Education
DOMINO: Visual Causal Reasoning with Time-Dependent Phenomena
Current work on using visual analytics to determine causal relations among variables has mostly been based on the concept of counterfactuals. As such the derived static causal networks do not take into account the effect of time as an indicator. However, knowing the time delay of a causal relation can be crucial as it instructs how and when actions should be taken. Yet, similar to static causality, deriving causal relations from observational time-series data, as opposed to designed experiments, is not a straightforward process. It can greatly benefit from human insight to break ties and resolve errors. We hence propose a set of visual analytics methods that allow humans to participate in the discovery of causal relations associated with windows of time delay. Specifically, we leverage a well-established method, logic-based causality, to enable analysts to test the significance of potential causes and measure their influences toward a certain effect. Furthermore, since an effect can be a cause of other effects, we allow users to aggregate different temporal cause-effect relations found with our method into a visual flow diagram to enable the discovery of temporal causal networks. To demonstrate the effectiveness of our methods we constructed a prototype system named DOMINO and showcase it via a number of case studies using real-world datasets. Finally, we also used DOMINO to conduct several evaluations with human analysts from different science domains in order to gain feedback on the utility of our system in practical scenarios.
No-regret Algorithms for Fair Resource Allocation
Sinha, Abhishek, Joshi, Ativ, Bhattacharjee, Rajarshi, Musco, Cameron, Hajiesmaili, Mohammad
We consider a fair resource allocation problem in the no-regret setting against an unrestricted adversary. The objective is to allocate resources equitably among several agents in an online fashion so that the difference of the aggregate $\alpha$-fair utilities of the agents between an optimal static clairvoyant allocation and that of the online policy grows sub-linearly with time. The problem is challenging due to the non-additive nature of the $\alpha$-fairness function. Previously, it was shown that no online policy can exist for this problem with a sublinear standard regret. In this paper, we propose an efficient online resource allocation policy, called Online Proportional Fair (OPF), that achieves $c_\alpha$-approximate sublinear regret with the approximation factor $c_\alpha=(1-\alpha)^{-(1-\alpha)}\leq 1.445,$ for $0\leq \alpha < 1$. The upper bound to the $c_\alpha$-regret for this problem exhibits a surprising phase transition phenomenon. The regret bound changes from a power-law to a constant at the critical exponent $\alpha=\frac{1}{2}.$ As a corollary, our result also resolves an open problem raised by Even-Dar et al. [2009] on designing an efficient no-regret policy for the online job scheduling problem in certain parameter regimes. The proof of our results introduces new algorithmic and analytical techniques, including greedy estimation of the future gradients for non-additive global reward functions and bootstrapping adaptive regret bounds, which may be of independent interest.
Data Dependent Regret Guarantees Against General Comparators for Full or Bandit Feedback
We study the adversarial online learning problem and create a completely online algorithmic framework that has data dependent regret guarantees in both full expert feedback and bandit feedback settings. We study the expected performance of our algorithm against general comparators, which makes it applicable for a wide variety of problem scenarios. Our algorithm works from a universal prediction perspective and the performance measure used is the expected regret against arbitrary comparator sequences, which is the difference between our losses and a competing loss sequence. The competition class can be designed to include fixed arm selections, switching bandits, contextual bandits, periodic bandits or any other competition of interest. The sequences in the competition class are generally determined by the specific application at hand and should be designed accordingly. Our algorithm neither uses nor needs any preliminary information about the loss sequences and is completely online. Its performance bounds are data dependent, where any affine transform of the losses has no effect on the normalized regret.
Handwriting Words Recognition With TensorFlow
The Most Advanced Data Science Roadmaps You've Ever Seen! Comes with Thousands of Free Learning Resources and ChatGPT Integration! In the previous tutorial, I showed you how to build a custom TensorFlow model to extract text from captcha images. Step by step, tutorial by tutorial, I am going to more complex things. This tutorial will extend previous tutorials to this one, using IAM Dataset, which has variable length ground-truth targets. Each sample in this Dataset consists of an image of handwritten text, and the corresponding target is the text string in the image.
