Data annotation is an essential component of the machine learning pipeline; it is also a costly and time-consuming process. With the introduction of transformer-based models, annotation at the document level is increasingly popular; however, there is no standard framework for structuring such tasks. The EffiARA annotation framework is, to our knowledge, the first project to support the whole annotation pipeline, from understanding the resources required for an annotation task to compiling the annotated dataset and gaining insights into the reliability of individual annotators as well as the dataset as a whole. The framework's efficacy is supported by two previous studies: one improving classification performance through annotator-reliability-based soft label aggregation and sample weighting, and the other increasing the overall agreement among annotators through removing identifying and replacing an unreliable annotator. This work introduces the EffiARA Python package and its accompanying webtool, which provides an accessible graphical user interface for the system. We open-source the EffiARA Python package at https://github.com/MiniEggz/EffiARA and the webtool is publicly accessible at https://effiara.gate.ac.uk.

The growing threat posed by deepfake videos, capable of manipulating realities and disseminating misinformation, drives the urgent need for effective detection methods. This work investigates and compares different approaches for identifying deepfakes, focusing on the GenConViT model and its performance relative to other architectures present in the DeepfakeBenchmark. To contextualize the research, the social and legal impacts of deepfakes are addressed, as well as the technical fundamentals of their creation and detection, including digital image processing, machine learning, and artificial neural networks, with emphasis on Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs), Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs), and Transformers. The performance evaluation of the models was conducted using relevant metrics and new datasets established in the literature, such as WildDeep-fake and DeepSpeak, aiming to identify the most effective tools in the battle against misinformation and media manipulation. The obtained results indicated that GenConViT, after fine-tuning, exhibited superior performance in terms of accuracy (93.82%) and generalization capacity, surpassing other architectures in the DeepfakeBenchmark on the DeepSpeak dataset. This study contributes to the advancement of deepfake detection techniques, offering contributions to the development of more robust and effective solutions against the dissemination of false information.

The increasing polarization in democratic societies is an emergent outcome of political opinion dynamics. Yet, the fundamental mechanisms behind the formation of political opinions, from individual beliefs to collective consensus, remain unknown. Understanding that a causal mechanism must account for both bottom-up and top-down influences, we conceptualize political opinion dynamics as hierarchical coarse-graining, where microscale opinions integrate into a macro-scale state variable. Using the CODA (Continuous Opinions Discrete Actions) model, we simulate Bayesian opinion updating, social identity-based information integration, and migration between social identity groups to represent higher-level connectivity. This results in coarse-graining across micro, meso, and macro levels. Our findings show that higher-level connectivity shapes information integration, yielding three regimes: independent (disconnected, local convergence), parallel (fast, global convergence), and iterative (slow, stepwise convergence). In the iterative regime, low connectivity fosters transient diversity, indicating an informed consensus. In all regimes, time-scale separation leads to downward causation, where agents converge on the aggregate majority choice, driving consensus. Critically, any degree of coherent higher-level information integration can overcome misalignment via global downward causation. The results highlight how emergent properties of the causal mechanism, such as downward causation, are essential for consensus and may inform more precise investigations into polarized political discourse.

Text semantic segmentation involves partitioning a document into multiple paragraphs with continuous semantics based on the subject matter, contextual information, and document structure. Traditional approaches have typically relied on preprocessing documents into segments to address input length constraints, resulting in the loss of critical semantic information across segments. To address this, we present CrossFormer, a transformer-based model featuring a novel cross-segment fusion module that dynamically models latent semantic dependencies across document segments, substantially elevating segmentation accuracy. Additionally, CrossFormer can replace rule-based chunk methods within the Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) system, producing more semantically coherent chunks that enhance its efficacy. Comprehensive evaluations confirm CrossFormer's state-of-the-art performance on public text semantic segmentation datasets, alongside considerable gains on RAG benchmarks.

Mathematics learning entails mastery of both content knowledge and cognitive processing of knowing, applying, and reasoning with it. Automated math assessment primarily has focused on grading students' exhibition of content knowledge by finding textual evidence, such as specific numbers, formulas, and statements. Recent advancements in problem-solving, image recognition, and reasoning capabilities of large language models (LLMs) show promise for nuanced evaluation of students' cognitive skills. Diagnosing cognitive skills needs to infer students' thinking processes beyond textual evidence, which is an underexplored task in LLM-based automated assessment. In this work, we investigate how state-of-the-art LLMs diagnose students' cognitive skills in mathematics. We constructed MathCog, a novel benchmark dataset comprising 639 student responses to 110 expert-curated middle school math problems, each annotated with detailed teachers' diagnoses based on cognitive skill checklists. Using MathCog, we evaluated 16 closed and open LLMs of varying model sizes and vendors. Our evaluation reveals that even the state-of-the-art LLMs struggle with the task, all F1 scores below 0.5, and tend to exhibit strong false confidence for incorrect cases ($r_s=.617$). We also found that model size positively correlates with the diagnosis performance ($r_s=.771$). Finally, we discuss the implications of these findings, the overconfidence issue, and directions for improving automated cognitive skill diagnosis.

