There is strong evidence that face processing is localized in the brain. The double dissociation between prosopagnosia, a face recognition deficit occurring after brain damage, and visual object agnosia, difficulty recognizing otber kinds of complex objects, indicates tbat face and nonface objectrecognition may be served by partially independent mechanisms inthe brain. Is neural specialization innate or learned? We suggest that this specialization could be tbe result of a competitive learning mechanism that, during development, devotes neural resources to the tasks they are best at performing. Furtber, we suggest that the specialization arisesas an interaction between task requirements and developmental constraints. In this paper, we present a feed-forward computational model of visual processing, in which two modules compete to classify input stimuli. When one module receives low spatial frequency information andthe other receives high spatial frequency information, and the task is to identify the faces while simply classifying the objects, the low frequency network shows a strong specialization for faces. No otber combination of tasks and inputs shows this strong specialization. We take these results as support for the idea that an innately-specified face processing module is unnecessary.

We present a study which is concerned with word recognition rates for heavily degraded documents. We compare human with machine reading capabilitiesin a series of experiments, which explores the interaction of word/non-word recognition, word frequency and legality of non-words with degradation level. We also study the influence of character segmentation, andcompare human performance with that of our artificial neural network model for reading. We found that the proposed computer model uses word context as efficiently as humans, but performs slightly worse on the pure character recognition task. 1 Introduction Optical Character Recognition (OCR) of machine-print document images ·has matured considerably during the last decade. Recognition rates as high as 99.5% have been reported ongood quality documents. However, for lower image resolutions (200 Dpl and below), noisy images, images with blur or skew, the recognition rate declines considerably. Inbad quality documents, character segmentation is as big a problem as the actual character recognition.

A rich body of data exists showing that recollection of specific information makesan important contribution to recognition memory, which is distinct from the contribution of familiarity, and is not adequately captured byexisting unitary memory models. Furthennore, neuropsychological evidence indicates that recollection is subserved by the hippocampus. We present a model, based largely on known features of hippocampal anatomy and physiology, that accounts for the following key characteristics ofrecollection: 1) false recollection is rare (i.e., participants rarely claim to recollect having studied nonstudied items), and 2) increasing interference leadsto less recollection but apparently does not compromise the quality of recollection (i.e., the extent to which recollected infonnation veridicallyreflects events that occurred at study).

One of the current challenges to understanding neural information processing in biological systems is to decipher the "code" carried by large populations of neurons acting in parallel. We present an algorithm for automated discovery of stochastic firing patterns in large ensembles of neurons. The algorithm, from the "Helmholtz Machine" family, attempts to predict the observed spike patterns in the data. The model consists of an observable layer which is directly activated by the input spike patterns, and hidden units that are activated throughascending connections from the input layer. The hidden unit activity can be propagated down to the observable layer to create a prediction of the data pattern that produced it.

Using displays of line orientations taken from Wolfe's experiments [1992], we study the hypothesis that the distinction between parallel versus serial processes arises from the availability of global information in the internal representations of the visual scene. The model operates in two phases. First, the visual displays are compressed via principal-component-analysis. Second, the compressed data is processed by a target detector module inorder to identify the existence of a target in the display. Our main finding is that targets in displays which were found experimentally tobe processed in parallel can be detected by the system, while targets in experimentally-serial displays cannot. This fundamental difference is explained via variance analysis of the compressed representations, providing a numerical criterion distinguishing parallelfrom serial displays. Our model yields a mapping of response-time slopes that is similar to Duncan and Humphreys's "search surface" [1989], providing an explicit formulation of their intuitive notion of feature similarity. It presents a neural realization ofthe processing that may underlie the classical metaphorical explanations of visual search.

Abstract Missing

Farah (1990) has proposed an alternative classof explanations involving partial damage to multiple pathways. Weexplore this explanation for optic aphasia, a disorder in which severe perfonnance deficits are observed when patients are asked to name visually presented objects, but surprisingly, performance is relatively nonnalon naming objects from auditory cues and on gesturing the appropriate use of visually presented objects.

In normal vision, the inputs from the two eyes are integrated intoa single percept. When dissimilar images are presented to the two eyes, however, perceptual integration givesway to alternation between monocular inputs, a phenomenon called binocular rivalry. Although recent evidence indicates that binocular rivalry involves a modulation ofneuronal responses in extrastriate cortex, the basic mechanisms responsible for differential processing of con:6.icting

Calendar of AI-related meetings, conferences, meetings, workshops, and symposia.

Now completing its first year, the High-Performance Knowledge Bases Project promotes technology for developing very large, flexible, and reusable knowledge bases. The project is supported by the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency and includes more than 15 contractors in universities, research laboratories, and companies. The evaluation of the constituent technologies centers on two challenge problems, in crisis management and battlespace reasoning, each demanding powerful problem solving with very large knowledge bases. This article discusses the challenge problems, the constituent technologies, and their integration and evaluation.