AuthSim: Towards Authentic and Effective Safety-critical Scenario Generation for Autonomous Driving Tests Y ukuan Y ang 1, Xucheng Lu 2, Zhili Zhang 1, Zepeng Wu 1, 3, Guoqi Li 4, Lingzhong Meng 1, Y unzhi Xue 1 1 Institute of Software, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China. 2 School of Science, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Beijing 100876, China. Abstract --Generating adversarial safety-critical scenarios is a pivotal method for testing autonomous driving systems, as it identifies potential weaknesses and enhances system robustness and reliability. However, existing approaches predominantly emphasize unrestricted collision scenarios, prompting non-player character (NPC) vehicles to attack the ego vehicle indiscriminately. These works overlook these scenarios' authenticity, rationality, and relevance, resulting in numerous extreme, contrived, and largely unrealistic collision events involving aggressive NPC vehicles. T o rectify this issue, we propose a three-layer relative safety region model, which partitions the area based on danger levels and increases the likelihood of NPC vehicles entering relative boundary regions. This model directs NPC vehicles to engage in adversarial actions within relatively safe boundary regions, thereby augmenting the scenarios' authenticity. We introduce AuthSim, a comprehensive platform for generating authentic and effective safety-critical scenarios by integrating the three-layer relative safety region model with reinforcement learning. T o our knowledge, this is the first attempt to address the authenticity and effectiveness of autonomous driving system test scenarios comprehensively. Extensive experiments demonstrate that AuthSim outperforms existing methods in generating effective safety-critical scenarios. Notably, AuthSim achieves a 5.25% improvement in average cut-in distance and a 27.12% enhancement in average collision interval time, while maintaining higher efficiency in generating effective safety-critical scenarios compared to existing methods. This underscores its significant advantage in producing authentic scenarios over current methodologies. I NTRODUCTION Over the past decade, autonomous driving vehicles [1-3] have made significant strides, largely due to the rapid development and application of machine learning [4, 5].

Clinical knowledge is the collection of information learned from studies on the causes, prognosis, diagnosis, and treatment of diseases. This type of knowledge can improve curing performances, and promote physical health. With the emergence of large language models (LLMs), medical artificial intelligence (medical AI), which aims to apply academic medical AI systems to real-world medical scenarios, has entered a new age of development, resulting in excellent works such as DoctorGPT and Pangu-Drug from academic and industrial researches. However, the field lacks a comprehensive compendium and comparison of building medical AI systems from academia and industry. Therefore, this survey focuses on the building paradigms of medical AI systems including the use of clinical databases, datasets, training pipelines, integrating medical knowledge graphs, system applications, and evaluation systems. We hope that this survey can help relevant practical researchers understand the current performance of academic models in various fields of healthcare, as well as the potential problems and future directions for implementing these scientific achievements.

Such designs arise when treatment assignment is based on whether a particular covariate -- referred to as the running variable -- lies above or below a known value, referred to as the cutoff value. Because treatment is deterministically assigned as a known function of the running variable, RDDs are trivially deconfounded: treatment assignment is independent of the outcome variable, given the running variable (because treatment is conditionally constant). However, estimation of treatment effects in RDDs is more complicated than simply controlling for the running variable, because doing so introduces a complete lack of overlap, which is the other key condition needed to justify regression adjustment for causal inference. Nonetheless, treatment effects at the cutoff may still be identified. Specifically, it is well-known that treatment effects at the cutoff can be estimated from RDDs as the magnitude of a discontinuity in the conditional mean response function at that point (Hahn et al., 2001). This paper investigates the use of Bayesian additive regression tree models (Chipman et al., 2010; Hahn et al., 2020) for the purpose of estimating conditional average treatments effects (CATE) at the cutoff, conditional on observed covariates other than the running variable. To the best of our knowledge, such data-driven CATE estimation has not been a focus of the existing RDD literature and we are the first to propose BART for this purpose.

