Oceania
Appendix: OnLearningDomain-Invariant RepresentationsforTransferLearningwithMultiple Sources
Let หf: X 7 Y where หf = หh g with g: X 7 Z and หh: Z 7 Y . Corollary 2. Consider a domainD = (P,f) with data distributionP and ground-truth labeling functionf. A hypothesis is หf: X 7 Y, where หf = หh g withg: X 7 Z and หh: Z 7 Y . Here, thiskind ofbound isdeveloped using data distributionPoninput space andlabeling functionf from input tolabel space, which arenot convenient in understanding representation learning, sincePT,PS are data nature and therefore fixed. Theorem 3. (Theorem 1 in the main paper) Consider a mixture of source domainsDฯ = Next, we relate the loss on targetDTg to hybrid domain Dhyg, which differs only at the feature marginals. In other words, the equality happens when all distributions are the sameQ1=...=QC.
Assessing Social and Intersectional Biases in Contextualized Word Representations
Socialbiasinmachine learning hasdrawnsignificant attention, withworkranging from demonstrations of bias in a multitude of applications, curating definitions of fairness for different contexts, to developing algorithms to mitigate bias. In natural language processing, gender bias has been shown to exist in context-free word embeddings. Recently, contextual word representations have outperformed word embeddings in several downstream NLP tasks.
e4d2b6e6fdeca3e60e0f1a62fee3d9dd-Paper.pdf
AwidevarietyofNLPapplications, suchasmachinetranslation, summarization, and dialog, involve text generation. One major challenge for these applications is how to evaluate whether such generated texts are actually fluent, accurate, or effective. In this work, we conceptualize theevaluation of generated text as a text generation problem, modeled using pre-trained sequence-to-sequence models. The general idea is that models trained to convert the generated text to/from a reference output or the source text will achieve higher scores when the generated text is better.