We present AutoStan, a framework in which a command-line interface (CLI) coding agent autonomously builds and iteratively improves Bayesian models written in Stan. The agent operates in a loop, writing a Stan model file, executing MCMC sampling, then deciding whether to keep or revert each change based on two complementary feedback signals: the negative log predictive density (NLPD) on held-out data and the sampler's own diagnostics (divergences, R-hat, effective sample size). We evaluate AutoStan on five datasets with diverse modeling structures. On a synthetic regression dataset with outliers, the agent progresses from naive linear regression to a model with Student-t robustness, nonlinear heteroscedastic structure, and an explicit contamination mixture, matching or outperforming TabPFN, a state-of-the-art black-box method, while remaining fully interpretable. Across four additional experiments, the same mechanism discovers hierarchical partial pooling, varying-slope models with correlated random effects, and a Poisson attack/defense model for soccer. No search algorithm, critic module, or domain-specific instructions are needed. This is, to our knowledge, the first demonstration that a CLI coding agent can autonomously write and iteratively improve Stan code for diverse Bayesian modeling problems.

Retrospective causal questions ask what would have happened to an observed individual had they received a different treatment. We study the problem of estimating $μ(x,y)=\mathbb{E}[Y(1)\mid X=x,Y(0)=y]$, the expected counterfactual outcome for an individual with covariates $x$ and observed outcome $y$, and constructing valid prediction intervals under the Neyman-Rubin superpopulation model. This quantity is generally not identified without additional assumptions. To link the observed and unobserved potential outcomes, we work with a cross-world correlation $ρ(x)=cor(Y(1),Y(0)\mid X=x)$; plausible bounds on $ρ(x)$ enable a principled approach to this otherwise unidentified problem. We introduce retrospective counterfactual estimators $\hatμ_ρ(x,y)$ and prediction intervals $C_ρ(x,y)$ that asymptotically satisfy $P[Y(1)\in C_ρ(x,y)\mid X=x, Y(0)=y]\ge1-α$ under standard causal assumptions. Many common baselines implicitly correspond to endpoint choices $ρ=0$ or $ρ=1$ (ignoring the factual outcome or treating the counterfactual as a shifted factual outcome). Interpolating between these cases through cross-world dependence yields substantial gains in both theory and practice.

We study finite-sample statistical performance guarantees for distributionally robust optimization (DRO) with optimal transport (OT) and OT-regularized divergence model neighborhoods. Specifically, we derive concentration inequalities for supervised learning via DRO-based adversarial training, as commonly employed to enhance the adversarial robustness of machine learning models. Our results apply to a wide range of OT cost functions, beyond the $p$-Wasserstein case studied by previous authors. In particular, our results are the first to: 1) cover soft-constraint norm-ball OT cost functions; soft-constraint costs have been shown empirically to enhance robustness when used in adversarial training, 2) apply to the combination of adversarial sample generation and adversarial reweighting that is induced by using OT-regularized $f$-divergence model neighborhoods; the added reweighting mechanism has also been shown empirically to further improve performance. In addition, even in the $p$-Wasserstein case, our bounds exhibit better behavior as a function of the DRO neighborhood size than previous results when applied to the adversarial setting.

Self-supervised pre-training, where large corpora of unlabeled data are used to learn representations for downstream fine-tuning, has become a cornerstone of modern machine learning. While a growing body of theoretical work has begun to analyze this paradigm, existing bounds leave open the question of how sharp the current rates are, and whether they accurately capture the complex interaction between pre-training and fine-tuning. In this paper, we address this gap by developing an asymptotic theory of pre-training via two-stage M-estimation. A key challenge is that the pre-training estimator is often identifiable only up to a group symmetry, a feature common in representation learning that requires careful treatment. We address this issue using tools from Riemannian geometry to study the intrinsic parameters of the pre-training representation, which we link with the downstream predictor through a notion of orbit-invariance, precisely characterizing the limiting distribution of the downstream test risk. We apply our main result to several case studies, including spectral pre-training, factor models, and Gaussian mixture models, and obtain substantial improvements in problem-specific factors over prior art when applicable.

In recent years, there has been growing interest in causal machine learning estimators for quantifying subject-specific effects of a binary treatment on time-to-event outcomes. Estimation approaches have been proposed which attenuate the inherent regularisation bias in machine learning predictions, with each of these estimators addressing measured confounding, right censoring, and in some cases, left truncation. However, the existing approaches are found to exhibit suboptimal finite-sample performance, with none of the existing estimators fully leveraging the temporal structure of the data, yielding non-smooth treatment effects over time. We address these limitations by introducing surv-iTMLE, a targeted learning procedure for estimating the difference in the conditional survival probabilities under two treatments. Unlike existing estimators, surv-iTMLE accommodates both left truncation and right censoring while enforcing smoothness and boundedness of the estimated treatment effect curve over time. Through extensive simulation studies under both right censoring and left truncation scenarios, we demonstrate that surv-iTMLE outperforms existing methods in terms of bias and smoothness of time-varying effect estimates in finite samples. We then illustrate surv-iTMLE's practical utility by exploring heterogeneity in the effects of immunotherapy on survival among non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, revealing clinically meaningful temporal patterns that existing estimators may obscure.

