Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable progress in generating functional code, leading to numerous AI-based coding assistant tools. However, their reliance on the perplexity objective during both training and inference primarily emphasizes functionality, often at the expense of efficiency--an essential consideration for real-world coding tasks. Interestingly, we observed that well-trained LLMs inherently possess knowledge about code efficiency, but this potential remains underutilized with standard decoding approaches. To address this, we design strategic prompts to activate the model's embedded efficiency understanding, effectively using LLMs as efficiency critiques to guide code generation toward higher efficiency without sacrificing--and sometimes even improving--functionality, all without the need for costly real code execution. Extensive experiments on benchmark datasets (EffiBench, HumanEval+, COFFE, Mercury) across multiple representative code models demonstrate up to a 70.6% reduction in average execution time and a 13.6% decrease in maximum memory usage, highlighting the computational efficiency and practicality of our approach compared to existing alternatives.

Volunteers in a new study preferred an insect protein bar over a cereal bar. More information Adding us as a Preferred Source in Google by using this link indicates that you would like to see more of our content in Google News results. Bugs are an excellent source of protein. Breakthroughs, discoveries, and DIY tips sent six days a week. By signing up, you confirm you are 16+, will receive newsletters and promotional content and agree to our Terms of Use and acknowledge the data practices in our Privacy Policy .

Recent generations of frontier language models have introduced Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) that generate detailed thinking processes before providing answers. While these models demonstrate improved performance on reasoning benchmarks, their fundamental capabilities, scaling properties, and limitations remain insufficiently understood. Current evaluations primarily focus on established mathematical and coding benchmarks, emphasizing final answer accuracy. However, this evaluation paradigm often suffers from data contamination and does not provide insights into the reasoning traces' structure and quality. In this work, we systematically investigate these gaps with the help of controllable puzzle environments that allow precise manipulation of compositional complexity while maintaining consistent logical structures.

Large language models (LLMs) have transformed natural language processing, but their reliable deployment requires effective uncertainty quantification (UQ). Existing UQ methods are often heuristic and lack a probabilistic interpretation. This paper begins by providing a theoretical justification for the role of perturbations in UQ for LLMs. We then introduce a dual random walk perspective, modeling input-output pairs as two Markov chains with transition probabilities defined by semantic similarity. Building on this, we propose a fully probabilistic framework based on an inverse model, which quantifies uncertainty by evaluating the diversity of the input space conditioned on a given output through systematic perturbations.

Zeroth-order Optimization (ZO) has received wide attention in machine learning, especially when computing full gradient is expensive or even impossible. Recently, ZO has emerged as an important paradigm for memory-efficient fine-tuning of large language models (LLMs), circumventing the memory overhead of backpropagation. However, existing ZO gradient estimators exhibit dimension-dependent variance scaling as!(d), leading to dimension-dependent convergence rates without further assumptions on the objective function, which is prohibitive for large-scale LLM parameters. To address this problem, we present a Pseudo-Zeroth-Order (PseuZO) framework for optimizing composite objective functions, especially large-scale models: minx XF(x)= Ezg h(x;z), where h represents complex, high-dimensional representations and g is a task-specific loss. While existing zeroth-order methods estimate gradients with final loss functions, our PseuZO algorithm estimate the Jacobian matrix of h(x) with the model output o = h(x), and the gradient of the loss function on model output e = og(o), and apply exponential moving average on Jacobian estimators to reduce the variance. Moreover, we use the sliding window technique to reduce memory costs. Our algorithm achieves an O! max "

Training reasoning language models (LMs) with reinforcement learning (RL) for one-hot correctness inherently relies on the LM being able to explore and solve its task with some chance at initialization. Furthermore, a key use case of reasoning LMs is to act as teachers for distilling new students and cold-starting future RL iterations rather than being deployed themselves. From these considerations, we introduce a new framework that avoids RL's exploration challenge by training a new class of Reinforcement-Learned Teachers (RLTs) focused on yielding the most effective downstream distillation. RLTs are prompted with both the question and solution to each problem, and tasked to simply "connect-the-dots" with detailed explanations tailored for their students. We train RLTs with dense rewards obtained by feeding each explanation to the student and testing its understanding of the problem's solution. In practice, the raw outputs of a 7BRLT provide higher final performance on competition and graduate-level tasks than existing distillation and cold-starting pipelines that collect and postprocess the reasoning traces of orders of magnitude larger LMs. Furthermore, RLTs maintain their effectiveness when training larger students and when applied zero-shot to out-of-distribution tasks, unlocking new levels of efficiency and re-usability for the RL reasoning framework.

