Can non-programmers annotate natural language utterances with complex programs that represent their meaning? We introduce APEL, a framework in which non-programmers select among candidate programs generated by a seed semantic parser (e.g., Codex). Since they cannot understand the candidate programs, we ask them to select indirectly by examining the programs' input-ouput examples. For each utterance, APEL actively searches for a simple input on which the candidate programs tend to produce different outputs. It then asks the non-programmers only to choose the appropriate output, thus allowing us to infer which program is correct and could be used to fine-tune the parser. As a first case study, we recruited human non-programmers to use APEL to re-annotate SPIDER, a text-to-SQL dataset. Our approach achieved the same annotation accuracy as the original expert annotators (75%) and exposed many subtle errors in the original annotations.

A common practice in knowledge-grounded dialogue generation is to explicitly utilize intermediate steps (e.g., web-search, memory retrieval) with modular approaches. However, data for such steps are often inaccessible compared to those of dialogue responses as they are unobservable in an ordinary dialogue. To fill in the absence of these data, we develop a self-improving method to improve the generative performances of intermediate steps without the ground truth data. In particular, we propose a novel bootstrapping scheme with a guided prompt and a modified loss function to enhance the diversity of appropriate self-generated responses. Through experiments on various benchmark datasets, we empirically demonstrate that our method successfully leverages a self-improving mechanism in generating intermediate and final responses and improves the performances on the task of knowledge-grounded dialogue generation. Along with the progress of Language Model (LM) pretraining, open-domain dialogue models have evolved to leverage the advantage of the transformer architecture's generalization ability (Zhang et al., 2019; Freitas et al., 2020; Roller et al., 2021; Xu et al., 2022a; Shuster et al., 2022b; Thoppilan et al., 2022). While model scaling also improves the dialogue quality (Freitas et al., 2020) as seen in large LMs, relying on sole LMs casts limitations such as hallucination and the lack of faithfulness by outdated training data (Brown et al., 2020; Thoppilan et al., 2022; Chowdhery et al., 2022). In order to overcome the limitations, prior works have adopted a modular design where multiple modules generate intermediate texts (e.g., to retrieve documents) before the final response (Lewis et al., 2020; Adolphs et al., 2021; Zhang et al., 2021; Shuster et al., 2022a). Among them, Komeili et al. (2022); Shuster et al. (2022b) have shown promising results in dialogue generation. Specifically, they adopted a modular design to integrate external knowledge (e.g., internet) and internal knowledge (e.g., memory) in dialogue models. For example, in Komeili et al. (2022), a LM first decides whether to access a knowledge in a form of text generation. Upon deciding to access knowledge, the LM generates an appropriate query for knowledge retrieval from external sources such as search engines. Then, the LM generates a response based on extracted knowledge from the accessed data. See Figure 2 of Appendix A for an illustrative example. Regarding each intermediate phase as a separate module, a convenient method of training these modules would be to apply supervised learning on each module using individual datasets (Dinan et al., 2019; Shuster et al., 2022a; Glass et al., 2022; Shuster et al., 2022b).

The recent advancements in Large Language Models (LLMs) have garnered widespread acclaim for their remarkable emerging capabilities. However, the issue of hallucination has parallelly emerged as a by-product, posing significant concerns. While some recent endeavors have been made to identify and mitigate different types of hallucination, there has been a limited emphasis on the nuanced categorization of hallucination and associated mitigation methods. To address this gap, we offer a fine-grained discourse on profiling hallucination based on its degree, orientation, and category, along with offering strategies for alleviation. As such, we define two overarching orientations of hallucination: (i) factual mirage (FM) and (ii) silver lining (SL). To provide a more comprehensive understanding, both orientations are further sub-categorized into intrinsic and extrinsic, with three degrees of severity - (i) mild, (ii) moderate, and (iii) alarming. We also meticulously categorize hallucination into six types: (i) acronym ambiguity, (ii) numeric nuisance, (iii) generated golem, (iv) virtual voice, (v) geographic erratum, and (vi) time wrap. Furthermore, we curate HallucInation eLiciTation (HILT), a publicly available dataset comprising of 75,000 samples generated using 15 contemporary LLMs along with human annotations for the aforementioned categories. Finally, to establish a method for quantifying and to offer a comparative spectrum that allows us to evaluate and rank LLMs based on their vulnerability to producing hallucinations, we propose Hallucination Vulnerability Index (HVI). We firmly believe that HVI holds significant value as a tool for the wider NLP community, with the potential to serve as a rubric in AI-related policy-making. In conclusion, we propose two solution strategies for mitigating hallucinations.

