Data quality is crucial for training accurate, unbiased, and trustworthy machine learning models as well as for their correct evaluation. Recent works, however, have shown that even popular datasets used to train and evaluate state-of-the-art models contain a non-negligible amount of erroneous annotations, biases, or artifacts. While practices and guidelines regarding dataset creation projects exist, to our knowledge, large-scale analysis has yet to be performed on how quality management is conducted when creating natural language datasets and whether these recommendations are followed. Therefore, we first survey and summarize recommended quality management practices for dataset creation as described in the literature and provide suggestions for applying them. Then, we compile a corpus of 591 scientific publications introducing text datasets and annotate it for quality-related aspects, such as annotator management, agreement, adjudication, or data validation. Using these annotations, we then analyze how quality management is conducted in practice. A majority of the annotated publications apply good or excellent quality management. However, we deem the effort of 30\% of the works as only subpar. Our analysis also shows common errors, especially when using inter-annotator agreement and computing annotation error rates.

Table-based reasoning with large language models (LLMs) is a promising direction to tackle many table understanding tasks, such as table-based question answering and fact verification. Compared with generic reasoning, table-based reasoning requires the extraction of underlying semantics from both free-form questions and semi-structured tabular data. Chain-of-Thought and its similar approaches incorporate the reasoning chain in the form of textual context, but it is still an open question how to effectively leverage tabular data in the reasoning chain. Specifically, we guide LLMs using in-context learning to iteratively generate operations and update the table to represent a tabular reasoning chain. LLMs can therefore dynamically plan the next operation based on the results of the previous ones. This continuous evolution of the table forms a chain, showing the reasoning process for a given tabular problem. The chain carries structured information of the intermediate results, enabling more accurate and reliable predictions. Tables are a popular data format and widely used in daily life (Cafarella et al., 2008). Understanding tabular data with language models can benefit various downstream tasks, such as table-based fact verification (Chen et al., 2019), and table-based question answering (Jin et al., 2022). Distinct from pure text, tables deliver rich information through the interaction between rows and columns in the tabular structure, which enhances the data capacity but also increases the difficulty for language models to understand them. Thus, reasoning over the tabular data is an important direction in natural language processing and attracts increasing attention from both academia and industry. In recent years, several approaches have been suggested to tackle the problem of table understanding by training language models. One common direction is to add specialized embedding layers or attention mechanisms into language models and pre-train the models by recovering table cells or segments (Herzig et al., 2020; Wang et al., 2021; Gu et al., 2022; Andrejczuk et al., 2022).

Hyper-parameter optimization is the black art of tuning a learner's control parameters. In software analytics, a repeated result is that such tuning can result in dramatic performance improvements. Despite this, hyper-parameter optimization is often applied rarely or poorly in software analytics--perhaps due to the CPU cost of exploring all those parameter options can be prohibitive. We theorize that learners generalize better when the loss landscape is ``smooth''. This theory is useful since the influence on ``smoothness'' of different hyper-parameter choices can be tested very quickly (e.g. for a deep learner, after just one epoch). To test this theory, this paper implements and tests SMOOTHIE, a novel hyper-parameter optimizer that guides its optimizations via considerations of ``smothness''. The experiments of this paper test SMOOTHIE on numerous SE tasks including (a) GitHub issue lifetime prediction; (b) detecting false alarms in static code warnings; (c) defect prediction, and (d) a set of standard ML datasets. In all these experiments, SMOOTHIE out-performed state-of-the-art optimizers. Better yet, SMOOTHIE ran 300% faster than the prior state-of-the art. We hence conclude that this theory (that hyper-parameter optimization is best viewed as a ``smoothing'' function for the decision landscape), is both theoretically interesting and practically very useful. To support open science and other researchers working in this area, all our scripts and datasets are available on-line at https://github.com/yrahul3910/smoothness-hpo/.

The stringent requirements for the Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) accelerator's reliability stand along with the need for reducing the computational burden on the hardware platforms, i.e. reducing the energy consumption and execution time as well as increasing the efficiency of DNN accelerators. Moreover, the growing demand for specialized DNN accelerators with tailored requirements, particularly for safety-critical applications, necessitates a comprehensive design space exploration to enable the development of efficient and robust accelerators that meet those requirements. Therefore, the trade-off between hardware performance, i.e. area and delay, and the reliability of the DNN accelerator implementation becomes critical and requires tools for analysis. This paper presents a comprehensive methodology for exploring and enabling a holistic assessment of the trilateral impact of quantization on model accuracy, activation fault reliability, and hardware efficiency. A fully automated framework is introduced that is capable of applying various quantization-aware techniques, fault injection, and hardware implementation, thus enabling the measurement of hardware parameters. Moreover, this paper proposes a novel lightweight protection technique integrated within the framework to ensure the dependable deployment of the final systolic-array-based FPGA implementation. The experiments on established benchmarks demonstrate the analysis flow and the profound implications of quantization on reliability, hardware performance, and network accuracy, particularly concerning the transient faults in the network's activations.