In this paper, we propose a new method called Self-Training with Dynamic Weighting (STDW), which aims to enhance robustness in Gradual Domain Adaptation (GDA) by addressing the challenge of smooth knowledge migration from the source to the target domain. Traditional GDA methods mitigate domain shift through intermediate domains and self-training but often suffer from inefficient knowledge migration or incomplete intermediate data. Our approach introduces a dynamic weighting mechanism that adaptively balances the loss contributions of the source and target domains during training. Specifically, we design an optimization framework governed by a time-varying hyperparameter ϱ (progressing from 0 to 1), which controls the strength of domain-specific learning and ensures stable adaptation. The method leverages self-training to generate pseudo-labels and optimizes a weighted objective function for iterative model updates, maintaining robustness across intermediate domains. Experiments on rotated MNIST, color-shifted MNIST, portrait datasets, and the Cover Type dataset demonstrate that STDW outperforms existing baselines.

Entropy minimization (EM) trains the model to concentrate even more probability mass on its most confident outputs. We show that this simple objective alone, without any labeled data, can substantially improve large language models' (LLMs) performance on challenging math, physics, and coding tasks. We explore three approaches: (1) EM-FT minimizes token-level entropy similarly to instruction finetuning, but on unlabeled outputs drawn from the model; (2) EM-RL: reinforcement learning with negative entropy as the only reward to maximize; (3) EM-INF: inference-time logit adjustment to reduce entropy without any training data or parameter updates. On Qwen-7B, EM-RL, without any labeled data, achieves comparable or better performance than strong RL baselines such as GRPO [68] and RLOO [1] that are trained on 60K labeled examples. Furthermore, EM-INF enables Qwen-32B to match or exceed the performance of proprietary models like GPT-4o, Claude 3 Opus, and Gemini 1.5 Pro on the challenging SciCode benchmark [78], while being 3x more efficient than self-consistency and sequential refinement. Our findings reveal that many pretrained LLMs possess previously underappreciated reasoning capabilities that can be effectively elicited through entropy minimization alone, without any labeled data or even any parameter updates. 1

Clinical risk prediction plays a crucial role in early disease detection and personalized intervention. While recent models increasingly incorporate multimodal data, their development typically assumes access to large-scale, multimodal datasets and substantial computational resources. In practice, however, most clinical sites operate under resource constraints, with access limited to EHR data alone and insufficient capacity to train complicated models. This gap highlights the urgent need to democratize clinical risk prediction by enabling effective deployment in dataand resource-limited local clinical settings. In this work, we propose a cross-cohort cross-modal knowledge transfer framework that leverages the multimodal model trained on a nationwide cohort and adapts it to local cohorts with only EHR data. We focus on EHR and genetic data as representative multimodal inputs and address two key challenges. First, to mitigate the influence of noisy or less informative biological signals, we propose a novel mixture-of-aggregations design to enhance the modeling of informative and relevant genetic features. Second, to support rapid model adaptation in low-resource sites, we develop a lightweight graph-guided fine-tuning method that adapts pretrained phenotypical EHR representations to local cohorts using limited patient data. Extensive experiments on real-world clinical data validate the effectiveness of our proposed model.

Modern causal language models, followed by rapid developments in discrete diffusion models, can now produce a wide variety of interesting and useful content. However, these families of models are predominantly trained to output tokens with a fixed (left-to-right) or random order, which may deviate from the logical order in which tokens are generated originally. In this paper, we observe that current causal and diffusion models encounter difficulties in problems that require adaptive token generation orders to solve tractably, which we characterize with the V-information framework. Motivated by this, we propose Reinforced Context Order Recovery (ReCOR), a reinforcement-learning-based framework to extract adaptive, data-dependent token generation orders from text data without annotations. Self-supervised by token prediction statistics, ReCOR estimates the hardness of predicting every unfilled token and adaptively selects the next token during both training and inference. Experiments on challenging reasoning and planning datasets demonstrate the superior performance of ReCOR compared with baselines, sometimes outperforming oracle models supervised with the ground-truth order.1