With the recent proliferation of Large Language Models (LLMs), there has been an increasing demand for tools to detect machine-generated text. The effective detection of machine-generated text face two pertinent problems: First, they are severely limited in generalizing against real-world scenarios, where machine-generated text is produced by a variety of generators, including but not limited to GPT-4 and Dolly, and spans diverse domains, ranging from academic manuscripts to social media posts. Second, existing detection methodologies treat texts produced by LLMs through a restrictive binary classification lens, neglecting the nuanced diversity of artifacts generated by different LLMs. In this work, we undertake a systematic study on the detection of machine-generated text in real-world scenarios. We first study the effectiveness of state-of-the-art approaches and find that they are severely limited against text produced by diverse generators and domains in the real world. Furthermore, t-SNE visualizations of the embeddings from a pretrained LLM's encoder show that they cannot reliably distinguish between human and machine-generated text. Based on our findings, we introduce a novel system, T5LLMCipher, for detecting machine-generated text using a pretrained T5 encoder combined with LLM embedding sub-clustering to address the text produced by diverse generators and domains in the real world. We evaluate our approach across 9 machine-generated text systems and 9 domains and find that our approach provides state-of-the-art generalization ability, with an average increase in F1 score on machine-generated text of 19.6\% on unseen generators and domains compared to the top performing existing approaches and correctly attributes the generator of text with an accuracy of 93.6\%.

We introduce a rapid and precise analytical approach for analyzing cerebral blood flow (CBF) using Diffuse Correlation Spectroscopy (DCS) with the application of the Extreme Learning Machine (ELM). Our evaluation of ELM and existing algorithms involves a comprehensive set of metrics. We assess these algorithms using synthetic datasets for both semi-infinite and multi-layer models. The results demonstrate that ELM consistently achieves higher fidelity across various noise levels and optical parameters, showcasing robust generalization ability and outperforming iterative fitting algorithms. Through a comparison with a computationally efficient neural network, ELM attains comparable accuracy with reduced training and inference times. Notably, the absence of a back-propagation process in ELM during training results in significantly faster training speeds compared to existing neural network approaches. This proposed strategy holds promise for edge computing applications with online training capabilities.

Recent years have witnessed a surge in the popularity of Machine Learning (ML), applied across diverse domains. However, progress is impeded by the scarcity of training data due to expensive acquisition and privacy legislation. Synthetic data emerges as a solution, but the abundance of released models and limited overview literature pose challenges for decision-making. This work surveys 417 Synthetic Data Generation (SDG) models over the last decade, providing a comprehensive overview of model types, functionality, and improvements. Common attributes are identified, leading to a classification and trend analysis. The findings reveal increased model performance and complexity, with neural network-based approaches prevailing, except for privacy-preserving data generation. Computer vision dominates, with GANs as primary generative models, while diffusion models, transformers, and RNNs compete. Implications from our performance evaluation highlight the scarcity of common metrics and datasets, making comparisons challenging. Additionally, the neglect of training and computational costs in literature necessitates attention in future research. This work serves as a guide for SDG model selection and identifies crucial areas for future exploration.

While deep neural networks can achieve good performance on in-distribution samples, their generalization ability significantly degrades under unknown test shifts. We study the problem of out-of-distribution (OOD) generalization capability of models by exploring the relationship between generalization error and training set size. Previous empirical evidence suggests that error falls off as a power of training set size and that lower errors indicate better model generalization. However, in the case of OOD samples, this is not true from our observations. Counterintuitively, increasing training data size does not always lead to a decrease in test generalization error. Such a non-decreasing phenomenon is formally investigated under a linear setting with empirical verification across varying visual benchmarks. To investigate the above results, we redefine OOD data as data located outside the convex hull of the data mixture in training and prove a new generalization error bound. Together our observations highlight that the effectiveness of well-trained models can be guaranteed on data within the convex hull of the training mixture. For OOD data beyond this coverage, the capability of models may be unassured. To achieve better generalization without knowledge of target environments, we demonstrate multiple strategies including data augmentation and pre-training. We also employ a novel data selection algorithm that outperforms baselines.

Class imbalance is a prevalent issue in real world machine learning applications, often leading to poor performance in rare and minority classes. With an abundance of wild unlabeled data, active learning is perhaps the most effective technique in solving the problem at its root -- collecting a more balanced and informative set of labeled examples during annotation. Label noise is another common issue in data annotation jobs, which is especially challenging for active learning methods. In this work, we conduct the first study of active learning under both class imbalance and label noise. We propose a novel algorithm that robustly identifies the class separation threshold and annotates the most uncertain examples that are closest from it. Through a novel reduction to one-dimensional active learning, our algorithm DIRECT is able to leverage the classic active learning literature to address issues such as batch labeling and tolerance towards label noise. We present extensive experiments on imbalanced datasets with and without label noise. Our results demonstrate that DIRECT can save more than 60% of the annotation budget compared to state-of-art active learning algorithms and more than 80% of annotation budget compared to random sampling.

Large language models (LLMs), such as GPT4 and LLaMA, are creating significant advancements in natural language processing, due to their strong text encoding/decoding ability and newly found emergent capability (e.g., reasoning). While LLMs are mainly designed to process pure texts, there are many real-world scenarios where text data is associated with rich structure information in the form of graphs (e.g., academic networks, and e-commerce networks) or scenarios where graph data is paired with rich textual information (e.g., molecules with descriptions). Besides, although LLMs have shown their pure text-based reasoning ability, it is underexplored whether such ability can be generalized to graphs (i.e., graph-based reasoning). In this paper, we provide a systematic review of scenarios and techniques related to large language models on graphs. We first summarize potential scenarios of adopting LLMs on graphs into three categories, namely pure graphs, text-attributed graphs, and text-paired graphs. We then discuss detailed techniques for utilizing LLMs on graphs, including LLM as Predictor, LLM as Encoder, and LLM as Aligner, and compare the advantages and disadvantages of different schools of models. Furthermore, we discuss the real-world applications of such methods and summarize open-source codes and benchmark datasets. Finally, we conclude with potential future research directions in this fast-growing field. The related source can be found at https://github.com/PeterGriffinJin/Awesome-Language-Model-on-Graphs.

Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown impressive adaptability in various fields, yet the optimal pathway of autonomous model evolution remains underexplored. Drawing inspiration from the self-driven learning process of humans, we introduce SELF (Self-Evolution with Language Feedback), a novel learning framework that empowers LLMs to continually self-improve their abilities. SELF initiates with a meta-skill learning process that equips the LLMs with capabilities for self-feedback and self-refinement. SELF employs language-based feedback for detailed and nuanced evaluations, pinpointing response flaws and suggesting refinements. Subsequently, the model engages in an iterative process of self-evolution: they autonomously generate responses to unlabeled instructions, refine these responses interactively, and use the refined and filtered data for iterative self-training, thereby progressively boosting their capabilities. Moreover, the SELF framework equips the model with the ability to self-refine during inference, leading to further improved response quality. Our experiments on mathematical and general tasks demonstrate that SELF enables the model to continually selfimprove without human intervention. The SELF framework indicates a promising direction for the autonomous evolution of LLMs, transitioning them from passive information receivers to active participants in their development. Large Language Models (LLMs), like ChatGPT (OpenAI, 2022) and GPT-4 (OpenAI, 2023), stand at the forefront of the AI revolution, demonstrating versatility across tasks. Despite their evident capabilities, the way towards achieving autonomous development of LLMs is still under-explored. The development of automatically improved LLMs can draw inspiration from human self-driven learning mechanisms. When facing new challenges, humans naturally engage in a learning cycle of initial attempts, introspective feedback, and behavior refinement. This leads to a critical question: "Can LLMs mimic the human learning process, utilizing self-refinement to enhance their inherent capabilities?"

Artificial neural networks suffer from catastrophic forgetting when they are sequentially trained on multiple tasks. Many continual learning (CL) strategies are trying to overcome this problem. One of the most effective is the hypernetwork-based approach. The hypernetwork generates the weights of a target model based on the task's identity. The model's main limitation is that, in practice, the hypernetwork can produce completely different architectures for subsequent tasks. To solve such a problem, we use the lottery ticket hypothesis, which postulates the existence of sparse subnetworks, named winning tickets, that preserve the performance of a whole network. In the paper, we propose a method called HyperMask, which trains a single network for all CL tasks. The hypernetwork produces semi-binary masks to obtain target subnetworks dedicated to consecutive tasks. Moreover, due to the lottery ticket hypothesis, we can use a single network with weighted subnets. Depending on the task, the importance of some weights may be dynamically enhanced while others may be weakened. HyperMask achieves competitive results in several CL datasets and, in some scenarios, goes beyond the state-of-the-art scores, both with derived and unknown task identities.

Personalized learner modeling using cognitive diagnosis (CD), which aims to model learners' cognitive states by diagnosing learner traits from behavioral data, is a fundamental yet significant task in many web learning services. Existing cognitive diagnosis models (CDMs) follow the proficiency-response paradigm that views learner traits and question parameters as trainable embeddings and learns them through learner performance prediction. However, we notice that this paradigm leads to the inevitable non-identifiability and explainability overfitting problem, which is harmful to the quantification of learners' cognitive states and the quality of web learning services. To address these problems, we propose an identifiable cognitive diagnosis framework (ID-CDF) based on a novel response-proficiency-response paradigm inspired by encoder-decoder models. Specifically, we first devise the diagnostic module of ID-CDF, which leverages inductive learning to eliminate randomness in optimization to guarantee identifiability and captures the monotonicity between overall response data distribution and cognitive states to prevent explainability overfitting. Next, we propose a flexible predictive module for ID-CDF to ensure diagnosis preciseness. We further present an implementation of ID-CDF, i.e., ID-CDM, to illustrate its usability. Extensive experiments on four real-world datasets with different characteristics demonstrate that ID-CDF can effectively address the problems without loss of diagnosis preciseness.

The multi-armed bandit problem, where a single learning agent chooses actions over a sequence of rounds in order to maximize its total reward, is among the most well-studied in online learning. Distributed, multi-agent variants of this problem have also been widely studied under various constraints; one particular such line of work is the cooperative multi-agent bandit setting, where agents are connected over a communication graph and play against a common bandit instance, choosing actions in parallel over T rounds. Each agent locally runs a bandit algorithm that may involve communication with neighbors, and the information exchanged can be used to determine an agent's future actions. This cooperative setting has been studied for both stochastic (Szorenyi et al., 2013; Landgren et al., 2016; Kolla et al., 2018; Martínez-Rubio et al., 2019) and non-stochastic bandits (Awerbuch & Kleinberg, 2008; Cesa-Bianchi et al., 2016; Bar-On & Mansour, 2019), where communication between agents has been shown to improve an agent's regret on average, compared to each agent locally running a centralized bandit algorithm without any communication. However, most prior works in this setting require that every agent communicate with all its neighbors in each round (as pointed out by Cesa-Bianchi et al. (2016), this resembles the LOCAL model of distributed computation (Linial, 1992)). When the underlying graph is dense, this volume of communication may be prohibitively large, which is a known bottleneck in many practical distributed machine learning settings (Alistarh et al., 2017; Koloskova et al., 2019a;b). In contrast, much less is known about cooperative multi-agent bandits in more lightweight decentralized models of distributed communication, such as the GOSSIP model (Boyd et al., 2006; Shah