Internet of Things (IoT) networks have become an increasingly attractive target of cyberattacks. Powerful Machine Learning (ML) models have recently been adopted to implement network intrusion detection systems to protect IoT networks. For the successful training of such ML models, selecting the right data features is crucial, maximising the detection accuracy and computational efficiency. This paper comprehensively analyses feature sets' importance and predictive power for detecting network attacks. Three feature selection algorithms: chi-square, information gain and correlation, have been utilised to identify and rank data features. The attributes are fed into two ML classifiers: deep feed-forward and random forest, to measure their attack detection performance. The experimental evaluation considered three datasets: UNSW-NB15, CSE-CIC-IDS2018, and ToN-IoT in their proprietary flow format. In addition, the respective variants in NetFlow format were also considered, i.e., NF-UNSW-NB15, NF-CSE-CIC-IDS2018, and NF-ToN-IoT. The experimental evaluation explored the marginal benefit of adding individual features. Our results show that the accuracy initially increases rapidly with adding features but converges quickly to the maximum. This demonstrates a significant potential to reduce the computational and storage cost of intrusion detection systems while maintaining near-optimal detection accuracy. This has particular relevance in IoT systems, with typically limited computational and storage resources.

This paper examines the robustness of deployed few-shot meta-learning systems when they are fed an imperceptibly perturbed few-shot dataset. We attack amortized meta-learners, which allows us to craft colluding sets of inputs that are tailored to fool the system's learning algorithm when used as training data. Jointly crafted adversarial inputs might be expected to synergistically manipulate a classifier, allowing for very strong data-poisoning attacks that would be hard to detect. We show that in a white box setting, these attacks are very successful and can cause the target model's predictions to become worse than chance. However, in opposition to the well-known transferability of adversarial examples in general, the colluding sets do not transfer well to different classifiers. We explore two hypotheses to explain this: "overfitting" by the attack, and mismatch between the model on which the attack is generated and that to which the attack is transferred. Regardless of the mitigation strategies suggested by these hypotheses, the colluding inputs transfer no better than adversarial inputs that are generated independently in the usual way.

Many machine learning tasks -- particularly those in affective computing -- are inherently subjective. When asked to classify facial expressions or to rate an individual's attractiveness, humans may disagree with one another, and no single answer may be objectively correct. However, machine learning datasets commonly have just one "ground truth" label for each sample, so models trained on these labels may not perform well on tasks that are subjective in nature. Though allowing models to learn from the individual annotators' ratings may help, most datasets do not provide annotator-specific labels for each sample. To address this issue, we propose SeedBERT, a method for recovering annotator rating distributions from a single label by inducing pre-trained models to attend to different portions of the input. Our human evaluations indicate that SeedBERT's attention mechanism is consistent with human sources of annotator disagreement. Moreover, in our empirical evaluations using large language models, SeedBERT demonstrates substantial gains in performance on downstream subjective tasks compared both to standard deep learning models and to other current models that account explicitly for annotator disagreement.

Big data analysis poses the dual problem of privacy preservation and utility, i.e., how accurate data analyses remain after transforming original data in order to protect the privacy of the individuals that the data is about - and whether they are accurate enough to be meaningful. In this paper, we thus investigate across several datasets whether different methods of generating fully synthetic data vary in their utility a priori (when the specific analyses to be performed on the data are not known yet), how closely their results conform to analyses on original data a posteriori, and whether these two effects are correlated. We find some methods (decision-tree based) to perform better than others across the board, sizeable effects of some choices of imputation parameters (notably the number of released datasets), no correlation between broad utility metrics and analysis accuracy, and varying correlations for narrow metrics. We did get promising findings for classification tasks when using synthetic data for training machine learning models, which we consider worth exploring further also in terms of mitigating privacy attacks against ML models such as membership inference and model inversion.

Legal documents are typically long and written in legalese, which makes it particularly difficult for laypeople to understand their rights and duties. While natural language understanding technologies can be valuable in supporting such understanding in the legal domain, the limited availability of datasets annotated for deontic modalities in the legal domain, due to the cost of hiring experts and privacy issues, is a bottleneck. To this end, we introduce, LEXDEMOD, a corpus of English contracts annotated with deontic modality expressed with respect to a contracting party or agent along with the modal triggers. We benchmark this dataset on two tasks: (i) agent-specific multi-label deontic modality classification, and (ii) agent-specific deontic modality and trigger span detection using Transformer-based (Vaswani et al., 2017) language models. Transfer learning experiments show that the linguistic diversity of modal expressions in LEXDEMOD generalizes reasonably from lease to employment and rental agreements. A small case study indicates that a model trained on LEXDEMOD can detect red flags with high recall. We believe our work offers a new research direction for deontic modality detection in the legal domain.

