This computer program accepts expressions in natural language as on-line input. It searches each expression for syntactic and semantic patterns. When a pattern match is discovered an appropriate reply is typed out in natural language so that a continuing dialogue develops between person and program. The dialogue is restricted to the context of interpersonal relations such as occurs in a psychiatric interview. The program is an interpreter/supervisor written in SUBALGOL and runs on a 32K IBM 7090 connected via a direct-data device to a PDP-1 and a Philco console.

Questions are asked and answered every day. Question answering (QA) technology aims to deliver the same facility online. It goes further than the more familiar search based on keywords (as in Google, Yahoo, and other search engines), in attempting to recognize what a question expresses and to respond with an actual answer. First, questions do not often translate into a simple list of keywords. For example, the question (1) Which countries did the pope visit in the 1960s? A much more complex set of keywords is needed in order to get anywhere close to the intended result, and experience shows that people will not learn how to formulate and use such sets. Second, QA takes responsibility for providing answers, rather than a searchable list of links to potentially relevant documents (web pages), highlighted by snippets of text that show how the query matched the documents. While this is not much of a burden when the answer appears in a snippet and further document access is unnecessary, QA technology aims to move this from being an accidental property of search to its focus. In keyword search and in much work to date on QA technology, the information seeking process has been seen as a one-shot affair: the user asks a question, and the system provides a satisfactory response. However, early work on QA (Section 1.1) did not make this assumption, and newly targeted applications are hindered by it: while a user may try to formulate a question whose answer is the information Question Answering 631 they want, they will not know whether they have succeeded until something has been returned for examination. If what is returned is unsatisfactory or, while not the answer, is still of interest, a user needs to be able to ask further questions that are understood in the context of the previous ones. For these target applications, QA must be part of a collaborative search process (Section 3.3). In the rest of this section, we give some historical background on QA systems (Section 1.1), on dialogue systems in which QA has played a significant role (Section 1.2), and on a particular QA task that has been a major driver of the field over the past 8 years (Section 1.3). Section 2 describes the current state of the art in QA systems, organized around the de facto architecture of such systems. Section 3 discusses some current directions in which QA is moving, including the development of interactive QA.

The challenging timeline for DARPA’s Orbital Express mission demanded a flexible, responsive, and (above all) safe approach to mission planning. Mission planning for space is challenging because of the mixture of goals and constraints. Every space mission tries to squeeze all of the capacity possible out of the spacecraft. For Orbital Express, this means performing as many experiments as possible, while still keeping the spacecraft safe. Keeping the spacecraft safe can be very challenging because we need to maintain the correct thermal environment (or batteries might freeze), we need to avoid pointing cameras and sensitive sensors at the sun, we need to keep the spacecraft batteries charged, and we need to keep the two spacecraft from colliding... made more difficult as only one of the spacecraft had thrusters. Because the mission was a technology demonstration, pertinent planning information was learned during actual mission execution. For example, we didn’t know for certain how long it would take to transfer propellant from one spacecraft to the other, although this was a primary mission goal. The only way to find out was to perform the task and monitor how long it actually took. This information led to amendments to procedures, which led to changes in the mission plan. In general, we used the ASPEN planner scheduler to generate and validate the mission plans. ASPEN is a planning system that allows us to enter all of the spacecraft constraints, the resources, the communications windows, and our objectives. ASPEN then could automatically plan our day. We enhanced ASPEN to enable it to reason about uncertainty. We also developed a model generator that would read the text of a procedure and translate it into an ASPEN model. Note that a model is the input to ASPEN that describes constraints, resources, and activities. These technologies had a significant impact on the success of the Orbital Express mission. Finally, we formulated a technique for converting procedural information to declarative information by transforming procedures into models of hierarchical task networks (HTNs). The impact of this effort on the mission was a significant reduction in (1) the execution time of the mission, (2) the daily staff required to produce plans, and (3) planning errors. Not a single miss-configured command was sent during operations.

Kristen Grauman is an associate professor in the Department of Computer Science at the University of Texas at Austin. Her research in computer vision and machine learning focuses on visual search and object recognition. Before joining the University of Texas at Austin in 2007, she received her Ph.D. in the Electrical Engineering and Computer Science department at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, in the Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory. She is an Alfred P. Sloan Research Fellow and Microsoft Research New Faculty Fellow, a recipient of NSF CAREER and ONR Young Investigator awards, the Regents' Outstanding Teaching Award from the University of Texas System in 2012, the PAMI Young Researcher Award in 2013, the 2013 Computers and Thought Award from the International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, and a Presidential Early Career Award for Scientists and Engineers (PECASE) in 2013. She and her collaborators were recognized with the CVPR Best Student Paper Award in 2008 for their work on hashing algorithms for large-scale image retrieval, and the Marr Best Paper Prize at ICCV in 2011 for their work on modeling relative visual attributes.