HR Systems and Data Analyst at MUFG Investor Services - London, United Kingdom
MUFG Investor Services provides asset servicing solutions to the global investment management industry. Leveraging the financial and intellectual capital of MUFG โ one of the largest banks in the world with $2.8 trillion in assets โ we provide clients access to a range of leading solutions from fund administration, middle-office outsourcing, custody, foreign exchange, trustee services and depository to securities lending and other banking services. With a diverse and dynamic network of offices across the globe, MUFG Investor Services provides challenging and rewarding careers. We achieve this by offering continuous learning and development, collaborative teamwork environment, promotion of work-life integration, and exposure to a wide variety of work. Imagine your future at MUFG Investor Services where you can grow professionally, in a diverse and inclusive workplace that rewards your contribution. As a key member of the HR team, you will act as a key point of contact for employees and managers providing HR support on all aspects of operational HR, across Europe & APAC and other global locations.
best way to be a machine learning engineer
Becoming a machine learning engineer requires a combination of skills and knowledge in various areas such as mathematics, programming, data analysis, and machine learning algorithms. Learn the basics of mathematics and statistics: Machine learning requires a strong foundation in mathematics and statistics. You should be familiar with calculus, linear algebra, probability, and statistics. Master a programming language: You should learn a programming language such as Python or R, which are commonly used for machine learning. You should also be familiar with data structures, algorithms, and object-oriented programming.
AI lectures at Berkeley to explore possibilities, implications of ChatGPT
AI experts from Berkeley and beyond will explore the ramifications of ChatGPT on science and society in a spring lecture series. Since its launch last November, the artificial intelligence chatbot ChatGPT has been an international sensation, with people using the platform to do everything from writing essays, computer code, poems and research proposals to planning vacations, flirting with Tinder matches and creating malware. According to UC Berkeley computer scientist Ken Goldberg, the computer program's facility with natural language -- particularly its ability to consistently demonstrate creativity -- is forcing many AI experts to rethink what machines may be capable of and even our understanding of intelligence. "ChatGPT may catalyze a paradigm shift," said Goldberg, the William S. Floyd Jr. Distinguished Chair in Engineering. "Something changed very dramatically with the performance of ChatGPT, compared with previous large language models, and everyone, including experts, is asking, 'What does it mean? Where do we go from here?'"
Learning How to Use ChatGPT to Learn Python (or anything else) - KDnuggets
The verdict is in: ChatGPT isn't just hype, it's a useful tool that everyone can take advantage of in some way. Note what I didn't say: ChatGPT is not sentient. It is not an artificial general intelligence. ChatGPT is not a panacea that can solve every problem, and will not take everyone's jobs. Understanding that ChatGPT is a tool at our disposal, let's see how it can help us learn Python.
iiot bigdata, Twitter, 3/10/2023 12:05:36 PM, 290794
The graph represents a network of 1,072 Twitter users whose recent tweets contained "iiot bigdata", or who were replied to, mentioned, retweeted or quoted in those tweets, taken from a data set limited to a maximum of 5,000 tweets, tweeted between 3/26/2006 12:00:00 AM and 3/9/2023 5:00:36 PM. The network was obtained from Twitter on Friday, 10 March 2023 at 12:02 UTC. The tweets in the network were tweeted over the 1827-day, 0-hour, 27-minute period from Friday, 09 March 2018 at 00:30 UTC to Friday, 10 March 2023 at 00:58 UTC. There is an edge for each "replies-to" relationship in a tweet, an edge for each "mentions" relationship in a tweet, an edge for each "retweet" relationship in a tweet, an edge for each "quote" relationship in a tweet, an edge for each "mention in retweet" relationship in a tweet, an edge for each "mention in reply-to" relationship in a tweet, an edge for each "mention in quote" relationship in a tweet, an edge for each "mention in quote reply-to" relationship in a tweet, and a self-loop edge for each tweet that is not from above. The graph's vertices were grouped by cluster using the Clauset-Newman-Moore cluster algorithm.
iiot machinelearning, Twitter, 3/10/2023 12:27:09 PM, 290795
The graph represents a network of 1,371 Twitter users whose recent tweets contained "iiot machinelearning", or who were replied to, mentioned, retweeted or quoted in those tweets, taken from a data set limited to a maximum of 5,000 tweets, tweeted between 3/26/2006 12:00:00 AM and 3/9/2023 5:00:36 PM. The network was obtained from Twitter on Friday, 10 March 2023 at 12:23 UTC. The tweets in the network were tweeted over the 1827-day, 0-hour, 27-minute period from Friday, 09 March 2018 at 00:30 UTC to Friday, 10 March 2023 at 00:58 UTC. There is an edge for each "replies-to" relationship in a tweet, an edge for each "mentions" relationship in a tweet, an edge for each "retweet" relationship in a tweet, an edge for each "quote" relationship in a tweet, an edge for each "mention in retweet" relationship in a tweet, an edge for each "mention in reply-to" relationship in a tweet, an edge for each "mention in quote" relationship in a tweet, an edge for each "mention in quote reply-to" relationship in a tweet, and a self-loop edge for each tweet that is not from above. The graph's vertices were grouped by cluster using the Clauset-Newman-Moore cluster algorithm.