Gaussian processes (GPs) are crucial in machine learning for quantifying uncertainty in predictions. However, their associated covariance matrices, defined by kernel functions, are typically dense and large-scale, posing significant computational challenges. This paper introduces a matrix-free method that utilizes the Non-equispaced Fast Fourier Transform (NFFT) to achieve nearly linear complexity in the multiplication of kernel matrices and their derivatives with vectors for a predetermined accuracy level. To address high-dimensional problems, we propose an additive kernel approach. Each sub-kernel in this approach captures lower-order feature interactions, allowing for the efficient application of the NFFT method and potentially increasing accuracy across various real-world datasets. Additionally, we implement a preconditioning strategy that accelerates hyperparameter tuning, further improving the efficiency and effectiveness of GPs.

The emergence of AI legislation has increased the need to assess the ethical compliance of high-risk AI systems. Traditional auditing methods rely on platforms' application programming interfaces (APIs), where responses to queries are examined through the lens of fairness requirements. However, such approaches put a significant burden on platforms, as they are forced to maintain APIs while ensuring privacy, facing the possibility of data leaks. This lack of proper collaboration between the two parties, in turn, causes a significant challenge to the auditor, who is subject to estimation bias as they are unaware of the data distribution of the platform. To address these two issues, we present P2NIA, a novel auditing scheme that proposes a mutually beneficial collaboration for both the auditor and the platform. Extensive experiments demonstrate P2NIA's effectiveness in addressing both issues. In summary, our work introduces a privacy-preserving and non-iterative audit scheme that enhances fairness assessments using synthetic or local data, avoiding the challenges associated with traditional API-based audits.

These embeddings can be leveraged in various downstream tasks, including node classification, link prediction, clustering, exploratory data analysis, and network visualization. The method has found broad application across diverse domains, such as fraud detection in financial networks (van Belle et al. 2023), friendship recommendation and bot detection in social networks (Saxena et al. 2022; Dehghan et al. 2023), knowledge discovery in knowledge graphs (Egami et al. 2023; Liu et al. 2023), analysis of biological networks (Jiang et al. 2021; Pasquier et al. 2023), and fake review detection on online platforms (Zaki et al. 2024). A key challenge in Node Embedding is developing a scalable method for preserving the structural properties of nodes suitable for the required structural patterns of a downstream application task. The type of structural patterns in which a node is embedded within the graph can vary depending on the role or function of the node in a specific application task. For instance, fraudulent activities such as money laundering can be embedded in particular money flow patterns among illicit entities, resulting in characteristic structural patterns within the financial transaction network, such as suspicious cyclic transaction chains (Granados Vargas 2022). These structural patterns differ significantly from those observed in social networks, where specific roles such as bridge and core nodes define the network's connectivity and influence (Huang et al. 2014). As Node Embedding methods cannot preserve all types of structural patterns simultaneously, they must align with the requirements of a specific application task when defining types of structural identities.

Selective retrieval improves retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) by reducing distractions from low-quality retrievals and improving efficiency. However, existing approaches under-utilize the inherent knowledge of large language models (LLMs), leading to suboptimal retrieval decisions and degraded generation performance. To bridge this gap, we propose Self-Routing RAG (SR-RAG), a novel framework that binds selective retrieval with knowledge verbalization. SR-RAG enables an LLM to dynamically decide between external retrieval and verbalizing its own parametric knowledge. To this end, we design a multi-task objective that jointly optimizes an LLM on knowledge source selection, knowledge verbalization, and response generation. We further introduce dynamic knowledge source inference via nearest neighbor search to improve the accuracy of knowledge source decision under domain shifts. Fine-tuning three LLMs with SR-RAG significantly improves both their response accuracy and inference latency. Compared to the strongest selective retrieval baseline, SR-RAG reduces retrievals by 29% while improving the performance by 5.1%.

The goal of translation, be it by human or by machine, is, given some text in a source language, to produce text in a target language that simultaneously 1) preserves the meaning of the source text and 2) achieves natural expression in the target language. However, researchers in the machine translation community usually assess translations using a single score intended to capture semantic accuracy and the naturalness of the output simultaneously. In this paper, we build on recent advances in information theory to mathematically prove and empirically demonstrate that such single-score summaries do not and cannot give the complete picture of a system's true performance. Concretely, we prove that a tradeoff exists between accuracy and naturalness and demonstrate it by evaluating the submissions to the WMT24 shared task. Our findings help explain well-known empirical phenomena, such as the observation that optimizing translation systems for a specific accuracy metric (like BLEU) initially improves the system's naturalness, while ``overfitting'' the system to the metric can significantly degrade its naturalness. Thus, we advocate for a change in how translations are evaluated: rather than comparing systems using a single number, they should be compared on an accuracy-naturalness plane.