The rising prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) necessitates the development of predictive models for T2DM risk assessment. Artificial intelligence (AI) models are being extensively used for this purpose, but a comprehensive review of their advancements and challenges is lacking. This scoping review analyzes existing literature on AI-based models for T2DM risk prediction. Forty studies were included, mainly published in the past four years. Traditional machine learning models were more prevalent than deep learning models. Electronic health records were the most commonly used data source. Unimodal AI models relying on EHR data were prominent, while only a few utilized multimodal models. Both unimodal and multimodal models showed promising performance, with the latter outperforming the former. Internal validation was common, while external validation was limited. Interpretability methods were reported in half of the studies. Few studies reported novel biomarkers, and open-source code availability was limited. This review provides insights into the current state and limitations of AI-based T2DM risk prediction models and highlights challenges for their development and clinical implementation.

Automatic literature review generation is one of the most challenging tasks in natural language processing. Although large language models have tackled literature review generation, the absence of large-scale datasets has been a stumbling block to the progress. We release SciReviewGen, consisting of over 10,000 literature reviews and 690,000 papers cited in the reviews. Based on the dataset, we evaluate recent transformer-based summarization models on the literature review generation task, including Fusion-in-Decoder extended for literature review generation. Human evaluation results show that some machine-generated summaries are comparable to human-written reviews, while revealing the challenges of automatic literature review generation such as hallucinations and a lack of detailed information. Our dataset and code are available at https://github.com/tetsu9923/SciReviewGen.

Event temporal reasoning aims at identifying the temporal relations between two or more events. However, knowledge conflicts arise when there is a mismatch between the actual temporal relations of events in the context and the prior knowledge or biases learned by the model. We first systematically define distinct kinds of bias in event temporal reasoning, which include event relation prior bias, tense bias, narrative bias, and dependency bias, as indicators to study knowledge conflicts. To mitigate such event-related knowledge conflict, we introduce a Counterfactual Data Augmentation based method that can be applied to both Pre-trained Language Models (PLMs) and Large Language Models (LLMs) either as additional training data or demonstrations for In-Context Learning. Experiments suggest the importance of mitigating knowledge conflicts in event temporal reasoning tasks for reducing hallucination and highlight the potential of counterfactual data augmentation for improving model performance.

Despite achieving remarkable performance on various vision-language tasks, Transformer-based pretrained vision-language models (VLMs) still suffer from efficiency issues arising from long inputs and numerous parameters, limiting their real-world applications. However, the huge computation is redundant for most samples and the degree of redundancy and the respective components vary significantly depending on tasks and input instances. In this work, we propose an adaptive acceleration method SmartTrim for VLMs, which adjusts the inference overhead based on the complexity of instances. Specifically, SmartTrim incorporates lightweight trimming modules into the backbone to perform task-specific pruning on redundant inputs and parameters, without the need for additional pre-training or data augmentation. Since visual and textual representations complement each other in VLMs, we propose to leverage cross-modal interaction information to provide more critical semantic guidance for identifying redundant parts. Meanwhile, we introduce a self-distillation strategy that encourages the trimmed model to be consistent with the full-capacity model, which yields further performance gains. Experimental results demonstrate that SmartTrim significantly reduces the computation overhead (2-3 times) of various VLMs with comparable performance (only a 1-2% degradation) on various vision-language tasks. Compared to previous acceleration methods, SmartTrim attains a better efficiency-performance trade-off, demonstrating great potential for application in resource-constrained scenarios.

Morphological inflection is a popular task in sub-word NLP with both practical and cognitive applications. For years now, state-of-the-art systems have reported high, but also highly variable, performance across data sets and languages. We investigate the causes of this high performance and high variability; we find several aspects of data set creation and evaluation which systematically inflate performance and obfuscate differences between languages. To improve generalizability and reliability of results, we propose new data sampling and evaluation strategies that better reflect likely use-cases. Using these new strategies, we make new observations on the generalization abilities of current inflection systems.

