Behavior cloning is a fundamental paradigm in machine learning, enabling policy learning from expert demonstrations across robotics, autonomous driving, and generative models. Autoregressive models like transformer have proven remarkably effective, from large language models (LLMs) to vision-language-action systems (VLAs). However, applying autoregressive models to continuous control requires discretizing actions through quantization, a practice widely adopted yet poorly understood theoretically. This paper provides theoretical foundations for this practice. We analyze how quantization error propagates along the horizon and interacts with statistical sample complexity. We show that behavior cloning with quantized actions and log-loss achieves optimal sample complexity, matching existing lower bounds, and incurs only polynomial horizon dependence on quantization error, provided the dynamics are stable and the policy satisfies a probabilistic smoothness condition. We further characterize when different quantization schemes satisfy or violate these requirements, and propose a model-based augmentation that provably improves the error bound without requiring policy smoothness. Finally, we establish fundamental limits that jointly capture the effects of quantization error and statistical complexity.

The problem of constrained online convex optimization is considered, where at each round, once a learner commits to an action $x_t \in \mathcal{X} \subset \mathbb{R}^d$, a convex loss function $f_t$ and a convex constraint function $g_t$ that drives the constraint $g_t(x)\le 0$ are revealed. The objective is to simultaneously minimize the static regret and cumulative constraint violation (CCV) compared to the benchmark that knows the loss functions and constraint functions $f_t$ and $g_t$ for all $t$ ahead of time, and chooses a static optimal action that is feasible with respect to all $g_t(x)\le 0$. In recent prior work Sinha and Vaze [2024], algorithms with simultaneous regret of $O(\sqrt{T})$ and CCV of $O(\sqrt{T})$ or (CCV of $O(1)$ in specific cases Vaze and Sinha [2025], e.g. when $d=1$) have been proposed. It is widely believed that CCV is $Ω(\sqrt{T})$ for all algorithms that ensure that regret is $O(\sqrt{T})$ with the worst case input for any $d\ge 2$. In this paper, we refute this and show that the algorithm of Vaze and Sinha [2025] simultaneously achieves regret of $O(\sqrt{T})$ regret and CCV of $O(T^{1/3})$ when $d=2$.

We derive the asymptotic risk function of regularized empirical risk minimization (ERM) estimators tuned by $n$-fold cross-validation (CV). The out-of-sample prediction loss of such estimators converges in distribution to the squared-error loss (risk function) of shrinkage estimators in the normal means model, tuned by Stein's unbiased risk estimate (SURE). This risk function provides a more fine-grained picture of predictive performance than uniform bounds on worst-case regret, which are common in learning theory: it quantifies how risk varies with the true parameter. As key intermediate steps, we show that (i) $n$-fold CV converges uniformly to SURE, and (ii) while SURE typically has multiple local minima, its global minimum is generically well separated. Well-separation ensures that uniform convergence of CV to SURE translates into convergence of the tuning parameter chosen by CV to that chosen by SURE.

Quantum principal component analysis (qPCA) is commonly formulated as the extraction of eigenvalues and eigenvectors of a covariance-encoded density operator. Yet in many qPCA settings, the practical objective is simpler: projecting data onto the dominant spectral subspace. In this work, we introduce a projection-first framework, the Filtered Spectral Projection Algorithm (FSPA), which bypasses explicit eigenvalue estimation while preserving the essential spectral structure. FSPA amplifies any nonzero warm-start overlap with the leading principal subspace and remains robust in small-gap and near-degenerate regimes without inducing artificial symmetry breaking in the absence of bias. To connect this approach to classical datasets, we show that for amplitude-encoded centered data, the ensemble density matrix $ρ=\sum_i p_i|ψ_i\rangle\langleψ_i|$ coincides with the covariance matrix. For uncentered data, $ρ$ corresponds to PCA without centering, and we derive eigenvalue interlacing bounds quantifying the deviation from standard PCA. We further show that ensembles of quantum states admit an equivalent centered covariance interpretation. Numerical demonstrations on benchmark datasets, including Breast Cancer Wisconsin and handwritten Digits, show that downstream performance remains stable whenever projection quality is preserved. These results suggest that, in a broad class of qPCA settings, spectral projection is the essential primitive, and explicit eigenvalue estimation is often unnecessary.

Time-varying causal models provide a powerful framework for studying dynamic scientific systems, yet most existing approaches assume that the underlying causal network is known a priori - an assumption rarely satisfied in real-world domains where causal structure is uncertain, evolving, or only indirectly observable. This limits the applicability of dynamic causal inference in many scientific settings. We propose Dynamic Causal Network Autoregression (DCNAR), a two-stage neural causal modeling framework that integrates data-driven causal discovery with time-varying causal inference. In the first stage, a neural autoregressive causal discovery model learns a sparse directed causal network from multivariate time series. In the second stage, this learned structure is used as a structural prior for a time-varying neural network autoregression, enabling dynamic estimation of causal influence without requiring pre-specified network structure. We evaluate the scientific validity of DCNAR using behavioral diagnostics that assess causal necessity, temporal stability, and sensitivity to structural change, rather than predictive accuracy alone. Experiments on multi-country panel time-series data demonstrate that learned causal networks yield more stable and behaviorally meaningful dynamic causal inferences than coefficient-based or structure-free alternatives, even when forecasting performance is comparable. These results position DCNAR as a general framework for using AI as a scientific instrument for dynamic causal reasoning under structural uncertainty.