We study dynamic regret minimization in unconstrained adversarial linear bandit problems. In this setting, a learner must minimize the cumulative loss relative to an arbitrary sequence of comparators $\boldsymbol{u}_1,\ldots,\boldsymbol{u}_T$ in $\mathbb{R}^d$, but receives only point-evaluation feedback on each round. We provide a simple approach to combining the guarantees of several bandit algorithms, allowing us to optimally adapt to the number of switches $S_T = \sum_t\mathbb{I}\{\boldsymbol{u}_t \neq \boldsymbol{u}_{t-1}\}$ of an arbitrary comparator sequence. In particular, we provide the first algorithm for linear bandits achieving the optimal regret guarantee of order $\mathcal{O}\big(\sqrt{d(1+S_T) T}\big)$ up to poly-logarithmic terms without prior knowledge of $S_T$, thus resolving a long-standing open problem.

Conditional independence is central to modern statistics, but beyond special parametric families it rarely admits an exact covariance characterization. We introduce the binary expansion group intersection network (BEGIN), a distribution-free graphical representation for multivariate binary data and bit-encoded multinomial variables. For arbitrary binary random vectors and bit representations of multinomial variables, we prove that conditional independence is equivalent to a sparse linear representation of conditional expectations, to a block factorization of the corresponding interaction covariance matrix, and to block diagonality of an associated generalized Schur complement. The resulting graph is indexed by the intersection of multiplicative groups of binary interactions, yielding an analogue of Gaussian graphical modeling beyond the Gaussian setting. This viewpoint treats data bits as atoms and local BEGIN molecules as building blocks for large Markov random fields. We also show how dyadic bit representations allow BEGIN to approximate conditional independence for general random vectors under mild regularity conditions. A key technical device is the Hadamard prism, a linear map that links interaction covariances to group structure.

Self-supervised image denoising methods have traditionally relied on either architectural constraints or specialized loss functions that require prior knowledge of the noise distribution to avoid the trivial identity mapping. Among these, approaches such as Noisier2Noise or Recorrupted2Recorrupted, create training pairs by adding synthetic noise to the noisy images. While effective, these recorruption-based approaches require precise knowledge of the noise distribution, which is often not available. We present Learning to Recorrupt (L2R), a noise distribution-agnostic denoising technique that eliminates the need for knowledge of the noise distribution. Our method introduces a learnable monotonic neural network that learns the recorruption process through a min-max saddle-point objective. The proposed method achieves state-of-the-art performance across unconventional and heavy-tailed noise distributions, such as log-gamma, Laplace, and spatially correlated noise, as well as signal-dependent noise models such as Poisson-Gaussian noise.

Conditional density estimation (CDE) - recovering the full conditional distribution of a response given tabular covariates - is essential in settings with heteroscedasticity, multimodality, or asymmetric uncertainty. Recent tabular foundation models, such as TabPFN and TabICL, naturally produce predictive distributions, but their effectiveness as general-purpose CDE methods has not been systematically evaluated, unlike their performance for point prediction, which is well studied. We benchmark three tabular foundation model variants against a diverse set of parametric, tree-based, and neural CDE baselines on 39 real-world datasets, across training sizes from 50 to 20,000, using six metrics covering density accuracy, calibration, and computation time. Across all sample sizes, foundation models achieve the best CDE loss, log-likelihood, and CRPS on the large majority of datasets tested. Calibration is competitive at small sample sizes but, for some metrics and datasets, lags behind task-specific neural baselines at larger sample sizes, suggesting that post-hoc recalibration may be a valuable complement. In a photometric redshift case study using SDSS DR18, TabPFN exposed to 50,000 training galaxies outperforms all baselines trained on the full 500,000-galaxy dataset. Taken together, these results establish tabular foundation models as strong off-the-shelf conditional density estimators.

In this work, we investigate how to develop sharp concentration inequalities for sub-Weibull random variables, including sub-Gaussian and sub-exponential distributions. Although the random variables may not be sub-Guassian, the tail probability around the origin behaves as if they were sub-Gaussian, and the tail probability decays align with the Orlicz $Ψ_α$-tail elsewhere. Specifically, for independent and identically distributed (i.i.d.) $\{X_i\}_{i=1}^n$ with finite Orlicz norm $\|X\|_{Ψ_α}$, our theory unveils that there is an interesting phase transition at $α= 2$ in that $\PPł(ł|\sum_{i=1}^n X_i \r| \geq t\r)$ with $t > 0$ is upper bounded by $2\expł(-C\maxł\{\frac{t^2}{n\|X\|_{Ψ_α}^2},\frac{t^α}{ n^{α-1} \|X\|_{Ψ_α}^α}\r\}\r)$ for $α\geq 2$, and by $2\expł(-C\minł\{\frac{t^2}{n\|X\|_{Ψ_α}^2},\frac{t^α}{ n^{α-1} \|X\|_{Ψ_α}^α}\r\}\r)$ for $1\leq α\leq 2$ with some positive constant $C$. In many scenarios, it is often necessary to distinguish the standard deviation from the Orlicz norm when the latter can exceed the former greatly. To accommodate this, we build a new theoretical analysis framework, and our sharp, flexible concentration inequalities involve the variance and a mixing of Orlicz $Ψ_α$-tails through the min and max functions. Our theory yields new, improved concentration inequalities even for the cases of sub-Gaussian and sub-exponential distributions with $α= 2$ and $1$, respectively. We further demonstrate our theory on martingales, random vectors, random matrices, and covariance matrix estimation. These sharp concentration inequalities can empower more precise non-asymptotic analyses across different statistical and machine learning applications.