Large language models (LLMs), such as ChatGPT/GPT-4, have proven to be powerful tools in promoting the user experience as an AI assistant. The continuous works are proposing multi-modal large language models (MLLM), empowering LLMs with the ability to sense multiple modality inputs through constructing a joint semantic space (e.g. visual-text space). Though significant success was achieved in LLMs and MLLMs, exploring LLMs and MLLMs in domain-specific applications that required domain-specific knowledge and expertise has been less conducted, especially for \textbf{marine domain}. Different from general-purpose MLLMs, the marine-specific MLLM is required to yield much more \textbf{sensitive}, \textbf{informative}, and \textbf{scientific} responses. In this work, we demonstrate that the existing MLLMs optimized on huge amounts of readily available general-purpose training data show a minimal ability to understand domain-specific intents and then generate informative and satisfactory responses. To address these issues, we propose \textbf{MarineGPT}, the first vision-language model specially designed for the marine domain, unlocking the secrets of the ocean to the public. We present our \textbf{Marine-5M} dataset with more than 5 million marine image-text pairs to inject domain-specific marine knowledge into our model and achieve better marine vision and language alignment. Our MarineGPT not only pushes the boundaries of marine understanding to the general public but also offers a standard protocol for adapting a general-purpose assistant to downstream domain-specific experts. We pave the way for a wide range of marine applications while setting valuable data and pre-trained models for future research in both academic and industrial communities.

We introduce Inference-Time Intervention (ITI), a technique designed to enhance the "truthfulness" of large language models (LLMs). ITI operates by shifting model activations during inference, following a set of directions across a limited number of attention heads. This intervention significantly improves the performance of LLaMA models on the TruthfulQA benchmark. On an instruction-finetuned LLaMA called Alpaca, ITI improves its truthfulness from 32.5% to 65.1%. We identify a trade-off between truthfulness and helpfulness and demonstrate how to balance it by tuning the intervention strength. ITI is minimally invasive and computationally inexpensive. Moreover, the technique is data efficient: while approaches like RLHF require extensive annotations, ITI locates truthful directions using only few hundred examples. Our findings suggest that LLMs may have an internal representation of the likelihood of something being true, even as they produce falsehoods on the surface.

Radon is a carcinogenic, radioactive gas that can accumulate indoors. Indoor radon exposure at the national scale is usually estimated on the basis of extensive measurement campaigns. However, characteristics of the sample often differ from the characteristics of the population due to the large number of relevant factors such as the availability of geogenic radon or floor level. Furthermore, the sample size usually does not allow exposure estimation with high spatial resolution. We propose a model-based approach that allows a more realistic estimation of indoor radon distribution with a higher spatial resolution than a purely data-based approach. We applied a two-stage modelling approach: 1) a quantile regression forest using environmental and building data as predictors was applied to estimate the probability distribution function of indoor radon for each floor level of each residential building in Germany; (2) a probabilistic Monte Carlo sampling technique enabled the combination and population weighting of floor-level predictions. In this way, the uncertainty of the individual predictions is effectively propagated into the estimate of variability at the aggregated level. The results give an arithmetic mean of 63 Bq/m3, a geometric mean of 41 Bq/m3 and a 95 %ile of 180 Bq/m3. The exceedance probability for 100 Bq/m3 and 300 Bq/m3 are 12.5 % (10.5 million people) and 2.2 % (1.9 million people), respectively. In large cities, individual indoor radon exposure is generally lower than in rural areas, which is a due to the different distribution of the population on floor levels. The advantages of our approach are 1) an accurate exposure estimation even if the survey was not fully representative with respect to the main controlling factors, and 2) an estimate of the exposure distribution with a much higher spatial resolution than basic descriptive statistics.