We study the problem of learning a low-degree spherical polynomial of degree $k_0 = Θ(1) \ge 1$ defined on the unit sphere in $\RR^d$ by training an over-parameterized two-layer neural network with augmented feature in this paper. Our main result is the significantly improved sample complexity for learning such low-degree polynomials. We show that, for any regression risk $\eps \in (0, Θ(d^{-k_0})]$, an over-parameterized two-layer neural network trained by a novel Gradient Descent with Projection (GDP) requires a sample complexity of $n \asymp Θ( \log(4/δ) \cdot d^{k_0}/\eps)$ with probability $1-δ$ for $δ\in (0,1)$, in contrast with the representative sample complexity $Θ(d^{k_0} \max\set{\eps^{-2},\log d})$. Moreover, such sample complexity is nearly unimprovable since the trained network renders a nearly optimal rate of the nonparametric regression risk of the order $\log({4}/δ) \cdot Θ(d^{k_0}/{n})$ with probability at least $1-δ$. On the other hand, the minimax optimal rate for the regression risk with a kernel of rank $Θ(d^{k_0})$ is $Θ(d^{k_0}/{n})$, so that the rate of the nonparametric regression risk of the network trained by GDP is nearly minimax optimal. In the case that the ground truth degree $k_0$ is unknown, we present a novel and provable adaptive degree selection algorithm which identifies the true degree and achieves the same nearly optimal regression rate. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first time that a nearly optimal risk bound is obtained by training an over-parameterized neural network with a popular activation function (ReLU) and algorithmic guarantee for learning low-degree spherical polynomials. Due to the feature learning capability of GDP, our results are beyond the regular Neural Tangent Kernel (NTK) limit.

Large language models are increasingly used as personal assistants, yet most lack a persistent user model, forcing users to repeatedly restate preferences across sessions. We propose Vector-Adapted Retrieval Scoring (VARS), a pipeline-agnostic, frozen-backbone framework that represents each user with long-term and short-term vectors in a shared preference space and uses these vectors to bias retrieval scoring over structured preference memory. The vectors are updated online from weak scalar rewards from users' feedback, enabling personalization without per-user fine-tuning. We evaluate on \textsc{MultiSessionCollab}, an online multi-session collaboration benchmark with rich user preference profiles, across math and code tasks. Under frozen backbones, the main benefit of user-aware retrieval is improved interaction efficiency rather than large gains in raw task accuracy: our full VARS agent achieves the strongest overall performance, matches a strong Reflection baseline in task success, and reduces timeout rate and user effort. The learned long-term vectors also align with cross-user preference overlap, while short-term vectors capture session-specific adaptation, supporting the interpretability of the dual-vector design. Code, model, and data are available at https://github.com/YurenHao0426/VARS.

We highlight a striking difference in behavior between two widely used variants of coordinate ascent variational inference: the sequential and parallel algorithms. While such differences were known in the numerical analysis literature in simpler settings, they remain largely unexplored in the optimization-focused literature on variational inference in more complex models. Focusing on the moderately high-dimensional linear regression problem, we show that the sequential algorithm, although typically slower, enjoys convergence guarantees under more relaxed conditions than the parallel variant, which is often employed to facilitate block-wise updates and improve computational efficiency.

Recommendation systems (RSs) are increasingly used to guide job seekers on online platforms, yet the algorithms currently deployed are typically optimized for predictive objectives such as clicks, applications, or hires, rather than job seekers' welfare. We develop a job-search model with an application stage in which the value of a vacancy depends on two dimensions: the utility it delivers to the worker and the probability that an application succeeds. The model implies that welfare-optimal RSs rank vacancies by an expected-surplus index combining both, and shows why rankings based solely on utility, hiring probabilities, or observed application behavior are generically suboptimal, an instance of the inversion problem between behavior and welfare. We test these predictions and quantify their practical importance through two randomized field experiments conducted with the French public employment service. The first experiment, comparing existing algorithms and their combinations, provides behavioral evidence that both dimensions shape application decisions. Guided by the model and these results, the second experiment extends the comparison to an RS designed to approximate the welfare-optimal ranking. The experiments generate exogenous variation in the vacancies shown to job seekers, allowing us to estimate the model, validate its behavioral predictions, and construct a welfare metric. Algorithms informed by the model-implied optimal ranking substantially outperform existing approaches and perform close to the welfare-optimal benchmark. Our results show that embedding predictive tools within a simple job-search framework and combining it with experimental evidence yields recommendation rules with substantial welfare gains in practice.

We study Constrained Online Convex Optimization with Memory (COCO-M), where both the loss and the constraints depend on a finite window of past decisions made by the learner. This setting extends the previously studied unconstrained online optimization with memory framework and captures practical problems such as the control of constrained dynamical systems and scheduling with reconfiguration budgets. For this problem, we propose the first algorithms that achieve sublinear regret and sublinear cumulative constraint violation under time-varying constraints, both with and without predictions of future loss and constraint functions. Without predictions, we introduce an adaptive penalty approach that guarantees sublinear regret and constraint violation. When short-horizon and potentially unreliable predictions are available, we reinterpret the problem as online learning with delayed feedback and design an optimistic algorithm whose performance improves as prediction accuracy improves, while remaining robust when predictions are inaccurate. Our results bridge the gap between classical constrained online convex optimization and memory-dependent settings, and provide a versatile learning toolbox with diverse applications.