Traditional approaches to learning fair machine learning models often require rebuilding models from scratch, generally without accounting for potentially existing previous models. In a context where models need to be retrained frequently, this can lead to inconsistent model updates, as well as redundant and costly validation testing. To address this limitation, we introduce the notion of controlled model debiasing, a novel supervised learning task relying on two desiderata: that the differences between new fair model and the existing one should be (i) interpretable and (ii) minimal. After providing theoretical guarantees to this new problem, we introduce a novel algorithm for algorithmic fairness, COMMOD, that is both model-agnostic and does not require the sensitive attribute at test time. In addition, our algorithm is explicitly designed to enforce (i) minimal and (ii) interpretable changes between biased and debiased predictions--a property that, while highly desirable in high-stakes applications, is rarely prioritized as an explicit objective in fairness literature. Our approach combines a concept-based architecture and adversarial learning and we demonstrate through empirical results that it achieves comparable performance to state-of-the-art debiasing methods while performing minimal and interpretable prediction changes. 1 Introduction The increasing adoption of machine learning models in high-stakes domains--such as criminal justice (Klein-berg et al., 2016) and credit lending (Bruckner, 2018)--has raised significant concerns about the potential biases that these models may reproduce and amplify, particularly against historically marginalized groups. Recent public discourse, along with regulatory developments such as the European AI Act (2024/1689), has further underscored the need for adapting AI systems to ensure fairness and trustworthiness (Bringas Col-menarejo et al., 2022). Consequently, many of the machine learning models deployed by organizations are, or may soon be, subject to these emerging regulatory requirements. Yet, such organizations frequently invest significant resources (e.g. The field of algorithmic fairness has experienced rapid growth in recent years, with numerous bias mitigation strategies proposed (Romei & Ruggieri, 2014; Mehrabi et al., 2021). These approaches can be broadly categorized into three types: pre-processing (e.g.,(Belrose et al., 2024)), in-processing (e.g.,(Zhang et al., 2018)), and post-processing(e.g., (Kamiran et al., 2010)), based on the stage of the machine learning pipeline at which fairness is enforced. While the two former categories do not account at all for any pre-existing biased model being available for the task, post-processing approaches aim to impose fairness by directly modifying the predictions of a biased classifier.

This paper presents the development and application of a Large Language Model Retrieval-Augmented Generation (LLM-RAG) system tailored for nanotechnology research. The system leverages the capabilities of a sophisticated language model to serve as an intelligent research assistant, enhancing the efficiency and comprehensiveness of literature reviews in the nanotechnology domain. Central to this LLM-RAG system is its advanced query backend retrieval mechanism, which integrates data from multiple reputable sources. The system retrieves relevant literature by utilizing Google Scholar's advanced search, and scraping open-access papers from Elsevier, Springer Nature, and ACS Publications. This multifaceted approach ensures a broad and diverse collection of up-to-date scholarly articles and papers. The proposed system demonstrates significant potential in aiding researchers by providing a streamlined, accurate, and exhaustive literature retrieval process, thereby accelerating research advancements in nanotechnology. The effectiveness of the LLM-RAG system is validated through rigorous testing, illustrating its capability to significantly reduce the time and effort required for comprehensive literature reviews, while maintaining high accuracy, query relevance and outperforming standard, publicly available LLMS.

--Integrating the structural inductive biases of Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) with the global contextual modeling capabilities of Transformers represents a pivotal challenge in graph representation learning. While GNNs excel at capturing localized topological patterns through message-passing mechanisms, their inherent limitations in modeling long-range dependencies and parallelizability hinder their deployment in large-scale scenarios. Conversely, Transformers leverage self-attention mechanisms to achieve global receptive fields but struggle to inherit the intrinsic graph structural priors of GNNs. This paper proposes a novel knowledge distillation framework that systematically transfers multiscale structural knowledge from GNN teacher models to Transformer student models, offering a new perspective on addressing the critical challenges in cross-architectural distillation. This work establishes a new paradigm for inheriting graph structural biases in Transformer architectures, with broad application prospects.