However, domain-specific knowledge from fields such as history, physics, or medicine is significantly underrepresented in those graphs. Although few domain-specific knowledge graphs exist (e.g., Pubmed for medicine), developing specialized retrieval applications for many domains still requires constructing knowledge graphs from scratch. To facilitate knowledge graph construction, we introduce WAKA: a Web application that allows domain experts to create knowledge graphs through the medium with which they are most familiar: natural language.

The development of cancer is triggered by alterations and mutations in the DNA. The majority of DNA changes responsible for cancer occur within specific regions known as genes. Among the various types of cancers, skin cancer is among the five on the list. If we disregard breast and prostate cancer which are gender-dependent, skin cancer will remain in the third largest cancer category among many others. Based on the statistics released by the American Cancer Society (ACS) [1], there were 58,120 recorded cases of skin cancer among males and 39,490 cases among females. An intriguing observation is that the incidence of skin cancer has been steadily rising from 1992 to 2019, with a notable exception in 2020 [2]. This exception can be attributed to the understandable decrease in cases during the COVID-19 pandemic, as people were mostly confined to their homes. This decline is reasonable considering that exposure to ultraviolet (UV) radiation is a significant contributing factor to the development of skin cancer. More people are diagnosed with skin cancer each year in the U.S. than all other cancers combined [3].

This paper presents policy-based motion planning for robotic systems. The motion planning literature has been mostly focused on open-loop trajectory planning which is followed by tracking online. In contrast, we solve the problem of path planning and controller synthesis simultaneously by solving the related feedback control problem. We present a novel incremental policy (iPolicy) algorithm for motion planning, which integrates sampling-based methods and set-valued optimal control methods to compute feedback controllers for the robotic system. In particular, we use sampling to incrementally construct the state space of the system. Asynchronous value iterations are performed on the sampled state space to synthesize the incremental policy feedback controller. We show the convergence of the estimates to the optimal value function in continuous state space. Numerical results with various different dynamical systems (including nonholonomic systems) verify the optimality and effectiveness of iPolicy.

One of the final frontiers in the development of complex human - AI collaborative systems is the ability of AI agents to comprehend the natural language and perform tasks accordingly. However, training efficient Reinforcement Learning (RL) agents grounded in natural language has been a long-standing challenge due to the complexity and ambiguity of the language and sparsity of the rewards, among other factors. Several advances in reinforcement learning, curriculum learning, continual learning, language models have independently contributed to effective training of grounded agents in various environments. Leveraging these developments, we present a novel algorithm, Grounded Language Instruction through DEmonstration in RL (GLIDE-RL) that introduces a teacher-instructor-student curriculum learning framework for training an RL agent capable of following natural language instructions that can generalize to previously unseen language instructions. In this multi-agent framework, the teacher and the student agents learn simultaneously based on the student's current skill level. We further demonstrate the necessity for training the student agent with not just one, but multiple teacher agents. Experiments on a complex sparse reward environment validates the effectiveness of our proposed approach.

Knowledge graph construction (KGC) is a multifaceted undertaking involving the extraction of entities, relations, and events. Traditionally, large language models (LLMs) have been viewed as solitary task-solving agents in this complex landscape. However, this paper challenges this paradigm by introducing a novel framework, CooperKGC. Departing from the conventional approach, CooperKGC establishes a collaborative processing network, assembling a KGC collaboration team capable of concurrently addressing entity, relation, and event extraction tasks. Our experiments unequivocally demonstrate that fostering collaboration and information interaction among diverse agents within CooperKGC yields superior results compared to individual cognitive processes operating in isolation. Importantly, our findings reveal that the collaboration facilitated by CooperKGC enhances knowledge selection, correction, and aggregation capabilities across multiple rounds of interactions.

Understanding Transformer-based models has attracted significant attention, as they lie at the heart of recent technological advances across machine learning. While most interpretability methods rely on running models over inputs, recent work has shown that a zero-pass approach, where parameters are interpreted directly without a forward/backward pass is feasible for some Transformer parameters, and for two-layer attention networks. In this work, we present a theoretical analysis where all parameters of a trained Transformer are interpreted by projecting them into the embedding space, that is, the space of vocabulary items they operate on. We derive a simple theoretical framework to support our arguments and provide ample evidence for its validity. First, an empirical analysis showing that parameters of both pretrained and fine-tuned models can be interpreted in embedding space. Second, we present two applications of our framework: (a) aligning the parameters of different models that share a vocabulary, and (b) constructing a classifier without training by ``translating'' the parameters of a fine-tuned classifier to parameters of a different model that was only pretrained. Overall, our findings open the door to interpretation methods that, at least in part, abstract away from model specifics and operate in the embedding space only.