It was founded in 1991 and, since 1994, has been located on the campus of the Autonomous University of Barcelona. IIIA grew out of an AI research group at the Center for Advanced Studies in Blanes (Spain) that started AI research in 1985. On average IIIA has had about 50 members per year during the last 12 years with a peak of almost 80 members in 2012. In total around 200 different people, including visiting researchers as well as master's and Ph.D. students, have been members of IIIA over the past 20 years. Seventy-seven students have completed their Ph.D. work at our Institute, 48 of them during the last 12 years.

Participants Intelligence (AAAI-15) and the Twenty-Seventh Conference in the AAAI-15 Robotics Exhibition and the on Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence AAAI-15 Video Competition are encouraged to contribute (IAAI-15) will be held January 25-29 at the to the Demonstration Program with their systems, Hyatt Regency Austin in Austin, Texas, USA. AAAI is working October 8 (Papers Due) closely with the local AI community to create opportunities The Senior Member Track provides an opportunity for attendees to experience AI in Texas! Attendees for established researchers in the AI community to can also enjoy nearly 200 music venues that feature give a broad talk on a well-developed body of everything from rock and blues to country and research, an important new research area, or a promising jazz every night of the week. Austin cuisine has new topic. This year, new "Blue Sky Ideas" track expanded from barbecue and Tex-Mex to award-winning is seeking presentations aimed at presenting ideas and inventive international cuisine, and blossomed and visions that can stimulate the research community beyond brick-and-mortar restaurants to a to pursue new directions, such as new problems, vibrant, citywide food truck movement.

The preliminary Call for Papers, including an The IAAI-14 technical program will feature overview of the special tracks and a preview of talks on seven award-winning deployed AI planned innovations is available at www.aaai.

This paper describes USI Answers — a natural language question answering system for enterprise data. We report on the progress towards the goal of offering easy access to enterprise data to a large number of business users, most of whom are not familiar with the specific syntax or semantics of the underlying data sources. Additional complications come from the nature of the data, which comes both as structured and unstructured. The proposed solution allows users to express questions in natural language, makes apparent the system's interpretation of the query, and allows easy query adjustment and reformulation. The application is in use by more than 1500 users from Siemens Energy. We evaluate our approach on a data set consisting of fleet data.

We present two graph-based algorithms for multiclass segmentation of high-dimensional data. The algorithms use a diffuse interface model based on the Ginzburg-Landau functional, related to total variation compressed sensing and image processing. A multiclass extension is introduced using the Gibbs simplex, with the functional's double-well potential modified to handle the multiclass case. The first algorithm minimizes the functional using a convex splitting numerical scheme. The second algorithm is a uses a graph adaptation of the classical numerical Merriman-Bence-Osher (MBO) scheme, which alternates between diffusion and thresholding. We demonstrate the performance of both algorithms experimentally on synthetic data, grayscale and color images, and several benchmark data sets such as MNIST, COIL and WebKB. We also make use of fast numerical solvers for finding the eigenvectors and eigenvalues of the graph Laplacian, and take advantage of the sparsity of the matrix. Experiments indicate that the results are competitive with or better than the current state-of-the-art multiclass segmentation algorithms.

This paper presents a multilayered architecture that enhances the capabilities of current QA systems and allows different types of complex questions or queries to be processed. The answers to these questions need to be gathered from factual information scattered throughout different documents. Specifically, we designed a specialized layer to process the different types of temporal questions. Complex temporal questions are first decomposed into simple questions, according to the temporal relations expressed in the original question. In the same way, the answers to the resulting simple questions are recomposed, fulfilling the temporal restrictions of the original complex question. A novel aspect of this approach resides in the decomposition which uses a minimal quantity of resources, with the final aim of obtaining a portable platform that is easily extensible to other languages. In this paper we also present a methodology for evaluation of the decomposition of the questions as well as the ability of the implemented temporal layer to perform at a multilingual level. The temporal layer was first performed for English, then evaluated and compared with: a) a general purpose QA system (F-measure 65.47% for QA plus English temporal layer vs. 38.01% for the general QA system), and b) a well-known QA system. Much better results were obtained for temporal questions with the multilayered system. This system was therefore extended to Spanish and very good results were again obtained in the evaluation (F-measure 40.36% for QA plus Spanish temporal layer vs. 22.94% for the general QA system).