Image translation has wide applications, such as style transfer and modality conversion, usually aiming to generate images having both high degrees of realism and faithfulness. These problems remain difficult, especially when it is important to preserve semantic structures. Traditional image-level similarity metrics are of limited use, since the semantics of an image are high-level, and not strongly governed by pixel-wise faithfulness to an original image. Towards filling this gap, we introduce SAMScore, a generic semantic structural similarity metric for evaluating the faithfulness of image translation models. SAMScore is based on the recent high-performance Segment Anything Model (SAM), which can perform semantic similarity comparisons with standout accuracy. We applied SAMScore on 19 image translation tasks, and found that it is able to outperform all other competitive metrics on all of the tasks. We envision that SAMScore will prove to be a valuable tool that will help to drive the vibrant field of image translation, by allowing for more precise evaluations of new and evolving translation models. The code is available at https://github.com/Kent0n-Li/SAMScore.

Hospital discharge documentation is among the most essential, yet time-consuming documents written by medical practitioners. The objective of this study was to automatically generate hospital discharge summaries using neural network summarization models. We studied various data preparation and neural network training techniques that generate discharge summaries. Using nursing notes and discharge summaries from the MIMIC-III dataset, we studied the viability of the automatic generation of various sections of a discharge summary using four state-of-the-art neural network summarization models (BART, T5, Longformer and FLAN-T5). Our experiments indicated that training environments including nursing notes as the source, and discrete sections of the discharge summary as the target output (e.g. "History of Present Illness") improve language model efficiency and text quality. According to our findings, the fine-tuned BART model improved its ROUGE F1 score by 43.6% against its standard off-the-shelf version. We also found that fine-tuning the baseline BART model with other setups caused different degrees of improvement (up to 80% relative improvement). We also observed that a fine-tuned T5 generally achieves higher ROUGE F1 scores than other fine-tuned models and a fine-tuned FLAN-T5 achieves the highest ROUGE score overall, i.e., 45.6. For majority of the fine-tuned language models, summarizing discharge summary report sections separately outperformed the summarization the entire report quantitatively. On the other hand, fine-tuning language models that were previously instruction fine-tuned showed better performance in summarizing entire reports. This study concludes that a focused dataset designed for the automatic generation of discharge summaries by a language model can produce coherent Discharge Summary sections.

Recent advancements in high-quality, large-scale English resources have pushed the frontier of English Automatic Text Simplification (ATS) research. However, less work has been done on multilingual text simplification due to the lack of a diverse evaluation benchmark that covers complex-simple sentence pairs in many languages. This paper introduces the MultiSim benchmark, a collection of 27 resources in 12 distinct languages containing over 1.7 million complex-simple sentence pairs. This benchmark will encourage research in developing more effective multilingual text simplification models and evaluation metrics. Our experiments using MultiSim with pre-trained multilingual language models reveal exciting performance improvements from multilingual training in non-English settings. We observe strong performance from Russian in zero-shot cross-lingual transfer to low-resource languages. We further show that few-shot prompting with BLOOM-176b achieves comparable quality to reference simplifications outperforming fine-tuned models in most languages. We validate these findings through human evaluation.

Code-Switching, a common phenomenon in written text and conversation, has been studied over decades by the natural language processing (NLP) research community. Initially, code-switching is intensively explored by leveraging linguistic theories and, currently, more machine-learning oriented approaches to develop models. We introduce a comprehensive systematic survey on code-switching research in natural language processing to understand the progress of the past decades and conceptualize the challenges and tasks on the code-switching topic. Finally, we summarize the trends and findings and conclude with a discussion for future direction and open questions for further investigation.

Sentiment analysis (SA) has been a long-standing research area in natural language processing. It can offer rich insights into human sentiments and opinions and has thus seen considerable interest from both academia and industry. With the advent of large language models (LLMs) such as ChatGPT, there is a great potential for their employment on SA problems. However, the extent to which existing LLMs can be leveraged for different sentiment analysis tasks remains unclear. This paper aims to provide a comprehensive investigation into the capabilities of LLMs in performing various sentiment analysis tasks, from conventional sentiment classification to aspect-based sentiment analysis and multifaceted analysis of subjective texts. We evaluate performance across 13 tasks on 26 datasets and compare the results against small language models (SLMs) trained on domain-specific datasets. Our study reveals that while LLMs demonstrate satisfactory performance in simpler tasks, they lag behind in more complex tasks requiring deeper understanding or structured sentiment information. However, LLMs significantly outperform SLMs in few-shot learning settings, suggesting their potential when annotation resources are limited. We also highlight the limitations of current evaluation practices in assessing LLMs' SA abilities and propose a novel benchmark, \textsc{SentiEval}, for a more comprehensive and realistic evaluation. Data and code during our investigations are available at \url{https://github.com/DAMO-NLP-SG/LLM-Sentiment}.