NeMo Guardrails is an open-source toolkit for easily adding programmable guardrails to LLM-based conversational systems. Guardrails (or rails for short) are a specific way of controlling the output of an LLM, such as not talking about topics considered harmful, following a predefined dialogue path, using a particular language style, and more. There are several mechanisms that allow LLM providers and developers to add guardrails that are embedded into a specific model at training, e.g. using model alignment. Differently, using a runtime inspired from dialogue management, NeMo Guardrails allows developers to add programmable rails to LLM applications - these are user-defined, independent of the underlying LLM, and interpretable. Our initial results show that the proposed approach can be used with several LLM providers to develop controllable and safe LLM applications using programmable rails.

In this paper, we delve into the problem of simplicial representation learning utilizing the 1-Wasserstein distance on a tree structure (a.k.a., Tree-Wasserstein distance (TWD)), where TWD is defined as the L1 distance between two tree-embedded vectors. Specifically, we consider a framework for simplicial representation estimation employing a self-supervised learning approach based on SimCLR with a negative TWD as a similarity measure. In SimCLR, the cosine similarity with real-vector embeddings is often utilized; however, it has not been well studied utilizing L1-based measures with simplicial embeddings. A key challenge is that training the L1 distance is numerically challenging and often yields unsatisfactory outcomes, and there are numerous choices for probability models. Thus, this study empirically investigates a strategy for optimizing self-supervised learning with TWD and find a stable training procedure. More specifically, we evaluate the combination of two types of TWD (total variation and ClusterTree) and several simplicial models including the softmax function, the ArcFace probability model, and simplicial embedding. Moreover, we propose a simple yet effective Jeffrey divergence-based regularization method to stabilize the optimization. Through empirical experiments on STL10, CIFAR10, CIFAR100, and SVHN, we first found that the simple combination of softmax function and TWD can obtain significantly lower results than the standard SimCLR (non-simplicial model and cosine similarity). We found that the model performance depends on the combination of TWD and the simplicial model, and the Jeffrey divergence regularization usually helps model training. Finally, we inferred that the appropriate choice of combination of TWD and simplicial models outperformed cosine similarity based representation learning.

Stealthy multi-agent active search is the problem of making efficient sequential data-collection decisions to identify an unknown number of sparsely located targets while adapting to new sensing information and concealing the search agents' location from the targets. This problem is applicable to reconnaissance tasks wherein the safety of the search agents can be compromised as the targets may be adversarial. Prior work usually focuses either on adversarial search, where the risk of revealing the agents' location to the targets is ignored or evasion strategies where efficient search is ignored. We present the Stealthy Terrain-Aware Reconnaissance (STAR) algorithm, a multi-objective parallelized Thompson sampling-based algorithm that relies on a strong topographical prior to reason over changing visibility risk over the course of the search. The STAR algorithm outperforms existing state-of-the-art multi-agent active search methods on both rate of recovery of targets as well as minimising risk even when subject to noisy observations, communication failures and an unknown number of targets.

A deep learning platform has been developed to forecast the occurrence of the low visibility events or hazes. It is trained by using multi-decadal daily regional maps of various meteorological and hydrological variables as input features and surface visibility observations as the targets. To better preserve the characteristic spatial information of different input features for training, two branched architectures have recently been developed for the case of Paris hazes. These new architectures have improved the performance of the network, producing reasonable scores in both validation and a blind forecasting evaluation using the data of 2021 and 2022 that have not been used in the training and validation.