With the increasing presence of robotic systems and human-robot environments in today's society, understanding the reasoning behind actions taken by a robot is becoming more important. To increase this understanding, users are provided with explanations as to why a specific action was taken. Among other effects, these explanations improve the trust of users in their robotic partners. One option for creating these explanations is an introspection-based approach which can be used in conjunction with reinforcement learning agents to provide probabilities of success. These can in turn be used to reason about the actions taken by the agent in a human-understandable fashion. In this work, this introspection-based approach is developed and evaluated further on the basis of an episodic and a non-episodic robotics simulation task. Furthermore, an additional normalization step to the Q-values is proposed, which enables the usage of the introspection-based approach on negative and comparatively small Q-values. Results obtained show the viability of introspection for episodic robotics tasks and, additionally, that the introspection-based approach can be used to generate explanations for the actions taken in a non-episodic robotics environment as well.

As machine learning models increasingly replace traditional business logic in the production system, their lifecycle management is becoming a significant concern. Once deployed into production, the machine learning models are constantly evaluated on new streaming data. Given the continuous data flow, shifting data, also known as concept drift, is ubiquitous in such settings. Concept drift usually impacts the performance of machine learning models, thus, identifying the moment when concept drift occurs is required. Concept drift is identified through concept drift detectors. In this work, we assess the reliability of concept drift detectors to identify drift in time by exploring how late are they reporting drifts and how many false alarms are they signaling. We compare the performance of the most popular drift detectors belonging to two different concept drift detector groups, error rate-based detectors and data distribution-based detectors. We assess their performance on both synthetic and real-world data. In the case of synthetic data, we investigate the performance of detectors to identify two types of concept drift, abrupt and gradual. Our findings aim to help practitioners understand which drift detector should be employed in different situations and, to achieve this, we share a list of the most important observations made throughout this study, which can serve as guidelines for practical usage. Furthermore, based on our empirical results, we analyze the suitability of each concept drift detection group to be used as alarming system.

Deep generative models have become useful for synthetic data generation, particularly population synthesis. The models implicitly learn the probability distribution of a dataset and can draw samples from a distribution. Several models have been proposed, but their performance is only tested on a single cross-sectional sample. The implementation of population synthesis on single datasets is seen as a drawback that needs further studies to explore the robustness of the models on multiple datasets. While comparing with the real data can increase trust and interpretability of the models, techniques to evaluate deep generative models' robustness for population synthesis remain underexplored. In this study, we present bootstrap confidence interval for the deep generative models, an approach that computes efficient confidence intervals for mean errors predictions to evaluate the robustness of the models to multiple datasets. Specifically, we adopt the tabular-based Composite Travel Generative Adversarial Network (CTGAN) and Variational Autoencoder (VAE), to estimate the distribution of the population, by generating agents that have tabular data using several samples over time from the same study area. The models are implemented on multiple travel diaries of Montreal Origin- Destination Survey of 2008, 2013, and 2018 and compare the predictive performance under varying sample sizes from multiple surveys. Results show that the predictive errors of CTGAN have narrower confidence intervals indicating its robustness to multiple datasets of the varying sample sizes when compared to VAE. Again, the evaluation of model robustness against varying sample size shows a minimal decrease in model performance with decrease in sample size. This study directly supports agent-based modelling by enabling finer synthetic generation of populations in a reliable environment.

Temporal sequences of satellite images constitute a highly valuable and abundant resource to analyze a given region. However, the labeled data needed to train most machine learning models are scarce and difficult to obtain. In this context, the current work investigates a fully unsupervised methodology that, given a sequence of images, learns a semantic embedding and then, creates a partition of the ground according to its semantic properties and its evolution over time. We illustrate the methodology by conducting the semantic analysis of a sequence of satellite images of a region of Navarre (Spain). The proposed approach reveals a novel broad perspective of the land, where potentially large areas that share both a similar semantic and a similar temporal evolution are connected in a compact and well-structured manner. The results also show a close relationship between the allocation of the clusters in the geographic space and their allocation in the embedded spaces. The semantic analysis is completed by obtaining the representative sequence of tiles corresponding to each cluster, the linear interpolation between related areas, and a graph that shows the relationships between the clusters, providing a concise semantic summary of the whole region.

Computing competency is becoming an essential quality needed by industry. For decades, the gap between baccalaureate computing graduates and industry needs was a discussion topic. Most graduates seek employment in deference to continuing their full-time graduate (master's or doctoral) programs. While the percent of such choice varies by institution, it is estimated that about 5% of computing graduates choose full-time graduate study upon graduation, meaning that 95% of computing graduates seek jobs in business, government, or industry.15 While computing graduates may acquire jobs in today's world, they often lack the competencies (skills and dispositions) expected in the workplace. Most undergraduate computing-degree programs want to produce job-ready graduates who are productive on the first workday. They often seek local advisory boards composed of industry, government, and business representatives to help develop a functional computing curriculum for their students. Information technology and computing disciplines are changing, and new fields appear continuously. Computing curricula and undergraduate programs are challenged to keep up with this rapid change. Employers are looking for competent graduates who can apply the knowledge, skill, and culture they acquire in college to solve problems as soon as they enter the workforce. High-performance computing (HPC) and parallel and distributed computing (PDC) have become pervasive.