summers and Dinneen, 2021, Yu et al., 2021] have also demonstrated that even when models Part of this work was done when Kwangjun Ahn and Ziwei Ji were interns at Google Research.

In domain adaptation, when there is a large distance between the source and target domains, the prediction performance will degrade. Gradual domain adaptation is one of the solutions to such an issue, assuming that we have access to intermediate domains, which shift gradually from the source to target domains. In previous works, it was assumed that the number of samples in the intermediate domains is sufficiently large; hence, self-training was possible without the need for labeled data. If access to an intermediate domain is restricted, self-training will fail. Practically, the cost of samples in intermediate domains will vary, and it is natural to consider that the closer an intermediate domain is to the target domain, the higher the cost of obtaining samples from the intermediate domain is. To solve the trade-off between cost and accuracy, we propose a framework that combines multifidelity and active domain adaptation. The effectiveness of the proposed method is evaluated by experiments with both artificial and real-world datasets. Codes are available at https://github.com/ssgw320/gdamf.

Consider the typical supervised learning pipeline that we teach students learning statistical machine learning: we collect data in (X, Y) pairs, where Y is a label or target to be predicted; we pick a model and loss measuring the fidelity of the model to observed data; we choose the model minimizing the loss and validate it on held-out data. This picture obscures what is becoming one of the major challenges in this endeavor: that of actually collecting highquality labeled data [44, 13, 38]. Hand labeling large-scale training sets is often impractically expensive. Consider, as simple motivation, a ranking problem: a prediction is an ordered list of a set of items, yet available feedback is likely to be incomplete and partial, such as a top element (for example, in web search a user clicks on a single preferred link, or in a grocery, an individual buys one kind of milk but provides no feedback on the other brands present). Developing methods to leverage such partial and weak feedback is therefore becoming a major focus, and researchers have developed methods to transform weak and noisy labels into a dataset with strong, "gold-standard" labels [38, 56]. In this paper, we adopt this weakly labeled setting, but instead of considering model fitting and the construction of strong labels, we focus on validation, model confidence, and predictive inference, moving beyond point predictions and single labels. Our goal is to develop methods to rigorously quantify the confidence a practitioner should have in a model given only weak labels.

Created by Lazy Programmer Inc. English [Auto-generated] Created by Lazy Programmer Inc. This is technically Deep Learning in Python part 11 of my deep learning series, and my 3rd reinforcement learning course. Deep Reinforcement Learning is actually the combination of 2 topics: Reinforcement Learning and Deep Learning (Neural Networks). While both of these have been around for quite some time, it's only been recently that Deep Learning has really taken off, and along with it, Reinforcement Learning. The maturation of deep learning has propelled advances in reinforcement learning, which has been around since the 1980s, although some aspects of it, such as the Bellman equation, have been for much longer.