In recent years, there has been significant development of autonomous vehicle (AV) technologies. However, despite the notable achievements of some industry players, a strong and appealing body of evidence that demonstrate AVs are actually safe is lacky, which could foster public distrust in this technology and further compromise the entire development of this industry, as well as related social impacts. To improve the safety of AVs, several techniques are proposed that use synthetic data in virtual simulation. In particular, the highest risk data, known as corner cases (CCs), are the most valuable for developing and testing AV controls, as they can expose and improve the weaknesses of these autonomous systems. In this context, the present paper presents a systematic literature review aiming to comprehensively analyze methodologies for CC identifi cation and generation, also pointing out current gaps and further implications of synthetic data for AV safety and reliability. Based on a selection criteria, 110 studies were picked from an initial sample of 1673 papers. These selected paper were mapped into multiple categories to answer eight inter-linked research questions. It concludes with the recommendation of a more integrated approach focused on safe development among all stakeholders, with active collaboration between industry, academia and regulatory bodies.

Recent progress in large language models (LLMs) has focused on producing responses that meet human expectations and align with shared values - a process coined alignment. However, aligning LLMs remains challenging due to the inherent disconnect between the complexity of human values and the narrow nature of the technological approaches designed to address them. Current alignment methods often lead to misspecified objectives, reflecting the broader issue of incomplete contracts, the impracticality of specifying a contract between a model developer, and the model that accounts for every scenario in LLM alignment. In this paper, we argue that improving LLM alignment requires incorporating insights from societal alignment frameworks, including social, economic, and contractual alignment, and discuss potential solutions drawn from these domains. Given the role of uncertainty within societal alignment frameworks, we then investigate how it manifests in LLM alignment. We end our discussion by offering an alternative view on LLM alignment, framing the underspecified nature of its objectives as an opportunity rather than perfect their specification. Beyond technical improvements in LLM alignment, we discuss the need for participatory alignment interface designs.

In this paper, we propose a systematic framework for fast exploration of complex and large 3-D environments using micro aerial vehicles (MAVs). The key insight is the organic integration of the frontier-based and sampling-based strategies that can achieve rapid global exploration of the environment. Specifically, a field-of-view-based (FOV) frontier detector with the guarantee of completeness and soundness is devised for identifying 3-D map frontiers. Different from random sampling-based methods, the deterministic sampling technique is employed to build and maintain an incremental road map based on the recorded sensor FOVs and newly detected frontiers. With the resulting road map, we propose a two-stage path planner. First, it quickly computes the global optimal exploration path on the road map using the lazy evaluation strategy. Then, the best exploration path is smoothed for further improving the exploration efficiency. We validate the proposed method both in simulation and real-world experiments. The comparative results demonstrate the promising performance of our planner in terms of exploration efficiency, computational time, and explored volume.

Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) has proven highly effective in improving large language models (LLMs) across various domains. However, there is no benchmark specifically designed to assess the effectiveness of RAG in the legal domain, which restricts progress in this area. To fill this gap, we propose LexRAG, the first benchmark to evaluate RAG systems for multi-turn legal consultations. LexRAG consists of 1,013 multi-turn dialogue samples and 17,228 candidate legal articles. Each sample is annotated by legal experts and consists of five rounds of progressive questioning. LexRAG includes two key tasks: (1) Conversational knowledge retrieval, requiring accurate retrieval of relevant legal articles based on multi-turn context. (2) Response generation, focusing on producing legally sound answers. To ensure reliable reproducibility, we develop LexiT, a legal RAG toolkit that provides a comprehensive implementation of RAG system components tailored for the legal domain. Additionally, we introduce an LLM-as-a-judge evaluation pipeline to enable detailed and effective assessment. Through experimental analysis of various LLMs and retrieval methods, we reveal the key limitations of existing RAG systems in handling legal consultation conversations. LexRAG establishes a new benchmark for the practical application of RAG systems in the legal domain, with its code and data available at https://github.com/CSHaitao/LexRAG.